0 The Nebraska Independent JULY 5, 1905 THE NEBRASKA INDEPENDENl ESTABLISHED 1889 J. M. DEYINE, Editor FREDERIC O. BERGE, Business Mgr. Pufcllriel Every Thursday -1328 O Street Lincoln, Nebraska Entered at the postofflce at Lincoln. Nebraska, as second-class mail matter. Under the act of oneress of March 3, 1879. subscription terms Subscriptions Mut be Faid in Advance. 1 OO Per Year .ISO 6 Months .its 3JUouthn Subscriptions Can be sent, direct to The Independent. They can also be 8yit through newspapers which have adveif tlsed a clubbing rate, or through local agents, where sub-agents have been ap pointed. All remittances should be sent by postoffice money order, express order, or by bank draft on New York or Chicago. Change of Address Subscribers re questing a change of address must give the OLD as well as the NEW address. Advertising Hates furnished upon applica tion. ' ' m. . Sample Copies sent free to any address up on appUcatioa Send for Sample Copies and c'Bb rates. Address all cummunications. and make ail drafts, money orders, etc., payable to THE INDEPENDENT, Lincoln, Neb. VERMONT AND PENNSYLVANIA The spirit of the times is contage ou3. The wave, of independence in politics that is sweeping over the land is irresistable, and is brushing aside moss covered traditions as things not to be longer reverenced. If evidence were wanted to put to shame even such burbous as are trying to jeopar dize the good name and best interests of the people of Nebraska by having! the democratic convention reject sense and reason and prostrate itself before the fetish of a party name, it is furnished in the recent action of the democrats of Vermont and Pennsyl vania. The democratic state conventions of these two old states have just nomi nated as their respective candidates for governor two men that have been lifelong members of the republican party, neither of whom have ever been or have ever professed to be members of the democratic party. And, in so doing they have riscu out of the dead past into the living present, and have challenged the good that is in the fu ture. Democratic principles are right and sound and include the best interest of all of the people. The party has traditions that are inspiring, but they are quite ancient. The party has been for many years under a leadership that has been stupid, antiquated and blind, such as forbid rather than en couraged growth. The party has lived on the charm of its name, to which it has not been true. The great rank and file, the ground tier of the party, the men who produce wealth, pay taxes and fight the na tions battles, found the desire of their hearts in the meaning of the word democrat, and voted for years for can didates bearing the name of that party who were mere adventurers and op portunists who kept the party trail lng along behind the republican party awaiting the day when that party would be rejected on account of its crimes against the commonality, in the hope that in such event they themselves would supercede the re publicans in the favor of the corporate and predatory interests. t , Democrats have been at all times in the great majority among our people. But the party "bearing the name has never been attractive to the real dem ocrat from a period antedating the civil war until it challenged the coun try in 1896 by a display of intelligence and courage, when, notwithstanding the party split in twain, its old lead ership going over to the enemy, it rolled up a million more votes than ever before, was successful in a ma jority of the states and its candidates were elected for the first time in ten states in the union. Between 1896 and 1900 the party leaders in many of the states together with many of the national leaders longed to return to the old life of in dodolence and mere negation. To the efforts of William J. Bryan it was due that the party was held in line for the principles enunciated in Chicago. And it was during the interium be tween 1896 and 1900, and in the na tional convention of the latter year, that the real worth and true character of William J. Bryan became known and established, known not only to the democrats in the party bearing that name, but to the democrats who have not yet affiliated with the party but who have learned to love and honor the man whom they regard as an ex ponent of genuine democracy. In 1904 the leadership of the demo cratic party could no longer be held in the path of recitude by Mr. Bryan single handed and alone, and that it devolved upon him alone to maintain the integrity of the party principles as enunciated at the two preceding na tional conventions was amply demon strated in the St. Louis convention of that year. But his voice was yet potent to reach the intelligence and conscience of the nation, and the lead ership that turned its back upon him in that convention found itself unable to hold the traditional party vote any where, not even in the states of the South. The old leaders of the demo cratic party utterly discredited and practically without a following now recognize the inevitable and are add ing their feeble voice to the spontan eous and universal call of democrats to Bryan to come and take helm. Such a course with the old leaders of the party has become a political necess ity. This last ground-swell of opinion that calls Bryan back into the lead ership of his party is co-incident with the waning power of the bourbons ele ment everywhere, as is so strongly ilustrated in the recent action In Ver mont and Pennsylvania. The action of the new democracy in those states tells in thunder tones what is coming, The reign of the bourbon is over and an era of progress during which Jeff ersonian principles will guide the con structive statesmanship of the nation is about to be ushered in with Bryan as its guiding genius. And, strange as it may seem, the bourbons of the party in Bryan's own state are particularly active at this time. When party names mean less than at any time in a century, when the democratic party nationally would be a moral bankrupt without the lead ership of Williain J. Bryan, and wheri Theodore Roosevelt with his many weaknesses, and faults is still able to wring some good out of a congress composed of the agents and attorneys of trusts, when the merits of men defy partisan bias and party lines set more loosely than ever before upon voters generally, does it not seem strange to find right here in Nebraska party leaders clinging to the grossest and most senseless form of party prejudice wherein a flimsy technical point, ad mitted to be. such and nothing more, is sought to be maintained at the risk of party success, it being suggested that a fearless, faultless, recognized tribune of the people with ten years of loyal service behind him, who as the standard bearer in the last cam paign, showed strength with the voters the state beyond all others and whose renominatibn , is widely demanded by the rank and file of the voters, be humiliated and turned down because he dees not wear an ancient brand. The folly of the suggestion passes all understanding in view of the fact that it is a slap at from thirty to fifty thousand independent voters who are ready to elect the whole democratic ticket including a United States senator. The consideration thus offered is unworthy of men of this age or any other. It is opposed to the spirit of the times. Let them behold the ex ample of Vermont and Pennsylvania and look to the East for light. event is so remote that only such as are utterly ignorant of the nature and functions of money, and of the pros pects of an adequate money supply from the gold mh,5s for the indefinite future, and are dead to the all-absorbing issue of rescuing industry from the deadly grip of depotism will ex pose themselves to the contempt of mankind by suggesting that any in telligent American incumber the burn ing issue of the day with the con sideration of a question far removed from present interest and belonging to the future. . . The editorials referred to, however, are replete with expressions that would suggest that the witer3 must have been born since the silver ques tion ceased to be an issue in our politics, and that their research into the question was limited to the read ing of old campaign speeches such as were formerly delivered on the stump in Nebraska by John M. Thurs ton. The slings made at the quan titative theory of money show such writers to be ignorant of the fact that since the denial of that theory ceased to serve the exigencies of republican party politics it has been abandoned, and that the arguments formerly em ployed by party organs and speak ers to appeal to ignorance on the mon ey question, having served their pur pose in their day, are no longer held to be sound or correct by their au thors. Those who, in the light of ex- BRYAN AND SILVER The normal individual experiences a feeling of inexpressable sadness and pity when in the presence of one of his own kind having the years of a mature person while in body and mind the development . remains that of a child. Cases of arrested develop ment, whether physical or mental, jar upon the natural sympathies oppress ively and repulsively. But the shrink ing from and sorrow for the unfor tunate dwarf, the helpless and inno cent victim of antecedent causes is soon softened into gt-ntleness and pity before the kindling fires of charity and love that proceed from the higher law of human sympathy. The tolera tion, however, which our higher na ture compels in us for the unfortunate victims of arrested r evelopment, where neither blame nor re sponsibility attach to the victims themselves, is as sternly forbidden in the case of the intellectual dwarf made so by Belf stultification and slavery to preju dice. In view of , the recent , labored at tempts of a few editors of newspapers that are corporation organs to revive a discussion of the silver question in connection with the prospective can didacy of Mr. Bryan for the presidency in 1908. The Independent, in a broth erly spirit, warns such editors against allowing their zeal to serve their mas ters in the dire extremity in which they are placed by the political ex igencies of the hour, to desist from doing that which will brand them selves as servile and idiotic, and there by cause them to forfeit the respect of all intelligent men and impair their future usefulness. The coinage of silver may again become a burning issue before the people of the western nations fo the earth at some future time. Bu,t such Club Offer Any one of the followina will ha sent with The Independent one year for the club price: All subscrintmns honln w,!u I . . mill life wur- rent number unless otherwise ordered nenewais received are entered for full year beginning at expiration date. DAILY PAPERS Regular With Price independent Omaha Daily News...,,. 1.50 2.00 Kansas City World, (Daily except Sunday). 2.00 1.75 WEEKLY PAPERS Weekly Inter Ocean.. .. 1.00 1.25 The Nebraska Farmer.. 1.00 125 Commoner '....$1.00 $L25 Cincinnati Enauirer 1.00 1 or ' - " VxF Youth's Companion 1.75 2.50 Sunny South k.. .50 1.25 Harper's Weekly 4. 00 3.95 The New York Tribune Farmer 1.00 1.10 The WorlJ, (Thrice Weekly) 1.00 1.35 Atlanta Constitution, (Thrice Weekly) 1.00 I.50 Harper's Bazaar 1.00 1.55 World-Herald, (Twice a week) 1.00 I.35 American Granger Bulle tin and Scientific Farm er 1.00 1.25- Kansas City Star .25 1.00 Iowa State Register and Farmer 50 1.10 The Prairie Farmer 1.00 1.25 MONTHLY MAGAZINES S. Louis Republic (twice a week) and Farm Pro gress (monthly) both.. 1.00 1.20 Referendum News 50 1.10 Ohio Liberty Bell 50 1.10 To-Morrow Magazine 1.00 1.35 Everybody's Magazine.... 1.50 2.00 Cosmopolitan 1.00 1.35 Mr. Berge's new book on "The Frea Pass Bribery System" which sells reg. ularly for $1.00 will be sent with either of the above combinations, postpaid for the additional sum of 60 cents. THE INDEPENDENT, .-.P,',' Lincoln, Neb.