U6& Nobraskcx Indopondoiit SEPTEMBER 7. 1905 jyJyj'f1' V"V y.VVV VV yV V yV vV Vv VV y "A V v y K 1 K H 11 1111 Great West OB - na ca LJ on yy EH yy na yy El yy en yy rn yy nn yy ,nn yy yy on yy en yy ' ca yy na yy -ca : yy : Da yy Da yy Da yy Da yy Da yy ca yy -Da yy Da yy Da yy Da : yy Da ' yy ca yy Da yy Da yj ca . yy ca yy Da, E'J Da yy . Da yy 'Da yy Da yy Da yy Da bet Da yy Da yy D3 -yy Da yy . Da yy E3- yy Da yy Da tQi Da yy Da yy Da ' yy -Da yy Da , yy . Da ' yy Da yy : Da yy Da yy Da yy . Da yy Ea . yy Da yy . Da yy Da yy Probably no mail order house looms up more conspicuously than does the "Arm strong Clothing Company". Many reasons combine to make it more profitable to trade with this house than with any other. The "Armstrong" name is known the country over,as a signal leader in style,- a name which carries with it true worth, and a name backed by a house-which refuses to sell an article which they can't guarantee. Our CexleJogvie Circulation is larger than that of the average newspapers There is no subscription price attached, they are absolutely free. Write : to-day for one or all of -them. r BOOK 1 BOOK 2 BOOK 3 Men's Suits Boy's Clothing . Men's Furnishings BOOK 4 ODD PANTS BOOK 5 OVERCOATS v2) (ft A a n lyiii 1221 to 1227 O Street u 1? 8 THE 1 REBATE CONTEMPT CASES Proceedings Begun in Kansas City Against Western Railways Kansas City, Sept. 2. Contempt proceedings, charging violation of the order of District Judge John F. Phillips issued in March, 1902, restraining the defendants from giving rebates in vio- Intinn nf tho Intprstflff . rnmmorfo law were filed in the United Slates district court against the Chicago and Alton, the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy, the .Missouri Pacific, the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific, and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe railway companies. These companies ' are charged with giving rebates in violation of the restrain ing order and the court is asked to cite them for contempt. The contempt proceedings allege specifically in the case of the Chicago and Alton," that that" company granted rebates amounting to many thousands of dollars on the shipments of agri cultural and farming machinery of the International Harvester company, "which owns and controls the Deer ing Harvester company, the McMor mick Harvester company, the Piano Harvester company, the South Chi cago Furnace company and the Illi nois Northern Railroad company." It is alleged that.Jhe. Chicago and Alton agreed with the Illinois North ern Railroad company to file with the interstate commerce, commission pre tended joint tariffs or freight rates effective from Chicago to Missouri river points, for the express purpose of evading the restraining order, and 1 that the Alton agreed and did iff fact give to the International Harvester company, twenty-five per cent of said pretended joint tariff rates. The proceedings against the Bur lington railroad are practically iden tical with those against the Alton. The proceedings against the Mis souri Pacific, the Rock Island and the Santa Fe railroads allege that in like manner these companies violated the ; restraining order by giving re bates to the Hutchinson-Kansas Salt company, in collusion with the Hutch Inson and Arkansas River railroad, which latter company is controlled and operated by the salt company. These railroad companies are alleged to have given the salt company twenty-five per cent of a pretended joint tariff rate on salt routed to points on the Missouri river. The proceedings were filed by A. S. Van Valkenburgh, United States district attorney for the western dis trict of Missouri at the instigation of M. D. Purdy,.i assistant attorney general of the United States. Judge Phillips today set September 18 as the date open which the dif ferent companies are ordered to make their plea to the charges of contempt. n K