LINCOLN, NEB., FEBRUARY 16,1905. No. 39 Vol. XVI. " in i " " "" ' ' 1 POSTAL RAILROAD RATES The Average' Amount for Which Each Passenger is tarried Is Sixty Cents. ; SAME SYSTEM OH STREET CARS. it Would Vastly Increase the Net ; Earnings of the Koads ana Build Up the West. The street car service of the city is the same in its nature as is the ran u-av nassp.Tieer service of the nation. Had the railways of the United stntos hfien onerated as one road (1902) as is the street car service of a city, ar.fi had the rate been CO qent3 for each passenger, as is five cents for a street car regardless of distance, the roads would have received the same gross thev did get. This is pro- : -.Tirio thw carried no more nor less passengers 'than they did. But, thg. tacts are that tne pasu&ei B v Ttmuifi under the postal theory, in crease ten-fold or more, over the in dividualized mileage theory. The ave roa train carries but forty-five pas- eengers (see page 67 interstate com statistical report 1902). The ca pacity of each coach is from fifty to sixty passengers, Tne writer nas uiLe" HHoTi nnnn trains where the passenger traffic could easily iiave been carried in nnft cnach. Why is that so? Be- n-ao th ft ner mile rate system re strains- travel and is in restraint of business. Think for a moment wnat a Mnrir Rvstem of street car charge . would result" in, with a rate of half cent per block (which rate would pe no ' no-hor fnr strp-et car service than is three cents per mile for passenger service). It would shrink the value of -h nnt-iavifier blocks, beyond, say ten blocks from the center of business, ex actly a3 tori per mile rates of freight ,v r,-t tniifiasrft rates for Dassenger service does land values on railways. And it would also shrink the earning value of street car property to the point of confiscation. Such system or rate mah fnr street cars would make it plain how ureent it is that a law ho onnptPd that all roads should make enforcable contracts for division or traffic making transportation na tional, and the rate a fixed one, abso lute and based on the average rate shown during the life of the interstate commerce commission to have been re ceived by the railways. ; Put in the average passenger rate and the average number -of passengers on a train, would be, raised from 45 to 500; this, without materially in creasing expense of conducting pas senger traffic. The average gross in come per train for its average distance of travel, from passenger service, would be raised from $27 to $300. " ; The railways take spurts giving ex cursion rates. The writer remembers a round trip rate of $3 made between Chicago, 111., and St. Paul, Minn. The regular one way fare was $9.70 or $19 40 for the trio to St. Paul and back on the mileage basis. The rush of travel called for three or four sections w each train. They were loaded to their capacity and suppose the average to havA he.en five coaches they got $900 npr round triD train, which they count aa costing -for service about $1 per mile or $820 for that trip. They were on iv about $80 Der train to the good on their passenger service or a little under 10 per cent profit. . it was claimed that this $3 excursion round trip service to St. Paul from Chicago was not profitable. JNO tiouot. t Pt us examine the ca3e from a postal basis which we claim is the true rate basis. The average distance per haul fnr pach passenger on the business of the United States va3 30 1-3 miles, the average rate of fare (the true rate) r.n cents. Prom Chicago to S't. Paul is 410 miles, back to Chicago makes 820 miles. This is just twenty-four times thA nvpraxre haul. The S3 rate they made was just five times the average rate. Had they received for that indi vidual rate the true rate based upon - the average they would have charged 24 times GO cents or $13.40 for each passenger. When you select someone haul out of the whole traffic of the country, vou individualize that haul and destroy the relation and in the case above cited the rate was but five times the average received for each passen srer while the distance of the haul wa3 24 times the average, and yet they lost no money on that business, wmcn shows the- wonderful margin of re ductions that are possible to be made in nasseneer service under an enngnt- ened management or that pusiness. fiet this fact fixed in your mma, ai e-pst. it as vou would a meal and make " . ... . it a nart of vourself and you win oe- gin to understand this question. An average embraces the longest haul ana the shortest haul and every interme diate haul. It is the true basis from which to fieure service to the public, hv ouasi-nublic corporations. The ave rage rate embraces the largest amount paid for any ticket and the smallest amount, and every intermediate rate is contained in that average rate. Thi3 is true of passenger service, this is true of freight service. You are en titled to a 60 cent passenger rate any distance, long or short. You should nprmit. roads to pool and make en- forcible contracts among tnemsei ves for divisions of revenue. 1 Ana n mey get into a fight 'on that division, let the. courts settle at the expense or the roads proper adjustment of those divi sions. You are entitled to a nve cent freieht rate, for that is the average rate on the postal basis for ireight service. If you do-hot know enough to demand what is due you, you ought not to have it. If you have the capacity to think for yourself and the determina tion to force your public servants, tne law makers, to nut the result or your thinking into statute law, you will have the relations between all citizens made right." If we know no more than the horse, we should be hitched up to pull the load, as most of us are. you ana I are treated as well as we deserve; be cause vfe deserve no more than as units of a community, we know how to administer for the community. The man who is bribed by a pass epta sixty cents of value for his per fMo ha tal'ps on the railroad. UUJ, VWVi "V To the railways the pass holders ride looks like 60 cents, but he looks to the writer like thirty cents. Study the passenger service table under the group map of the united states tpuo lished on page 2 of the Feb.9 issue) you sists of Nebraska, Colorado, north of an east and west-line through Denver, Wyoming, Montana and the Dakotas west of the Missouri river. That is a big country, with no large cities com manding interurban traffic to lower the average rate. For that reason our group stands at the head of the ave rage in long haul and large outlay per individual. The iron hand of railway discrimination has been laid on every milft to an extent, which would have depopulated it as a Sahara, had it not been for a natural fertility, boundless mineral resources and work of the hardv Dioneers who make ud the pop ulation. We often hear the question asked, what would we do witnout tne railroads? It could as well be asked what could the reads do without the people to prove that railways can not be mismanaged. . m. 1 I . 1 11. . 1 1 ! .1 i ,1 lne iact mai uie puuni; uuuaieu money and lands sufficient to build all the roads in Group VII, might be an argument for more reasonable rates. But we discuss this subject only on its merits, without prejudice to legiti mate railroading or to the public. A. J. GUSTlN. Kearney, weo. FUNDS FOR PROMOTING TRUSTS How They Are Accumulated In New York. No Rich Popl In New York In sDite of Thomas E. Watson, the rich are certainly , growing poorer, and the poor are growing richer, l nere are row only 20 thrifty souls in all New York who have managed to accumulate $500,000 or more in personal property. . Of these, only eight have $1,000,000 or upward. One of them is Mr. Carne gie, who has managed to save $5,000, 000 out of the $200,000,000 for which he sold his steel properties, and who also owns a modest cottage on Fifth avenue, p.o;he is not obliged to pay rent. Mr Rockefeller is only half as rich as Mr. Carnegie, anl is more frugal, too. It is an inspiring showing of middle class comfort that is revealed by the personal property li3t made public by the tax board. All the tinsel is stripped fiom New York's pretentions to plu tocracy. The real money is some where else. New York World. The editor of The Independent got a personal letter from a banker last week in which he said f "You take jt for granted that the people kpow more or political economy and thg details of banking than they reany ao. in con sequence of that, your many allusions to reserves, reserve cities, ana a great many other thing3 are totally lost when presented to the ordinary man. xou have many times alluded to the accu mulation of vast amounts ' of money in Wall street banks and their use m floating immense promotion schemes. You have denounced in a general way, the law concerning thetransrerence or rpservea from one bank to another to the reserve cities, and have said that the banks really have no reserves, put von have never explained to .your readers ,ust how that thing was done. I suggest that you write sucn an aruae a it would be or permanent vame. The work of preparing such an article as that would be very great, ana as tha pmnr. since De France went to New York, had no assistant, he dreaded the undertaking. However ne wem w thp lihraries. eot the comptroller s re ports and the facts necessary for its nrpnaration.. when he strucit a run un innk ouch as seldom happens. He found in Pearson's Magazine of No vember, an article of that very Kina, his attention having been called to it by tho nhmrian: a ladv who knew her dus- iUV mm- " J V iness and what she was drawing ner salary for. , This article was written by Mr. O. H S'chreiner, a banker of many years'- ex npripnep. He was president of the New York Seventh National bank in the days of its prosperity. -Some or tne flfwrps he srives were verified, and with- out doubt they are all absolutely ac curate. It is a kind or reading uwi can-not be run oyer as one reads a novel. 1 It will require some thlnklpg. There was never a more aamnaDie con aniracv nrnontr hankers, and there have been many of them than that by which they secured the amendments to tn vio-fnnl hanking: act. That act did provide for reservesand it prevented thp conerestion or money in fNew ium, wh i i p. the west and the south were skinned clean of all currency. The edi tor of The Independent fully agrees with Mr. S'chreiner when he says that our financial laws are "the nourishing mother of trusts." . ' A national election is approaching, and one of the principal bones of con tpntion is aeain - to be the tariff, which ripmnirats denounce as father of the trusts. If the tariff law is father of the trusts, national law v.hich effects unnatural, and lopsided distribution of money is their nourisning moiuer. Mnnpv in circulation was below $11 per head of 35,000,000 population at th close of the civil war in isoa, dui is now over $30 per head of 80,000,000 population. . The natural flow of so great an increase snouia, nave tm nished the only source or surplus sup nlv to the money market. In whatever form, money can be created only by or under national law. Monev is the only life blood of all undertakings, and the measure of all vainps. Labor, industry, and property arc all eaueed thereby. It should therefore circulate without favor or impediment of law, guided only oy natural demand and supply. A proposal to favor by law a -few hanks in large cities with use of money denied to thousands ; of other bank throughout the country would quickly mppt with public ridicule and condem nation. Yet by deposits from bank re- KPrvps. such legal favoritism is actu- oiiv accomnlished. continues, and grows with the growth ot the national hanking system. ThP law fixing, and regulating re serves by national banks is found in section 5191 U. S. Revised Statutes, modified by portions of sections 5192 and-5195; and since modified by act of June 20, 1874; March 3, 1887, and March 3, 1903. 'Section 5191 provides as follows "Every national banking association in cither of the following cities: Albany, Baltimore, Boston, Cincinnati, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Louisville Milwau kee, New Orleans, New York, Phila delphia, Pittsburg, St. Louis, San Fran cisco and Washington, shall at an times have on hand, in lawful money of the United States, an amount equal to at least twenty-five per centum or the aggregate amount of its notes in circulation and its deposits; and every other association shall at all times have on hand,-in lawful money of the United States, an amount equal to at least fifteen per centum of the aggre gate amount of It3 notes in circulation, and of its deposits." And it forbids banks to make loans or -discounts whenever their "lawful money", falls fcelow such required reserves. .t This is mandatory, requiring 26 per cent in lawful money to be - kept on hand by bank3 in designated largo cities, and 15 per cent in lawful money by all others. Had reserves "been regulated solely thereby, the existing monetary dis crimination could never have "grown. Section 5192 provides that "Three fifths of the reserve of fifteen per centum reauired by the preceding sec tion to be kept, may consist of bal ances due to an association, avanaoie for the redemption of its circulating notes, from 'associations approved by the comptroller of the currency or ganized under the act of June 3 1864, or under this' title, and doing business In the cities of Albany, Baltimore, Bos ton, Charleston, . Chicago, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Detroit, Louisville Milwau kee, New Orleans, New York, Phila delphia, Pittsburg, Kicnjnona, ou Louis, San Francisco, and Washing ton." This nprmits three-fifths of ' all" 15 per cent reserves to be kepi as deposits or "balances in nauonai oansB, iu designated or approved reserve cities, which now number thirty-eight, a follows: New York. Chicago, St. Louis; Rnaton Alhanv. Brooklyn. 'Philadel phia, Pittsburg, Baltimore, Washing- ton, D. C, savannan, xsew uraauu, Louisville, "Houston, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Indianapolls, , Detroit, Milwaukee, ues Mpmes, ou ii . MnTiPQ noils v,- Kansas City. Kan. Kansas City, Mo., St. Joseph, Lincoln, Omaha "Denver, an ru cisco, Los Angeles, "Portland, Ore., Dallas, Ft. Worth, "Cedar Rapids, Dubuque, "Wichita, and -salt Law City; Thnoo mnrkPd with an asterisk were designated under act of March 3, 1887, or March 3, 1903. - - " fe'ectfon 5195 provides a3 rouows: Pnoh association organized in any of tha rtip named in section fifty-one hundred and ninety-one may keep one- , half of its lawful money reserve in cash deposits in the city of New York." This now permits one-nan oi tm per cent reserves of banks in the last thirty-five mentioned cities to be kept as deposits in national I anks in the first three mentioned, nameiy; York. Chicago or St. Louis, insteacroi New York only. ' ' By act of June 20, 1874, oanns are t rtr ronnirpd to keen 15 per cent and 25 per cent reserves against their respective circulations, put, v niveau, must at all times keep 5 per cent of amount of same on deposit in the United States treasury, as a reaemp Hnn fund, "which sum shall be counted as part of their lawful reserves' against deposits. The total of such redemption funds was on March 28, 1904, $19,073,100. " riv act. March 3. 1887, amenaea oy 0t March s. 1903 whenever three- fourths of the DanKs .iocaiu uicm shall make application, any city ol 25,000 population may be designated a reserve city; and any city of 200,000 population may be designated a cemii reserve , city, "liKe tne cuy -ui iOrk;" and thereafter oanKs in an such cities must "have on hand in lawful money" 25 per cent or tneir oe posits. Only1 Chicago and St. Louis banks have availed to Decume wuu reserve cities. .' From the above summary tne ronow- y ing, considerations are apparent: First: The mandatory requirement of section 5191, renewed n acts, March 3, 1887, and, March 3, 1903, that re serves of 25 percent and 15 percent shall consist of lawful money on hand, Is in practice nullified by the permis sions of sections 5192 and 5195, re ducing the required amount of lawful money ou iianwuy vuna iu .., designated cities from" 25 per cent to 12 V2 per cent, and by d(her banks from 15 per cent to C per cent; and permit- v I 4 Si, 4-