The daily Nebraskan. ([Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-current, February 28, 1996, Page 4, Image 4
Ohnion Nebraskan Editorial Board University of Nebraska-Lincoln J. Christopher Haiti..Editor, 472-1766 Doug Kouma.Managing Editor Doug Peters... ....Opinion Page Editor Sarah Scalet. ....Associate News Editor Matt Waite...Associate News Editor Michelle Garner.. Wire Editor » Jennifer Mapes.,y..Columnist Primary concern Arizona voters give race new pace And out of chaos came order. After the biggest single day so far in the 1996 presidential cam paign Tuesday, the race for the Republican nomination appears to be taking shape. The 1996 presidential campaign has now seen three solid candi dates emerge. Senate majority leader Bob Dole picked up needed victories in North Dakota and South Dakota. Pat Buchanan, who scored an upset victory in New Hampshire, failed to win another race but picked up some delagates in the Dakotas. Meanwhile, Steve Forbes, who was left for dead after finishing far back in Iowa and New Hampshire, scored the biggest single victory so far by taking the winner-takc-all Arizona primary and its 39 delegates. Gramm is gone. Soon to follow will be Bob Doman, Alan Keyes, Dick Lugar and Morry Taylor, who have all finished far back in the contests so far. Lamar Alexander, who got a boost from strong third place finishes in Iowa and New Hampshire, still has not won any state and seems to be fading fast. The largest question ringing in the minds of political pundits af ter Tuesday’s primaries is who among Dole, Forbes and Buchanan is the frontrunner? It seems as though the Buchanan bashing since the columnist and spcechwriter won New Hampshire has helped resurrect the Dole and Forbes campaigns. The Buchanan campaign is on the losing side of a noticeable shift in momentum — he and his extremist views arc likely to continue to fade. However, the issues he has raised may continue to shape the campaign on into November. That leaves Dole and Forbes — two well-financed candidates. Dole has his intricate nationwide political organization. Forbes has his personal fortune and the flat tax. Dole is the experienced Wash ington politician. Forbes is the anti-establishment outsider. The two men have positioned themselves well. Where things will go from here is anyone’s guess. Both men have a mainstream ap peal that will win diem votes across the nation. The deciding factor will be whether the wins in the Dakotas will invigorate Dole, who has looked tired, even exhausted, at times during this campaign. If Dole can run an energetic campaign, he may be able to hold off Forbes. If not, the “outsider” may just find himself an “in.” Staff editorials represent die official policy of the Fall 1995 Daily Nebras kan. Policy is set by the Daily Nebras kan Editorial Board. Editorials do not necessarily reflect die views of the university, its employees, the students or die NU Board of Regents. Editorial columns represent the opinion of the author. The regents publish die Daily Nebraskan. They establish die UNL Publications Board to supervise die daily production of the paper. Accord ing to policy set by the regents, respon sibility for die editorial content of die newspaper lies solely in the hands of its students. The Daily Nebraskan welcomes brief letters to the editor from all readera and interested others. Letters will be selected for publication on the basis of clarity, originality, timeliness and space available. The Duly Nebraskan retains the right to edit or reject all material submitted. Readers also are welcome to submit mate rial as guest opinions. The editor decides whether material should nm as a guest opinion. Letters and guest opinions sent to the newspaper become the property of the Deify Nebraskan and cannot be re turned. Anonymous submissions will not be pub lished. Letters should include the author’s name, year in school, major and group affiliation, if any. Re quests to withhold names will not be granted. Submit material to: Daily Nebraskan, 34 Nebraska Union, 1400 R St Lincoln, Neb. 685884)448. ONE TWO HOT COVERED EY THE OSim EMBARGO ‘Geezers’ stay ' active Now wait jusl a gosh-dum minute, Brian Priesman! Do I detect geezerAliscrimination in your latest review, no one wants to see old people kissing...”? Since when did you young pups get a monopoly on displays of affection, in movies or real life, anyway? Keep in mind that there is love and affection and even sex after 35. And after 45,55, 65, etc. Besides the scene could not have been any more repulsive than some of the scenes depicting the amateur gropings and carrying on by you young unskilled folks. You’d better watch the pros—you might leam something. On behalf of geezers everywhere Jerry Frobom University Libraries via e-mail Truth hurts Veera Supinen's columns have provoked a somewhat defensive reaction from two ironically optimis tic scientists (Feb. 23). I empathize with Julie Paschold’s view that Europe is not perfect, just as the U.S. isn't perfect, but Ms. Supinen is not a “foreigner” to Europe, nor is she living there. I am glad she has the valuable opportu nity to hold a mirror up to Nebraska, to comment cm whatever flaws she might see. If Ms. Pascbold were in Ms. Supinen's native country and had a similar opportunity, I hope she would do the same. Professor Ilya Fabrikant raises a true point about the tolerance of America to dissident or foreign opinions. People of our country are fairly tolerant, in that we do not often resort to violence to quiet the throats of dissenters. I think the voices of immigrants such as Prof. jr s7~u.u % G~#t~ jzrrO jtmrt J Bret Gottschall/DN Fabrikant are, more than anything else, responsible for such tolerance in our country. Veera Supinen raises some important questions about the character of American civilization. For instance, America’s death penalty is evidence of some power ful contradictions about the value of human life in our nation, and Ms. Supinen is not the first to wonder how civilized a country really is if its response to crime is to murder the criminal. As the most powerful nation on the planet, the United States must realize that the world holds us to a high standard, and when we falter, the world is rightfully quick to judge. We falter much too often to retain a uniformly rosy picture of ourselves. We must acknowledge rather than avoid our responsibility for the negative, if we plan to first “concen trate on the positive.” I want to thank Veera Supinen for her thoughtful, well-written columns. She deserves our respect, our attention and, if necessary, our tolerance. Scott Wesely alumnus, class of 1990 Lincoln Column unfair to candidates In regard to Jennifer Mapes’ column “Primary Peeves” (Feb. 26): Please offer me real evidence, i,f you are going to say there is a weak selection of GOP candidates running in the primaries. Your statements are illogical, “dime a dozen,” and stereotypically degrading, serving no purpose. You sum up candidates by saying Bob Dole is dumb because he seeks the presidency and needs to seek the Wizard to give him a brain; Steve Forbes could be an alien; Lamar and Honey Alexander have , funny names; and Pat Buchanan is the head of the party for racists. Your use of humor and ignorance of the candidates divert attention from your main argument. If you actually knew they were weak, you would tell me why instead of just boring me with mindless name-calling. You say of people running for the presidency, “I’m deeply suspicious of anyone dumb enough to want the job in the first place. The hours are terrible, and no matter what you do, millions of people will be furious with you.” First of all, what is to be suspicious about someone who is not intelli gent? Second, is anyone who runs for the job really dumb? Some people find satisfaction in working hard, and the millions of people they help overshadow the ones who are “furious.” George Washington and Abraham Lincoln were dumb? This is a new argument. These men held together the nation in times of crisis and triumphed over adversity and cynical people who lacked wisdom to see at the level of great men. Bill Armstrong junior agribusiness Send your brief letters to: Daily Nebraskan, 34 77/0 IMlim Nebraska Union, 1400 R St., ■■■■El Lincoln, Neb. 68588, or Fax “XT'! i to (402)472-1761, or email I XI r\”tf*d C l^d id betters @ unlinfo.unl.edu.> X d Ml dOJV^lll Letters must be signed and l include a phone number for y verification.