The daily Nebraskan. ([Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-current, February 08, 1985, Page Page 4, Image 4
i Friday, February 8, 1S35 Daily Nebraskan r1 1 1 j ri ,0 1 1 r" ! 9 'J! (( J VI, J. " " ""f " T- I i J (BsMbll&a Mil A "1 T. til 4 1 ' f .. ' f. ; r Irst thirds CrxL Erria Chmbrs1 hill tn , i mass cuung on couepaw prcisa sienal team sports in Nebraska doesn't have a prayer in the Nebraska Legislature. With the uneasiness surrounding video lotteries, another grj.blirsver.ture doesn't stand a chance just now. But the id a itself isn't such a bid one. In fact, with a few adjustments, the bill could be a viable optica sometime don the read. Illegal gambling v, ill take place anyway. Much like prohibition, the more avenues that are shut err, the larger the desire becomes. Bookies in Nebraska tend to make a pretty gcod living during the college basketball and football seasons, when betting sheets share the same visibility as textbooks. Ail you have to do is know one person who has a contact wiht a bookie and your way to fame and fortune cr despair and poverty are set. When the law decides to crack down, the bookies are only temporarily stalled until a new location can be found. And, new customers pep up in the new place. Since the business is thriving anyway, the state could use Chambers' bill to make money for itself. The Sports Wagering Act proposes the state license any person who acce pts wagers on sport ing events totaling more than $100 a year. The fee would be $500 annually, plus a 2 percent tax cf gross wagers each month. Because of some gamblers' willingness to con tinue operating on their own, the law might be difficult to enforce. But, the mere likely reaction from the successful bookies would be to pay the amount. This would not only keep the law from paying its rare, but catastrophic visits, it also could encourage his clients to have more trust, i.e. spend more money, with that particular bookmaker. The bettors, meanwhile, will have the chance to play their skills and so forth in a state approved entrepreneur, an opportunity they will have to find favorable. ' Tliis is also where some adjustment may come in, such as the fees charged by Off Track Betting services in Nebraska over Ak-Sar-Ben. The com pany, itself, makes money off each winning ticket. A similar process could be used by the team sports bookies, with the money spent on bets being split between the state and the entrepreneur. Like Ak-Sar-Ben, strict guidelines would have to be set up for the implementation of the bill, a factor which would make law enforcement for the renegades easier. It's unlikely bettors would continue to support a bookie outside the lav Jf other options are made available to him,, The difficult part of the bill is how teams themselves would react to legalized gambling. If Nebraska is favored by 30 points against Kansas State, and as usual, the Huskers are smashing the evil Purple Cats, would the players them selves be tempted to keep scoring or stop scoring? But then again, the lines have not seemed to effect Las Vegas, Nev., much. h-" A My y 37 4 TTT i i M - I I LZL." ' r 2 . , - " i i 4 v ' t "...3 -'vvv; fr J U i 'tei'" 0 WeillrBush dvsbra ct vewmg 1 lease don't think I'm some kind of political M analyst because I watched President Ronald -ii. Reagan's entire State of the Union address Wednesday night. I'm not a hard-core Democrat, though I'm registered that way, but I do vote and try to keep up with what's going on. 4-. i ill Allen That aside, let me give this grassroots reac tion about last night's telecast. Behind the president, throughout the speech, we could see Vice President George Bush and House Speaker Thomas "Tip" O'Neill, D-Mass. These two talked to each other continuously throughout the speech. It was fairly obvious, and I'm not the only one who noticed it. Don Walton, Daily Nebraskan professional adviser and a reporter for the Journal Star, said, "I thought a couple of times that Eeagan was going to turn around and tell them to shut up." I doubt, if Reagan could hear them and as a viewer I couldn't, but I could see them and it was certainly unprofessional on their part. As far as I could tell, neither Bush nor O'Neill instigated the conversations more often than the other. I am only assuming that what they were saying was in response to Reagan's speech. .They could have been talking about the weather for all I know. 1 don't read lips. Whatever the topic, I thought they were rude. If I had behaved like that when someone was speaking in front of the class in say, junior high, I would have been severely dealt with. I often was. This was not a good example for two of the most powerful political people in our democratic society to set. It showed a total lack of respect for the office cf president, even if this was not the case. Walton said it distracted him from the speech at times, as it did me, and I can imagine others as well. You didn't "kick their ass," this time, Bush you acted like one. O'Neill, the Democrats were allowed to pres ent a response after the address. Couldn't you hold your comments until then? Sure, Bush probably knew the speech by heart, as he and Eeagan probably memorized the speech writer's wcrds together, but he should have at least tried to display some interest in what was being said.' Reagan was blissfully unaware of this dis respect going on behind him, or else he is a good actor. Of course, Rea gan is blissfully unaware of a lot of things, but that's another column. "i il Daily n EDITOR GENERAL MANAGER PRODUCTION MANAGES ADVERTISING MANAGER ASSISTANT ADVERTISING MANAGER CIRCULATION MANAGER NEWS EDITOR CAMPUS EDITOR WIFie EDITOR COPY DESK CHIEF EDITORIAL PAGE EDITOR SPORTS EDITOR AftTS & ENTERTAINMENT EDITOR NIGHT NEWS EDITORS GRAPHICS EDITOR ASSISTANT GRAPHICS EDITOR PHOTO CHIEF ASSISTANT PHOTO CHIEF PUBLICATIONS BOARD CHAIRPERSON PROFESSIONAL ADVISER Chfto 47M72$ KttimliM Psi'.shy Tom 9tTk Kl!y Maftgan Stew Mroir ;ciT.'-s;t fhuntan $& irr '! Vtett Rwfcf mam W. TrM ;) &:! Thome SuU Jordan Hwwirtekt Ad Huftir ah V. Hy J". A Ssrtwt Lav tim cnn CNte, 473-?:i Thj Daily Nsbraskan (USPS 144-08C) Is published by tha UNL Publications Board Monday through Friday In trt taii and soring semesters and TusdyB and Fridays in the summer sessions, except durinq ysottions. F.&sde.-s era encouraged to submit story k!s end com ments to the Daily NabrssNan by phoning 472-1 ?S3 between 9 a.m, antf 5 p.m. Monday through Frhtoy. The public eiso has ccess to the Puoitettions Boad. Fo? InformsSton, cell Chris Cho6?, 472-?"i. Postmaster Sand is chants to the Daily Nbrcsteq. 34 K9torata Union. 1480 R St, Lincoln, h'? h. 03339448. sofa cis owtaj'e pid ! Lincoln, rv'l ( Xirv j 20s Interview sessions need creaiivity resi In this technological day and age, you think we'd be bullheaded in our attempts to preserve the individuality cf humanity. Universities do a good job at this. After all, the word "university" suggests an sll-encompsssing attitude. Yet, when graduates begin the interviewing process, this attitude is literally snuffed out...th h&sun ele ment virtually Is eliminated. Ninety-eight percent cf today's interviewers seera to spprctch job eppitots with precon ceived notions 3 to how the sppUerr.t should tdk, dress, think mi carry htetself not to mention specific notions as to how the Job itself should be carried out. And 93 percent cf the 'v4wij iW& iv- iVii-iie conform to these preconceived neiierj, ssttinj aside otherwise personal traits tsd abilities. The results of such behavior? Eiaplcyees end up dis satislfed with thepcrforsiance cf new er.plcyecs i present interview process to continue a pro cess void cf ingenuity, creativity and tolerance cf individuality we are demanding the most vulgar cf impossibilities human robotics. if ; . ,Usl Lineeln B-Week symbol honest in capitalist tradMion It is pahifiiHy obvious that the isenibs ofthe tudent ccrAiaittee in charge cf this year's B- i m rs Week have mi yet te&a these ital advanced t' 1 courses in business tdahustrstiea, subtlety uv and 111 Of course, mast neoBle in cur society already know the operiUvevdaes cf business today. Too a a i i V lfB . I .-a. a li'f 'V fihO'.lt putting those vslucs into so msny words, in public places. 6 V cr, this ytir's B-Weck lojo a clenched D-l... .1.-11 JS lni, f)lfif it wa un tig i;cj m r,sra &o iuwo brings ters to my cysa. Ah well, the trcopswia iesrn seen ensush to their drily realities with pieties ami rr.cts end free enter prise. Such cbssmilirtj is, efts? sli, just about e.'r,sl-.? - UrryDserr cetss minister " ufIIS-Iincoln