Image provided by: University of Nebraska-Lincoln Libraries, Lincoln, NE
About The Loup City northwestern. (Loup City, Neb.) 189?-1917 | View Entire Issue (Sept. 7, 1900)
BRYAN'S MANAGER. JONES, ON ''IGNORANT FOREIGNERS” He Said that “Ignorant Foreigners” Com prised Fully One Half of the Number of Votes Received by McKinley. Deliteate Assertion of Democratic National Chairman Jas. K. Jones, that "He Believed Bevontly that Bryan Hal Been Elected anil Was Swindled Ont of the Pres.facj." “Be Belicrei tiial is 1900 tnc Bimetallic Forces Wonld Win a Great Victory Els Declaration Tie! He Principles of 1896 Are AOsolntely Essential to llie Welfare of He Country.” (Extroct* from the a(Mro.«s of United StatP* Senator Jump* K. .Tonox, elialr mau of the Democratic natiounl commit ice, before the Logialuture of Arkansna.) Bryiin's manager, 3. K. Jones, said: “Hundreds of thousands of ignorant foreigners, who were here taking bread out of the months of honest labor, voted at the last election at the dictation of Me lory." This still makes It! to 1 tlse para* mount issue. He reasserted his conviction “that the principles he spoke for were absolutely essential to the welfare of the country.” That is lt> to 1. had been elected and was swindled out of the presidency. He told how the rail roads, the banks and the bondholders, ar rayed against Bryan with a campaign fund the like of which was never before seen in this country, and which was used lavishly. Business men were intimidat ed by the threats of the money power. The Senator said, with groHt pride, he would never forget the liberal responses from the people of Arkansas to the Dem ocratic campaign fund.” Predicting that the Republican party would drop the idea of the gold standard and endeavor to bring aliout bimetallism, the Senator said "the McKinleyites saw the handwriting on the wall.” "What has become of the promised prosperity?” the Senator asked. “Mr. McKinley seems to be advanc ing. but the prosperity is not coming with him.” Senator Jones said "the gold ites bail been put on notice.” He believ ed “that in t!XH) the bimetallic forces would win a great victory. Kising prices always bring prosperity, declining prices adversity. The repeal of the Sherman act huil been followed by a decline of to per cent in prices. The cause of it was the striking down of one-half of the metallic money of the world.” Senator Jones concluded by asserting his belief “that the principles he spoke for were -bsolutely essential to the welfare of the country.” l'n the midst of the enunciation of such views as these the Senator accounted for the election of the Republican ticket by declaring: “HUNDERDS OF THOUSANDS OF IGNORANT FOREIGNERS, WHO AUK HKUK TAKING THK BKKA1) OFT OF THK MOUTHS OF HONKST LABOR, VOTED AT THK LAST ELECTION AT THK DICTATION OF M'KINLEYS SUPPORTERS. THKSK FOREIGNERS COMPRISED ONE HALF OF TILE NUMBER OF VOTES RECEIVED BY M’KINLKY” On the day after delivery the Sena tor’s speech was reported in Arkansas Gazette, the principal Democratic paper of the State and the organ of the Demo cratic party. Front that report, the ac curacy of which has never been <iues tioned by the Senator, the above is taken. JONES ABUSES FOREIGN VOTERS Kiuley’a supporters. These foreigners comprised fully one-half of the number of votes received by McKinley." These are the words of the tnnn who conducted the Democratic campaign iu 1800. The same mnn is the present chair man of the Democratic national com mittee. He owes his position to the wish of Mr. Hryun. The language quoted above was used In a speed). It is no remembered scrap of idle conversation. It was uttered in tio heat of discussion. It was a deliber ate expression. “Hundreds of thousands of ignorant foreigners," said Chairman James K. Jones of the Democratic national com mittee, “who came here taking bread out of the mouths of honest lubor, voted at the last election at the dictation of Mc Kinley's supporters. These foreigners comprised fully one-half the number of Votes received by McKinley.” And then on this basis that the Re publican party owed success in l.MMI to "ignorant foreigners.” i'liuirmun Junes proceeded to hold out the hope of success in 1000. “Can there be any doubt,” be asked, “ns to which shall prevail, the six and oue-hulf millions of intelligent Itryan vot ers or the three und one half million* ‘ignorant foreigners' who Voted for Mc Kinley ?" It will Seetn to sensible people almost incredible that the chairman of the Democratic national committee could make such statements in a puMie speech. Hut the Honorable .Isa. K. Junes did it. More than two months after the elec tion of IMni he uttered the assertion •looted. The occasion was no U•» sc riots* than an addresa before the legislature of Ar kansas. detialwr Jones hod |o.t been elected to bis third term in the I'niled States Heiiate. On tbv 'Jtnh •>( January, l*t*T, the Hisitur appeared before an in fe. uni y- si aces u it h . Hi4t, |4gi>)a lure at tb« mp.tel in l.iitli It f |f, returned bis thanks to the people of \r kan*aa through tb« ir rvprt sentauven, the Legislatnte an t itum Its piflasadtd t vsm the deft st of Itryan, speaking a* the chairman of the |t>m>.ii natnoial summit tee and Ihe head »f the manage ment of the Item era) ■ vaoipa.a1* Its said that he 'belie«. d btmitl) that H | aa had been eb»t»*l and was snisp. d snt of tbs prvatdeSsy '* U* dsslar* i his belief “that Is I •** tl Mm*tabor fuses* *w«M *-n g««at *t The Senator spoke for over an hour. Ilunniug through his speech were two principal thoughts. One was this idea, that Uepilblirnn success had been achiev ed through the "ignorant foreigners," n remit which the Senator resented in the name of the native Southern population which was “more American." The other central idea with the Sen ator was the injustice of the unequal distribution of wealth. Upon this he dwelt with almost the emphasis which he gave to the "ignorant foreigners.” "What has been the cause of this great struggle?" the Senator asked. “The people are as honest ami as industrious as they ever were. Whut, then, was the matter? The last census report shows that the wealth of the country was $tl5, OlKI.iM*1,000, or about $.1,000 to each fam ily of five members.” The Senator quot ed figures to show the inequality in the distribution of wealth. "Why was Mas sachusetts so much better off than Ar kansas? Were they more industrious and more deservingV" lie considered that the Southern people rank fully up to, if not alieail of, the people iu the balance of the country. The Southern people are more completely Anglo-Saxon than tbo«e of the other States and there fore more Viueriean. At this point tile chairman of the Item* erratic national committee made one of tile most remarkable of this series of startling statements for Arkan<as con sumption. He illustrated Ids assertion that the Southern people are "more American" than tin- rest of the country, iu this way: "It took the people of the combined North and Ku»t four years to conquer the Southern |ieople, and the latter had built for them u pension list that was appalling.” The Senator’s »|ieech bristled with as sertions intruded io incite the spirit of class prejudice. He said "Millionaires and pau|M-r« grew on the same bush. When you make a million •ire you make doaetis of pauper*." the men who advocated the gold stand ard the S- tiatof >(escribed as "no better than a viie thief " The argument by whbh he hd up |o tb s rooetiistou is interesting. Tbs* Sen at -r said that in I si A i national debt '‘amounted to V.n,M‘i.oil " II, show j ed * how many bales of c..ii<*n w >otd have i paid this debt then and hew many uow ' ! Then be proceeded: "The non who I *.<h the bond* then | gate gr,t nbat bs worth a<« at "ss in g»N : N *w they ate pant in g «td tU , dod-bog Ib, bnr.b n a; . the pe- /- M la. It** tost be.,S of c.ltea WotM bate paid I lh« debt when it sstrusirtdr.l it would ' tab* '*»*•«» may bate, now Is pay it with | > at ttt'sresi ’* A set ^ Tone* m*I “that I be who ttnd*-rti*.h N tstkv the ps- id, pay W. H loan they hed roe*i». 1.4 I - pay was tm toiler than 4 »<h tbwf." ' rk yob North-rw Stale*,*’ the It, a I «•-.» t* d. “|,t after th,c tsrt »f s issiicl | Hr y in i ■ • , | . tk4M 1,1 . i i .1,1 I la rtitw at What I'letrl ,,. | r,.,i.,4 |H [ ItW || b* st i bl ally It at II. tea DEMOCRATS UNFIT TO GOVERN. Why F.x-Henutor W. A. Peffer Is Sup porting McKinley. In a published letter issued at Topeka, Kan., ex-U, S. Senator PefTer of that State xayx one of the principal reasons why he leaves the Demo-Populist party is that it is not tit to govern the coun try. His exact words are: “The Democratic party is not fit to govern this country under inodoru condi tions of universal freedom. Look back upon the second administration of Presi dent Cleveland. I'pward of $250,000,000 in 1'uited States bonds were sold with out special authority of Congress to pro cure gold for the redemption reserve. Most of the bonds were sold to or through syndicates of speculators at enormous profits. “The Republicans were wiser. The war with Spain made large expenditures necessary: Congress authorized the bor rowing of money, and $2<XI,«MJU,IJiM> of 3 per cent bonds were sold to our own p<se pie in sums of $25 to $500. This is the fourth year of the McKinley administra tion, and not one dollar of gold has been bought or borrowed. The treasury now holds nearly, if not unite, $I.'si.uimi.imhi in gold coin anti bullion, nud there is plenty of money in the country for the transaction of the people's business." On the Philippine <|uestiou Mr. Peffer says: “The insurrection of Aguiualdo and his followers must lie completely and per inaucutly suppressed tiefore elvil govern ment can be permanently established In the meantime the President is exertiug every effort to preserve order and protect sit iM-accuhly disposed persons. “As before staled when one sovereign power cedes territory to another, the al legiautv of the inhabitants is transferred to the Hew sovereign, 'The saiue act which transfers their eonniry transfers the allegiance ,,f these who remain in It.' That is the language of the Mitpretue Court of the 11 lilted Stales ill the ease of the Aiuericau Insurance Company vs. Canter, 1 Peter*, 511. “Our nattoual title the Philippine* it a* good in law as the titles we hold for fur home*, and the allegiance of tito | $ dlplli- * to the I lilted States is iloe the | same as till* of tile people of Alaska or ; Hawaii r New Melli u, AiltoWa or OMn I horns ' V cc tunes* on of able and < -.n*ci, a { ttons lie u h ol d to Judge Taft of 111, .., * iff I ftt (R ul jttrinl « it in il tkvsfll In | Itg | t it D4 IW feat fuf I i if mi»» rI #ft«t i lug iiifurmiii .a [ (til til** Mm •( tb. H that I vk« mi If* tl> I af* u >»f all* tvriMiittif ill I* a I *UI«i t*f thf m |m % uk *6 m 11.a PhU.ppie.s as ii i*. »vf h*Mm* »|t(n W* iWrar m lk« An**! t| i|«i tlmi ««<i ii« f #t»4 |«ff BRYAN'S THEORIES AND PRACTICES. Shouting About the Consent of the Governed. Bryan's Utterances Wholly Inconsistent with the Practice of Democrats, Who Have Invariably Suppressed the Colored Vote The verification of theory is practice, the test of sincerity is conduct. When a person or a party preaches one thing anil practices another, there is no excuse for being deceived us to his honesty. Four years ago when Mr. Itrynn captured the Chicago convention by his eloquent “cross and crown" speech on the free coinage of silver, there was plenty of room for doubting the soundness or even the sanity of his proposition, but it was difficult to question his sincerity or the sincerity of the party which Dominated hint. How ever bud their logic, their theory accord ed with their practice. The party us then organized, so far as it hud the pow er had practiced what it was then preach ing. Tlw Southern States are the backbone and body of the Democratic party in practice. They are the States where the party is most completely devoted to .Mr. Bryan and his doctrine, and they ure also the States where the party is and has always been in most supreme control. It is in these States, therefore, that we must look for the practice verifying par ty principles. These States were the home of the greenback movement, of the wildcat hanks, and they were and are the hotbed of free silver; therefore in advocating It* to 1, Government paper money and the overthrow of the national banks, Mr. Bryan is entirely consistent with the practice of his party as at pres ent organized. in his speech accepting the nomination for President, at Indianapolis, however, he preaches a new gospel for .Democ racy. It is not money and hanking this time, hut it is “Liberty,” the “consent of file governed,” and “equal political rights,” regardless of race, etc. Here are a few extracts. How do these pro fessions accord with Democratic prac tice, where its control is supreme? TIIEOKY. j PItAt'TIt’E, “It was <!od Him Then why does Mr. self who placed-In Bryan's party resort every Human heart to force and fraud to the love of liberty, disfranchise the col lie has never made a ored "race" iu this race of people so low country? Iu the scale of drill ration or Intelligence that It would wel come a foreign mas ter." We cannot repudl Nor can we “repndl i "rep ate the principles of ate" the principle of self government In self government In the the Philippines with Houth, without weak out weakening that cuing that principle principle here." jthroughout the repub lic. "A republic can Yet Mr. Bryan's par have no subject*. A ty has made millions subject is possible of citizens Into "sub only in a government Jeets,” practicing gov restlng upon force; he eminent by force Is unknown In u gov eminent deriving its Just powers from the consent of the gov erned." " T h e Democratic party dispute* this doctrine (of vassai age'j and denounces it as repugnant to without the "consent of the governed.” While "the Demo cratic party disputes this doctrine " In words It Is enforcing It In practice in a both the letter and nuarter of the States spirit of our organ of the Union. I zed law." “If governments de Very true, but In rive tlielr Just powers what Ntstes where from the consent of Mr. Bryan's party has the governed, it Is: power to prevent It Impossible to secure!do "governments de tltie to people either! rive their Just power* by force or pur- from the consent of chase." 11he governed?" When and where did It try to practice this pre 'Mcn may dare to cept ? Then Mr. Bryan's do In crowds what party is uu organized they would not dure fraud, fur Its Hitpre to do as individuals, maey In many State* tint the moral charac has been obtained by ter of an act Is not doing "In crowds determined by the what they would not number of those who dare to do as lndlvld Joln In It. Force can uals." Its "right" to defend a right, tiut rule Is "created" by force has never yet force, created a right." I "Bights never con , of course not. Yet tl I e t : duties never Mr. Bryan’s party Is clash, t'uan it tie our "unurping poll t leal duty to usurp pollti l ights" of hundreds of cal rights whbU be ihoiisHUds of Amerl long to others?" cun citizens. "There are degrees True, the "Creator" of proficiency In the never "denied to any art of self govern people the capacity of incut, hul It is a re Section upon i k* ('re utor tu say that Ha denied to any people the capacity of self government." "Once admit that some people are caps ble of self govern incut and others are not. and capable pe elf government," lint despots and llemo crais always have. While Mr. Bryan was saying tills his parly was using fraud, force uiid legislation that the to deprive a whole pie have a race of their political right to seise upon rights, and estahllsti uni govern the In lug "the reign of the despot' • ty III this coun capable, and J o u wake force brut force the only fouu datlon of government and Invite the reign of the despot." ' Would we tread In the paths of tyr-j a any. Nur reckon the tyr ant's lost'; Who Mketh another's ertjr, llbevtv. total Insecurity |u III* f reedom Is *i*u taking the liberty of t • I which diet cl rule. and the Mouth, ha* been af by Democratic la paying "the Ityrant s cost" lu pot ■ disorder and so lost Would we strong won Make re the del for the tell* Hshyio I* the i win has aa the atet dv tu par Who others It has **c»| »< ed Its awn progress ' erl'y. "the lind who relgnesl over Ha hy Ion I* the «i>*l who It reigning yet." d gt > pr< tan * M| l p g » 4 a that d i 4 uf «w* Mi lit Is del th< e . .i 1 Mr. Bryan Is insincere ami is merely ns- i ins these "liberty phrases'' t<> catch Totes where political rights are uiore ad vanced than ill the Democratic States, or else he does not represent the Demo cratic party at all. The party’s practice for a generation speaks infinitely louder than Mr. Bryau’s words. What the party has always done and is now doing, it may be relied upon to do if elected to power. Until the States whore Mr. Bry an’s party reigns supreme show some in tention of practicing these "golden pre cepts.” their declaration in nati <ul platforms and candidates’ speeches, may properly be taken ns only so much mate rial for political deception. It is not a question of wliefher the en franchisement of the negro was a wise or unwise policy, but it is a question of rommon political honesty. If the party believes, as its practice shows, that the negroes are an inferior rats* and cannot with safety to our institutions he admit ted to political rights, to proclaim the doctrine that the "Creator never denied to any race of people the capacity of self-government,” is obvious hypocrisy. Some of the Democrats in tin- South, who are more frank and honest than Mr. Bryan, are already repudiating any pre tense of seriously living up to his ethe real political declarations. The Macon, Ga„ Telegraph, for instance, frankly de clares its unwillingness to tnke Mr. Bry an seriously in this “consent of the gov erned” talk and says: "It Is nil sweet and nice enough to Indulge on Fourth of July occasions In the generali ties about the ‘consent of the governed,’ uhout ‘Inullenulile rights,' about the equality of all men at birth, and so forth, Just ns our forefathers did who owned slaves and who robbed the Indians of their land, but It Is another matter when you try to apply It to the Negro, the Indian, the Kanaka and the Filipino. We of the South are contending for our own, and we are going to have it. The Negro has nothing that we want that wus not taken from os by force and given to him. lie has no land, he has no birth right, no heritage nothing but a right to help govern which was given wrongfully to him. When we take the ballot from him we leave him In a far better condition than he found himself when In- came among us as a result of Yankee thrift and speculation.” Tint Macon Telegraph, with real South ern frankness, tells the simple truth about the Democratic position on this subject. Its statement is supported by both tlie theory utwl practice of the party wherever it is in power. Moreover the Democratic party has never been dishon est enough to pretend to believe in the po litical enfranchisement of the inferior races,^and Mr. Bryan's sudden admira tion of Lincoln ami udvocaey of Garri sonian principles is a personal (light in political oratory, which has no relation to the past practice or future intention of tlie present Democratic party. If Mr. Bryan should he elected the ollices would he filled and tlie Government conducted by people who, like the Macon Telegraph, jeer at these “equality phrases" as empty generalities. They evidently regard these utterances as so much verbal halt for new votes in the "enemy's country." But here Mr. Bryan’s cunning is not as wise as the Telegraph's frankness. Honesty is always respected and such cheap cun ning ns Mr. Bryan's Indianapolis speech reveals will fail to deceive. The Ameri can citizens are not ignorant Filipinos, they are too well informed on the policy and practice of the Democracy on this subject to be caught by Mr. Bryan’s rhetorical if not hypocritical phrases. The name of "Lincoln" and "political liberty” are too sacred to he flippantly used in such a cause. The American people have some sense of the fitness of things. HALUCI NATIONS, HOBGOBLINS. Senator Stewart Telia What Ails the Nebraska Colonel. Senator Stewart of Nevada, the stal wart silver leader, will vote and work for McKinley this year. He is tired of Bry an and Brynuism and here is why he has left the Popocrnt fold: “Mr. Bryan's unparalleled campaign for the principles of the Chicago plat form and his insistence on the adoption of that platform nt Ksor.as City,” said Senator Stewart, “induced the people to suppose the campaign of 1!MM) would l»e conducted on the issues of In this way they were mistaken. An hallucina tion induced Bryan to make wur on an army of ghosts and hobgoblins, which a diseased brain created. His instinct, which has formerly led him to consider realities, departed. He sought his closet in pursuit of phantoms, nnd strung to gether ten thousand words, which he gave to the public nt Indiunapolis. He omitted all mention of the issues of ItilMl and summarized the paramount issue of the present campaign iu a pledge to the Tagal Guerrillas." Whatever the direct result of Senator Stewart's secession from the fusion alli ance in Nevada, the rapid spread of the Western revolt against Col. Bryan's In dianupolia program introduces an element of doubt into the canvass in Nevada, Colorado, Montana, Idaho and I'tah which was wholly lacking four years ago. But on the defensive in one and all these former strongholds by an at tempted change of issues, and gaining no uinteriul strength elsewhere by the sudden aiiout fuee of his acceptance Speech, it is easy to nee the stump of genuine inspiration on Mr. Stewart's prophecy that the Nebraska lender's pres ent "anti-imperialistic" canvas* is doom ed to defeat. Nevada silveriles. what are left of them, are bothered about the determina tion of Senator Mlewurt to support the policy of the administration. Surveyor General Kelly says: "I think Jones will go neat," and Sam BuvW, the acrobatic humorist who conduct* the ('arson Ap peal, is Stale controller and engages in various occupations, meanwhile rtpicsse* his ideas in the oue sentence: “The Ap peal will blister Stewart," FACTS ABOUT THAT “BRITISH ALLIANCE. Investigation by Father Malone, the American Priest. Lord Salisbury's Diplomatic Plans— President McKinley s Independent Policy—Our Course Regarding China Tells the Story. Rev. Thomas II. Malone of Denver writes from London his information and opinion on the relations between the United States and Great Britain. The letter is the more significant because four years ago Father Malone's sympathies were strongly with the free silver cause and his influence was east on the side of Bryan. For some time this widely known priest hus been abroud and his facilities for judging of what are the actual rela tions between the two governments have been exceptionally good. The letter is addressed to Mr. It. C. Kerens, the Mis souri member of the Republican national committee. Father Malone writes: “Mr. McKinley’s attitude during the present crisis in China must be sorely disappointing to such men as lion. Bourke Coekran and others who have a special object in making it appear that the President lias really if not nominal ly entered into an alliance with England. “Mr. Coekran and those who think with him are well aware that if the pop ular mind cun be led to believe Mr. Mc Kinley's administration is committed to the fortunes of England the Irish and Germans of the country would resent his attitude to the extent of throwing their votes against him at the polls. “But in considering this question one should be actuated by higher motives titan partisan advantage, for the welfare of our country, regardless of purty, must depend upon the patriotic impulses of tho people. "I, too, would resent any alliance be tween the United States and England, but I would equally resent the charge that such au alliance exists until it shall have I teen proven beyond the peradven ture of a doubt. Now, what are the facts in the case ns demonstrated by re cent developments? The Chinese trou bles, which at the present writing arc in u most acute stage, furnish the key to the position of the United States Government in so far at least as any alleged alliance with England is concerned. "Mr. Hay's note to the powers sets forth clearly the President’s policy, and, looking at it from this side of the ocean, I confess thi«t it seems to'disarm the critics who for the past year have been profligate in charging undue sympathy for England on the part of our Govern ment. r runt mo j'.itgiisii point oi view ujis policy, it is frankly admitted here in London, has been keenly disappointing. It was assuredly the desire and inteution of the British Government to so use the United States and Japan as to conserve its own interests at home and abroad. This would readily have beeu done by throwing these two countries between China and Russin so ns to thwart ami weaken the latter, afld thus gain a timely advantage over the allied powers, “Indeed I speak advisedly when I say that it was confidently hoped that Mr. McKinley, in consideration of England's attitude during the Spnnish-American war, would readily acquiesce in Lord Sal isbury's well-laid plans for action in China and allow our Government to be pushed to the front and thus shield the British Government in an hour of trying need. Hail the President consented to commit the United States to a policy of joint action with the powers England would have been highly elated, for in that ease we would soon find ourselves in open opposition to Itussia, and, while nominally protecting American lives and interests, we would in reality be fighting the battles of the British Empire. “But Mr. McKinley’s more prudent course, as outlined in Mr. Hay’s note, lias not been received with cordial good will in England, whose position may lie inferred from a paragraph in to-day’s Globe which expresses amazement that the United States will suffer the Vhole campaign to be rendered abortive in or der to gratify what it is pleased to cult •the cold and calculating designs of Itus sia.' “One feels from tlie ntmospherp that tlie United States Government is in no mood for an alliance of any kind with England. That 'Barkis is willin' ’ on this side of the ocean there is no shadow of doubt. "Hence, looking at the President** pol icy from the point of view affurded iu England, I am convinced that he meant what he said at the dinner of the Ohio Society iu New Yolk when he affirmed that bis policy was both to avoid entan gling alliances with as wed as hostility to an.v other nation. And I am moreover convinced that the British Empire is re ceiving neither eneoumgciucnt nor sym pathy at this time from the Government at Washington. “THOMAS II. MAl.ONU. “London, England." WHY CORN PRICES ARE HIGHER. HlllWIiM ('alley llaa l.aoklH lh* WurkMi In Dal Mur*. In l*g»; tbrrv *»• a rmiH I'mlni ■ u| rut n, uni,.nutmg |m 'J.'JXt,n75.MU*i bHahrU. Tlu> bighrtt r, cura rrti hnl tli.il year In I’bn-agii as* n ul. |K*r bu«H» I. during On- unnMi <<f .%|*rtl Iltirmg n > ulln r Mill tint Itir j iirkv ii.m It :k« ii*ni». In Hi im uil* i. at i ill* bright at Ik* lit >414 lociiit. It |ul a* 1 l»w •• I ? •* , i-fNii. mi I t Urni gh l lii’ r»»« ! of IMai It ilnt t.. l t**iii b high, r than £'<1 ( I ikr l*. .ml f ir »!*• wnil bait at 1 ik» y*ar bring mu l»* •Imrili attar I in an n Him . MW-lit <»f %|*'KlnU’i’* iW*’in*n In I at a) tk«n> ill Ihr Utijiii i r<i|i t i ••*« *in<t> Ntl. It um.itiD'ii. g In illjb IbllliU liutbi It, a bn It til yi^.lill.T'W • • *w(i at I MW I m> I Un ag i yiicr «f rain, bmlvr, during I.’.* a 'l •• I IMHI 4i I I nut tun>b twlna Ju mi't a b»»h*l. ak »b I a a* na>| *j it at a bu»b*i b*l«<» ib« b-g » I leeonl prion .if IMW. For in luonth* of lh<* Jiir it iliit Rot gel tielow rrnt* « liuebrl After ?••»»»*. 1 the im^, wa« between ai', ami ;Wl rent* a bu«br|, who'll wm« liter |u II lit* ti 1.11,Url I ■met, «r front D in *» |»r tori liTii«r, thau iho range for I bo <»««■ imti.hI m laiai. That I be Until., lu I Hint . .oil,I gel |r..ut i.ne ifuarlrr |« tin,,] i,nr, pn.T, f„r ibeir forn Mmi in iMni. nub oul> aboal •tie irnllt (•>*, t..r» t , nil, »»■,.*» bow gieailf «hr» In-it. m..| by ibe brut.leitril utarbela I be ||if«bir.tk poliof of Riling Ibe rll| Workman'* ilium r |.ail bet g,% on Hum 'the «|..lt.,uoit of ibe I ■.mu eraite |>artt ■ -, nt v ml that ihe ^r. h n| «•' *1" »»»» ! »• * tie fl.tu lb, litrg, , . of lbo W,t f. nr tear*, u,.| t* t»<t tin# ir <•'»» Hi. »,M.e I . M. Rttbio •• Itolti i. , |r Imni, b*.never, n ib a to, i«4 breaking Ioiwro* «ir **» of W»R Ibete «,l| R,, | liRtee Rot fH..|n(lty, lu Ibe t-wfl* bolt Ir IRiM nttb 4 W |*#t real ,,, e,„w • < i> I *e» o, |» ». .... „ H ,,,, , !»• *|t»4 J »• ttRtl f I..I. .g «■«»,