The daily Nebraskan. ([Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-current, April 04, 1968, Image 1
L, ,1V,,TY OF HEW P ii ii ii " !! r i Thursday, April 4, 1968 The Doily Nebraskon Vol. 91, No. 93 ii i y 11 iiii I i x a ' : ! t MY ' -1,.. - . ,. I .. , . It -1 - ' ' " v r ; j , . I J) - , ' r ..'., , i ' i '. :y '6X1 N V 'M1 ' i v ; f i v-V it 11 niiwiiainiiiiiinniii rniiM.iiiiimi nn n m iiiiim Ii Presidential Candidate Dave Shonka Faculty respond to evaluation book . by Jim Pedersen Junior Staff Writer Approximately 230 University faculty members have responded to the Faculty Evaluation Com mittee's letter requesting cooper ation in the evaluation program, and nearly 150 instructors have consented to participate, Bob Zuc ker, ' chairman of the committee, said Tuesday. . . The committee recently sent over ?50 letters to University faculty members asking for response to the evaluation program. Of the professors who failed to agree to participate, only ten re fused to tate reasons, and the re mainder gave reasons for being un able to participate which were ac ceptable to the committee, Zucker said. Urge participation Another letter will soon be sent to those faculty members who have not as yet replied to the commit tee to serve as a reminder, and urge them once again to partici pate, Zucker added. . According to Zucker, question able forms have already been dis tributed to nearly a hundred of the faculty members who agreed to take part in the program. Zucker expressed hope that the faculty who have not responded to the letter would do so by April 12. Contact committee ' If a large number of the faculty have not responded by the end of spring vacation, the committee will contact them personally, Zucker said. ' '. ; "We will use as much personal contact as possible," Zucker said. "By talking with the people who : object to the program, we hope to see what mistakes we are mak ing," he added. . The committee desires to show th faculty that the students are sin cerely concerned, and that the Faculty Evaluation Book is doing a professional job of evaluating, Zucker said. Give criteria According to Zucker, this year's questionnaire is considerably shor ter than the questionnaires used . In the past, and has the added ad vantage if giving the students a de finite criteria for judging their in structors. ; This criteria is the : use of th e student's eight previous instructors as a basis . for the evaluation, Zucker said. "From each question we cu draw first the means of all the instructors evaluated, secondly a percentile rank for each professor, and lastly a variance between the individual judgements of all the students evaluating the professor," Zucker said. Zucker stressed the importance of the variance as giving validity to the evaluation. Statistics published A definite style for the book has not been determined yet, but the statistics from the questionnaires will be published in figure form, Zucker said. He added that the format of the book will depend largely on the ' number of faculty participants in the program. Each questionnaire will ask for additional information to be writ ten on the back of the form. The greater part of the mater ial which will appear in the book will be drawn from these com ments, Zucker said. Include comments In addition to the letters that were sent to the faculty, question naires asking , for information on lecture format, advance planning . of the course, exams, quizzes, and papers were also sent to the in structors. . The questionnaire included a question which asked for comments and criticisms on the Faculty Eval uation Program. "This questionnaire is very im portant because it gives the stu dents the opportunity to learn of tre instructor's teaching methods from information taken directly from the instructor," Zucker said. Return forms ,,'I expect more of the faculty to return forms," Zucker. said. "After attending a faculty meet ing, I realized that through, per sonal contact we can get a bet ter response from the faculty," he added. The student questionnaires will be distributed in class by the in dividual instructors, and the stu dents will have fifteen minutes to complete them, according to Zucker- The students will then- present the completed questionnaire to an appointed student in the class who will iijaii uie quequOiui&ires io :ihe evaluation committee, Zucker said. " In this manner the instructors have nothing to do .with the eval uation once they have distributed the questionnaires, Zucker. added. cite issues Communication causes constituent problems Hopefuls 1 Basic ' 1 by Kent Cocksca Senior Staff Writer Communication be tween the student and ASUN Senate and executives is 4 main issue of concern of the candidates for president , of ASUN. I Both candidates presented their general platforms at the East Campus Union Tuesday night to a small gathering of students, most ly coeds. Craig Dreeszen, a junior in agriculture running on -t h e Party for Student Action (PSA) platform, said that communication is a problem for three reasons: There is no intensive ef fort to communicate action between students and ASUN executives. Many of the proj ects currently being acted upon are long-range and do not merit open discussion . The third reason, Dreeszen said, is that the Senators are not so much reacting to cri ses, as in the past, but have begun to work in areas where they can forsee crises within the University and handle problems in a more preventative and subtle way. The PSA candidate added that he is introducing an amendment to a Senate liai son officer who will coordi nate informal Senate-executive meetings each week that will be open to the students for any questions they faay have concerning student gov ernment action. Dreeszen also voiced a possibility of dormitory semi nars about topics of gen eral concern, publishing com mittee reports in full and frequent Senate newsletters on a limited trial basis. Dave. Shonka, a junior in the College of Arts and Sci ences also on the Executive slate, said that ASUN com munications must be im proved and he prescribed bi weekly panel discussions similar to Hyde Park involv ing student senators and ex ecutives. Shonka, who said he want ed to know what happened to the Student Bill of Rights because of the irregular re porting, promised to issue ex ecutive statements apart from the Senate to keep stu dents informed about cam pus issues. Concerning his platform, Shonka said that University students are responsible and "should be treated so." He added that in the past, stu dent rights have been passed over or ignored and that ' he plans to push the Bill of Rights to its appro priate conclusion. , Student power means full student participation, he said, and in order to overcome the apathy on the campus, ASUN must encourage student in volvement on all levels of University life. If a group of students is interested in the passage of a Nebraska legislative bill, then, ASUN should encourage the organization of student lobbies, Shonka explained. He added that his goals will be to seek a realistic implementation of a new housing policy, promote bet ter student-faculty relation ships and promote some program to deal with the in adequacy of campus park ing facilities. Shonka said that he would seek more recreational fa cilities for both campuses and that he was disappointed with the results of the Fac ulty Evaluation book. Dreeszen, who is on the Senate Education Committee, said that the PSA platform is divided into three gener al areas: education, student rights and student power. He had two specific pro posals in the area of educa tion: students should be par ticipating more on faculty advisory boards and he would seek to place students with voting power on the im portant faculty advisory committees. His second proposal is that the University should conduct a survey to solidify the problems in education here so these problems may be more readily resolved. He said that a survey at Berke ley localized 14 problems and that "we can probably find 80." Dreeszen said that ha would establish committees to help solve some of t h e problems in race relations at the University if he is elected. He said he will recruit qualified personnel to help eliminate on and off-campus segregation and that "there is no reason why the Uni versity should condone rac ism." Concerning housing, Drees zen said he will demand an ad hoc housing committee to consider alternatives to lim iting students to certain housing. Blaming many of the cur rent housing problems on last year's dorm expansion, he proposed to establish an organization allowing s t u dents to have a voice in fu ture housing planning. "I think we are more im portant than stop-gaps for problems," he said. "If the University administration would spend half as much time trying to force students to live in the dorms and start making them attractive in stead, they would have more residents." Besides setting up a com mittee to investigate dorm conditions, Dreeszen said that co-ed visitation rules ought to be set by students who should be allowed to make the decisions in all areas where students are concerned. "We feel that PSA repre sents continuity of leader ship," he concluded. IpiiiiinnmiiiraniMmiiwmim s Compare your Instructor with the instructors yon listed one by one, on each of the following traits. The number you write In 1 etchbox below will indicate how many of the others you rate as f & BETTER than your Instructor in that way. I 1. COMMUNICATION SKILL. How many of the instructors I yon listed are better than your instructor in speaking effectively, 5 in making a point, and in getting themselves understood? 1 2. SCHOLARSHIP. How many of the instructors you listed appeared to know the subject matter that they were teaching better than your instructor knows his subject matter? 5 3. ORGANIZATION. How many of the instructors you listed 5 were better than your instructor in guiding the activities of the 1 class toward clearly understood goals? i 4, CLASS INTEREST. How many of the instructors you listed are better than your instructor in making the class period inter- I estlng, even when the topic may seem somewhat difficult or dull? I 5. PROVOCATION OF THOUGHT. How many of the instruc- f tors yon listed seem to be more able to stimulate original thought and to evoke critical thinking than your instructor is able to do? s 6. GRADING EFFECTIVENESS. How many of the instructors f I you listed are more skillful at evaluating your achievement, at I grading fairlv and sensibly, than your instructor is? i 7. PERSONAL CONCERN. How many of the instructors yon lifted ant more sensitive to and appreciative of the personal cir- m g cumstances of the individual student that your instructor is? I 3 pared to your instructor, bow many of the instructors that you 1 i listed contributed more to your own intellectual maturity and more f I to your ability to deal effectively with important problems in life? i HiiiiuuiwiinmiunHiuuniuim ; - ir -, JW'nyw ommm """" :'i . "V - J V n f, v " 'HMD s to 1 lisM ' voting Aim Presidential Candidate Craig Dreezen Senate passes bill to better communications In the final pre-election meeting. Student Senate Wednesday passed an act that should help their suc cessors in communicating with the student body. The bill is a substitute presented by Senator Craig Dreeszen to re place one introduced last week by Senator Bill Mobley. Among its provisions are: there shall be a regularly sched uled time when ASUN Executives, Senators and students can meet informally to discuss issues; Senators should be available for presentations to organizations and living units; committee reports shall be pub lished and distributed to insure that students have ready access to them; the ASUN shall publish a sen ate newsletter at least twice a Senate term. Whenever possible it shall be complemented by addition al letters from individual senators or college delegations dealing with their views on areas dealt with by ASUN. The bill further recommended that the ASUN executives create a position called "student liaison." who would coordinate and imple ment the proposals. Senator Mark Schreiber also pre sented his summary of the drug seminar. Schreiber judged the seminar suc cessful, mainly because of the new delegate system of attendance, which "assured attendance and adequate representation," Schrei ber said. In further business, Senate offi cially divorced itself from Spring Day by passing a resolution stat ing that ASUN no longer sponsors the group. Senate also appointed Sena tors Suone Cotner and Mark Gus tafson to serve on the Honors Con vocation Committee, and Lynn Al exander was apointed as the Uni versity of Nebraska Citizen am bassador to Europe. Alexander was selected through his work for People to People and by the ASUN Special Projects Committee. Senate will hold a special meet ing Sunday at 4 p.m. to discuss endorsement for the report from the Student Academic Freedom Committee which was delivered to Chancellor Hardin earlier this week, according to Dick Schulze, ASUN President. At this meeting, the Senate will act to place the outcome of the report on the general election bal lot, April 10. 2iiitiiiiiitiiiiiiiimfiiiiiiitiitiusitiiiiititiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiisiiiriiiitiniifiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiitiifiiiiNitiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiifiitua e On Campus Today Governmental secrecy and power will be discussed by Alan Reit man, associate director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Thursday at 4 p.m. in the East Union. Reitman, who is a member of the NAACP and CORE, has been a free lance writer, lecturer, and re searcher in public affairs. Alpha Phi Omega, a national ser vice organization, wiii sponsor a political forum with representatives of all the major national candi dates. Students will also be ad vised about voter registration. The forum will begin at 3:30 in the Nebraska Union. Dr. Phillip Crowl of the Univer sity History department told Free University Black Power class that a Negro history course is quite con ceivable. The possible target date for starting such a course is sec ond semester next year. See story on page 3. Orchesis, the modern dance troup will present their spring concert, "Sketches in Movement," Thursday and Friday evening at 7:30 in the University High Auditorium. it & Candidates of the Concerned Stu dents Party, (CSP) Bill Mobley, Bill Chaloupka, and Mary Lynne Nelson for the Senate will debate candidates of the Partv for Stu dent Action (PSA) at 8 p.m. in the Selleck cafeteria. fr -k it Craig Dreeszen and Dave Shon ka, candidates for president of the ASUN, will debate at Hyde Park, Thursday at 3:30 in the Nebraska Union. it it it Three theologians at the Cotner School of Religion plan to try a team teaching approach in the field of modern problems in society. This will be a first for the school. For a further discussion of the top ic see story on page 3. 8 I n 5 I if i i t i 1 i O.- . -of. 4 mi Hi k A t- JL v . 5 fa