The daily Nebraskan. ([Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-current, March 22, 1990, Page 4, Image 4
Editorial 1 Daily Nebraskan Editorial Board University of Nebraska-Uncoin Amy lid wards. Editor, 472-1766 Bob Nelson, Editorial Page Editor Ryan Sleeves, Managing Editor [iric Pfanner, Associate News Editor Lisa Donovan, Associate News Editor Brandon Loomis, Wire Editor Jana Pedersen, Night News Editor Resolution needed Homosexuals deserve military opportunities The Association of Students of the University of Nebraska on Wednesday passed what is possibly the best resolution introduced in the senate this year. Introduced by Engineering Sen. Paul Pouiosky, the resolution protests the ban of gays and lesbians from U.S. military organizations and supports the inclusion of ! homosexuals in ROTC programs. It’s about time. For far too long, the U.S. military has kept gay and . lesbian students from opportunities offered through its ] programs. Military officials claim homosexuals in the 1 U.S. Armed Forces are a security threat because they can be bribed. People can be bribed only if they have something to » hide, and homosexuals would have nothing to hide if the I U.S. Armed Forces allowed them to reveal their sexual identity without facing some form of punishment. Other claims or low morale are vana only to tnose wno are too closed-minded to accept others’ differences. UNL’s student government is not the only one that has recognized that fact. Resolutions at other universities range from those condemning the ROTC’s discriminatory policies to those that will end ROTC classes if the pro grams aren’t changed in two years. Rochelle Slominski, a business administration senator, opposed the resolution, saying only the U.S. government should deal with the military’s policy. Bullshit. ASUN’s resolution doesn’t alter the military’s policy. It only encourages a necessary change. And if enough universities oppose that discrimination, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Department of Defense may be forced to make that change. Discrimination -- for any reason -- is inherently wrong. ASUN should be congratulated for its move. Hopefully, Slominski and others who oppose that move will realize that it is up to the people who support the U.S. Armed Forces to force the government to respect the rights of everyone. •• Amy Edwards for the Daily Nebraskan Election litter troubles student ▼▼cii, iiuw nidi uit noun ciuu lions are over, who gels lo clean up ihc campus? Walking lo class Thurs day morning, 1 picked up a dozen various orange, yellow and while pieces of paper along with slickers care lessly crumpled up and scattered across campus. The messages on these balls of pulp read basically the same: “Vote AS UN." My sightings of this gar bage were limited to campus only. Who knows how much of this "Vote AS UN" garbage has blown off cam pus and into other people’s yards. Did anyone handing these fliers out ever uiin* uiai mosi 01 incm would be crumpled up and thrown away by people apalhclic to AS UN and even more apalhclic to the environment? Maybe some restraint should be taken on how many of these flyers arc dis tributed. Litter is a high price to pay for a token student government. I’d like to see some of these newly elected persons out picking up some of the garbage leftover from their "glori ous” victory. Luke J. Barker senior electrical engineering letter i_ The Daily Nebraskan welcomes brief letters to the editor from all readers and interested others. Readers also are welcome to sub mit material as guest opinions. Whether material should run as a let ter or guest opinion, or not to run, i left to the editor's discretion. Submit material to the Daily Nc braskan, 34 Nebraska Union, 1400 F St., Lincoln, Neb. 68588-0448. The Daily Nebraskan welcomes brief letters to the editor from all readers and interested others. Letters will be selected for publi cation on the basisofclarily,original ity, timeliness and space available. The Daily Nebraskan retains the right to edit all material submitted. Readers also are welcome to sub mit material as guest opinions. Whether material should run as a let ter or guest opinion, or not to run, is left to the editor’s discretion. Letters and guest opinions sent u the newspaper become the property o the Daily Nebraskan and cannot h relumed. Letters should be typewrit ten. Anonymous submissions will no be considered for publication. Letter should include the author’s name year in school, major and group affili ation, if any. Requests to withhoU names will not be granted. Submit material to the Daily Ne braskan, 34 Nebraska Union, 1400 F Sl, Lincoln, Neb. 68588-0448. lUftSHumi * |i»7"w"s4en » fmL moved to bettep M tZH SEP\/P TUr Lf?, r**-; rr ® 5t ^E ™E PEOPLE > *>1 M|gpltopv bipds ruk%E j-' J FOLLOW DETOup sic,ms, t « -W— Everyone can learn from Haiti Preserving a tree would save much more than a shady spot Haiti is once again a roiling mess of blood and revolt, if it was ever anything else. Gen eral Prosper Avril has been booted from the old general’s home like Nam phy before him. Ertha Pascal-Trouil lot, a Supreme Court justice, heads the provisional government. Our State Department louts the new leader as a positive force for democracy. But then, the State Department was optimistic about Avril, loo. Stabilizing their small comer of the Caribbean may be impossible no matter who runs the government. Haiti’s problems arc deep rooted -- hence the people's movement; “dcch oukaj,” to uproot a tree so it will never grow back. Dcchoukaj is prac ticed to clear fields for planting. It became a slogan signifying the up rooting of the hated bully-boys Ton tons Macoutc, former dictator Papa Doc’s terrorist gang who still exert influence on the island nation. Haiti is the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. Poverty is rampant. Food is scarce. The country once was one of the world’s most productive nations. Now it imports most of its food. In 1983, fear of swine flu led the Haitian government with the United Slates prompting to kill all native pigs. Pigs were a large source of peasant income and a staple food. The United Slates supplied Haiti with replace ment swine; however, these were unlike the hearty, nauve breed that thrived on garbage and scrub. The American ■ pigs needed pampering by compari , son. Governmental abuse in dislribu s lion and peasants’ fears of a U.S. conspiracy to control the economy have made the replacement plan a • fiasco. The peasants were Jell with > even less than before and had virtu ally no recourse to recoup the income their swine had brought. In a country that can’t feed itself, propped up by U.S. aid of billions of dollars, importing most of its food ’ and still unable to feed its people, an [ agriculture program aimed at atlain ' ing self-sufficiency would seem to be a reasonable proposal. But it could be too late for Haiti to feed its people from its own land. Haiti is becoming a desert. Charcoal has long been a primary I source of fuel in Haiti. It is cheap and easily made. Hundreds of trees are chopped up and thrown in a pit. A slow fire is set. Earth is poured over the burning wood. With loo little oxygen to burn to ashes, the wood chars. When peasants lost their pigs, they needed a new source of income. Trees became that income. Certainly, it was exports that robbed Haiti of its mahogany groves. And many trees would have become char coal without the swine disaster. But the need for food and cash (formerly provided by pigs) accelerated the deforestation. This peasant, charcoal economy left Haiti a virtual wasteland. In 1920, 60 percent of Haiti had heavy forest cover. Today, less than 5 percent is forested. That 5 percent is comprised of six tracts greater than 20 square miles. Trees are wonderful, hard plants. They give shade, arc famous for dim bability and hold soil and moisture. Their disappearance coincides with the disappearance of Haiti’s topsoil. In tropical soils, 90 percent of the soil’s total nutrients arc found in the upper four inches of soil. Without trees to hold this soil, it quickly washes away. Rivers flow in torrents carry ing soil to the sea. Unchecked by trees, rivers’ effectiveness for irriga tion is reduced. Haiti’s topsoil is in the Caribbean. The land is left dry and infertile. A November 1987 National Geo graphic article, “Haiti Against All Odds,’ ’displays a chilling aerial pho tograph. The photo shows a moun tainous border between Haiti and the Dominican Republic, which shares the island of Hispaniola with Haiti. The Dominican land is densely for ested, lush and green. The Haitian land’s brown dirt and rocky outcrop pings arc hare except for a few fra//led trees on the slopes, standing lonely, easily countable in their rocky isola tion. The same article notes that all of Haiti’s 30 watersheds have been de forested and that potable water is available to only 23 percent of the population. Haiti's ecological nightmare is intriguing because the United States shares a horrible statistic with Haiti. Both countries have less than 5 per cent of their native forestlands re maining. In the U.S., limber on national forest tracts is sold by the Forest Serv ice to the limber industry. The gov ernment, however, docs not make a profit from selling this timber. The National Forest Service has an annual budget deficit of more than SI bil lion. Because it is less expensive to cut old growth timber sold cheaply by the government, there is little incentive for private industry to grow and har vest forests specifically planned for timber production. The government has undercut the timber market mak ing speculators slaver over the na tion’s public forests. Two-thirds of the timber cut in the Northwest is exported as logs, chips or pulp. The timber industry is selling an irreplaceable natural resource be longing to all citizens — our virgin forests - overseas. Since the govern ment subsidizes the timber industry through low-cost timber sales that produce a return which cannot cover replacement costs of trees, the nation is paying for this rape without exact ing the cost of rehabilitation. The limber industry is a necessary and viable part of the national econ omy. Trees must be harvested. Recy cling can only dent our need for wood products. So why should we worry over the deforestation of our public old growth forests? Old growth forests are balanced, self-sustaining ecosystems that pro vide water and clean air. They main tain topsoil and prevent runoff. De forestation causes soil loss in the area of the cut and degradation of sur rounding land. Our old growth forests arc the last strongholds of the forests that once covered all but the Great Plains and the Southwest They are a record of millennia of natural interaction, a storehouse of the genetic composi tion of this land. They arc a record of how life on this continent developed and sustained itself before man de stroyed the balance. They are a scien tific trove that gives to the nation without requiring maintenance. Seventy-two percent of the nation ’ s forestland is privately owned. These lands could easily support the timber industry if public timber sales did not undercut private investment. Once the old growth forests are gone, they arc gone forever. Haiti is finding that out now. BatUstoni is a senior English major and Daily Nebraskan columnist.