The daily Nebraskan. ([Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-current, July 08, 1993, Summer, Page 4, Image 4
Opinion Nebraskan Thursday, July 8,1883 Nebraskan -v Editorial Board University of Nebraska-Lincoln Jeff Singer. Jeremy Fitzpatrick... Jeff Zeleny..... Sam Kepfield.. Anne Sleyer.•..,,. ‘. Editoki \l Enough press Editor, 472-1766 . Features Editor .Copy Desk Chief .Columnist ... Staff Reporter Media attention too high for Bjorklund Last week’s decision to bring in a jury outside of Lincoln for the Roger Bjorklund trial could have and should have been avoided. Judge Donald Endacott ruled that due to circumstances surrounding the Bjorklund case, a jury from Sidney would be chosen to decide on the innocence or guilt of Bjorklund for the murder of University of Ncbraska-Lincoln Candice Harms last year. But what was the main reasoning for having to send 344 miles away for Bjorklund to get a “fair” trial? The majority of the blame can be placed on the media’s shoulders, as more often than not, freedom of the press has been used too generously in the seven months since Bjorklund's arrest. It was the court’s belief that Bjorklund could not receive an impartial trial from a Lancaster County jury, thus the residents of a small town in western Nebraska now have to be bused to Lincoln for Bjorklund’s trial. But had the local media not feasted on every little move that Bjorklund made, maybe he could have had a trial by his peers, as the U.S. Constitution stales, which is supposed to mean by those in the community that the crime occurred. So did being bombarded with information on a daily basis about him defending himself need as much attention as it did? Or when he changed his mind and decided he wanted appointed counsel to help him in his ease — did he deserve this maneuver to receive the media hype that transpired? The best way to show how the press has gone overboard in deciding what is vital for the citizens of Lincoln to know, was when Bjorklund decided to go on a brief hunger strike, and again he had the media in the palm of his hand over an issue that did not deserve a place in the classified ads. It has almost gone to the point where defendant Bjorklund has a media caravan following his every move. Being given the right to a fair trial is a right in the Constitu tion that needs to be upheld, so Endacolt’s decision was just, / but it is too bad that the media had to play such an influence upon the judicial system. F.DITOKI\i Pouo Staff editorial* represent the official policy of the Summer 1993 Daily Nebraskan. Policy it tel by the Daily Nebraskan Lditorial Hoard, Hditorials do not necessarily reflect the views of the university, its employees, the students or the NU Board of Regents. Ldilorial columns represent the opinion of the author. The regents publish the Daily Nebraskan. They establish the UNL Publications Board to supervise the daily production of the paper. According to policy set by the regents, responsibility for the editorial content of the newspaper lies solely in the hands of its students. I t 111« Policy The Daily Nebraskan welcomes brief letters to the editor from all readers and interested others. Letters will be selected for publication on the basis of clarity, originality, timeliness and space available. The Daily Nebraskan rcuins the right to editor reject all material submitted. Readers also arc welcome to submit material as guest opinions. The editor decides whether material should run as a guest opinion. Letters and guest opinions sent to the newspaper become the property of the Daily Nebraskan and cannot be returned. Anonymous submissions will not be published. Letters should included the author’s name, year in school, major and group affiliation, if any. Requests to withhold names will not he granted. Submit material to the Daily Nebraskan, 34 Nebraska Union, 1400 R St., Lincoln, Neb. 68588-0448. COULD YOU GIVE ME A SPOT-? / Sam Kkimiku) Racial disparity lingers in U.S. On its last day for the 1992 1993 term, the U.S. Supreme Court held the 12th Congres sional district in North Carolina was gerrymandered in such a way as to be possibly violative of while voters’ rights. The district, 160 miles long, snakes through the stale, at times no wider than an interstate highway. The thinking was that if you put blacks in a majority, they will elect a black to Congress. If you’re Lani Guinicr, this Congressman will be a “true” black leader, unsullied by sell ing his soul to the wh i tc man to achieve power. Such is the state of the civil rights movement today. Now, under the leadership of Ben jamin Chavis, the NAACP wants to redefine its focus and intensify fundraising. How to revive the mori bund body? Chavis coined the term “environmental racism” to describe putting toxic waste in minority com munities, combining two politically correct hot buttons. He also signed an agreement with the parent company of Denny’s for $1 billion in job oppor tunities over the next seven years. Ai the same time, paradoxically, the Ku Klux Klan is trying to reestab lish itself in my home state of Kansas. Thrown out of Kansas in the 1920s, the Klan is aiming for a January rally at the capitol building to protest the Martin Luther King holiday. As if Kansas didn’t have enough problems with image, it’s now going to be put in the same light with Arizona. The Klan leadership today is a concoction, of vicious Nazi kooks, hell-bent on exterminating blacks, Catholics, and Jews from the face of the Earth. And yet, the KKK leader ship is emboldened enough to resur rect itself in the Sunflower State. A former Klansman can run for Gover nor of Lousiana, and attract a respect able percentage of the vote. How docs this fringe clement attract thousands of new members, and uncounted si lent sympathizers? When David Duke ran for Senate, The old spirit of self reliance is gone, re placed by the federal dollar. With this comes the sad fact that Martin Luther King is a holiday that the Kansas KKK will protest, and Malcom X is nothing more than a slick marketing ploy to sell ball caps and Jerseys. then for Governor, then for President, he was often criticized as the inevita ble result of— yes, you guessed it— “12 years of Rcagan-Bush ” It was now OK for people to be racist, to be bigoted, to be justplain uncaring about the plight of the less fortunate in our society. That’s the easy, feel-good explanation. The truth is that David Duke struck a note with the American people. It was not one of racism, but one of protest against good intentions run amok. The civil rights movement, in its early days, strove for political equal ity under the law, but it also fought for economic equality. The early leaders knew that economic freedom was the source of all liberty, that without it life is meaningless. Black leaders from Booker T. Washington to Marlin Luther King and even Malcom X preached economic self-sufficiency as a key to freedom. They voted Re publican up until 1960. After the great battles were won, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, after King and Malcom X were dead, the focus somehow shifted. Equality of oppor tunity gradually became equality of result. It wasn’t enough that blacks were given a level playing field, be cause the centuries of white oppres sion made fair play impossible. Affir mative action and quotas were needed to make it “fair.” All this time, the Great Society began shackling more people than ever to poverty; $1.7 trillion dollars later, the ghettos arc worse than ever before. The solution from the NAACP? More money. The result is predictable. The I irc man in Philly, the construction work er in Chicago, saw people getting ahead just because they were black, not because of talent. The blue-collar guy believed he had to work and sweat to gel ahead, while blacks got into college or jobs because of their skin color, or lived on welfare and had the nerve to say that the federal gov ernment wasn’t throwing enough of its tax dollars at them, or that the American people didn’t care because they were racists. By focusing on special rights, by ignoring economic equality and by becoming slavish adherents to the liberal plantation mentality of the Democratic Party, the NAACP has de-lcgitimixcd itself in the public eye, creating a backlash. Exclusively harp ing on past injustice obscures a future controlled by economic freedom. The old spirit of self-reliance is gone, replaced by the federal dollar. With this comes the sad fact that Martin Luther King is a holiday that the Kansas KKK will protest, and Malcom X is nothing more than a slick marketing ploy to sell ball caps and jerseys. Kcpfldd is a graduate student in history, an alumnus of the L'NL College of Law and a Summer Daily Nebraskan columnist.