The Conservative (Nebraska City, Neb.) 1898-1902, July 27, 1899, Page 9, Image 9
I 'Cbe Conservative * THE PASSING OF "PROTECTION. " Evidently , Havomeyer our robber bnrou of our sugar Rhine in his point ing to protection that McKinley hobby horse as the "Mother of the Trusts" has induced something like administra tion heart failure. The following symp toms of a protective tariff collapse are noted : Smith , of McKinley's cabinet , and presumed to mirror the president , says as in the nature of that maneuver of politics known as crawfishing that "The tariff is not an issue of the same importance as in the past. The policy of protection aimed to build up our in dustries to a point where they could stand independent on their own feet. This object has been accomplished. Protec tion has established the complete indus trial independence of this country. More than that : it may fairly be said that it has substantially established our industrial supremacy. This truth has been demonstrated within the past two years , as we are now beating the pro ducts of the Old World on their own grounds. " This is flubdub and the bal derdash of corruption satiated. If an industry "needs protection" when it's small , it "needs" it to the same proportionate tionate extent , and for precisely the same reason , when its big. "Protection" was a taking without license of right from one and giving to another , for that the latter chose to go into a certain bus iness. Eor example , protection took constantly from the farmer and gave to the iron-mongers like Carnegie. As one fruit of this leech system , note the difference between the farmer and Car negie. Smith , in his effort to cover McKinley's retreat of protection pipes exultantly to the effect that within two years we have "been beating the pro ducts of the Old "World on their own ground. " One is to infer that this lat ter feat having had happy accomplish ment , we can now take down our pro tective tariff fence. If that were all , then protection should have been abated twenty years ago. There should have been no swindle of a McKinley bill in 1890. As far away as the early 80's we were "beating the products of the Old World on their own ground. " We were for a handful of samples selling Singer sewing machines in London at $15 , that cost because of protection the American purchaser $30 , in Jersey City , where they were made. Clark's spool cotton and the Clarks , all Scotch and never naturalized , are the subjects of " 'Er Gracious Majesty the Queen' today was three cents in London and five cents where made. Syracuse salt was cheaper in Toronto than in Syra cuse. An Oakes Ames shovel cost less in Mexico than in Massachusetts , and the Santa Fo road took advantage of i as far away as 1881 to buy shovels in El Paso Del Norte , they being $1.7fi cheaper per dozen there than at thei own Bay state manufactory. And hey'd paid freight 8,000 miles. An ndless list of this kind can be made. Hero's why the McKinley gang of pro- iective loot and plunder seem to be tak ing the back track. There's danger in he word "protection ; " always was. ? he more , since Havemeyer of Sugar ) ointed to it as the well-head of the irust crime. And they're about to abandon the word. "Protection was ; he name for that excess of tariff col- ected beyond the needs of government. To a tariff for revenue was added a giant per cent beyond what the govern ment must have to meet its bills : and that last was called "protection , " It was the favoring arm of Uncle Sam thrown around such folk as Havemeyer , and Cramp , and Carnegie , and Elkins , and Armour , and Clark , and Whitney , and Payne , and the whole brood of re publican harpies. It was reserving the jome market for their wares. It was a icense to loot in favor of manufacturers. They didn't need it. They never needed t. It would have been a robbery and extortion even if they had needed it. 3ut a time of politics has come when protection may be put aside. Why ? A swindling republicanism , 'ceding fraud on every hand , has ele vated our "expenses" to a point that makes protection unnecessary. What was "protection" is now a "tariff for revenue. " When we've imposed a duty to meet our "expenses , " as the fraud and corruption of our Haima gov ernment have cut and corded them , that duty will be 50 per cent higher all along the line than the atrocious Mc Kinley bill. Here we have the Dingley bill towering a story or two above the McKinley bill of eight years ago ; and still the first of July displayed a deficit for the year of $114,000,000. You say the war fed on the nation's money ? The money that carried on the war was borrowed ; we've sold over half a bil lion dollars' worth of bonds in the post six years. This , in addition to the tariff. Where has that borrowed money gone ? Where have the revenues departed to ? They have been swallowed by the maws of republican waste , and fraud , and swindle , and digested as "appropria tions. " Would you know how "ap propriations" have grown ? In 1819 , with 9,000,000 of population , the ap propriations for government's currenl expenses were $8,500,000. In Jackson's day , with 18,000,000 of folk on our books , appropriations were a dollar a head , or $18,000,000. As lately as the 60's our year's bills came no higher than $60,000,000. Today , aside from a Phil ippine outrage costing $100,000,000 , they run up to $800,000,000 a year. And that's why "protection" is no longer called for. With public expense piled mountains high by fraud , the Carnegie and the Cramps and the rest of afore time protection bloodsuckers can get nl the blood they want a bellyful of blood u sooth ! with a "tariff for revenue nly. " What's the remedy ? Income ax and cut tariff to the roots. New York Verdict. PERSONAL. The pope has sent a full-length por- ; rait of himself with a dedication and iguaturo to Dr. Mazzoni , who attended lim in his recent illness. He also ap- ) oiuted Dr. Mazzoni his consulting sur geon. The Holy See having expressed dis approval of the further distribution of Professor Zahm's new work "Evolution and Dogma , " he has requested that it ) e withdrawn from sale , and has writ- ; en to his translators to the same pur pose. Dr. Nathan C. Schaeffer , superinten dent of public instruction in Pennsyl vania , is to return to his former position at the hend of the Keystone State Nor mal School at Kutztown. Not being in ) olitical harmony with Governor Stone le did not expect reappointment. Field Marshal Lord Roberts of the British Army mourns the loss of his famous Arab charger Vonodel. He had ridden her in India and at home for twenty-two years , and Vonodel was a 'avorite with both the British and the native troops. She attracted great at tention in the Jubilee procession of 1897 , when she was decorated , by permission of the queen , with the Kabul medal , with four clasps , and the Kandahar star. star.E. E. N. Dingley , of Kalamazoo , Mich. , who is preparing a biography of his father , the late Representative Diugley , reports that President McKiuley , in a recent conversation with him , said : 'When you come to write of my rela tions to Congressman Dingley say in the strongest and most emphatic terms that I offered him the position of secre tary of the treasury , and that he de clined on the ground that he could help me more in the house than in the treas ury. " The most contemptible beast is the pseudo conservative. A slave to tradi tion he seeks to enslave others. He isnot ] a man , neither is he fish , flesh nor fowl. He is a nondescript. Barnum once ex hibited him as the "What is it ? " He is an anthropomorphic with a skull clogged with the mouldy wool of traditionalism instead of brains. Commenting on Postmaster-General Smith's speech at Omaha , the Portland ( Me. ) Press ( Rep. ) says : "It is useless and worse than useless now to undertake to fix the responsibility of the war. It leads simply to unprofitable crimination and recrimination. It is the end and not the beginning of the war that people are now concerned about. "