The daily Nebraskan. ([Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-current, October 12, 1970, Page PAGE 4, Image 4
Everyone loves to publish This is the season when young people, printer's ink in their blood, turn their fancies to thoughts of publishing. The Informer, in the tradition of campus gad fly, has already tossed its cap (admittedly, only a size 4 but with potential to grow) into the ring, published by a group that prefers to remain an onymous, this mimeographed sheet has already been produced three times. According to its creators, the original concept of the Informer involved changing the minds of those who were not yet radicalized. Now, however, the paper acts as a house organ a means of com munication among members of the "new culture." For staffers of the Informer it's "publish and perish' rather than "publish or perish". Publishing is difficult enough (the Informer staff knows that they were evicted after their first issue and con sequently missed the next deadline) without the added problems of harassment from neightbors, the police and the landlord. Another paper, still lurking somewhere in the w ings, is scheduled to come out as soon as the pub lishers learn how to use the press (someone said that the would-be publishers accidentally poured ink into their offset press). Produced by members of the Young Americans for Freedom, this paper will 'assume the role of ad versary to The Nebraskan in order to provide stu dents with an alternate source of information and opinions. YAF apparently doesn't have the finan cial problems that the Informer is struggling with. Claiming that, "A paper isn't that hard to get to gether." Terrill Cannon, president of the group, stated, "We have the funds and the press. We'll print as soon as we get organized." The Nebraska welcomes both the Informer and the yet un-named and unproduced YAF papers into the business. There is plenty of room for the diver, sity of thought and expression. Whether or not the two papers will last the year is a matter that will rest on the finances and, more importantly, the dedication of the people involved. THE NEBRASKAN Ttlaphonaa; icHtort a7MttaV wslnvss: 473SSK Nwa: 471-2 WO. Sacana? tfaaa mnl-aii aa'4 a LlncotR, Kaev Suaserietiuni mn w IS mr tamastar or U.) Mr y Pwblishad Monday. Waiasda. Thrs antf Frkfciy jrir tha adHxri w axcapt 4uri vac ttn are xsn 1fknt. Member a th tnNH-callasiato rms. NjMcm.il Ctuc Monot AdvrNsJnt Sarvca lit Hatoraskan I htam uMJeaflgn, Indaeandant at ma University at NaaV rsM' MtnlntatruHon. tocwity and stgijan fuvarnrminh. AtWrw.- The Mwferaska 34 Naaraftka Union Owlvarsity a Nweraska lliwuln, Naoraska aKKM attarta SaM lwt katlan arr Manaatim ttfifur: tmti yln!rf Sawn I tort il Smldwmnni Savrts Editor: Jim Johnston and Rouar Hifa; Hvbrmkan Halt Wrlhr.' Gary Saaerasf, John Dvor , Mick Moriarty. Cava Stink, Stwva Slraaaar, Sua Senator,. 5te Kadat. Pat McTaa, Carol Goatschfua; tnotoara mfiri: Dan LeuiHK. Mika Nayman IciNrrtii.nmant tJItort Frad K sannartj Vnran Editor; Ala aovar Maw Assistant Marsha BanqarH Copy Ictttwr:: Jaora rortsch, Jim Cray, Warrei Osr, lyma Ertcksnu HigM Nawa Editor; hm lanawiwthv, Night Now Assistant: La Schleicher. aalwaia Staff aWnasa Manager; Pat Di Natal Ciwdlnatort Sandra Carter; SubscrltrrloM ad Ciortsltied Ad toanaqart Ja Osatfnan Salesman.- Cran Scott, k Jan Kidvaelt. i. J. Shield; drvwlahoit Maoaaen: Chvck taidttrt,, arry Pillar, John Waetjenar.. (Editors note:: the following letter refers to a style change recently adopted by THE NEBRASKAN. Almost a 1 1 newspapers use AF style which suggests that men be called by their first and last names for the first reference and thereafter b designated only by their last came. Likewise, women are first referred to by their first and last names but later references are supposed to consist of the last name with "Miss or "Mrs."' as a prefix. THE NEBRASKAN has eliminated the use of Miss or Mrs. when referring to women. However, Ms. will be used to designate a woman when clarity requires differentiation between the sexes as between husband and wife, brother and sister, or two unrelated people with the siime last name. ) Dear Editor: With regard to the notice that THE NEBRASKAN wilt henceforth designate women by the prefix "Ms. rather than "Mrs. or "Miss (small black box, bottom of front page, Oct. 8 issue) because the traditional usage "discriminates between married and unmarried women, let me express my outrage at the Inadequacy of the decision. As a male member ttf the human race, I submit that tht designations yn Mm propose to us rMs." - "Mr.") discriminate between men and women, aa obvious and trade THE NEBRASKAN Letters . affront to my personal dignity, to say nothing of an infringe ment of my civil rights. In the interests of fairness, let us designate every human being at birth with a unique number which he will use for identification thereafter under all circumstances. This will insure complete fairness in all public communication and end the blatant discrimination im plied by distinguishing between married vs. unmarried status, or between male vs. female. I hope you will give both this suggestion and the one described in the Oct. 3 issue of THE NEBRASKAN the careful attention they both deserve. Identification Number 12345HS9 I Richard K.Boohar Kudos Dear Editor-. On Friday, October 2, your paper published a review of the motion picture Getting Straight. The review was writ ten by Cater Chamblee. I enjoyed bis review im mensely, as it reconfirmed In my mind the idea that there Is definitely a lack of com munication between students, faculty, and administrators. I would be the first to agree with those who suggest that the movie is a gross over simplification of the problems that exist on our college can, puses today. I would suggest that before one can proceed to solve any problem, an in dividual must be cognizant of . . Letters . the fact that a conflict of sorts does exist. Also, one must have the ability to analyze the prob lem objectively, which is often quite hard to do. Each of us is either playina the role of stu dent, faculty member or administrator. And sadly enough, none of us is willing to assume the responsibility or attitudes of the other. Joseph J. Plant To Mr. Cater Chamblee: As I left the movie Getting Straight. I was inundated by surrounding comments such as "right on," "lays it on the tine," "very heavy, et at I almost slit my wrists. Many thanks for your . trenchant testimonial elucidating the true worth of this abomination. G. I. Anderson ..Associate Professor Architecture P.S. I sent a copy of your review to Holly Spence of the Lincoln paper suggesting sh should shape up. Vrrsent Crisis Dear Editor: A non - functioning govern ment for the people. Educa tion that is totally irrelevant to the people. Economics that to totally irrelevant to the people. Religions and values that are totally Irrelevant to the people. People are irrelevant to the people. Exploitation of the environ ment, poisoning of the en vironment, exploitation o f natural fords through process ing; exploitation of people . . Letters through processing.. Overpopulation without ration is out to kill our world and our nation. This sounds apocalyptic, but it isn't. What is apocalyptic is the fact that most people don't know this entity of confused terror is in existence and they are responsible for it and they make it worse every tenth of a second of a day, by not ackowledgiiig its existence. The present crisis is to make people aware of the doom and demise of the humn race by its own hands (in fifteen years approximately) without them panicking and bringing it closer.. My guess is that the only thing that can save us is us, but we can't save us if we don't know we need saving. Our romantic notions of "life will go on as usual" has totally blinded us to the real reality of the present crisis. It seems ludicrous to me to bring children into the world today to become presidents, lawyers, doctors, teachers, or even policemen, when you have to be way over fifteen years of age to hold these types of jobs and your kids won't make it past sixteen. Pre-teenage marriages are going to be the thing of the day for those who wish to see their grandchildren. You might want to ask me where are my isolated ex amples of documented proof of what I'm saying. And I say Outside the Tower Universal service: dangerous by TOM SIEDELL If Sen, Birch Bayh's (D-Ind.) recent visit to our campus proved anything, it was that the art of nostrum-peddling is not dead. In less than an hour the good senator covered everything from God to Mother (she died when he was young, you see).. THE "SYSTEM, he said,, must be made more represen tative, more responsive, more relevant, more viable. He quoted John Kennedy. In short, he used every cliche in the liberal's handbook. He even discarded his prepared text in order to give a more personal, "off the cuff" speech. No kidding. Of course most of the speech, was given verbatim from his press conference earlier, but at least he tried. MOST OF HIS speech was innocuous enough, of course, butt in the question-and-answer period afterward he touched lig&tjy on a proposal which seenjs to me to be one of the most dangerous ideas yet to appear on the American political scene, more dangerous eviift than, involuntary military conscription. The proposal is generally called by its proponents "na tional service." The idea is not that we abolish the draft by instituting a volunteer army, but rather that people be allowed to fulfill their obliga- don't show me your cowardice and ignorance show me your courage and intellect,, disprove what I say about the nation and the world, Michael Don Carlos Randall P S. Suicide is painless, it brings on many changes .. .. . WA denies YAF Dear Editor. The Executive Board of the Institute for Political Analysis wishes it to be known that; In recent weeks, since the issue of our analysis and commentary of the reports concerning th student strike of last May, we have been asked by several in dividuals if the Institute is in any way connected with YAF or Us campus leadership.. We state .firmly and h revocably that it Is not Further, we have been advised that some individuals were led to believe that our analysis was the brainchild of the YAF leadership and-or that it was printed by the YAF or with YAF backing. There is absolutely no shred of truth in either of theee statements. The conscience of the IPA membership precludes affiliation with the YAF in any form whatsoever. Any statements linking the IPA with YAF or its leadership, national or local, ore patently untrue. Michael L. Egger Vice President , The Institute for Political Analysis tion to the national government by serving in, for example,, the Peace Corps or VISTA. ON THE SURFACE, this seems like a wonderful idea.. Just think, all our young people can serve their country by waging peace, a marvelous idea to be sure, rather than waging war.. How glorious this sounds!' Of course, some will still have to go into the military, to be shot at like clay pigeons at a trap shoot, but there will be an alternative for those who desire it. The root question here is this: Does the government have the right to demand the services of its citizens without their consent, and, if so, under what circumstances? THE FIRST DUTY of a government, any government, is to preserve itself. If it does not try to preserve itself, it fails those from whom that government derives its support, whether that be a small group in the society, or, as in the ideal democracy, the entire ; citizenry. This means that the government has two primary objectives. First, it must pro tect itself from internal subversion, and second, it must maintain its existence as a sovereign nation. In a . republican form of government this does not mean that, for in stance, the party in power tries to preserve itself in power, but rather that those of both Our man hoppe Will anybody buy Unruh? by ARTHUR HOPPE Here it is, less tihara four weeks to election day. As usual, the eyes of the Nation are focused on California. If Governor Reagan can win big, the experts say, he will once again become the Con servatives' standard, bearer. He'll be a force at the '72 GOP Convention. And he'll possibly be our next President. So as the excitement mounts to fever pieth, the question on everyone s lips across this great land of ours is: "Can Reagan whip Whatshisname?" To get the answer, I in stituted an all-out search for the Democratic campaign headquarters. I think I found it: a third-floor watlk-up strategically located outside the high-rent district in the lit tle community of East Gilroy. A crayoned sign over the door says bravely: "Jess Unruh Victory Headquarters and Next-to-New-Shop (pants cuffed while U wait).' I could tell I was in the right place.. A cburehmouse stag gered out of a hole in the wall, toppled over, clutched its bony chest and expired before my eyes in the last agonies of starvation. "Yes, we're confident our dynamic, hard-hitting, all-out parties, all elected represen tatives of the people, must work to protect the "system." Now, given this rule, I think a case can be made that a government can call upon its citizenry to aid in those twin objectives; in particular, it can draft people into the military. This, of course,, causes certain problems in a naton that fan cies itself to be free. Clearly any free society which desires to abridge to any extent an in dividual's freedom of action must do so on clearly defined grounds. This is the essence of constitutionalism. Indeed, it is only in a constitutional system that freedom can exist at all. Surely, then, a free soceity, specifically the government in that society, must limit itself in order to provide the greatest degree of freedom to in dividuals in that society. As this applies to the military draft, it can force conscription only when absolutely necessary "emergency" conditions, if you will; and it must never forget that this service is involuntary servitude. Slavery no more, no less. Sen. Bayh and those of his cohorts who favor "national service" are clearly violating this principle. What they are saying is something like this. No, we don't need to draft everyone (indeed, maybe by making certain changes we campaign will bring us vic tory", said one of the many (three) campaign aides, "and do you have a cheese sandwich on you? Or maybe a stale cracker?" I asked where the candidate was. "He's off on another triumphal Statewide tour to carry his message to tflie .peo ple," said the aide. "But you might still catch him at the 11th street eatrawce to the Breeway, unless he's already caught a ride." Hitchhiking? Was this any way for a candidate to carry his message to the people? "Frankly, we can't afford a stamp." said foe aide. "That's why Mr. Unruh's been going around standing on sidewalks. You knew, he stood on Henry Salvabori's sidewalk to dramatize the tax break this big contributor got from the Reagan Administration. Then he stood on Reagan's sidewalk to dramatize the free housing Keagan got from Salvatori and his friends." Very dramatic. "It gets us free television time," said the aide. "Our goal Is to have Mr. Unruh do something each day that'll make the 6 o'clock news. We had a dilly scheduled for tomorrow: Mr. Unruh was going to ride miked on a white palfrey down Sunset boulevard to dramatize high taxes." could get enough volunteers to do the job), but, gee, wouldn't it be nice if we could get all these warm bodies to work on all the wonderful projects we'd like to see done. Think of all the VISTA workers! Marvelous! What these men fail to realize is that they are asking people to become slaves, not on the grounds that it is absolutely essential in order to preserve what freedoms they have, but rather in order to make certain charitable contributions. Now, I have nothing against charity; I consider it to be one of the most noble activities a man can participate in. But the essence of charity is that it is voluntarily done, not forced. The proposal for "national service" asks the citizenry to give up their freedom not just in a limited, short-term, emergency situation, but rather in a lasting program which would conscript people, needed or not. I THINK IT IS TIME that all of us, not just those of us who have sought for a longtime a volunteer military, but everyone who recognizes that a draft is involuntary servitude, necessary or not, to understand that a system which would de mand such servitude for what are essentially political ac tivities would be a grave blow indeed to a free society. Great idea! What went wrong? "Do you know how much it costs to rent a white palfrey?" Poor Mr. Unruh. I suppose if he loses, he'll kill himself. "We advised against it," said the aide. "What good's free TV time after the polls have closed?" Wait! The very fact that Mr. Unruh's poverty-stricken can be turned to his advantage. It shows bhat no fat cats have bought him off. Poor, but honest, that's Mr. Unruh. "By George, you're right! This will turn the whole cam paign airound. I'll get on the phone to Associated Press!" cried the aide enthusiastically. "Excuse me, do you have a dime on you and how would you like to be Finance Director in our new Administration?" I said I didn't have a dime. "Well, we'll just have to think of something else," lie said with a shrug. And as 1 left he was debating whether to spend the remaining campaign funds on three bumper strips or a ham sandwich. But it's good to know that no one's bought my old friend, Mr. Unruh. Unfortunately for him, at this stage of the campaign, it doesn't look as though anyone will PAGE 4 MONDAY. OCTOBER 12, 1970 MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1970 THE NEBRASKAN