The daily Nebraskan. ([Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-current, December 04, 1972, Page PAGE 4, Image 4
editorial o o Gazette gripes NCAA- sellout for TV money Sometimes newspapers tend to think of freedom of the press as freedom of the establishment press, and . that's not always good. At times, the very freedoms of that establishment institution can be eroded by events which sneak in the bathroom window with the repression of the underground press. If Lincoln's press isn't careful, that could be one result of the Lincoln Board of Education's decision last week against the Lincoln Gazette, an underground newspaper. In that dscision, acting on complaints from students' parents, the board backed up Lincoln Public Schools Superintendent John Prasch's decision to ban the Gazette from distribution on school property. Reasons given by Prasch for the ban include allegations that the paper prints four-letter words, accepts advertising and solicits donations. He also implied that the paper has no educational value. None of these objections seem to be worth much. Advertising doesn't seem to bother the schools when it appears in school-distributed high school newspapers and dramatic and sport activity programs. Nor does it seem to bother the schools that the Red Cross, Community Chest and countless "establishment" charities solicit donations on school campuses. Most ridiculous of all, however, is the complaint against the Gazette's use of four-letter words. By the time a "child" reaches high school, where the Gazette has been distributed, it seems highly unlikely that even the most sheltered innocent would not have had contact with words worse than those appi Ting in the Gazette. Indeed, the syllables that appear on the walls of high school restrooms would make the Gazette seem like "Little Boy Blue." To deny student access to the Gazette because it uses words the establishment press doesn't is extremely hypocritical. In fact, the Gazette non establishment approach is where it may have its greatest "educational" value. Because the Gazette takes a different approach, a different editorial stance, a different look at the news, it deserves a spot in the curriculum of those students in the captive audience of the Lincoln Public Schools, perhaps more than the "establishment press." This is not to say the Gazette deserves any special treatment. As a newspaper, it should be accorded all privileges that others receive, including placement in school libraries and curriculum usage. On-campus distribution should be determined by existing rules applied equally to all publications. If Lincoln's press ignores the discrimination against the Gazette, it can scarcely blame anyone but itself if the public schools decide to abridge freedom of the press in another way which could curtail even the establishment press. Jim Gray ri 'jm osmss FreecJbm of the Press'' C.K. Walter is an assistant professor in the marketing department of the College of Business Administration. by C.K. Welter The NCAA has sold out to television. At the bottom of the 1972 football schedule (the same one that had the Thanksgiving Day game listed for Saturday, Nov. 25), it says: "Cornhusker Home Games Start at 1:30 p.m." So why were people asking in the days preceding, "When does the game start Thursday?" It was simply assumed that the television program director might choose some other hour, like 12 or two, depending when he thought his audience, not our fans, would be most likely to tune in. This time, he only moved the time up 10 minutes; it could have been worse. The paved track running beside the playing field normally is used by people who want to get from one part of the stadium to another -a logical use. But Thursday, the public address system asked us to keep the track clear for free passage of the T.V. cameras. Between plays, a T.V. cameraman focused on a student section, waved his arm and extended one finger in the best of "we're No. 1" styles. Like puppets, hundreds of the otherwise intelligent and rational persons reflected this . ail-American spontaneous excitement. Along the 30-yard line, I happened to notice what looked like cn official, dressed solely in white, with dark gloves. He seemed to have an interesting talent: when his arms dangled at his sides, the men on the field played football; when he crossed his arms on his chest, the men on the field stood around not playing football and they didn't play football for, oh, about the same time that a T.V. commerical would take. Watch how this works: pick any old pi ay -for example, the one where Oklahoma kicked an extra point after a touchdown and tied the game at 14-14. Nebraska's kick-off return team roared onto the field, ready for blood. Ordinarily, the scoring team would kick off and see if they could handle the fury now facing them. But Thanksgiving Day, the man in white calmly crossed his arms and nothing happened for a minute. A little later, Oklahoma kicked a field goal, which was their margin of victory. Once again, Nebraska took the field, this time more than just a little heated up. And once again, Mr. Super-official (who isn't a referee at all but a network technician) crossed his arms and all action ceased for another minute. No, I won't say the commercial time-outs changed the outcome of the ball game. I will just ask how long can you keep the old adrenaline flowing? A stranger visiting the stadium might have round it interesting to see how honored we were to have a national T.V. announcer introduce the players, as each runs to a magic spot where we can see only, their backs, their faces being blocked from view by a camera. The stranger might also enjoy telling his friends back home how interesting the stadium looked, with all those signs being carried and hung; undoubtedly a longstanding tradition. But he might have criticized the stadium's builders for installing three metal towers with TV cameras on top of them in such a way that his view from one of the choice seats was obstructed. The villain, as it is so very often these days, Is money. The television people wave their green and the NCAA schools bow down, asking, I suppose, how far. But can't the networks build their, programming around the game, rather than vice versa? Don't accept any threats of their taking their money and going home. What other show will attract an audience on Saturday afternoons? The T.V. people should be invited to broadcast our games as spectators, not as controllers. They can produce commericals to fit the shorter spacing of a 20-second huddle and save the longer messages for the legitimate time-outs and quarter changes. The participating schools (through the NCAA) should be paid a rate comparable with other T.V. programs of similar audience size and appeal: if the games draw like "All In The Family," they should be paid like it; conversely, if the T.V. audience drops to the size of "Little Rascal" reruns (not likely, but possible), it would be robbery to accept more. If the network's production costs are too high for this arrangement, they once again may have to learn to make do with fewer than a dozen cameras and assorted "color-men." Thanks largely to abundant television coverage, football is at an all-time high in popularity. But don't forget that before television focused in on them, baseball ana ooxing were popular, too. daily nebraskan monday, december 4, 1972