The Omaha li mess -THii' '.M4 W V S3& A Group of Alimony Debtors in Ludlow Street Jail To day. Better Surroundings, but the Principle the Same. Actor Theodore Roberts in Centre. The Interesting Philan- , thropic Plan to Reduce Matrimonial Risks by Insuring Bridegrooms Against Alimony and Brides Against Desertion's Financial Pangs rorylDESPREAl) recognition lu X ClirlHtlan countries of the ' clement of chanco In mar riage has created the saw that "mar rlnge la a gnmblo." Human frailty, tho swamping of tho sense of propor tion and of foresight by tho lovo vi brations, unforeseen complications, all menace the matrimonial bark. It In, in fact, concerted that no lottery ever offcrod Ingenuous patrons n greater risk. 'Witness the manifold ing of divorce. An ingenious and philanthropic ylna for lessening the risk In this greatest of human relationships has passed tho Incubation stage in Now York. Not that n Solomon has arisen wlso enough to guarantee that love will Inst, nor to propound n formula for the blending of human oil and water. That problem still baffles tho magi, Out nn organization has been completed to make the hurt of sun dering the ties less. It proposes to offer you, on your wedding day or be fore, an immunity policy. It will make your ronrrlagc garablo less by Itself gambling on tho risk. It enables n man ns he leads his blushing bride to the altar to reflect comfortably that If things don't turn out right ho has behind htm n con cern which will keep him from going to Jail for not paying his ojlmony; while the happy brldo can bo happier in the conviction that If ho doesn't turn out right the samo concern will provide her with the sinews of war to mako him regret It nnd also pro vide her with tho alimony ho won't or can't pay. To tho objection that such a pro ceeding Is destructive Of true romaneo tho promoters nnswer that It is ro mance that puts the mar In marriage nnd that It is the plain intention of tho plan to substitute n little useful business foresight. To the objection that It Is Immoral In that It affords protection ngalntit certain consequences of breaking the marriage vow, and so, in theory, en courages such violations, the promo ters point to similar Insurance taken out by physicians, dentists and aut moblllsts. The doctor will tnko out a policy which Insures him against tho financial consequences of mal practice or careleHSiu'SB, even to tlui killing of n patient; tho dentist takes out Insurance against the conse quences of pulling tho wrong tooth, or breaking tho Jaw or infecting the patient; the automobillst in tho same way takes out Insurance that puts the cost of the thing when ho smashes another mnchlno or runs over a pe destrian upon tho Insuring company. Thcee are acknowledged and "le gitimate" risks. It might be urged that the doctor's and dentist's policy puts a premium on lnettlclency and stupidity In that if either knew that damages must come out of their own pockets they would be more careful. Acd the automobillst would not drive so recklessly if he knew that dam ages Would come out of his pocket Instead of the rich companies'. So the alimony Insurance men point out they are at least In well-known, if nut distinguished company. Besides, they say. anything which will keep a man from the criminal absurdity of loafing In prison because he can't pay a debt, or help along a poor aban doned wife, has much better morula lu It than the cases of the profes sional men and nutolsts. Furthermore, whatever profits ac crue to tho concern will not bo used for dividends, as In the case of tho insurance companies. They will bo Uted, instead, to promote uniform divorce legislation throughout tho United States. Mr. Mlmbeuu L. Towns, the dis tinguished New York attorney, is tho founder of the relief measure, which came into being at tho time the handsome and romantic actor, Con vay Tearle. was cast into Ludlow Street Juil, that New York dungeon for debtors and matrimonial delin quents, "Five men who have married and snffered sympathized with Mr. Tearle," said Mr. Towns, who has curling white hair, a luxuriant beard the color of snow, flashing dark eyes ind the gift of poetic imagery. They nre all toen of high standing toclally and in the professions or )uslnea. One is rated as the owner pkt:: i s rax a szstx mxm $s radios m tv HVniwniBHii V of eight millions, They proposed to help Mr. Tearle and others like him. Realizing that a man might spend all his life in Jail bc- cause tho law pormlts him to be rearrested again nnd again tor non-payment of ali mony,' whllo in Jail wo planned his relief. How was It donoT It was very simple Each of the five men contrib uted $800. Out of the $4,000 thus collected thoy paid tho paltry $400, which represented Mr. Tearlo's failure to pay hU wife a stipend pt 25 a weok for four months.? To tho Ludlow Street Bastllo for Husbands, where Mr. Tearlo Was not languishing his specialty Is not lan guishing, but champing his bit and saying rude and profane things about tho laws of Now York wont Mr. Towns on his errand of morcy. "Come, my boy," said tho lawyer. "Come with me. You aro free." Picturesque language, freely punctuated, bit ter, staccato speech burst from tho hand somo prisoner. With arm on high and wav ing fist he bado Mr. Towns doslst. Ho ad vised tho attorney to choofio loss dangerous objects for his Jokes. "My boy," began the lawytr when tho nctor stopped, "you are free. Tho newly organized Lloyds for Domestic Derelicts has paid the alimony. You will sign this note promising to re pay the money in three months at six per cent nnd lleo from these clanging gates Joyously ns ever bird flew to you mountain." Back went Mr. Tearle to Mrs. Tearlo tho second formerly the charming Roberta Mcngcs, known us tho "Pearl of 8hecpshend Boy" tho cnuso and reward of his troubles with tho first. Tho promoters then went into ex ecutive session, drew up articles of Incorporation, nnd these hnvo now been passed uimn and been O, K.'d by the Department at Albany. "But wo have nnother and higher purpose than alimony immunization In founding this organluztlon," said Mr. Towns. "A part of the surplus will be applied to tho establishment of universal divorce laws legislation and to tho abolition of Imprisonment for debt. "Divorce laws of Now York nnd several other States aro in a most chaotic condition. By a decision ren dered last week by Justice. Samuel W. Qreenbaum. n man who has been married for twenty yeurs to his sec ond wife may lllegltimntlzo their children and cast her off on the plea that his second marriage was null. It Is unfair that tho mnrringo con tracted In Connecticut should have no standing In this Stnto and that the wife in. that second ' marriage should bo without social or legal standing in nnother State. The abuses accruing from Inck of uni form divorce laws In this country cry out to heaven. "New York is branded with a fur ther shame tho existence of Impris onment for debt In but one other State may n man bo arrested for debt And Delawaro is an nrchaic State, for it still has the whipping post "We are already at work in Albany upon a bill for tho abolition of the Ludlow Street Jail shame, I have, here a message from nn official in Albnny who says: There will be uo trouble at nil to secure the repeal of the Ludlow Street Jail act for ali mony provided you act promptly. I am sure it will go through at once.' When the organization has done that work In New York It will try to ex lend Its humanlty-nlding ngcncle to other StAtes. If the Ludlow Street Jail and the cruelty it represents hre ubollshed, half of Lloyd's object for existence will be gone. That accom- , VTNriJiXa f i tsil IS VX II I W 111 IH HI tl IVVNS 111 V 131 HI JS m III ttll'llftlWX "! It- MrMWI "1" WWWHBfTIBB'fTOC'W'I'fT - " "' Sunday Bee Magazine - RMTT i J III MiSnSHi & .r pllshed, wo can snvo men tho embar rassment nnd Ignominy of owing buck alimony, which Is as bitter to tho spirit as the durance In Ludlow is oppressive to tho body. "Look ut somo of the pictures bv Hogarth of tho horrors of Imprison ment for debt In his time. Tho sur roundings aro not so bad to-day, but it is still the same horror in its essence. "What of contributory negligence t" n representative of this newspdper asked Mr. Towns. "You moanr "If a man has an insurance on his automobile ho may bo less careful of it. If ho hnye an accident insuranco ho may be less careful of his person. If ho has Insured his house or hli furniture, he mny toss burning matches about If he has an alimony Insurance he may" "Nonsense," said Mr. Towns. "It a watchman in n bnuk knows how much wealth ho Is guarding ho may bo tempted to steal It But has It ever occurred to you to glva human nature thp benefit of the doubt? Why think the worse of people? Think tho best of then). They will rise to it ' 'Bo noble, nnd tho nobleness that lies in others Sleeping, but not dead, will rise to meet your own. "The husband will pay weekly what we deem ho Is able to pay. Ho may make no more reservations with tho Domestic Derelicts Association than ho uld with tho Government when ho tilled the income tax blanks. If tho weekly wage is ten doltars or less, we might require him to pay teu cents a week or less. If the salary be seventy-five dollars n week, he might be expected to pay seventy-five cents a week or less. The amount he and 'Lloyds' would have to ar range. The amount of the premium fixed, he has only to keep It up. Then, in case the matrimonial ship strikes the rocks, his wife will smile, even though bltterlyi and on his own visage may beseen a reflection of that smile, for he won't have to go to Jail if be folia Into arrears In alimony. Laura Bigger, a Famous Phase in the Matrimonial Troubles of Dr. Charles Hendricks, Who Will Be the Next All mony Beneficiary. "On the other hand, if she belongs to the association she will not be distressed by her Inability to pmploy a counsel to force her husband to pay or go to Jail. At the 8ame tlmo she will bo paid reasonable nllmony. Copyrig-ht, 10X4, by the Star Company. Great Britain Mrs. Menges-Corwin-Hill, the "Belle of Sheepshead Bay, Who by Becoming Mrs. Tearle No. 2, Made Actor Tearle the, First Beneficiary of the "Lloyd's Matrimonial Derelicts." That is the privilege of the female member of 'Lloyds.' "Why do we call It 'Lloyds?' I will tell you. They will Insure a ship ten days overdue. We are as cour ageous ns they. Wo Insure matri monial barks. Lloyds, of London, will insure lost Jewelry, a cork leg or n flesh one, a tenor voice, the life ter of n frock, or a scalp from bald ness. We will lusuro lost happi ness." "But suppose a wife and a husband both Insure and then the marrlago goes to smash?" "Wo will be Just to both," said Mr. Towns. "It's Just tho situation we want to create like two negatives making a positive." Mr. Tearle was the tlrst beueficlary of the organization. Two others are about to feel Its beneficence. The first Is Theodore Roberts, the well known nctor, who recently for a debt to his wife, from whom the courtd had granted separation, endured the gyves for six months and is liable to be flung Into Jail again for the same offense if he dares to step upon the soil of Manhattan Isle. The other is Dr. Charles M. Hendricks, who In R. ymond Street Jail, Brooklyn, sits ii. Achllles-IIke wrath thinking rem iniscent thoughts, including Miss Laura Blggnr. Dr. Hendricks say be reads by the stars that be would remain In Jail for another hundred years but for tho mercy of "Lloyds." and "Lloyds" Is inclined to be merci ful, even though Dr. Hendricks has been adjudged his wife's debtor to the amount of $60,000. In the en forced calm of Raymond Street Jail the doctor has been permitting the milk of human kindness, curdled In his bosom, to flow out to the world In the form of bitter epigrams against women, love and marriage. IUffhU Reserved. "But Now There Is Hope. Fancy Draws a Picture of the Recalcitrant Husband Speeding Toward Mr. Towns's Welcoming Arms. Constables and Wife Three Paces Behind Just as the Pursued Used to (Flee To ward Sanctuary. Judge and Jury THIS newspaper recently printed tho evdlonce for the actuality of tho Jeofail and -the Whalo incident as set forth by "Tho Bible Champion," a religious publication which Is taking up tho Biblical miracles one by ono and "proving" thorn on tho very lines of tho higher orHiclsm. "The Bible Champion" for March has Just devoted its campaign to the mlraclo of the resurrection of Lazarus, and deala with Its credibility this tlmo on the lines of permissible legal evi dence. The defense is conducted by Judge Francis J. Lamb, a dis tinguished American Jurist,, and Is essentially as follows: "We offer in evidence the Gospel of John as an Ancient Docu ment, especially parts thereof relevant to the tissue,' viz., as particular, subsidiary, evidentiary facts, and cite the verse or verses in which the fact is recorded. "PACTS "Lazarus was a man residing at Bethany, a village situated about flfteon furlongs from Jerusalem. (John xl. 18.) "Mary and Martha were sisters of Lazarus, and tho three were beloved by Jbbus. (John xl. 5, 21, 32.) " " "Lazarus was sick, and his malady became so serious that his sisters became alarmed. A message was sent to Jesus, who was absent (John xl. 3, 21, 23.) "Jesus received the message, and, after receiving it, stayed two days in the place where he received It; during which time Lazarus died. (John xl. 6.) "Jesus then informed the disciples that accompanied him that Lazarus was dead. (John xl. 14.) "Jesus announced to his disciples his determination to return again to Judaea, where the home of Lazarus had been. (John xi. 7. 16.) "Jesus and the desclples returned to Bethany, and found that tho dead body of Lazarus Had been burled and lain in tho tomb four days. (John xi. 17.) "When Jesus arrived at Bethany he found many of tho Jews attendant at the home of Mary and Martha, met to mourn with tne sisters over tho death of Lazarus. (John xl. 19,- 31,) "The sisters, Mary and Martha, each met Jesus on his arrival at Bethany, and each said to Jesus, 'Lord, if thou hadst been here, my brother had not died.' (John xi. 21, 32.) "Jesus told Martha that Lazarus should rise again from death, which Martha said she believed would occur 'in tho resurrection at the last day. (John xl. 23, 24.) 'Tho grief of Mary over the death of Lazarus and that of the Jews also weeping with her, was manifested with such intensity that Jesus, sympathizing, wept also. (John xl. 35.) "At Jesus' request Mary apd Martha and the friends in their com pany conducted Jesus and his disciples to the tomb, In which lay the dead body of Lazarus. 'It was a cave, and a stone lay against It' (John xl. 38, Am. Rev.) "The dpcument shows that, besides JesUB and bis disciples and Mary and Martha, there was a considerable concourse of Jews met to sym pathize with Mary and Martha over the death of Lazarus. (John xi. 19. K "In the presence of this considerable assembly, immediately at the door of the tomb in which the dead body of Lazarus lay enshrouded in grave-clothes, Jesus ordered tho stone to be taken away. 'Martha, the sister of him that was dead,' .protested against opening the tomb. She said to Jesus, 'Lord, by this time the body decay eth; for he hath been dead four days. (John xl. 39, Am. Rev.) "In obedience, howover, to Jesus' command, those present removed the stone from tho door of the tomb. (John xl. 41.) "Then, after brief prayer, Jesus at the door ot tho tomb spoke with a loud vojee, 'Lazarus, como forth.' Immediately 'he that was dead came forth, bound band and foot with grave-clothes; and his face was bound about with a napkin,' and Jesus said, 'Lose him. and let him go.' (John si. 43, 44.) Judge Lamb then refers, for furthor evidence, to; (John xlt. 1. 2) ; (John xli. 9, Am. Rev.) ; (John xll. 10, 11) ; (John xii. 17) ; (John xl!. 18. Ho then continues: "All these separate items, evidentiary facts, are ordinary testimony. Mary and Martha were perfectly competent witnesses to know and. to testify to the sickness, death and burial of Lazarus, and that he had been dead and burled four days before Jesus had the tomb opened. The neighbors of Mary and Martha were also competent witnesses to know and testify to the death and sepulture of Lazarus. All ot them, and John, who wrote tho document, were competent to observe and testify to the transactions detailed that took place at tho tomb when Lazarus came forth from it alive, and that he continued alive. "Each and all the items of evidence are ot matters plain and simple In their nature, easily seen, and capable ot being readily and accurately observed, scrutinized, comprehended, and detailed in testimony by witnesses who are of ordinary capacity and observation. The amount ot competent evidence is abundant unlmpeacbed and uncontradicted, "THE RESULT OF A TRIAL. "Tho evidence would require, at the hands of a Jury, a verdict embodying these facts: (1) That. Lazarus was dead; (2) that Jesus spoke over tho dead body of Lazarus the words, 'Lazarus, come forth,' and immediately Lazarus' dead body was alive; and (3) that Lazarus came forth from the tomb alive, and continued alive. "A Juror would violate his octh If he refused to find a verdict on that evidence. A contrary verdict would be set aside by a court as not only contrary to the evidence, but perverse, in short tho miracle 1b proved by competent evidence. "The tact that Lazarus was dead, and at the flat words ot Jesus he vos immediately alive and continued alive, establishes the transaction a mlraclo as tested by any standard definition; and the proof Is by human testimony. "It Is undoubtedly a law of nature that the dead body of a man remain dead. It at once commences to decompose, continues to decom pose, and returns to dust But Lazarus' dead body did not remain dead. dldnot return to dust, but became alive and continued to live. These facts, thwarting, frustrating the operation ot the laws of nature, were clearly and abundantly proved by a multitude of competent witnesses by human testimony. "This review of the law and evidence on the 'issue' tried Justifies the conclusion. that the miracles ot the Bibles aro capable of being proved, and are proved, by existing available evidence evidence competent, proper, admissible under the rules and standards of the science ot jurisprudence as administered In courts of Justice of enlightened nations of the earth; also the miracles of the Bible are verities tested by the same standards by which fact and truth are established onall questions between man and man in which fact and truth depend on and are ascertained and aro established through evidence," Page The Horrors of the Debtor's Prison in Hogarth's Time. A Scene of His "Rake's Pro- The Miracle' of Lazarus Before a Modern 1