The McCook tribune. (McCook, Neb.) 1886-1936, April 06, 1894, Image 6

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    for Infants and Children.
1 ^ *‘orf •*, tgpo well adapted to children that
I recommend .fc as superior to any prescription
known to me." IL A. Aucrma, 11. D.,
Ill Ik). Oxford Lk., Erooklyn, N. Y.
“The uso of ‘Castorla Lj bo wiivereal and
its rr.critj so well known that it seems a work
of supererogation to endorse it. Few are the
intelligent families who do not keep Castoria
within easy reach."'
Carixjs Martyn, D. D.,
New York City.
Castorla cures Oolic, Constipation,
Sour Stomach, Diarrhoea, Eructation,
Kills Worms, gives sleep, and promotes di
gestion,
Without injurious medication.
“For several years I have recommended
your ‘ Oastoria,’ and shall always continue to
do so aa it has invariably produced beneficial
results.”
Edwdi F. Pabdee, M. D.,
125th Street and 7th Avo., New York City.
The Centaur Company, 77 Murray Street, New York City.
DO YOU KEEP ST m TfriC HOUSE?
Will Cure Cramps, Colic, Cholera**
fi^lorfoys and all Bowel Complaints.
P/!7LICE,25g., 50o., aad $S.CO A BOTTLE.
W. C. BULLARD & CO.
•
"" LIME,
, CEMENT,
DOORS,
WINDOWS,
BLINDS.
•
BED CEDAR. AND OAK POSTS.
W“U. J. WARREN, Manager.
B. & M. Meat Market.
F. S. WILCOX, Prop.
F. D. BURGESS,
PLUMBERi>STEAM FITTER
NORTH MAIN AVE.. McCOOE NEB.
Stock of Iron, Lead and Sewer Pipe, Brass Goods,
Pumps, and Boiler Trimmings. Agent for Hallid&y,
Eclipse and Waupun Wind Mills.
CABLED FIELD and HOG FENCING, £4 inches to 08 inches high; the bcM
aM-purpose fence made. Also STEEL WEB PICKET FENCE fop yards and lawns,
and STEEL WIRE PENCE BOARD and ORNAMENTAL STRIP for horses and cattle.
The most complete line of wire fencing of any factory in the country.
Write for circulars. *
DE KALB FENCE CO., De Kalb, Ilf.
MANHOOD RESTORED! SINKSSfiS&Tr
B!SS82$2^SS3£tf^^ Nrfrvons
nenTalldralnsandiossof power In Generative Onians of either sex canned
byoverexbrtlon.yoothftarerrors ezoeeeive rise of tobacco, oplnm or atim
alaota,which lead to Infirmity, Oonaomption or Insanity. Can be carried In
.vest pocket. »1 per bfir,« f or IBS, by mall propcld. With a SS order we
Ivin a written rssrnntee to ran arrehsd the money, gold by all
"druccirtr. Ark font, into no other. Write for free Medical Book sent sealed
uKwitt^ i^UtekT91sTi. inp.'Rin v/rapper. A'idrts# 31 EKV£SE£D (30.* Masonlo Temple,CHICAGO.
*For sal* in MoCook, Neb , by I- W. McConnell A Co., Druggist*,
« ' r
;.r ■■ .<;• ■ . 3* ’
A MISTAKE.
“Can yon imagine mo in lodgings,cheap
ening tho butw?ii*r?"Bjys Belinda, with her
laugh. “Orsbopping in thoEdgwaro road
in a waterproof? Am I your idea of the per
son who would take au interest in Buetaod
semolina and darn your socks in the even
ing as a recreation? My dearest Jack, if
you think anything go absurd, you must
be evenn greater fool than I take you for.”
“And you aro so clever—so confounded
ly clever, you know, Belinda,” says Jack,
looking at her curiously through his half
closed eyes. Belinda has taken the chair
opposite to him—a great, deepehair which
acts as a frame to her fair, assured beauty
and the rich softness of her costly dress.
“1 am honest,” answers Belinda, “and
romantic, too—that is, as romantic as mast
people. Theoretically romantic, you know,
and in practice practical. My dear Jack,
1 may have been—I don't say that I have,
yon know—sentimental enough to fall in
love with a government clerk, but I shall
not be fool enough to marry him.”
“Thank you,” says Jack, still looking
at her indolently.
“I am glad you are grateful,” answers
Belinda. “You ought to be. I am spar
ing you a great deal. What would you do
with a wife who wanted about double your
entire annual income for a dress allow
ance?”
Jack is understood to murmur lazily
that any wife of bis would be required to
make a good many sacrifices.
“Sacriflcet!” echoes Belinda. “How
bourgeois and high minded we are! My
dear Jack, the influence of tho country
clergyman, your papa, and the squire's
daughter, your mamma, is painfully ap
parent even now. If people are not to mar
ry to better themselves, why in tho world
should they nmrry at all?”
“Effete persons in the country, Belin
da,” says Jack, leaning forward and look
ing into her face with an odd inteutnesa,
“occasionally marry for love.”
“Bo you offer their example for my ben
efit?” says Belinda, laughing a little.
Perhaps she laughs to cover some slight
and unusual nervousness. A faint color
flickers for a moment in her cheeks and
dies away and leaves her pale.
“I have the audacity to do so,” says
Jack. “It’s absurd and quixotic and ri
diculous, »f course. I don’t think I expect
you to follow it. The instances in which
women have found affection capable of
making life more tolerable than do a to wn
house and a country house and a first rate
dressmaker are uncommonly rare. Yet
they have been, Belinda.”
“Have they ?” says Belinda. “Is there
any proof of that? Is there any proof that
the women who have married for uffection
wouldn’t be ready enough to barter it at
the end of a year or two for thoseother ad
vantages? The birthright for the mess of
pottage, yon would say. But my sympa
thies have always been with Esau.”
“Suppose,” says Jack, with something
that is eager and strained under his light
manner, “we come to the point. Bo you
care for me, Belinda?”
“lam going to be honest in every're
spect,” says Belinda, with that color com
ing and going in her face. “So—yes.”
“Will you marry me, Belinda?”
Thtre is a pause.
“No,” says Belinda, but as if it hurt
her.
“Why not?”
“ I-Ionesty r.gain, ” answers Belie da light
ly. She feel3 perhaps as if that lightness
were a sort of safeguard. “To put it bru
tally, I don’t consider love and a clerkship
are enough to live upon.”
“Is this final?” Hays Jack, still very in
tently.
“It is so final,” she answers, "that I
must ask you never to mention the subject
again. I have my feelings, too, you know.
I wish perhaps they were strong enough,
as some women’s have been, to let me do
as you wish. But they are not. Spare me
as much as yon can. When I am rich and
prosperous, I shall no doubt regret yon,
but if 1 had you I should spend my life
regretting the richness and prosperity. I
choose the lesser of two evils.”
“And suppose, Belinda,” says the man,
“that you bad been fortunate enough to
fall in love with a rich man?”
“I can’t suppose anything so absurd,”
answers Belinda. “That sort of thing does
not happen outside novels.”
“Sometimes,” he answers,“though rare
ly. Yesterday I was a poor man; today,
through the death of a relative, I am a
rich one.”
She looks at him suddenly. The color
burns into he** face and dies out of it. She
reads contempt in his eyes—a scathing
contempt for her.
“I leave here early tomorrow morning,”
she says at last and very steadily. “I will
say goodby to you now.”
He opens the door for her, and as she
passes him their eyes meet for the last
time.—M. and T. in Black und White.
Nationality Shown In Tillage.
For 50 miles about New York the coun
try is a region of small farms. Nearly all
are carefully tilled, but the manner in
which each is conducted comes close to in
dicating the nationality of the owner. The
native American likes a lawn in front of
his house and leaves uncultivated strips
near the fences of his fields. Also his pref
erence in the way of crops is for grain.
The Englishman and the German devote
much space to berries and vegetables, and
both delight in displays of flowers before
their houses. The Frenchman is sure to
be a grape grower. He, too, revels in flow
ers, but he fosters those that, cut or as
potted plants, will find a city market.
The Irishman is a raiser of potatoes, cab
bages and corn. His home displays little
outside adornment, but almost always
there is about it an air of solid comfort,
and one may be sure to see a pigpen not
far from the cottage.
Abroad “land is land,” and those who
have been tenants of holdings that cost
them an annual rental of $20 per acre re
tain their habit of close cultivation when
farming in the United States.
Here, again, the difference between the
American and the foreigner crops out.
The former is prodigal of soil BDd lets the
difficult spots alone, the latter utilizes ev
ery inch of dirt clear to the roadway and
uses fertilizers with skill and advantage
to himself.—New York Herald.
Lampblack.
The manufacture of lampblack, which
is extensively used in tberubberand other
trades, is an industry the extent of which
is not readily understood. Two houses in
New York alone handle over 30,000 tons,
one bouse in Glasgow as much more, and
the quantities traded in Cincinnati and
Chicago are of like proportion. Printers’
Ink is made on the basis of 16 parts of
lampblack, 1 part of linseed cdl and 1 part
of soap. Shoe blacking is made from lamp
black, molasses and oil of vitriol. In ev
ery ton of fertiliser put upon the market
there are 50 pounds of lampblack. A lamp
black manufactory can be pnt up at the
low cost of $50. It is made from the low
grades of rosin.—Hardware.
TJL.b*dEE2 TiLELZ
GOING KA8T—CkNTltAL TIMK—LKAVKrt.
No. 2, through passenger. 5:40 A. M.
No. 4. local passenger. 9:10 P. M
No. 76. freight... 0.45 A. M.
No. 64. freight. 4 30 A !M !
No. 80. freight .ld:U0 A. M
No. 148. freight, made up here fi.no A. M.
GOING WK8T—MOUNTAIN TIMK—I.KAVKH.
No. 3. through passenger.11:35 P.M.
No. 5. local pabbhtnger.9:25 P. M.
No. 63 freight. .fi:H0 P. M.
No. 77. freight.4:£ P. M.
No. 149, freight, made up here. 6:00 A. M.
IMPKItlAL LINK.—MOUNTAIN TIMK.
No. 175. leaves at.8:00 A. M.
No. 176. arrives at..5:40 P. M.
£erNoTB:—No. 63 carri *8 passengers for
Straiton, lienkeliuai. and Ilaigler.
All trams run daily excepting 148, 149 and
176. which run daily except 5iindaj.
No. 3 stops at Iteiikelinaii and Wra>.
No. 2 slops at lndianola. Cambridge and Ar
apahoe.
No. 80 will carry passengers for lndianola.
Cambridge and Arapahoe.
Nos. 4. 5.148,149 and 176 carry passengers for
all si hi ions.
You can purchase ai this office tickets lo all
principal points in the United States and Can
ada and baggage checked through to desiimi
. lion without extra charge of transfer. For
information regarding rates, etc. trail on or
address C K MAONKU. Agent.
MIDWINTER FAIR RATES ARE DOWN.
The Burlington Route is now selling round
trip tickets to San Francisco at $35.50. One
way $20.
Think of it! Four thousand miles for less
than forty dollars.
See the company’s local agent and get full
information, or write to J. Francis, General
Passenger agent, Omaha, Neb.
Sheriff's Sale.
By virtue of an order ol sale directed to me
from the district court of Red Y\ illuw county,
Nebraska, on a judgment obtained b fore
I Ion. D. T. Welty, judge of the district court
I of Red Willow county, Nebraska, on the
eighth day of May 1893, 1 n
favor ol John 1'. Ekstedt, as plaintiff, and
against Ollie M. Waterman as defendant, lor
the sum of Eighty-Three ($83.13) dollars, and j
thirteen cents, and costs taxed at $20.38 and I
accruing costs. I have levied upon the fol-1
lowing real estate taken as ihe property ol 1
said defendant, to satisfy said judgment, to-1
wit:
Lot Five in block Nine, Second addition to
McCook, Red Willow county, Nebraska. And ,
will offer the same for sale to the highest bid -1
der, for cash in hand, on the 30th day of April,
A. L). 1894, in front <if the south door of the |
court house, in lndianola, Nebraska, that be- !
ing the building wherein the last term of dist
rict court was held, at the hour of I o’clock p.
m., of said day, when and where due attend
ance will he given by the undersigned.
Dated Match 28, 1894. E. K. Banks,
W.S. Morlan, Sheriff of said county. ,
Attorney. 45-5
i_
Noticeto Land Owners.
i To B. J. Doyle, Christopher 'Troester, John
F. L. Curtis, Fannie Moore, Michael O’Brien,
and tti ail whom it may concern:
'The commissioner appointed to locate a
road commencing at the Southwest corner of
Section Five, Town Two, Range Twenty-six,
I in Tyrone precinct, Red Willow county, Ne
braska, running thence south on section line
to Southwest corner of Section Thirty-Two,
Town Two, Range Twenty-six, terminating
thereat, has repoited in favor of the loc ition
thereof, and all obj ctions thereto or claims
for damages must be filed in the county clerk’s
office on or b fore no m of the 9th day of June,
A. D. i894,or said road will be established with
out reference thereto. Geo. W. Roper,
44 4t County Clerk
Dissolution of Partnership.
By mutual consent the co-partnership be
tween Colvin & Bern's, is hereby dissolved.
Silas H. Colvin will pay all bills against said
firm, and collect all accounts due same, and
complete all unfinished business.
Dated McCook, Neb., March 15th, 1894
Signed. Silas 11. Colvin.
43-6C Carey T. Blogs.
United States Land Office,
McCook, Nebraska, March 12, 1894.
Public notice is hereby given that under and
by authority of instructions received from the
commissioner of the general land office, the
southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of
section 4, township 3, north of range 30, west
of the 6th P. M., containing 40 acres, will be
offered for sale at this office on the 251I1 day
of Aprii, 1894, at ten o’clock, A. M., to the
highest bidder for cash and at not less than
I. 25 per acre, under section 2,455, f-!- S. re
vised statutes, and act of March 3d. 1891.
J. P. Lindsay. Register.
D. E. Bomgardner, Receiver.
J. E. Kf.i.ley, Attorney. 43-5!;;.
LODGE MEETINGS.
K. O. T. M.—Second and fourth Thursday
evenings of each month. J. H. Dwyer, Com. I
J. H. Yarger, Record Keeper.
L. O. T. M.—First and third Thursday even- i
! lugs of each month. Mrs. J. F.Ganeebow.
Mrs. Nellie Johnson, Com. .
Record Keeper.
I-- I
Sheriff’s Sale.
By virtue of an order of sale directed to me
from the district court of Red Willow county,
Nebraska, on a judgment obtained before
Hon. D. T. Wfclty. judge of the dietr et court
of Red Willow county, Nebraska, on tne 18th
day of December. 1893. in favor of George A.
Dewey as plaintiff, and against Elbert J. Hen
derson etal.. as defendants, for the sum of
five hundred sixty-eight ($568.00) dollars and
ninety-eight (38) cents, and costs taxed at
$2218 and accruing costs, and Burton &
Harvey on the same day on their cross petition
having obtained a decree for the sum of $33 25,
I have levied upon the following described
real estate taken as the property ol said de
fendants to satisfy said judgment, to-wit: The
east half of the northwest quarter and the west
half of the northeast quarter of section twen
ty-nine, in township two. north of range
twenty-nine, west of the fill) P. M„ in Red
Willow county. Nebraska. And will offer the
same for sale to the highest bidder, for cash
in hand, on the 12th oay of March, A. D., 1894. |
in front of the south door of the court house ;
in Indianola. Nebraska, that being the build- |
ing wherein the last term of court was held, j
at the hour of or.e o’clock. P. M., of paid day,
when and where due attendance will he given j
by the undersigned. Dated February I, 1894. *
E. R. BANKS. Sheriff of said county, j
W. S. Morlan, Attorney. S8-5t8.
The above sale was continued thirty days
for lack of bidders. E. R. Banks,
Dated March 18lh. 1994. Sheriff.
HOW'S THIS!
We offer Oue Hundred Dollars lie
ward for any case of Catarrh that can-i
not be cured by Hall’s Catarrh Cure. i
F. J. C HENKY& Co., props.,Toledo, O. j
We, the undersigned, have known F. |
Cheney for the last 15 years, and
believe him perfectly honorable in all
business transactions and finacialiy able
to carry out any obligation made by the
firm. West & Truax. Wholesale Drug
gists, Toledo, Ohio.
Walding, Kinnan & Marvin, Whole
sale Druggists, Toledo, Ohic.
Hall's Catarrh Cure is taken intern
ally, acting directly upon the blood and
mucous surfaces of the system. Pnice
75 cents per bottle. Sold by all drug
gists. Testimonials free.
District Court Proceedings.
CASKS CONTINUED.
Burnham Tulleys & Co. vs Georg* K. Mayo
et al equity.
.1. H. Ludwiek vs J. H.Bennett et al.equity.
Citizens Hank of McCook vh K. U. hanks,
sheriff, et al, appeal.
John A Thomas vs C. I>. Cramer et al. equi
ty.
McKinley, Hundley & Walker vs O. M. Knip
ple, levivm ot Judgment.
David Fisher vs Charles VV. heck, appeal.
Charles 0. Ely vs Francis M. hurt et al,
equity.
8. L. Sticther vs W.H. Williams et al.equity.
Charles C. Crabtree vs George Crabtree,
equity.
Charles Wright 2d vs Ephraim Green et al.
equity.
Ida Haistead vs A. L. Pollock, equity.
Henry Carolhers vs Henry Simmormau,
equity.
Kffa I. Hobson vs Joseph A. Gardner etal,
attachment.
J. A. Kelly vs Joseph A. Gardner, attach
ment.
John H. Cowles vs Wm. Pennington,appeal.
Samuel hall vs George hoyer, McCoy & Co.,
equity.
The lndianola P. & O. M’f’g- Co., vs The
Garner 11. & F. Paint Co., equity.
Tiimuus Lonergan vs James H. heckcr et ai,
equity,
Thomas Lonergan vs David D. Smith et al,
equity.
Allen C. Clyde vs E. It. hanks et al, equity.
Ch.is. Kestner & Co. vs Garner II. & F. Paint
Co., attachment.
V. Franklin et a! vs h. F. Brower etal..equi
ty.
Albert G. Dole vs Minneapolis O. & 8. F. Co.,
equity.
It. G. Dunn & Co., vs James K. Ellis, appeal.
Kittenhouse & Hoyle vs Charles H. Pate, at
luchmeut.
Indianoln Paint & Ochre Mfg. Co., vs Jacob
Lerch, equity.
0. S. Quick vs Simeon Hillings et al. appeal.
John J. Lauiboni vs Loyal M. Hayes etal.
equity.
Morgan P. Muiford vs Taylor K. Quigley,
damages.
Frederick Welles vs Peter Hrookham et al.
equity.
Leah Adamire vs James Adamire, divorce.
Ciurk & Leonard Investment Co. vs John
MeOotteret al. equity.
W. c. Bullard & Co. vs Sallie.F.DeGroff et al,
equity.
Balthazar Lehn vs Honry Harter et al, eqni |
tv.
Johnson I. Robins vs Satnue! A. Shaffer et 1
al.
CASKS DI8MI8SKD.
Nebraska & Kansas Farm Loan Co., vs Wm.
M. Nun el al, equity.
H. II. Beaty vs Joe! Z. Teeters, equity, dis
nnS8ed at cost of plaintiff.
George Kiugeu vs James Harris, appeal,
L). M. Mon jo, trustee vs Lillian M. Pitney et
cons., equity, settled and dismissed at cost of (
plaintiff.
C. S. Weiser vs Tr’y Ev’l Lutheran church
McCook. Neb., equity,settled and dismissed at 1
cost of pluiutilf.
UUCKRbB OF FOHBCLOPURR.
Peoples Building, L & S. Asn’n vs Samuel
R. Smith et al, equity—due $1.130 64,
McKmley Landing L. A; T. Co.. v*6 William
Duhm ka—due $722.04.
Nathan L. Case vs James Neelings, equity
due $539 20
Norman F. Thompson vs Andrew Kinkaid
et al, equity—due $901 33.
J. E. Seely vs George A.McClung et al, equi
ty-due $27 95.
Hai tiord Theological Seminary vs Stephen
Guucber et al.equity—due $768,48.
Randolph L. Bullard vs George H. Tupper
et al, equity—duo $1 ( 34.22.
CCnarles C. White, receiver, vs Johanna L.
Butcher, equity—due $155 31.
Julia Trow bridge vs Jacob Long et al.equity
—due $1,008 06.
Charles A. Flint vs Fred G. Thompson et ux
equity—due $887.10.
Norman Spencer vs samuel Ball et al, equi
ty-due $1,183.50.
J. E. Kelley vs Dovier J. Smith et al. equity
—$354 10.
Ruudolph L. Bullard vs Sarah E. Griggs et
al, equity—due $520.
Christian Hartman vs Adam Grass, equity
—due $198 61.
Josiah G. Adams, administrator vs Peter
Bailus et al. equity—due $1,159.63.
Thankful P. Buck vs Amos K. Buck et al,
equity—due $4,032.59,
A. S Baldwin vs Henry Walker et al.equity
—due $539.40.
Robert McFarland vs Edwin W. Mosher et al
equity—due $535.65.
Robert McFarland vs Cap. National bank,
Lincoln, Neb., equity—due $653.50.
James Potter et a) vs Capital National bank !
Lincoln, Neb.,equity—due $698.
S. J. Mattocks vs Paul E. Boynton et al,
equity—due $707.33.
Wm. H. Ritteuburg vs Thos. Inman et al.
equity—due 326 55.
Charles Nash vs James F. O’Rourke et al,
equity—due 1.086.25.
Matilda J. Webber, guardiaa vs Henry Sey
mour—duo 196 94.
State Bank Indianola, .Neb, vs Henry B.
Lan- et al, equity—due 1.419 30.
John A. Baker vs F. P. Chessman et al, equi
ty—due 237.64.
DIVORCE CA8ES.
Florence M. Lytle rs Charles Lytle, divorce
granted.
Robert J. McElhinney vs Anna M. McEl
hiuney. divorce granted.
George E. Thurman vs Ella R. Thurman, di
vorce granted.
Emilie Austin vs Charles A. Austin, decree
of divorce.
Laura Allington vs Eli J. Allington, divorce
granted.
.JUDGMENTS.
Emil Lindner vs James C. Birney, appeal.
Judgment against defendant, for 80.90.
William Karp vs Edward Fitzgerald, dam
ages. Verdict of 225 against defendant.
First National Bank of Tobias, Neb., va F. 8.
Granger et at. equity. Judgment against
Granger for 1,230-58.
B. B. Davis vs Red Wiilow county, appeal
from county commissioners. Judgment
against defendant for 52.90.
Frank H. Spearman vs Neo., Loan & Bank
ing Co., etal, appeal. Judgment against de
fendants for 60.00.
H. T. Clark Drug Co., vs John F. Shafer, at
tacbment. Property ordered sold.
H. T. Clark Drug Go., vs John F. Shafer, at
tacbment. Property ordered sold.
Van Natla Lyuds Drug Co., vs John F. Shaf
er, attachment. Property ordered sold.
Pekin Plow Co., vs James Harris, equity,
judgment against defendant for 701.43.
CASES ROLLED.
Tbe State of Nebraska vs James K. Ellis,
gambling.
Tbe State of Nebraska vs James K. Ellis
gambling
The State of Nebraska vs James K. Ellis,
gambling.
The State of Nebraska vs Harry Edwards.re
cognizance.
The State of Nebraska vs James K. Ellis, re
cognizance. i
OaMBINLO.
The State of Nebraska, vs. James K. Kills,
gambling. Defendant pled guilty and flood
135 011 and costs
The Slate of Nebraska, vs Harry Howards,
appeal. Defendant pled gulliy und fined
50.00 and coals.
UIHCBbbAHKOUB CASKS.
A. A. Monger vs Ifed Willow jounty, appeal
from county commissioners, taken under ad
visement.
The State of Nebraska vs Grant Hlaekman.
larceny, verdict of guilty, and sentenced to
oneyeur in the penitentiary.
Petition of trustees Presbyterian churcb
Lebanon, Neb., an order to mortgage real es
tate, relief granted and order made.
lit the mailer of the estate of Isabell M
Kloyd-Junes, petition to sell real estate, set fur
hearing Muy 13th, IS94, at Chambers.
CONFIRMATION CASES.
Nebraska Loan & Trust Co., vs George W.
Conrad, et al. Bale confirmed.
American Investment Co., vs Richard G
Mitchell et al. sale confirmed.
Phoenix Insurance Co., vs Wm. Knape, et
al, former decree corrected.
Wm. Meggat vs John U. Meserve, et al. salt*
confirmed.
Arthur A. Hyde vs Robert 8. Cooley et al.
sale confirmed.
Eugene A. Rose vs Adelbert D. Ashley et al,
sale confirmed.
H. G. Hrainerd vs Sadie Bates et al, sale con
firmed with deficiency judgment for 98 95.
B. M. Vincent vs George 8. Cundiff, et al.sale
confirmed.
George Henry Waring. Jr., trustee vs An
drew H. Oman et al. sale confirmed and defi
cency judgment for 78 43.
j. Lowell Moore, trustee vs William Relpb,
et hI, sale confirmed and deficiency judgment
for 192.85.
Garwood H. Atwood vs Louis Mather, et al.
sale continued.
Warren O. McClure vs Hezekiah M. Ash
more, et al. wale confirmed.
George Hockuell vs James W. Speer, sale
confirmed.
AffaC. Seeley vs Bart j. Doyle, et al, salt
confirmed.
Nebrask Mortgage Co., vs Louis J. Mather,
et al, sale confirmed.
Eliza H. Eaton vs John P. Rawlings et al,
sale confirmed.
justin A. Wilcox vs George A. Niccoison ei
al. sale confirmed.
S. Anna Small vs William H. Rich eta.1, sale
confirmed.
Susan K. Broughton vs Thomas Clark et al.
sale confirmed.
The Rank of Commerce vs William Iteming
ton, jr., sale confirmed and deflcency Judg
meni for 108 7'J.
The Investors Company vs John Uaisch et
al, sale confirmed.
Atlantic Trust C., vs H. A. Frederick et al,
sale confirmed.
Affa C. Seely vs John C. Crawley et al, salt
confirmed.
Charles Nash vs Stephen Lyon et al, sale
confirmed.
Salinda E, LeFever vs James II. Goodrich jr
^.William Ellinwood vs Eli C. Popejoy et al
et al, sale confirmed.
j. E. Kelley vs Charles A. Sollers etal, sale
confirmed.
Atlantic Trust Company, trustee vs Francis
j. Finite et al, sa'e confirmed.
John McKiever vs Herman Abormeth, sale
confirmed.
The Investors Company vs Belle F. King et
al, sale confirmed.
j. Abbott Thompson vs Ira McClung, etal,
sale confirmed.
Gertrude E. Sadd vs Amos Cotnmaok et al,
sale confirmed.
John M. Boies vs Alexander M. Simoulon et
al, sale confirmed.
8elvester Hyne vs Ira Sylvester et al, sale
confirmed.
Sam C. Colt vs William W. Bunnell et ai.sale
confirmed.
j. Walter King vs Wilber H. Kosencrans et
al. sale confirmed.
Joseph H. King, executor vs Theodore M.
Pbillippi et al, sale confirmed.
Joseph II. King, executor vs Thomas Clark
et al, sale confirmed.
j. Abbott Thompson vs Lambert jay etal,
sale confirmed.
josiah G. Adams administrator, vs Stillwell
Conner et al. sale confirmed.
josiah G. Adams administrator, vs Charles
H. Nichols et al, continued.
j Abbott Thompson vs Sarah j. Smith et al,
sale confirmed.
Bank of Commerce vs John Wintjen et al,
sale confirmed and deficiency judgment for
79.78.
Lucy a. Cain vs Baxter J. Davis et al, sale
confirmed.
Lucian H. Chidsey administrator, vs Edgar
R. Byars etal, sale confirmed.
Hartford Theological Seminary vs John
Farley et al, sale confirmed.
jarnes Eaton vs James R. Botte et al, sale
confirmed.
Emily M. Reed, Ex., vs James McCotter et
al, sale confirmed.
John A. Hamilton vs Ance Shrater et al,sale
confirmed.
Frederick W. Warner administrator, vs
Enoch M. Watson et al, sale confirmed.
Thomas Lonergan vs Mary M. Cox et al, sale
confirmed.
Thomas Lonergan vs Frank L. McCracken
etal, sale confirmed.
Sandwich Enterprise Co., vs E. F. Kopp.sale
confirmed.
Charles H. Hall 2 vs Rufus M, Snavely, sale
confirmed.
Bank of Commerce vs Samuel Pollock, sale
confirmed.
Barnett Lumber Co., vs John Kelley,sale con
firmed.
W. B. Gould vs James B. Jacobs, continued.
Edward S. Ogden vs Stephen Brown, con
tinued.
Elizabeth B.Crosbey vs Patrick McDonnell,
sale confirmed.
j. E. Seeley vs James H. Goodrich jr, con
tinued.
Henry Parmelee vs Lucy j. Cramer.continu
ed.
j. E. Seeley vs Antoine Deitsch, sale con
firmed.
F. A. Hotchkiss, vs Albert E. Lang, sale
confirmed.
Willman Mercantile Co. vs Eli Collette, con*
tinued.
The Barnett Lumber Co. vs John Kelley.sale
confirmed.
Newton Hart vs George Weill, continued.
^ illiam H. Lockwood et al, vs Thomas
Clark, continued. \
Mary T. Hyde vs James A. Lyon, continued.
J. Loolidge Hills, vs William J. Portety sale
confirmed.
Kate A. L. Chapin vs Henry Voges,
confirmed.
Charles T. Stetson vs William H. Sprague,
sale confirmed.
Iowa Mortgage Co., vs Abraham Williams,
sale confirmed.
J. Lowell Moore vs Sarah E. Gerver, sale
confirmed.
Hartford Theological Seminary vs Joseph
Albrecht, sale confirmed.
Lucy H. Alford as Executrix vs John R.
Topper, sale confirmed.
Oliver M. Hyde vs Charles H.Cook, sate con
firmed.