page 12
i!
daily nebraskan
thursday, february 12, 1976
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
J3 Ja fv () Focultfy Union
A No VotO Against Unionization Moans:
1 . Cooperation Joint-planning between Faculty
and Administration with mutual rospoct and
common goals.
2. Occasional prossuro tactics supported by
right and reason with no logal club - only
persuasion, public opinion and the civil courts.
The Executive Committee would not be a
bargaining agent -
assuming only an advisory role.
3. Significant public support related to quality of
productive services.
4. Relative freedom for individual faculty actions.
5. Considerable faculty input on Academic
Administrative appointments through search
committees.
6. Reasonably low planning and development
costs and no union duos.
7. Effective cooperation between faculty on
student needs.
8. Compatible unity and cooperation among
major units of UN-L. s
9. Faculty in an advisory rolo on management
decisions with Administration and Board of
Regents bearing the responsibility risks.
Totals:
A progressive university employing coop
erative processes to resolve problems and
providing productive services for the stud
ent and the public. .
A YES VofO For Unionization Moans:
1. Adversary negotiation with structured
antagonism and mutual distrust.
2. A continuous stato of confrontation with
many battles over trivia and self-interest with
-little concern for student and
public responsibilities.
3. Considerable legal and structural restriction
on individual faculty actions.
4. Serious loss of public trust and support
5. A possible loss of this privilege under NLR
Act and NLRB rulings on management vs. union
functions which are not negotiable.
6. Increased costs for negotiation and litigation
actions and payment of union duos to havo
a logal volco In union policy.
7. Probable polarization between faculty units
at the student's expense.
8. Fragmentation of UN-L with loss of integrative
efficiency and subsequent budget support.
9. Unionization and negotiated contracts would
permit the blamo for program. and operational
failures to bo placed on the faculty by the
administration and others.
A structurally self-centered university
with a greatly diminished sense of public
trust end permeated with contractual
restrictions from unionization and legis
lative reaction.
These ASSETS Clearly Outweigh ..These LIABILITIES.'
: ENHANCE NET l"OTH F
TOE HON BUN
yg-og
omivgc2sitv. .
AM
WBWaMHlplBn m
to A FcySf y Mmm
..." This advertisement paid for by tho Committee of Concsrrsod Fcculty.
"ti -nri-jiiir rirj-jiirnrriT.ri:i.iLLliMWiiiiiw ihihwpmiiumwii n i ' iri r r " i i -"r r - i 1 1 r--r-- a , IM , n i i Wi n i n. m Li 0
