The Hesperian / (Lincoln, Neb.) 1885-1899, December 17, 1897, Page 7, Image 7
H TUB : HESPERIAN t Tlio Xioliiiiimiv Dehatos. The first of the preliminary debates to de cide the sixteen for the final eontest to deter mine who shall represent the University in the Kansas, Missouri andColorado debates was held in the University chapel lYiday evening. The lower part of the chapel was nearly filled. The following was the question: Resolved, that President Jackson was justified in his attitude toward the bank of the United States. Affirmative. Berge, Pearson, Moyer. Nega tive, Deal, Sloan, McXaughlon. All of the nine judges were present but only three marked. The speech of Mr. Berge was forceful. Mr. Deal was both effective and logical. The speech of Mr. McNaughton was clear and strong. SATURDAY ltVKXlNO. Divisions two. three and four debated in Palladian Union and D?liau halls, respec tively, Saturday evening. Uaeh hall con tained a fair sized audience. Division two debated the following question: Resolved, that tlie United States should annex Hawaii as a territory. Affirmative. Taylor, Kemp, Hager and Goodwill. Negative. Denison, Griffith and Tellisen. The judges were Profs. Caldwell and Ward and Judge Reese. Mr. Taylor gave a speech winch was notic able for its force and clearness. Mr, Danison made his -usual effective speech eloquent as well as logical. Mr. Hager bad his subject matter well in hand, his delivery was beyond criticism. The third -division discussed the .question: Resolved, Tli at municipal! tins should own and ontrol thelrnatural monopolies. Affirmative Pope, Meier, Maguire and Tucker, Negative Spuncer, "Waterman and Poriy, The jndgas were Profs. Hill. Sherman and Lracky. Messirs. Spencer and "Waterman madc-care-ful, analytic speeches on tilie negative. Mr, Magniro made ji forcible speech hut spent too mucli time in preliminaries and gen emli ties. Mr, Meier clearty failed to dohiTrielf justice. Hx)did not have Ids subject matter well in hand, liis "delivery was tmmatuml and lie 'Jacked 1lie (usual force. On the wliole tins de bate is considered one of the strongest of the first preliminaries. The fourth division diseusred the question: Resolved, that the income tax measure passed by the second session of the Fifty-third congress was just and equitable. Affirmative, llalderson. Sackett. "Warner and Lee. Nega tive, Frazier, Payne. Wessel and Miss Stull. The judges were Profs. Ansley and Wilson and Dr. Hinman. Mr. Sackett had a systematically arranged speech, his delivery was effective. Mr. Payne wTas forcible in delivery but thi' arrangement of his speech could have been more connected and systematic. Miss Stull w.is thoroughly at home with her subject, she had a pleasing delivery. MONDAY nVKM2C. The fifth division debated in Delian hall. The question discussed was: Resolved, that the rical is of gnaur importance to society than ine conservative. Affirmative, Oury, Hawxby. Negative, Elgerton, Eidcm and O'Connell. Oury made a forcible speech but showed a lack of prcperation. Hawxby made a strong argument. Edgcrton and Eidem made logical speeches. O'Connell was forcible but his ar gument lacked coherence. The sixth division spoke in Palladian hall. The question discussed was: resolved, that a permanent national board should be :stab lished for tbe compulsory arbitration of diffi culties between fniploycr and employes. Affirmative. OaIc. Matson. Negative, Bur leigb and Burch. Cake was fluent but lacked strength and coherence in argument, Mafsyn made a idling speech. Burleigh was not atrlns best, Burch was logical but his manner was un impressive. The seventh division spoke in Union lia.ll. This division discussed tilie following question resolved, that the United States Avould Le justified in extending be'Uigerant Tahiti to Cuba, Affirmative, Bollcn'bach, Jones and Dassenbroolu Negative, Kinton, Ewart, Kfindlernnd Baker. Bollenbach nnd Evart mndelogical .speeches Ivindlerwasnt his hestu He spoke fluently jYrt with exceeding force. The mighty Ra!kr. W&2M&