Hesperian student / (Lincoln [Neb.]) 1872-1885, April 15, 1886, Page 4, Image 6
THE HESPERIAN. and rain. The rotary motion causes a rarefaction of air which, mc to be a reader, while he who has rend only under com- pulsion will cease as soon as that compulsion is removed. If so much may be said of the ability to read, an equal amount might be said concerning style in writing or ability in speak ing and writing. The ability to clothe the thoughts in apt phrase is no small part of an education. As there exist un written constitutions, so there are also unwritten curriculums. n the center of the storm being increased by the condensa ion of moisture, sometimes becomes almost a vacuum. The pressure from above then begins and pushes the center of the cloud downward, thus causing the funnel shaped cloud which is an invariable attendant of the tornado. On the outside of these storms the air is almost always comparatively calm and, in case of the larger storms, which are properly called cyclones, the wind generally blows away rom the storm center as well as towards it, owing to the in creased density of air caused by the outpouring of warmer air at the top of the chimney of heated air, if we may again use the illustration of the stove , The Professor then related some of the terrible effetts of , these storms. A very common thing is for the roof of ahnild ing to be destroyed or some part, as the side, forced out, caused by the expansive pressure of the air inside. Sometimes build ings in the direct path of the storm arc almost uninjured and in one case the roof was lifted from a house and a cow stand ing in the yard near by was lifted unhurt into the house. In a tornado which created great destruction near Rock Island in 1844 not only were the fences demolished, but the rails themselves were broken to pieces. Wagon wheels were torn from wagons and the spokes drawn bodily from the hub. A large log which some workmen had tried in vain to split was, by the storm split into four pieces. In another case not only were trees torn up, but small pieces of wood were driven into them. These terrible illustrations were not, the Professor thought, from electricity as is so often claimed, but from the violent movement of the air. Air moving 100 miles per hour exerts a pressure of fifty pounds per square foot. If the vel ocity is increased to 300 miles per hour the pressure becomes nine times as great as before, and the rotary motion of the tor nado is computed to be fnlly 300 miles per hour. In concluding it was remarked that observations taken showed Nebraska to be comparatively free from these terrible visitations A contemporary regrets that some great authors have failed to "put themselves into their works." In a certain sense the objection may be well taken, for too many in their imitations of others or from a false idea of what is proper and desirable fail to write naturally; but when one undertakes to lament that Shakespeare did not stamp his individuality on his works he assumes more than most readers will admit. It is spoken ol as the crowning glory of Shakespeare that he was able to so thoroughly sympathize with and enter into other men's thought. It is this which made him a great depictor of char acter and we could not wish him otherwise. No man with a nature of the strongly, narrowly intense stamp could have been a Shakespeare. Certain things not mentioned in the college curriculum should be cultivated and studied as assiduously by every stu dent as though they were compelled to take them as regular studies. These are reading, writing and speaking well. Cer tainly they are the indirect objects of much college work, but too many fail to perceive their value and pass through one, two, or three years of school life without any special effort to attain excellence in them. It should be urged, and urged again upon every student that in nothing can he err more than in thinking it unnecessary to cultivat a proficiency in these three things. It is a fundamental principle of advanced teach, ing that the ability to procure is more valuable than possession itself. He who can read rapidly and intelligently need not jpng be poorly read, nor will he. And such a. one will never John Ruskin is great, but like some others equally great js terribly egotistic. This is illustrated in his criticisms on some seven authors.whosc works he threw out of a list pre sented to him for inspection. Of Grotc's History of Greece he says "There is probably no commercial establishment be tween Charing Cross and the bank, whose head clerk could not write a better one, if he had the vanity to waste his time on it;" of Charles Kingslcy, "His sentiment is false and his tragedy frightful. The story of 'Hypatia' is the most ghastly in christian tradition, and should forever have been left in si lence." Darwin he rejects because it is every man's duty to know what he is, and not to think of the embryo he was, nor the skeleton he shall be. Rccause, also, Darwin has a mortal fascination for all vainly curious and idly speculative persons, and has collected, in the train of him, every impudent imbe cility in Europe, like a dim comet wagging its useless tail of phosphorescent nothing across the steadfast stars." Gibbon he rejects because "none but the malignant study the Decline and Fall of cither state or organism. Dissolution and pu trescence arc alike common and unclean in all things. For the rest, Gibbon's is the worst English that was ever written by an educated Englishman." Voltaire's work "is, in com parison with good literature, what nitric acid is to wine, and sulphuretted hydrogen is to air." Seldom have we seen a criticism more evidently arising from prejudice or expressed with less regard to the good that might be said. It may do for Mr. Ruskin to criticise so unguardedly and swecpingly be cause Mr. Ruskin is a man who is, in some measure, great, but if one of less renown had undertaken to write such opin ions he would have been a laughing stock. There is a fresh personality about Ruskin's criticsm, yet we think it only just to concede something to the value of the opinions of others, and this he does not do. Our friend from Suspension Bridge appears concerned be cause the Cornell Sun has clipped from a western exchange something that reflects on the Jesuits. The Index devotes something over two columns to quotation, personal allusion and an attempt at consideration of the charges made. The Hesperian did not sec the article in question for the simple reason that, knowing such topics to be generally treated from a standpoint of religious prejudice rather than from any desire to reach the truth, we pay them small attention. The Index scarcely meets the charges fairly or successfully. It uses words from a partizan standpoint and evidently with a partizan meaning. The western journal before mentioned charged that in a certain Catholic college in California no book on philosophy other than Tongcorgi was allowed within the walls and that the students were forbidden to read anything not sanctioned by the church. The Index dees not presume to deny the statements, but rather seeks to justify such a course. It remarks that, in philosophical studies, the course above mentioned is the surest step to success. Rut what is success in philosophical study? We grant that one may reach a precon ceived conclusion much more certainly by reading only those books which are in harmony with that conclusion; but, unless we can be infallibly assured that the preconceived conclusion is foe whole truth and nothing but tjie truth, such, a course