Letters ‘support’ tickets, killing homeless System will help stuff police wallets In response to J.K. Purtzer’s letter (Daily Nebraskan, March 15), it is obvious that Purtzer has no idea what a computerized ticket system will do for the campus police. The increased simplicity will al low them to increase the number of tickets issued and in the end get the money faster. Not only will the police and their ticket people have more money to spend at the new U-Stop by their station but instead of having to buy new Porsches as mentioned by Purtzer, they will be able to take on the Don Johnson approach and drive Ferraris (our police only deserve the very best). It would be stupid to improve the parking situation at UNL because thol rlAarlt/ rr*r% on nnm her of tickets issued. That would then force the police to cut back the fund ing on the new U-Stop. I propose that the number of parking stalls at the University of Ncbraska-Lincoln be decreased and also randomly rotate the numbered lots throughout the day as to allow more tickets to be issued. In addition to this, I believe that cars from the same county as the day of the month should be towed. Purtzer, now that you have seen the other side of the story, I am sure that you will agree that the computer system needs to be implemented. Troy L. Huffman junior Arts and Sciences Reader supports change in format I applaud Chuck Green’s column on the need for a progressive radio station here in Lincoln (DN, March 13). I have only one thing to point out. Our dear friend Chuck doesn’t need a few hundred thousand dollars lying around. He just needs a few thousand students with five minutes to spend. KRNU is a university radio station and it should serve the students of this university. If students such as you and I, Chuck, would write to professor Richard Alloway or Larry Walklin in the broadcasting department, per haps we students can change the music format. It only makes sense; there are 10 or so top 40 radio stations that serve Lincoln. Why should KRNU com pete in a market where it is not ca pable of competing? I urge every student who hates Debbie Gibson, Def Leppard, Win ger, Tiffany, Huey Louis and the News and Guns ‘N’ Roses as much as I do to write in and change it I spend two hours a week in the KRNU studios playing that dreaded top 40 music and believe me, I’ve contemplated suicide more than once during those two hours. So if not for the music, please for my sanity write to the broadcasting department. Mark Holt man sophomore broadcasting Reader: Homeless will be ‘killed’ As the weather turns warmer, the number of homeless people who populate the streets is bound to once again increase. A friend of mine from North Dakota once told me that they have a saying up there, “20 below keeps the riff-raff out.” The riff-raff, the street people, the homeless, what’s in a name? Rather than the conventional method of ridding our streets of riff-raff by committing them to mental hospitals, jailing them, or giving them one-way bus tickets to nowhere (greyhound ther apy), I propose a method which will, once and for all, eliminate the prob lem of unsightly people bothering us by asking for handouts or loitering in the finer parts of town. Kill them. Kill them all. The state could pass a statute which would proscribe death to anyone who could not show they had permanent shelter. A time limit could be set so all those who are really just “free loading” off government programs could get seri ous about joining the rest of us in living out some version of the Ameri can Dream. I suggest a year, two at the absolute most. What would be the effect of such a policy? I am not sure. My hope would be that people would prioritize find ing shelter for the homeless. With the real threat of death imminent for anyone to be found without a home, maybe serious programs at the state and federal levels would finally be realized. On a more personal scale, in passing the homeless on the street, people might be moved to action knowing that inaction would result in death. The homeless would become visible people, rather than the trans parent population they arc now. I can already hear arguments that “such a proposal is ludicrous, it sim ply can’t be done. After all,” some would say, “the homeless are people Inn iinH lh(*u hav#» f'lrvncti»iili/-vna1 rights. Why just recently they fought in court and won the right to vote.” Some would probably shout other legal arguments, ‘‘Hey, you can’t punish someone for having a particu lar status, like homelessness. And even if you could, the punishment of death in this instance is cruel and unusual,” etc, etc. I would even be willing to concede some or all of these points, but argue that the plan is still not fatally flawed. The Constitution, after all, can be amended or reinterpreted. But there is one argument that cannot be rebutted; that the proposal is inhumane. What, I m ight ask, is the current policy to deal with the home less? The current policy is not to kill them, but to let them die. Just as we do not sec them live, we do not see them die. We assume that all is, if not well, then at least manageable be cause we are not tripping over bodies on the sidewalk. Granted the dying process under the current policy may lake more than a year or two, but the result is the same. And what impera tive does the current policy hold for dealing with the homeless? None. SCHWINN dew «’0AltT&ofv£ Ji'Lv jK&ii-*’1989 NO. 0.1.«». _ _ I at both »tor*» SCHWINN CYCLING AND FITNESS 1517 No. Cotner Y 2 locatioms^ 3321 Pioneers 464-6952 ^ * 488-2101 Hrs: So. Store — M-F 8-8, Sat. 8-5, Sun. 12-5; No. Store — M-F 9-6, Thurs. 9-8, Sat. 9-5, Sun. 1-4 At least under my proposal, our show those struggling to cope with attitudes and concerns are made ex- life, plicit. Mark Small graduate student law/psychology Reader: Women must have choice In response to the controversy which has surfaced in the editorials and reader mail of the Daily Nebras kan concerning the moral aspects of abortion, I offer this contribution. The sanctity of human life is an ideal, a concept, a theoretical goal to which we, as human beings, need to aspire. Life’s realities are less clearly defined, often cruel, and burdened with the judgmental considerations of relative worth. The potential for humanity exists in the very fact of fertility so certainly the conceived unborn is viable as a future being. Musi we, as a society, couny me relative weight of worth assigned mother and child as separate entities while they physically exist as one? Anti-abortion fervor seems all to vociferous in its castigation and sub tly lacking in its compassion. Women who feel that they must have abortions, for whatever reasons, must be enabled by our society to reflect upon and pursue that option as they choose. Without this respect for the relative weight of worth of the physically mature female human being in our, at best imperfect species and civilization, than the relative weights of worth given the embryo and fetus arc meaningless. Those advocates of reversal of the Roc vs. Wade decision, please see through the anger at the injustices of death to the empathy Christ admonished us to James L. Willns junior Teachers College Senator perturbed by DN accusation Once again, the Daily Nebraskan has ferreted out a non-issue in order to blast the Residence Hall Associa tion. On Tuesday, Curt Wagner ac cused the entire RHA Senate of being unethical. I, for one, feel that a blan ket statement has again been made accusing the entire senate of having complete disregard for their bylaws and as you say, “any type of ethics.” It is ironic that you w ould criticize us for our lack of ethics when only a week ago, in the same space, you attacked us for our overt concern w ith ethics. Are we ethical or unethical? We know that the answer is “Yes!” Dui uo you: i ne rsn/\ senate works very hard for our constituents; and most of us follow the rules and still manage to get several things accom plished each meeting. I think what you were trying to say was that a select few try to undermine the true motives of the Senate. The letters were not written from the Senate, but from only select indiv idu als with only personal motives in mind. Instead you choose to accuse all of us and that is wrong. I stand by the current bylaws and have no prob lem working within them. In the fu ture I hope the DN will realize this and write their editorials appropri ately. John Gibson Cather senator Editor's Query: You are ethical and unethical? HIM H ■ »■■■■■! II ..■ SHI ■■Hill ■ I >■ ■ ■ COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTANCY FALL 1989 SCHEDULE (cxceipts) VATC Oil A VOf?C CHANGED SECTIONS, CALL NUMBERS, ROOMS Call No. Course No. Hrs. Sect. Time Room Intro Acctg. 0031 Note: Exams 201 3 901 07:30-08:20 MWE CBA 123 0033 for all Acct. 201 3 902 07:30-08:20 MWE CBA 229 0003 201 are sched- 201 3 010 08:00-09:15 TR CBA 142* 0041 uled at 17:30 201 3 903 08:30-09:20 MWE CBA 115 0046 onTues.as 201 3 904 08:30-09:20 MWE CBA 142 0048 announced 201 3 905 09:30-10:20 MWE CBA 232 0002 eachmonth. 201 3 020 11:00-12:15 TR CBA 142* 0055 Coordinator: 201 3 906 11:30-12:20 MWE CBA 117 0057 Carpenter 201 3 907 12:30-13:20 MWE CBA 115 0061 201 3 908 12:30-13:20 MWE CBA 120 0066 201 3 909 13:30-14:20 MWE CBA 110 0068 201 3 910 13:30-14:20 MWE CBA 230 0071 201 3 911 14:30-15:20 MWE CBA 119 0075 201 3 912 14:30-15:20 MWF CBA 123 0079 201 3 913 15:30-16:20 MWF CBA 107 0084 201 3 914 15:30-16:20 MWF CBA 232 0087 201 3 915 15:30-16:45 TR CBA 110 0090 201 3 930 15:30-16:45 TR CBA 111*** 0012 201 3 060 18:00-19:15 TR CBA 142* 0015 201 3 111 18:00-19:15 M CBA 142** * VIDEO CLASS (Note: must also sign up for the video assistance section) ** VIDEO ASSISTANCE CLASS (Note: must also sign up for one of the three video sections). ***N'OTE: Class requires cumulative GPA of 3.6 or above, or permission. DELETED SECTIONS 001 AND 002 Intro Acctg. Preq: Acct. 0030 201. Note: 202 3 003 08:30-09:20 MWF CBA 111 0034 Exams for >11 202 3 004 09:30-10:20 MWF CBA 115 0044 sections of Acct. 202 3 005 10:30-11:20 MWF CBA 124 0045 202are 202 3 006 11:30-12:20 MWF CBA 233 0037 scheduled at 202 3 007 11:30-12:20 MWF CBA 111 0035 17:30 on Thurs. 202 3 008 12:30-13:20 MWF CBA 119 0039 as announced 202 3 009 12:30-13:45 TR CBA 233 0032 each month. 202 3 010 12:30-13:45 TR CBA 119 0043 Coordinator: 202 3 011 13:30-14:20 MWF CBA 111 0038 Carpenter 202 3 012 14:00-15:15 TR CBA 119*** 0040 202 3 013 14:30-15:20 MWF CBA 110 ***NOTE: Class requires cumulative GPA of 3.6 or above, or permission. ADDED THIS CLASS - “CPA REVIEW” 0081 Current Acct. 411 3 001 17:00-19:30 M CBA 111 Theory & Prob. Preq: Acct. 410 with grade of “C” or better or permission of instructor. Coordinator: Hubbard