The Hesperian / (Lincoln, Neb.) 1885-1899, December 22, 1892, Page 12, Image 12
12 THE HESPERIAN flenses that nil can deal with it as they ploaso, but that no part of it has boon assigned to any particular individaul, and that tho limits of private possession have been left to bo iixed by 'man's own industry, and by tho laws of individual people. The object of this new tax is to euro tho evils of the present system of land-holding. But in attempting to euro the supposed evils of that system, greater ones are sure to bo created. Abolish the present system by direct methods, if it is necessary to abolish it, but not by taxation. Equity will not permit the one-fifteenth of the people of tho country to bear all the burdens of govern ment. Taxes are levied to satisfy collective wants, wants that spring from the organiza tion of society; and those who share in the benefits of society, in tho protection of tho state, must share as well in the burdens. It is a principle of wise taxation that taxes should be so levied that no one class of peo ple, or no one kind of property, should bear all the burden or bear more than an .equal and just share. Put all taxes on one class of persons and you at once unite them to protect their common interest. Put all taxes upon one kind of property and you at once create a class out of those who possess that property. It has been a maxim of tho American people, and it should continue to be, that there should be no taxation without representation, which means also that only those who are taxed should be represented. The single tax is recommended because it is an easy and simple method of providing for the revenue to support this government. While ease and simplicity are good things, neither that which is easy nor that which is fiimplo is always the best thing. Perhaps tho easiest and simplest way of getting rid of a man who annoys you is to shoot him. But it frequently happens, however, that this is not tho best way. If state ownership of land would, as Ilenry George claims, ex tirpate pauperism, abolish poverty, lessen crime, elevate morals and tastes and intelli gence, purify government, and carry civil ization to yet nobler heights, then indeed it is to bo devoutly desired. Is it not how ever true that tho causes of poverty are deep seated in tho naturo of men ; that human nature would need be revolutionized and formed anew before poverty would become unknown? Is it not true that the most ef fectual remedies for poverty must come through tho individual himself rather than through legislation from within rather than from without? Tho question . of the origin of private ownership or land has boon one of much dispute and confusion. It may be said, howevor, that its origin is not different from the origin of man's right to property in gen eral. Whether that origin is natural or conventional it is tho same with personal property. The single tax theorists cannot consistently destroy the property in tho one without destroying tho property in the other. If man has no natural right to exclusive ownership of land, how is it possible for a state to acquire that right ? Since the state is simply the people in their organized ca pacity, the rights of tho state are the rights of the individuals that compose the state. How would it be possible for a single state to stand out among the nations of the earth as a single individual and claim ownership of land? If an individual has a natural right to land then that right rests only in the whole people of tho globe, and in the state that includes all nations. Then may not the single tax theorists more consistently say with Marcus Aurelis while standing at the threshhold of tho Christian era, and looking forward seventeen centuries, "That men are under one common law, and if so, they must be fellow citizens and belong to tho same body politic. From whence it will follow that the whole world is but one common wealth." E. C. Stkode. Tfoe Big Cut. "I can think of nothing else, nothing else," and Olaf straightened up where he stood half way up the side of tho Big Cut, and drawing his sleevo across his forehead, looked down with a haggard face on tho JA