Opinion NetJraskan Wednesday, October 27,1993 Nebraskan Editorial Board University of Nebraska-Lincoln Jeremy Fitzpatrick Kathy Steinauer Wendy Mott. Todd Cooper. Chris Hopfensperger Kim Spurlock. Kiley Timperley . . . Editor. 472-1766 Opinion Page Editor Managing Editor .Spoils Editor . . . Cop}’ Desk Chief .Sower Editor Sen ior Photographer Km inui \i Rumor mill Expedite investigation to end speculation The beating of Boon-Chung Ong, a University of Ncbraska Lincoln student from Malaysia, has been talked about since it happened shortly after midnight Oct. 17. Rumors have been spreading rampantly about who did it, why it happened and if the beating was racially motivated. UNL police have identified three men as suspects in the assault; two arc not students, and one is. All three arc black. One of the nonstudent suspects was cited on third-degree assault charges in Omaha Monday night. The suspect was a juvenile and was not identified. UNL Police Chief Ken Caublc said another suspect was interviewed by police Tuesday night. Caublc said the man, who is not a UNL student, offered additional information on the assault and was not cited at the time of the interview. Caublc said he would not make additional arrests until he was certain of the suspects’ involvement. Rumors have spread about the assault. Why did the athletic department assist in the investigation? Some rumors have said that football players were involved. Until this matter is resolved, the rumors will continue to spread. UNL police need to expedite their investigation so this matter can be resolved. The police need enough time to fully complete their investigation, but they also need to fully disclose the facts of this case as soon as they can. The rumors about this case need to be stopped. Only after the case is fully brought to light will speculation be replaced by facts. Others’ View Chalk one up for Lutherans. A new report from the leadership of the Lutheran Church offers a welcome reality check to religious crusaders in the moral wars. The report tells Lutherans — among other things — that masturbation is healthy, homosexuality is biblically justifiable and using condoms is not sinful, but morally imperative. When the pope issued statements about human sexuality over the summer, he took the opposite position on these issues. He lambasted homosexuality and birth control, and he launched a broad attack on humanistic values. The Lutherans’ message of tolerance is a happy alternative. Their stance toward human sexuality is a model for a harmonious relationship between religion and life. In order for democracy to function, there must be a certain level of tolerance. Protection of free speech relies on the tolerance of offensive speech. Equal opportunity in the secular world relies on tolerance differing lifestyles — and religions. Whenever a moral line is drawn dividing good from evil, tolerance is threatened. On the other hand, that line is drawn all the time. Democracy exists in the delicate balance between moral dichotomies and forbearance. The moral code handed down by the Lutheran church seems to embrace democratic tolerance. By accepting masturbation, homosexuality and birth control, the Lutheran Church accepts and tolerates people as they are. — The Minnesota Daily University of Minnesota I HI I nl