8 THE OMAHA DAILY BEE : THURSDAY , MARCH 35 , J888. THE BOOD1E GANG REBUKED , Judge Doano Upholds the Sovereign Will of the People. THE DOWNFALL OF WE , US & CO. I . Mullen , n Mnn En Ronfo to Chicago cage , Takes Ills Own Ijlfo On Hoard A Train Other Hems or Local Interest. A Itcbulco to IJotxllcrs. Yesterday .Tudgo Donno handed down Ills decision in the Injunctloh suit of the llns Pnbllshlng Company ngntnRt the city of Omnhn. Hla decision is considered as n com plete denunciation of tlio unlawful tactics employed by the councllmnnlc firm ofVo , Us & Co. Judge Wakoloy , who snt with Judge Doano on the bench during the hear ing ns nn advisory , fully concurs in the de cision. ' The decision was most anxiously awaited Vy Hascnll , Leo , ford , nnd others of tholr class , and the long line of contractors who RO hand In hand With the nbovo-named city fathers. As soon ns the reading of the docu ment wns concluded Hascall nnd Jim Crclgh- ton hastened from the court room to carry the news to friends. The full text of the opinion niul the order mmlo is na follows : Tin : OPINION. The Hr.n Publishing company vs. the city of Omnhn ct nl. , on application for temporary Injunction : In this case nn application wns made for n temporary Injunction on the 15th dny of February last , nt which tlmo an order wns made thut notice should bo given ot the np- pllcatlon to the defendants , and the 18th dny of February was fixed for the hearing , nnd In the meantime a restraining order wns nl- lowed until the hearing. Postponements oc curred fiom titno to tlmo , nnd on the day of the application wns hcnrd by consent upon oral testimony , which occu pied several days. The application Is based upon the following stnto of facts : In 18S3 the city being the owner of lots C nnd 0 in block 110 , in the City of Omnhn , negotia tions were entered upon between the board of education of the school district Of Omnhn nnd the city council of the city of Omahn , looking to the erection of the City hnll building upon the lots named , in which accommodations should bo provided for the 'uso of the board of education.These ne gotiations resulted in the agreement between the city mid the board of education on the 27th day of July , 1885 , by the terms of which the city was to erect n city hall build ing on the lots named , "upon plans und specifications accepted by ccrtiiin committees appointed by the said city nnd the said board , " nt nn estimated cost of S20J.OOO , of which cost the board of education offered to contribute the one-eighth part , but not to exceed ยง 25.000. Upon the completion of the building which it wns provided should con tain suitable rooms for the hoard of education ns well ns for the city ofllccrs , the board of education wns to become the , owner In fee of such proportion pf the building as the money they contributed should bear to the whole cost of the building. This agreement wns executed in the iiumo of the city of Omahn by Its mayor , and of the board of education by its president und sec retary. The validity of this agreement as n binding ono upon the school district , wns called in question und urged with much earnestness nnd ability In argument by the city attorney. But in our view of this cnso. this question is not before us. The school district is not ask ing to bo relieved from the ngrccment , nor Is the city offering to refund the money of the school district , which it has used in the con struction of the basement of the building , and ns far ns this application is concerned wo express no opinion as to the binding effect of that agreement upon the school district. Wo may say In general that thn court cnn not bo called upon in this action , or nt any rnto on this applicationto pass upon the rights nnd interests of the school district under its agreement with the city , or in the the building which the city undertook to erect for n city hall. Those rights and Inter ests will bo guarded presumably by Iho board of education nnd there' wo leave thorn. After the ngrecmcnt had been made be tween the city nnd the board of education , plans for the construction of the city hall building wcro invited and among others were submitted plans by B. K. Myers , an architect bf Detioit , Mich , , of national reputation. These plans wcro finally agreed upon by the joint committees of the city council and of the board of educntion , and were adopted by the city council as those upon which the city hall building should bo erected. The law then In force providing for the incorporation of cities of the firstclass nnd rcgulatlntr their duties and powers , required that any Improvement , costing in the aggregate a sum prcnter than 45,000 , for the erection of mar ket houses nnd other useful nnd necessary buildings , for the use of the city , should not ' bo nuthoriz'ed until the ordinance providing therefor should bo ilrst submitted to , and rat ified by n majority of the legal voters of such city voting thoreon.- See Comp. Sts. of 1&S1 , p..bO. subd. 11 , An ordinance was accordingly passed by the city council nnd approved by the mayor , October 8 , 1885 , m-pvidlng for the construc tion of a city hull , nnd submitting the snino to the electors of tno city of Ouiuha for rat ification. This was ordinnnco WO , the flrst Section of which described the proposed building as located on lots 5 nnd 0 , In block 110 , In the city of Omaha , nnd authorized Its construction , the said building to cost'not exceeding the Sum of $200,000 , und the construction to be proceeded with us rnpidly ns funds could bo provided und in uc- 'f cordanco with the plans proposed by IS. IS. 1 Myers. Section second provided for the i , submission of the ordinnnco for the ratifica tion of the electors of the city nt the general w election to bo held on the 3d day of Novem- ber. 18S5. The ordinance wns submitted at Buch election , and wns duly rat I lied by a ma- ? , jorlty of the legal voters voting thereon , A * contract was entered into with Architect Myers for the plans und spculllcutions for and fniporlntcudcnco of tho. erection of the build ing , by the terms of which Myers agreed nnd Kuurnnteod that the building could bo erected arid completed In accordance with his plans nnft specifications for the sum of $100,000 , ex clusive of the steam-heating apparatus , and provided that in case the city should , after mvlting and receiving proposals for the erection of the. building ac cording to such plans nnd specifications , full to receive ) any proposals from a reliable and responsible bidder for the erection of the building for such sum , then the city should be nt liberty to reject the plans , in which event Myers should not bo entitled to iccclvo from the city any compensation for such re jected plans , or for any services or cluiin whatever. The city having no available funds to apply towards the erection of the building at that tlmo , the board of education advanced , under its contract with the city , the sum of about $30,000 , In round numbers , from tlmo to time , to enable the city to proceed with the work > , without delay. The city proceeded accord ( ugly to have the lots graded down nnd cxea vntod to prepare for the sub-structure of iho building , and on the the ild cliiy of Septem ber , ISsd. entered into a contract for the construction of the foundation , sub-basement nnd boscjnent of the city hnll building , with Kcgan Uros. , for tha ngrcod prlco of MS- , C40. The contract provided that the work should bo done according to the plans and specifications of I ) . IS. Myers , architect , and that oil disputes regarding material , work or amount duo the contractors should bo settled nnd determined by said architect , nnd tliut his decision should be final and conclusive in all cases on both parties. The work wus to bo done under the direc tion and control ot the city engineer nnd the boar.d of public works , and was to bo com piloted to the satisfaction nnd with the acceptance anco bf the architect nnd the approval of the board of public works , the mayor and the city council on or before July 1,1SS7. ft wa.8 further provided that if the contractors should assign the contract , or abandon tha work , or should neglect or refuse to comply With the instructions of the engi neer in cnargo relative thereto , or should fall . Jn any manner Id comply with the spceiflca' , . _ rt thereof , apd. such Annulment should not entitle the contractor to any claim for dam- prti on account Hereof , nor should it effect tfte right of the city to recover damages \vhlch might urlso from such , failure. JTiUJ WUttft t haying been opfroyed by tlio mayor nnd city council , work wns commenced under It within thirty unys thereafter , ns required - quired by the terms of the contract , nnd wns continued with varying degrees of diligence until finally abandoned by consent of both parties , IM will bo noted hero- nftcr. Whllo the work wns so progressing to-wit on the 13th dny of April 1S37. n proclnnmtton was issued nnd published by the mayor , submitting to the electors of tlio city , the question whether bonds of the city should bo Issued In tho. ajim of $200,000 to bo enllfd "city hnll bonds. " the proceeds to bo used In paying the cost 6f the construction of n city hnll for the use of the city and for no other purpose. The election under such proo Inmntlon was held May 8 , 1837 , nnd resulted In n majority of the electors in favor of the issue of the bonds , None of these bonds It appears , have ever been actually Issued or sold. The work under tlio Kogiin contract wns not completed by July 1,1887 , ns re quired by Its terms , but continued through the summer nnd fall , nnd Into November 18S7 , nt Which time the chairman of the board of public works in the Oxcrciso of the authority conferred \ipon him by the contract nnnullcd the same , nnd relct the work , Jlls notion wnS disapproved , however , by the city council , nnd on the 10th of December , 1&S7 , the board wns directed to notify Hegnn Uros. to proceed with the com pletion of the work under tholr contract. This was done , and some work was per formed In the further prosecution of the con- trnct , until early In February Inst , the con tract wns finally nnnullcd by consent of nil pintles , the city council agreeing to allow the Jlrm of IJrcnnun & Co. , who seemed to hnvo succeeded by assignment or otherwise to the interest of Hegan Bros. , nnd hnd done nil the work which hud been performed under the contract , what was Just nnd omiltnblo for the labor performed and materials furnished by them In and about &aid city hull building. Without stopping to t in quire as to the iwsslblo complications which might nrlso with Hcgnn Uros. , the contrnct- ors , If settlement should bo made with 13ren nnn & Co. , without their ( Uegan IJros. ) ex press consent nnd acquiescence , It is suf ficient to say , for the purpose of this applica tion , that In taking this action , there is noth ing in the testimony to satisfy us that the city council acted from nny Improper motives , or that the action was improvident or ngnlnst the best interests of the olty. On the con trary , It appears under all the circumstances to hnvo been the best nnd most prudent solu tion of nn unfortunnto complication , to say the lenst. 13y this action the contractors wore released from n contract out of which serious disputes had already nriscn , nnd others quite ns serious were likely to nrlso which could not hnvo been adjusted probably without n vexatious and perhaps disastrous litigation , nnd the city was released from nny liability to account for nny profits which might hnvo nccrucd under the contract , and was bound to allow only what wns Just nnd equitable for the labor actually performed nnd the ma terials actually furnished In and about the building. Soon after the annulling of the contract , Urcnnnn & Co. submitted their ac count to the city council , claiming' therein a lurgo amount in excess of the contract price , nnd what Is claimed to bo nn exorbi tant bill for the amount of Inbor performed nnd materials supplied for the building , and ono of the objects sought by the petition of plaintiff herein is to enjoin the city from paying to Uegan Bros , or their assigns , any money out of the city hnll fund until the approval by Myers the arch itect of the work already done under the con tract , nnd the allegations of the petition is that the mayor and the majority of the city council will ' , unless eiijoinedprocccd to nllow , audit and 'pay the account , and that such action will bo tnken for the purpose and with the Intention of defrauding the city of Omaha , its taxpayers nud the plaintiff. The testimony docs not satisfy us that such an Intention exists. The facts shown by plaintiff upon which to ground such a sus picion nro by no means conclusive , and the mayor and the members of the committee of the city council to whom has been referred the account , all disclaim most posi tively any intention to nllow any thing moro than what would bo Just nnd equitable thereon and all have testified that the account has not yet been the subject of consideration at all. We would bo very loth to conclude that the mayor and n majority of the council could bo so recreant to the trust reposed in them ns to deliberately allow and order paid a fraudulent claim against the city , or ono which should embrace a claim for profits or any other illegal claim In favor of the contractors , and were it not that there has been more or less warrant in past experi ence with other municipal bodies , for such nn assertion , wo should say it is incredible. But beyond this , there is the question of power in the court to interfere with the ac tion of the official body upon which is cast the duty and authority by law. to audit and allow claims against the city. It cannot bo presumed that the mayor and council will act fraudulently , and it is only after the fraud has passed from intent to act that the court can interfere , but if such n contingency should arise this court at least would not hesitate In the exercise of Its restraining power. But the prayer of the petition for such a restraining order now is based upon that provision of the Hegan contract , which constitutes the architect the nibltcr as to the amount duo the contractor , etc. , and the prayer is thut the payment to Uegan Bros , bo enjoined "until such n tlmo as the architect , E. K. Myers , shall approve of the work already done. " It is a sufliciunt objection to the granting of such on order , that the con tract has been rescinded by mutual consent , and has no longer any binding force , and the provision constituting Myers the arbiter , bus fallen with the rest , so that to grant the prayer would effectually jn event the settlement of the account on a just and equitable basis' by any body or authority. As to the prayer for. an Injunction ngninst the school district nnd its olllcprs as to pre vent them from annulling the contract heretofore toforo entered into with the city for the orca- tion of the city hall , upoif lots 5 and 0 , or en tering into a contract for its erection upon any other lots , it Is sufficient to say that oven if the court had the power to make such an Older , there is no iiroof whatever that any such intention exists or that any stop has been taken by the school district or its of- tlcors looklilg toward such a result. As to the position of the city council In ref erence to its power" , and the action proposed by it relating to the city hall building , the status Is somewhat different. Inthoflrst place the ordinnnco providing for the erection of a city hall , was required by the very law which created and called into being the municipal body Itself , to bo sub mitted to the electors of the city for their ratification , und without such ratification , no authority existed for .such erection. Whether it was necessary or not to have em bodied in such ordinnnco the designation of tlui location of the building , the limit of the cost , nnd the designation of the plans under which the building was to bo elected , they wore certainly very proper to bo so embodied , and they wore nil designated In tlio prdinanco which wns submitted to the electors. In fact It would bo dltllcult to conceive of any practical benefits' or purpose of such nn ordinance without such designation. Without them , a submission to a vote of the electors might prove but a delusion and a snare , whereby nine-tenths of those voting to ratify the ordi nance might bo grossly deceived In all or anyone ono of the respects named. However , there is no restriction in the law as to the details which may bo covered by the ordinance , but there Is the positive requirement that no .au thority shall exist for tlio improvement , un til tie | ordlnunro , with whatever of detail it may bo burdened , shull huvo been ratified by a majority of the votes at the election. This being so , It is clearlv not in the power of iho council either to change the location of the building , to erect it on substantially differ ent phins , or to exnendnn amount substan tially in excess of that designated in the ordi nance. , without first obtaining authority thetcfor by an ordinance prepared for that purpose , nnd submitted to and latillcd by n majority of the legal voters of the city voting thereon. Until such authority U con ferrcd no power exists in the mayor nnd city council to change the plans .substantially , or to change the locntiott of the city hall build ing , or to expend any amount substantially In excess of that voted upon In the ordinance. If by reasons of changes in'tho cost of labor and material since the plans were prepared it has become impracticable to erect the building upon such plans within tlio limit prescribed , nnd the plans cannot bo so changed ns to bring the cost within the limit without substantially changing tha plans , tjien one of two courses mus > t be pur sued either different and cheaper plans , must bo adopted , or pro vision must bo made for a larger Outlay , and hi either case the ordinance pro viding for such changes must bp submitted to the electors of the city for theli' satisfac tion. If it should be deemed advisable to change the location of the building , the same course must be pursued , and in the meantime - time and until such-authority is obtained by an ordmauce raUlied. by a majority ofthe voters , the present structure , BO far as It has progressed , having bcotl erected under the authority conferred by the electors and In conformity with tholr expressed wishes by the act of ratification of the ordinance , nnd the evidence tending to show that the stmcturfc , ns fur as It has progressed , is In substantial compliance with the Myers1 plans and is RUfllciont for the purpose for which It Was intended. and It cannot bo removed or destroyed. The bonds for the erection of the city hall building hav ing been voted after the location of the snmo by ordinance. anil during the progress of the work thereon Upon such location , must bo deemed to have been voted with reference to such location. It follows therefore that no part of them , or of their proceeds can bo used for the erection of a building on any other site , until the question of expen diture upon such site shall hnvo been flrst submitted to , and ratified by the electors of the city. Notwithstanding the mayor nnd a few of the members of the city council have ills- claimed any Immediate intention to change the slto for the city hall , or to destroy the present work upon the structure , thcro hnvo been many significant nets by different mem bers of the city council , some of which hnvo crystnllrcd Into action in the council as n municipal body , Indicating' pretty clearly a disposition , to disre gard the ordinance No. 050 , the ratification of which by the majority of the voters of the city , conferred the only author ity which the mayor nnd council possess In the premises , They claim , In fact , to have already rejected the plans adopted by the jtooplo , and to bo no longer bound to work by them In the erection of the building. This being so. any taxpayer has the right to Intcr- pose to fitny the hands of the municipal body in the execution of nn unlawful and unau thorized net. Wo do not Intend to Interfere with the legitimate exercise of the legisla tive functions of the mayor and council , but only with the execution of unlawful acts , Neither do wo Intend in any way to Interfere or express any opinion ns to the controversy between the council nnd the architect. All the questions .which may arise between Mr. Myers nnd the city under his contract with the city , wo leave entirely unexamined - examined nnd without the intimation of nnv opinion thoreon. They will rpmaln for set tlement or adjudication between the parties at the proper tlmo , when much of the testi mony presented on this hearing may have some relevancy , which wo do not accord to it hero. TUP. OI111EU. I An order will bo mode temporarily enjoin ing the defendants ( or such of them ns the Injunction should apply toy from annulling or setting aside the plans and specifications of B. E. Myers , architect for the erectioa of the city hall building , as referred to in ordi nance No. 050 , adopted and ratified by n vote of the majority of the legal voters of said city , or from proceeding under any other plans or specifications or any substantial change of the Myers' plans until nu ordinance specifying such plans , or substantial changes in the Myers plans shall have been flrst submitted to and ratified by n majority of the legal voters of the city voting thereon. Also from removing or destroying the basement or sub-basement already erected upon lots 5 and 0 in block 110 in the city of Omaha. Also from erecting or contracting to erect a city hall building upon any other ground than upon said lots above described , until an ordinance providing therefor shall have been first submitted to nnd ratified by a majority of the legal voters of the city voting thereon , or from using any portion of the bonds voted for the purpose of.'puylng for the construction of n city hall for the use of the city of Omaha called "city hall bonds , " or the proceeds thereof lor the , erection of a city hall on any other site than upon said lots above described , until an ordinance pro viding for such use slfnll have been first sub mitted to and ratified by a majority of the legal voters of the city of Omaha voting thereon. This order will not interfere with the changing of the site for a city hall building nor with the adoption of different plans and specifications upon which to erect it , pro vided the question of such site and plans shall bo first submitted to and ratified by a majority of the legal voters of the city voting thereon. _ A surprise , when smoking "Seidon- berg1 Figaro" for 6c you will find it a 10c cigar. Ask your dealer for thorn. " " "MATTRESSES worth $3. only si.os. Everything1 elsein proportion at NKW YOUK STOHAOK Co. , Entire blouk , Capitol avo. and loth st. ITY THIS PIBTOIj UOUTE. A Miner Pills His Head mill Botly "With Ijcndcii Uullcts. A miner , named P. Mullen , who boarded the Union Pacific train No. 2 , at Ogden , Utah , Monday morning , committed suicide In the water closet of the car yesterday at Elkhorn. Ills fellow passengers were half asleep and the man with whom Mullen wns seated was awakened by the latter getting up. Mullen went to the water closet and rcmalno d there nt least 10 minutes. The man with whom ho had been travelling since the day before wns preparing to go to the closet to see what was the matter. Just then ho heard a shot followed in quick suc cession by three more reports. The passen gers in the car became panic stricken and made a rush for the front platform. Two of the t nil inn on entered the car and broke into the closet. There lay the man Mullen in a pool of blood that poured from four wounds , two of them in the right temple and two in the abdomen. The suicide was carried into the baggage car and taken into the depot at this city. Coroner Drexel was summoned , who secured a jury. The testimony was in ac cord with the facts stated above and the following verdict was rendered : "Tim said P. Mullen came to his death bya pistol-shot llrcd by his own hand with sui- cldul Intent , somewhere between Elkhoru nnd Millurd , while riding on a passenger train on the Union Pacific railway , on the morning of March 14 , 1SSS. " "CiiAiu.ua F. TUTTI.E. B. IlAxrv. C. H. Au.r.x. II. A. COI.B. W , TlIIIlKTTS. T. E. JONES. " Mullen had a ticket to Chicago and S4.30 on his person. The man with whom ho became acquainted yesterday and who was his seat mate , stated that the deceased stated to him that ho was en route to Chicago to obtain medical treatment for "lead colic , " n diseuso usually contracted by men who work in lead mines , _ MATTRESSES , worth 1.00 , on y $1.08. Everything1 else in proportion at NEW YOUK STOHAOK Qo. , En tire block , Capitol avo. and 15th st , Vlfillors From Wichita. The county commissioners of Wichita , Kan. , are visiting the city , Thclrobjcct Is to vlow the court house and jail. They Intend to erect u jail this summer and nro making u tour of the principal cities to obtain points. 1 Thlspowder never varies. A nmrrelof . . tjr.strongth ami wliolesoinenesa. More ecotiot ; . leal than the ordinary klncjs , and cannot becolp in competition witn the multitude ef low < on. sliurt weight alumqr phosphate pnwdtre. Sold only Jn cans , lloyal Uakiojr I'owder CN-i l i 3lc r 5c 22c 29c For the best quality of For Apron Chocjc For All Wool , For All Wool Dress. Calicos , Ginghams Dress Goods , Tricots , nt nt at N. B. FALCONER'S. N. B. FALCONER'S. N. B. FALCONER'S. N. B. FALCONER'S ; Wi BB * VQ HH HHBllBlBRHERpF . SiSJLJET SATURDAY , MARCH i7th. On April 1st wo will vacate the store rooijn Nos. 1501 and 1508 Douglas , and move into our own store next door. Before doing that wo make a grand Moving Sale ; we must sell at least ono hundred thousand dollars worth before moving. Wo dq not take the cost of the goods into consideration in making prices. The goods must bo sold and wo make the prices to selj j hem. Many of the lots offered will not last ' ono week , so ask'all to como as oarlv as possible. DRESS GOODS. 4O pieces 83-Inch nil Do Beige , regular price 6Bc , moving sale price OOc. 41 pieces 44inch nil wool Do Beige , regular price QBc , moving sale price 7J3c. 14 pieces tan shades French Suiting , in tan shades only , regular price $1 and $1.26 , moving sale price , B7c. Outing Flannels , 32 inches wide , 48c ; worth 78c. Colored Dress Goods 4O pieces pin striped all wool Dress Goods , 38 inches wide , regular price 7Bc , moving sale price 22c. 4O pieces 38 inch all wool Tricots , regular price 8Oc , moving sale price 29c. 1O pieces fancy sillc striped. Dress Goods , 40 inches wide , regular price 7Bc , moving sale price 8Sc. 4O , 44 and 46 inch Tweed , Serge , Fancy French Suiting , 54-inch all wool Flannels and. Novelty Suiting , regular price from 75c to 95c , moving sale price 42c. 84-Inch Tweed Suitings , regular price $1.3B , moving sale price 79c. 42-inch all -wool French Plaid Suitings , regular price $1.25 , moving sale price 68c. 44-inch fine French Plaid Dress Goods , regular price $1.8O to $1.78 , moving sale price 79c. 84-inch fine Plaid Dress Goods , regular price $1.78 , moving sdle price $1.18. VELVETS AND PLUSHES. In this department we will make some terrible sacrifices. These goods must be sold and the prices are made to sell each lot out fast. Fancy Velvets that have been sold at $1.6O and $1.28 , moving sale price , 6Bc per yard. Fancy Velvets. beautiful floods that have been selling at $8.OO. * moving sale price $1.80. Fancy Velvets , the finest goods made , that have been sold from $ C3 to $7 per yard , moving sale price $2.18. Fancy Velvets , elegant pat terns , that have sold , from $7.BO to $1O , in short lengths only , moving sale price $3.68. Plush and Velvet , 16 inches wide , in all colors , never sold at less than $ l.OOmoving sale price 68 c. Plain Plush , Moire Plush , Moire Velvets , 19 inches wide , never offered before at less than $1.28 and $1.8O , moving sale price 98c. Plain Plush , 19 inches wide , our regular $1.8O Plush , mov ing sale price $1.O7. Plain Velvets , our $2 qual ity. moving sale price $1.39. Plain Velvets , our $3 qual- itv , moving sale price $2.O8. Plain Velvets , 22 Inches wide , elegant goods , regular price $3.BO , moving sale pries $2.48. All Silk Colored Velvets.reg- ular price $8 , moving sale price $3.63. Velveteens. Velveteens , regular price BOc , sale price 37 l-2c. Velveteens , regular price 7Bcsale price BOc. Velveteens , regular price $1 , sale price 6Sc. velveteens , regular price $1.48 , sale price $1. OB. Health is Wealth ! In. K.O. Wrst's NEII\'E AND Tiiuiv TIIRAT- MKNT. a ( ftmrnntped spcclllo for HyMrrJn , Dizzi ness. Convulsions I'ltn , Nervous Neuralgia , Headache. Nervous j'rostwlou. caused by the be of alcohol or tobacco , \Vakefulneas , Mental Depression , Hoftentnu of the Drain , resulting In Insunlty.aiiil loading to mUery.docay and death , 1'remature Old Ape , Darrenness. toss of I'ower In either sex. Involuntary tosses ami Bperma. torrlura caused byovrr-uxeitlon of the brain , self-abuse or over-Indulgence. Kach box con tains one month's treatment. Il.ttJa box , or Bijc boxes for Jo.OO , beut by mall prepaid on receipt of price. price.WU GUARANTEE 8X | BOXK8 To cure any case. With each order received by us for sir box k , accompanied with KUK ) , wo will send the purchaser our written Kuaroutao to re fund the money if the treatment dnos not eircct a cure. Guarantees issued only by O. V , OOOO- MAN , UniRBlst , Solo Agent , 1UO rarnarn Street , Omahii , Neb. urerncfromthfff ( f t. ofyonlhfil er- EEl runi.rarlr < l c r. < t nCood. etc. I wil mT aluitlo tre tl e < tt lr < l ) uUUlBr full v eulu tut Uuiu * nue , Inn ut XPROF. F , b'l'FOWLER , Moodus , Conru % . LINEN And Housekeeping GOODS. 1 case Turkey Red Damask , regular price 6Oc , moving sale price 49c. 1 case fine Cream Damask , regular price 7Bc , moving sale price BOc. 11-4 Marseilles Bed Spreads , ' regular price $3.BO , moving sale price $2.78. 11-4 Marseilles Bed Spreads , regular price $4 , moving sale price $3.28. 1OO dozen fancy bordered DoVles. size 2Ox2O , regular price Jfl.BO. moving sale price $1 per dozen. 1OO dozen 8-8 Bleached Napkins , regular price $1.BO , sale price $1.28. 1OO dozen B-8 Bleached Damask Napkins , regular price $2 , sale price sfl.BO. 8O dozen 8-8 Double Dam ask Napkins , regular price ? 3 , sale price $2. At S1.OO--Odd. lot 3-4 and 8-8 fine Napkins , slightly soiled at $1 ; would be cheap at White" Blankets. 1O-4 white Blankets at 8Bc , regular price $1.28. 1O-4 white Blankets at $1.49 , regular price $2.28. 1O-4 white Blankets at $2.OB regular price $3.OO. 1O-4 white Blankets at $2.88 , regular price $3.BO. 1O-4 white Blankets at $3.O7J , regular price $4.OO. Grey Blankets. 1O-4 grey Blankets at $1.78 , regular price $2.BO. 1O-4 grey Blankets at $2.33 , regular price $3.OO. A few pairsof 11-4 , 12-4 and 13-4 white and colored Blank ets , all slightly soiled , regu lar price from $16 to $2O , sale price $9.78. WHITE" FLANNEL. 27-inch white Flannel at 18 l-2c , regular price 2Bc. 27-inch all wool white Flannel - nel at 22 l-2c , regular price 3Oc. 7-8 white all wool Flannel atSlc. regular price 4Oo. White Shaker Flannel at llo , regular price IBc. white shaker Flannel at IS l-2c , regular price 2Bc. White shaker Flannel at 22 l 2c , regular price 3Oc. White shaker Flannel at 38c , regular price 4Bc. Blue mixed Flannel at IBc , regular price 2Oc. Navy blue all wool Flannel at 18 l-2c , regular price 2Bc. All wool scarlet Flannel at 18 l-2c , regular price 2Bc. Fine fancy Jersey Flannels at BBc , regular price 7Oc. Fancy French striped Flan nels at BBc , regular price 7Bc. Gent's Furnishings 40 dozen men's flno launtlried shirts , nt S9o , worth $1.2.5. 10 do/sen men's flno kumdriod shirts , regular price $1.'J5. sale piieo. 9oo. 25 do/.cn moil's flno plaited bosom luuiidricd shirts ; rogulur price $1.6(1 ( , sale price $1.15. MEN'S NECKTIES. All the flno sillc and satin neck ties thut wo have boon bolliii } , ' from 50u to 75c , ut this sale 25o each MEN'S GLOVES. Tivonty-flvo do/ton men's-buck , castor , doer skin and icid gloves , worth from $1.60 to $2.00 , at this sale $1.00 per pair. MEN'S FANCY FLANNEL SHIRTS. Twonty-Ilvo dozen men's fancy HAT IN HAND , Wo innko our best bpw to tuo public. Ono ofttio tests of good taste is a be coming lint. MlnJfiu of tlio viifluj needs of our jmUons we lire 8uppled ] Vvltli hats jorthe tpriui ; trade , suited In duality and style to e\ery pursuit and profentlon lints and cups for the loyp , hats for their fathers mid brothers , ami liroad-brlinmod huts ( or their grandfath ers , all at i > rtr ? which munitibtoul-.u the public. ; flnmiol shirts , regular price $3.00 , sale price $2.10. MEN'S COLLARS-CO EACTI. Forty dozen men's linen colltu'8 nt 60 each , regular price 10c. 100 Aozon men's 4-ply linin col- Inra in nil the now styles lUJo , worth 17io. Men's cuffs IGcworth Coo. Men's cuffs iSo ! , regular price 40c. 40c.MEN' MEN' SUSPENDERS 160. 100 dozen men's fine suspenders at 15o , regular price 25o. grey merino half hose at ISa , regular price 25c. British half hose at 16c , regular price 25c. LINEN HANDKERCHIEFS. 100 dozen men's white and fan cy bordered all linen hd'k'fsat 8jo each , reduced from 121 and 15c. 15c.Men's Men's white ami colored bor dered all linen hemstitched li'dkfs nt 17c , regular price 25c. Men's wliito and colored bor dered all linen handkerchiefs. Never offered by us before at less than 35c. On Saturday 25c. All the fine men's colored bor dered all-linen handkerchiefs that wo have boon selling at 60o. On Saturday the price is ; i7jc. SILK HANDKERCHIEFS. 25 dozen fancy silk handker chiefs , regular price 05c , sale price 25c. 40 dozen fancy silk handker chiefs , regular price 85c , sale price 65c. Mons' China silk h'dk'fs , regu lar price COc , sale price 40c. Metis' China silk h'dk'fs , eizo 21 inch with wide hem , regular price 75c , sale price 55c. Mons'20-inch Chinasilkh'dk'fs , regular price $1.00 , sale price 72c. Mens' cream silk mulllors ut50c , worth $1.00. 40 dozen China silk mufflers , regular price $1.76 , sale price 81.00. 81.00.MEN'S MEN'S UNDERWEAR. Men's white merino shirts , reg ular price 40c , moving sale price orf > . M < JU. JU.Men's white merino shirts , reg ular price 60c , moving' sale price 8Sc. 8Sc.Men's Men's white merino shirts , reg ular price 75c , moving sale price 55c. 55c.MEN'S MEN'S ALL WOOL SCARLET SHIRTS A D DRAWERS , ; t5c , 100 dozen men's all-wool scarlet shirts and drawers at 35o , regular price 85c. 25 dozen men's fine scarlet shirts , slightly soiled , regular price $1.00 and S1.25 , moving bale price 05c. Men's full regular merino shirts , nil sizes , tliat are worth $2.50 , moving sale price 08c. Ladies" SILK VESTS. Ladles' spun sillc Vests , reg ular price $3.BO and $4 , mov ing sale price $2. Ladies' spun silk Vests , short sleeves , regular price $4 , moving sale price $2.98. Ladles' natural wool fine light weight merino Vests , regular price $1.BO , moving sale price 98c. Ladies' fine French Saxony knit Vests , regular price $2.28 moving sale prlcel. Childs' scarlet vests and pants , sizes 16 to 26 , worth from 3Bc to 48c , moving sale price 23c. Children's scarlet vests and. pants , very fine quality , reg ular price from 6Oc to $1.1O , moving sale price BOc. Children's white merino Vests , sizes 18 to 32 , regular price 33c , moving sale price IBc. IBc.Ladies' Ladies' merino vests , regu lar price 38e , moving sale price 2Bc. Ladles' fine white merino vests , regular price OBc. mov ing sale price 39c. Ladies'light weight merino vests and pants , regular price 78c , moving sale price 43c. Ladies' light weight merino vests and pants , regular price 88c , moving sale price BBc. Ladies' all wool scarlet vests also camel's hair vests. NO PANTS , regular price 7Bc , " U , S. DEPOSITORY , OMAHA , 1TEB. Paid Up Capital , - $2BOOOO Surplus , - BO.OOO II. W. VATKH. Pruslrtpnt. LEWIS H. ] ( nt : > , Vlco-T'rcBldcnt. A , JJ.TOUZAI.IN , "ml VIco-rresIiTent. W. It. a. lluuiits , Cuslilcr. W , V. Mouse , JOHN B. COM.INS , Jl.V. . VATLH. LKWIHS. luuu , A , K. TOU/AUN , DanklnpOmco THE IRON BANK , Cor. mi ) uml I'ltrnuin Sti. A General Dunking Hiiainuaa Transacted. Proprietor Omaha Business College , in WHICH ta TuQHr Boole-Keeping , Penmanship , Commercial Law , Shprthand , Telegraphing and Typewriting. Send lor College Journal. S E' . Cor 10th. and Capitol Avenue moving sale price 83o. Ladles' very fine all wool scarlet pants and vests , rcgu lar prlco $1. , moving sale price 78c. 78c.WASH WASH GOODS. Fancy Scotch and Frenclj Zephyr Ginghams , regular price 3Bc and 4Oc , sale price 28c. Indigo Blue Calico , regular price 8 l-2c , moving sale price Bc > Fancy Striped Seersucker Ginghams , regular prlco I2jo , sale price 9c. French Sateens , in a lot or odd lengths , regular price QOo and 4Oc , sale price 28c. Apron Checft Ginghams , regular price 8 l-2c , sale price Be. V\ \ Best quality dress styles of Calico , 3 1-26 , worth 8 l-2c. A splendid line of colored lawns at JHc , worth Go. Gorman calicos , ono yard wide , ntSlic , worth 16c. Not moro than 12 yards to each customer. Fancy dross buttons , 2 dozen for Oc ; tlicso buttons nro worth froul 25c to 35o per dozen. Cream Russian and vonnicllljS lace , from 3 to 5 inches wide , at 8jc. worth from ICc to U5c. Not moro than 12 yards to each customer. CHILDREN'S WHITE DRESSES. Children's white dresses at 606 , worth frum 7Cc to $1. Children's white dresses at 75o. worth $1. / Children's white dresses nt $1 , worth SI. 50. , , Children's white dross at $1.CO > worth $2. ' JERSEYS. Black jorioys at OOc , $1.50. $2 $2.50 , &t , $4 , jutt about half prlcol , Black and fancy jerseys at $1.50. vl S2.-75 , $3 , at just half prico. i | Colored jerseys at $2.50 , $3 and , ) f $3.50 , worth double. RIBBONS. All silk sash ribbons in bcautK ful shades , 7 inches widoin moire crown edge at 05c worth $1.45. Blocked pattern sash ribbon in all colors 55c , worth 85c. FEATHER PILLOWS , NO ODOR. NO DUST. We have just received our spring order of Feather Pil lows from the Cold Dlaat Feather Co. These Feathers have all undergone the most thorough renovating process- known to the trade , and cug- tomers can rest assured they are as represented. At $1,25 1OO pairs Feather Pillowg at $1.28 , worth $1.78. At $1.75 1OO pairs Feather Pillows at $1.73 , worth $2.BO. At $2.25 1OO pairs fine Feather Pit > lows at $2.28 , worth ? 3.BO. At $2,75 BO pairs Feather Pillows afc ? 2.7B , worth $4 , At $3.5O BO pairs Live Geese Feath er Pillows at $3.BO , worth $ B. At $4.50 BO pairs Live Geese Feathei Pillows at $ 4.BO , worth | 6. DOWN PILLOWS. ' DOWN PILLOWS At $3.75 2B pairs fine Down Pillows , satin covers , at $3.78 , wor i $6. At $5.50 28 pairs fine Down Pillows , largo size at $8. BO , wortlj $7.80. At $6.00 2B pairs best Down Pillowg at $6 , worth $9. These Pillows are all guar anteed to be perfectly odorless and free from dust. .T. B. HAYNES , OYtflGIAl. STENOGRAPHER , TMrd Judicial Dlstilct , Room 41 , Chamber of Commerce. Telephone Oil. SteekPiano Jtcidnrkableforjiowerfiil vmjai thetlc tone.JilittlJUMictlon umliu _ fcbirtediiraljllTty. ) mTyearaTreconT tITelcatjtunrmUiiUjt "the mcel- HIKO of tliesa liistrurntiita.