Hesperian student / (Lincoln [Neb.]) 1872-1885, February 15, 1882, Image 3
THE HESPERIAN STUDENT advanced work. The almighty dollar Is larger in their eyes than the lasting good of their pupils. Wo hop:' this is not true of any of our under graduates or alumni that may be teacher.;, but, did they do their work better, did they properly guide and stimulate the mental energies of the youth they meet, whether in the school room or in the town, surely mere would come to enjoy the advantages of a school that for six years instruction charges but five dollars. Now, if never befote, is the traditional Sophomore with all his turbulence and wicked and ridiculous " cusscdness" gen erally, outdone bj a couple of Juniors at Princeton, who were so regardless of all prudence, law or even common decency as to lead a crowd of " innocent " Fresh men through the streets oT the town howl ing and binashing all the street lamps and making themselves nuisances generally. We quote from the Independent in calling them " innocent " Freshmen, and are rather inclined to quarrel with the adjec live. However, thoy receive their just deserts, whether so very innocent or not, mid that too at the bauds of the munici pal authorities. The mayor had them arrested nml they were fined by the justice of the peace and severely lectured also, 'and warned that a lepotition of the oH'onse would not receive any such leniency. A little more of this kind or justice .vould ' bpmlily remove the glamour from all midnight carousing on the part of students and make it as disgraceful and as much an act of rowdyism for a collegian to tear up sidewalks, walk off with gates and smash windows as it is for an ordinary citizen. The nonsense and dangerous practices of college secret societies ought to have been treated long ago in just this way. Sooner or later college authorities will have to let the state cr municipal law take in hand all such' cases, and col lego rowdyism and hazing will never be fully stopped until this is done. Tub Student, as it has taken occasion to state before, Is not a believer in the usefulness of the preparatory department. It is of the opinion that the High School of Lincoln should bear the same relation to our University that the High School of Ann Arbor bears to Michigan University' viz: a preparatory dcpaitment. If it did the interest of both could be served uest. The High Salmi would be built up. H would contain older, and consequent l. butter, students than it docs now. By the present antagonistic system the Uuivor sity enters the market as it were, and bids for the children, of the High School, scarcely started in their icons, with minds not suftlciently developed to do the work that a college ought to requiie. Nor is tills the worst feature of the presiMit ays tern. When a professor of the High School begins to requiio his pupils to do hard and thorough work, or, when they fail entirely in their examinations, they show their disapproval of his teaching by leaving his classes and entering the Uni versity. Worthy additions, no doubt 1 Such students bring neither srtcugth nor respect to an institution, but they do weaken its powers and humble its dig nity. Can it be that such should he the case? Docs not not the University crip, pie itself by accepting such students? Its purpose is not to do the work of the com- moil school. The time and energy that professors spend with the sub-freslimau classes is lost to that work which properly belongs to them. By a very little trouble, and no extra expense, arrange incuts could be made so that the High School of Lincoln could tit students (or the freshman class in any one of thu three courses of the University. In other words the High School could, and ought to be made the preparatory department of the University. Why cannot it be done? cise litis must be so, as the college p.ner rather than the columns of the daily or weekly press is the especial property of tho student and accessible to him when scarcity of space, policy or some other equally feasible excuse might forbid him the latter. One of the good tilings which the new Board of Malingers did at their last meet ing, which was also their first, was to provide a table or desk for the Hesperian ofllcc. upon which arc to be kept the ex changes received from week to week. The Student cannot remember that those exchanges have ever before this time been placed whom the subscribers as well as the editors of our college paper could have access to them. It is time that all should have the opportunity to see and examine for themselves the pii ers o( other colleges, to which, all things being considered, the Student may be favorably compared. Some of these college papers are quite enjoyable and from a literary point of view are a credit to the institu lions from which ihcy come. The sphere of college journalism, to judge by the exchanges, is as boundless as that of the daily press, and all questions of the dny, whether of politics science, religion, or morality, are mingled with translations from musty authors, theories upon ancient languages and philosophies quotations from Horace and the Koran, original poems and pungent locals and these last, In papers like the Student, with advertisements. College papers are the medium through which the students of tho different colleges express their opin ions upon tho questions of vital impor tance to them, make their complaints of unjust and unpopular rules and restric lions, and set forth thpir own ideas and thoughts upon tilings in general. In short, the colloge paper is usually just what the students make it and is the index When one comes to think of it there arc really very few who are correct spel lers always and everywhere and who, in their daily conversation, are not guilty again and again of the grossest violations of English Grammar. When a student signifies his intention of entering tho class in Elocution and spells it " Elecu shun," one feels like suggesting to him tho ptoprioty of purchasing a spelling book. Candidates for tho "Komcstry" class arc evidently in need ot the drill alVordcd by the district school and the old- fnshionicd spelling bee. Even Prof. How ard would scarcely recognize tlie"Ansliunt History " class, though lie may a certain, member of it unless the young man adopts a different system of orthography. In the opinion of the etudent children and young people generally are not the good spellers they used to be. Tho now methods of teaching, the enlarged courses of study, tho many branches now em braced in tho common school system which were formerly supposed to belong especially to the academies and colleges, necessarily prevents the time being given to the "three It's" and to spelling, to which of old they were entitled. And speaking of spelling we are reminded of that commonest of all mistakes in gram mar, a mistake which even well educated people make, which we hear from the pulpit, the lecture platform and the prof essor's chair, the mistake of using don't for doesn't. Some phrases, through gen eral use, gradually become to be recog nized as allowable, and into the English language have thus been adopted children of a foreign birth naturalized by custom, precedence and their frequent appearance, in the woiks of standard authors. But no amount of custom or use by writers and speakers of all sorts will ever justify set flagrant an abuse of all grammatical rules, us ho don't, and it don't. The absurdity of thu whole matter appears plain when, the abbreviated form is dropped and one attempts to say ho do not, or it do not. And yet if one docs not believe that seven persons out of every ten say don't for doesn't, try the experiment of listening cm chilly to the conversations one hears mid keep an accurate account and tho re sult is simply disgraceful. We have been more unlortuiiato than most people in tho acquaintance with tho world in general, if it bo not found that we have made a very reasonable estimate that seven per sons out of every tnn almost invariably of tlmir culture, wit, wisdom, loyally and enterprise. By the very nature of the say don't for doesn't.