Image provided by: University of Nebraska-Lincoln Libraries, Lincoln, NE
About The Hesperian / (Lincoln, Neb.) 1885-1899 | View Entire Issue (March 1, 1892)
''""'w Mttl Till- IIESI'EKIAK. Tin Gi'i'iituii IllHlorlcal Sinnliiitr. I Extracts from Professor F. M. Fling's account of the German Historical Seminar published in the April and May numbers of the Academy. About two weeks after the opening of the semester, the first meeting of the seminar occurs. What I describe is what 1 actually experienced. Whether this picture is true, in all its details, ol work in other universities, 1 am unable to say. An American needs all of his mother wit to enable him to make his way during the first few months at Leipzig. The buildings of the academic department alone occupy nearly all the space enclosed by four streets, and the interior courts, intricate passages and antiquities of a like nature, are quite sure to perplex a man coming from a city where all the houses front on the street and every foot of ground is not utilized for building purposes. The rooms of the historical seminar are at No. 7 Universitatsstrasse. On the fourth floor, I paused before two substantial hard wood doors, very modern in appearance, bearing above them in large letters, "Ifistorischer Seminar." At this side of the door, was a German boot-cleaner with its brushes on top, sides, and bottom. Passing through a convenient ante-room, with its coat and umbrella rack and its bowls with running wa.or and an abundance of soap and towels, suggestive of clean hands and consequently unsoiled pages, I entered room No. III. The whole number of rooms devoted to the work of the historical seminar, inclusive of the ante-room, is five. Three face upon the street; No. I, ancient history; No. II, used for a library: No. Ill, modiiuval and modern history, while No. IV, a small back room of No. Ill, extending into the court, is used by students that are writing their theses and prearilig for exam ination. The corresponding departments from the ground floor up are used for the various seminars and institutes. All the members of the different division?) were present in room No. Ill, on this evening, ns Dr. Maurcnbrecher, the director, was to organize the work. I was acquainted with no one but the professor, and naturally did not feel quite Vm luutse." As I entered the apartment, at a few minutes after six, 1 was at once captivated by the scene taken in at a glance of the eye; the room was well filled with students, some read ing at the long tables, some standing in Tittle groups engaged in low conversation, while the shaded lights and the book cases in the dusky background, gave a charm to the picture that 1 at once acknowleged. The hands of the clock indicated the first quarter after six, and suddenly a solemn stillness pervaded the apartment. Each man standing up by his chair turned hjs face towards room No. IV, at 'he door of which Professor Muurenbrechcr appeared. A chair had been placed for him at the extremity of the short arc of the table, and near the door through which he had entered. Reaching this lie acknowledged the presence of the students by a bow and a "good evening, gentlemen," and then with a wave of the hand, requested them to be seated, while he remained Standing, his hand on the back of the chair. The professor is the life of a seminar, almost everything depends upon the individuality of the man, as it gives the color to the whole work. Maurcnbrecher has made a name as a writer on reformation history, and it is from that period, for the most part, that he selects the subjects for study and discus sion. To sit at the same table with a man who has spent forty years ot his life to the investigation of an historical period, to listen to his criticisms and suggestions, will fire a young stud ent as nothing else can. The remarks of the professor that evening might be summmed up under three heads; (a) prgliminary remarks, (b) hints upon historical investigation and study, and (c) rule and regulations of the seminar. He stated that the attendance, 56 in all, was larger than ever before. Consider in conneetidn with this that there are more than 3000 students at the univer sity, and it becomes at once evident that a relatively small number are studying history. On the second point, he gave as tlie rule of investigation, tlie advice once given by Sybul, "Follow up your subject until no man on Coil's earth knows more about it than you do." He then read the rules and reg ulations, keeping up a running commentary and softening his remarks upon fines by a good-natured laugh. I drew from his remarks that the rules were the outgrowth of experience, and that the welfare of the seminar demands a rigid enforce ment of them. Tlie professor then informed us that as our names were called we could come forward, receive the hand sehag, and obtain a card and key. The following Wednesday evening at a quarter after six, the students received Professor Maurcnbrecher with the same respect, and were recognized by him in the same gracious man ner as on the previous Saturday. This bearing of the German student toward his instructor makes a vivid impression on an American, it is so radically different from what we are used to at home; for witli us, however much we may honor a man, we are not accustomed to make a little god of him. This evening the professor's easy chair had been placed at the head of the long arm of the table, toward the street, and he was obliged to make quite a detour before reaching it. Tlie students stood in silence on both sides of the I. shaped table, and, as Maurcn brecher passed, they turned about so that their faces were con stantly toward him. A second later, we were all in our places, our eyes fixed upon the big man at tlie head of tlie table. , Note books, paper, pen, and ink, ami pencils were in use on air sides and the students were busily engaged in taking notes on the literature and divisions of the subject to bi studied, "Tlie Augslmrger Reichstag" I was very curious to learn just haw the work would bo laid out, and followed the "order of business" quite closely. The first topic taken up was the literature of tlie subject. This consisted of, first, tlie letters and reports of those who had taken an aetu-o part in the affaiis of the Rclchstng, hence, uyc witnesses; second, letters and reports of contemporaries, who did not get their material first hand, but being personally inter ested, were likely to draw it from reliable sources; third, works of later historians covering this ground. There was no extended discussion of the merits or demerits of the works, farther than an occasional statement that the writer was not In a position to obtain reliable infoi niation, was not an eye wit ness,1 or gave only one side of the story, while at the stunu time witnesses were named who supplied the counter version. Every book was expected to,e within reach of the students, if these were not to be found in the seminar library the senior librarian was instructed to bring them from the university library and retain them during tlie semester. The second topic was the divisions of the subject; thoru were nine. The professor enumerated thoni, and indicated the ground covered by each. Tlie distribution of the topics was particularly interesting. Looking .round tlie table a good-natured way, Maurcnbrecher asked who would lake the first, some one at once voluntered, and was received with ft smile and, "Ah! I thank you." Sometimes the students rose, at other times they did not, and "I'll take that" was the cus tomary expression. The whole affair was very informal, and whenever during tlie evening the men spoke, it was always with the utmost freedom and the evident feeling that they stood on an equal footing with the professor. 1 do not recall that two men ever voluntered to take the same topic, had that occurcd, Maurenbrechor would, doubtless, have exercised his " HWfcMgWWjtjlggJg muwtjMjMbMrjmtvi