The Hesperian / (Lincoln, Neb.) 1885-1899, June 09, 1894, Page 10, Image 10
10 THE HESPERIAN I1 91 ' rang as sharp and clear as bugle notes, and were obeyed with the precision with which they were given. When the long blue col umn came marching back to the grand stand the cheers were so long and loud that a few drops of rain fell. There is no doubt that if Company B had repeated the drill Nebraska would have been blessed with a rain which would have meant universal salvation. Next came the individual drill between . the four best drilled men of each company. The boys hold their places nobly, but the sixteen wore soon diminished to six, and the six to three. Those three stood it out to gether for a long time, but at last there were only two, Sergeant Weeks of Company A and Sergeant Pullis of Company B. Both men did some fine work, and Sergeant Pull is missed being first by almost an accident. The gold modal wont to Sergeant Weeks, the silver medal to Sergeant Pullis. After the markings had been figured up by the inspectors Lieutenant Wright, adju tant Second Infantry; Lieutenant Ponn, commandant at Omaha High School and Lieutenant Hardin, instructor at Donne, Mrs. E. E. Giffon, Mrs. Jnmos A. Cnnfiold, Mrs. E. H. Bnrbour nnd Mrs nnd Governor Crounso descended into the plnin. The batnllion lined up in dross parade nnd Adju tnnt General Wostorman announced the prizes. The drill of compnnios resulted in n vic tory for Company B, with n mnrk of 90.2. D Oompnny securod sacond plnco, obtaining a mark of 80.3. The winning company will bo in possession of tho Omaha cup and the University colors. Tho individual artill ery first prize, consisting of a gold medal, was won by Corporal Bonjamin, Company D, and Sergeant Weeks of Company A, won second prize. Tho artillery detachment drill was won by Company B. Tho officers of tho winning company are John W. Dixon, captain; W. A. Richmond, first lieutenant; Howard Rickotts, second lieutenant; Charles Elliott, first sergeant, and Joe Boardsloy, second sergeant. WOMEN AND POLITICAL ECONOMY. In a former communication to the College presB, reasons were given why women should study goliticnl economy ; or, to put the mat ter more explicitly, it was attempted to bo shown that there, is an absence of reason why women should not study political economy. It has come to stay; it needs no defense; and the burden of proof lies on those who claim that any normal motive excludes any portion of the student-world from its benefits. It may interest tho women of the Univer sity of Nebraska to learn to what extent tho prejudices of sex-differentiation have disap peared in tho case of their sisters in other universities. For tho purpose of gratifying tho desire for this much needed information, the following data are given, personally fur nished by tho professors of tho respective in stitutions, to whom acknowledgements for their kindness is hereby proffered. Although not expressly bo stated, oxcopt in the case of Bryn Mawr, it may be safely assumed that all tho work mentioned is elec tive. At Wollosloy, out of a total of 700 stud ents, some 30 are studying economics. No course is offered in sociology. At Bryn Mawr, out of 250 students, 70 are studying political and economic science. Of 40 graduate students, 10 are included in tho above 70. At Loland Stanford, Jr., are 075 students. Of those, 297 nro women. Of 50 studonts taking economics as a major study, 4 aro women. "Tho total registration of nil class es in this dopartmont is 255, of whom 38 aro women," At University of Chicago, out of n totnl (ostimntod) of 900 studonts, 241 nro women. Of tho lnttor, during tho past winter quurtor, 9 wore studying political economy; 13, po liticnl science; nnd 1 wns studying socinl science. Doducting nnmos inserted twico, wo hnvo 17 studying politicnl and economic science. Those probably all aro graduate women, who number altogether 72. At Ynssar, economics nro only opop, to