The daily Nebraskan. ([Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-current, September 29, 1997, Page 4, Image 4
EDITOR Paula Lavigne OPINION EDITOR Jessica Kennedy EDITORIAL BOARD Erin Gibson Joshua Gillin Jeff Randall Julie Sobczyk Ryan Soderlin Guest VIEW The jungle Meat recalls should be made public (U-WIRE) GAINESVILLE, Fla. - When was the last time you were sick? Did you think it was something you ate, maybe that greasy cheeseburger you had last night at a downtown bar? Well, that might have been what it was. Records from the Agricultural Department show the public was never notified of federal recalls of more than 20.2 million pounds of meat and poultry since 1990, the Associated Press reported Wednesday. Officials had their reasons for recall ing the meat. Some was contaminated with bacteria. Other meats were peppered with bits of bone, metal or plastic. And yet oth ers were improperly labeled, or had defec tive containers, USDA reports show. Wait a second, didn’t anyone read Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle in high school? Apparently, most of the 142 recalls were on products either distributed to restaurants and school cafeterias, or were just sitting in warehouses or on trucks, and had not yet been distributed to retailers. Since the public would not be able to distinguish which meats were tainted, the department said it simply decided to keep me imormauon 10 lisen. uoesn i me puo lic deserve to know what kind of little bac terial microbes (excuse us if that is not the scientific term) are squirming about in its cheeseburgers? Well, this is how it works: The USDA does not make a recall public unless it is likely consumers have purchased the taint ed meat, or might still have it on hand. Apparently it does not matter if the public might have already consumed it. Then, officials within the industry work together to determine where the spoiled meat is, and they privately get it out of the system. So we are left to wonder, what kind of meat have we been eating for the past seven years? Industry officials claim they have nothing to gain by keeping their little secret to themselves. But we are not so sure. Why would some industry officials be dismayed over a new USDA Web site that posts details on every recall since 1990, whether they were public or not? “It has a potentially damaging effect on the companies involved,” said Bob Hibbert, an attorney for the Eastern Beef Processors Association. Well, yeah. But a cheeseburger with bits of metal and plastic in it can be dam aging too. Independent Florida Alligator (U. Florida) Editorial Policy Unsigned editorials are the opinions of the Fall 1997 Daily Nebraskan. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, its employees, its student body or the University of Nebraska Board of Regents. A column is solely the opinion of its author. The Board of Regents serve as publisher of the Daily Nebraskan; policy is set by the Daily Nebraskan Editorial Board. The UNL Publications Board, established by the regents, supervises the production of the paper. According to policy set by the regents, responsibility for the editorial content of the newspaper lies solely in the hands of its student employees. letter Policy The Daily Nebraskan welcomes brief letters to the editor and guest columns, but does not guarantee their publication. The Daily Nebraskan retains the right to edit or reject any material submitted. Submitted material becomes property of the Daily Nebraskan an<i cannot be returned. Anonymous submissions will not be published. Those who submit letters must identify themselves by name, year in school, major and/or group affiliation, if any. Submit material to: Daily Nebraskan, 34 Nebraska Union, 1400 R St. Lincoln, NE. 68588-0448. E-mail: letters@unlinfo.unl.edu. --J II ' • ~ 11 Cartoonist’s i VIEW . j f U£5 mg WA6E. DfpFERENCE BETWeeN I MPM AMD WOfAEN IS WIDENING AFAiN, l qjt t^t'S MOT REASON FoR CONCERN. yOfPBff1'1 - fig* m — .. ■ ■ ■—- — r TMERE ARE MANV factors /WVOLVeD: [ mMV women we hme TC> ^SE V/i/fpeRewt i-E^ea op wv /spuct/ws we Wb*nT W XS"*" '-a*wB: DN LETTERS My view I am writing in response to “In the toilet.” Yes, I am a member of the greek system. Yes, I have done my share of “sneaking” and toilet-paper ing. And yes, the greek system’s GPA is as high as stated. If what we choose to do to our houses offends you, I have two words of advice: DON’T LOOK. As soon as the staff of the DN starts paying my rent, they can tell me how to live in my house. Kelly Brey sophomore undeclared Another view While I realize that Lane Hickenbottom (Thursday) did not intend that his article be read as antifeminist, I think he needs to do a nine more mimang ^ana reacting; on a couple of the points he brought up. He makes the claim that femi nism has caused a situation where people do not “feel appreciated.” Perhaps he is unaware that patriarchal structures create situations where women and men are unappreciated. Women’s work goes unpaid, unrecognized, or worse, degraded. Men are forced into roles they might not be comfortable in. He writes that “in the past, a man came home after a day’s work where his wife and children were happy to see him.” This is the image that con servatives would like to put forth, but underneath the veneer, there were dif ferent stories: women and children physically, mentally or sexually abused, lesbians and gay men trapped into soulless marriages, and men who had extramarital affairs. He claims that feminism created the current economic situation, where families require two incomes to get by. This is a very difficult posi tion to maintain, particularly if one points out that capitalism, rather than feminism, has made the cost of living so high that in order to maintain a household of any kind, two incomes are required. Perhaps the divorce rates are due to factors other than men and women feeling unappreciated in their mar riages. Many women married young because they got pregnant, for exam ple, before abortion was legal. Many women entered into marriages with men who later became abusive. Many lesbian women and gay men entered into marriage before gay rights issues were raised in this country. The notion that the family can only be happy with one father, one mother, 2.4 children, a dog and a rose-covered picket fence has always been a patriarchal and heterosexist fantasy. Maybe they existed on televi sion, in the movies and in fiction. Lastly, I believe Mr. Hickenbottom should read current feminist thought before he declares “the feminist movement... an old car with a nnnctant hQr*Lrfinnr* nr^Klam ” He might find that feminist critiques of society are far more cutting-edge than he seems to believe. Robert W. Anderson graduate student English Clear view I am a student who takes the majority of my classes on City Campus, and have had the habit of spending my time in the Nebraska Union between classes. However, this a habit I am going to quickly break. The union used to be a place where I enjoyed a quick bite to eat and a chance to sit and read the DN, and it also used to be a chance for me to conveniently take a bio-break if need ed. Not anymore!! The union, in the glory of its construction, has left only seven toi let stalls for males compared to the roughly 17 we had in years past. Now, it doesn’t bother me that there are only seven stalls (all on the second floor, and one nearly overrun by construc tion anyway), but what does bother me is that only three toilet stalls have doors to ensure privacy. What does that mea&? It means that if three peo ple have to do their duty before me, I’m all of a sudden putting oil a pub lic performance. I CAN’T POOP LIKE THAT!!! Pardon the pun, but this is a bunch of crap. Are you seriously telling me that the union can’t afford four more doors for their bathroom ] stalls? Or are the construction guys ' playing a funny, cute prank on males? 1 I hope someone who works in the union does something about this, so I can quit making a stink. Jerry Ridell sophomore sociology 1 i: I Matt Haney/DN jj J 1 ........ - • ...... I V S < Send letters totBatly Nebraskan, 34 Nebraska Union, 1400 "R" St., Lincoln, ' ,%7 ' T” ' ■' ^ NJMI8588, or fax to (402) 472-1761, or e-mail <letters@unMnfo.unl.edu. Letters must be signed and include a phone number for verification