yariff, Tax and Freight Cut, Restore European Market, Davis Farm Remedy j Nominee in j Answer to j Dawes Here Democratic Party Chieftain Attacks Agricultural Com (| mission Proposals of Re publicans as Ineffective. • o r* — ^ *Says Co-Operate Abroad ai Following is the text of the address by John W. Davis, democratic oandi 0< date for president, at Omaha Satur iday night: This generous welcome which the citizens of Omaha and of Nebraska give to a comparative stranger Is evidence of that hospitality for which the west Is so justly famous. You are not afraid, In this part of the world, of new Ideas, and after tonight T shall be willing to testify that you are not inhospitable to new faces. It was at my personal request that those who were arranging my west ern Itinerary fixed on Nebraska ^ts the spot for my first utterance west - ‘ ttie Mississippi river. I had per • Tsonal reasons for this choice. 11 The first was that I wished to testl J fy to my genuine satisfaction at the wction which the New York conven J tion took in associating me on the ticket with the present governor of { i Nebraska. There is not a democrat In the United States to whom he has not been known in person or by name for more than 20 years. During the ^ ' whole of that time he has been a fear '* lesa and active champion of democrat f’" ie ideals and principles. When you called him to your service her# in ! Nebraska he was quick to show how these principles can he exemplified ■U In action. Others have talked of tax *d* reduction, but. he has actually re •B dueed your state levy by 33 1-3 per cent. Many have proposed to help *■ ' the farmer; but he has saved to the bet state the value of its entire wheat ■tl crop in reduced prices of some of the th* necessaries of life. Others have de * plored the multiplication of govern in| mental boards and bureaus, the ten otl dency to bureaucracy, and the grow n* ing numbers ot government em Mb ployes. He State looses: Nation Gains. or* He has shown you that ths way to Te reduce is to reduce. That he should so* have been elected governor of NebraB otl ka by the largest majority ever given ng any candidate for that office, and th eliould have received a renomination B* beford the expiration of his term are * things of which not only himself, but his party In the state and nation may be justly proud. What you In Nebraska lose by the draft we have made upon him, his party and the nation gain. I welcome him as my ••►running mate, and I count with con -cofh . of e on his aid and counsel. W My second reason for coming to Ne braska was also distinctly personal. 1 am here primarily to learn rather than to teach. I wish to take counsel with the people of these wstem states, to study with them their prob lems and to fit myself to deal with them in an Intelligent and sympa thetic manner, If the responsibilities of the presidency should come to rest upon me. While It cannot be too often repeated that we arc one people In America, that the prosperity of one section is the prosperity of all, and the distress of one the misfortune of the whole, yet we occupy a continen tal domain. We range In climate from the tem perate to the torrid zone, and the surface of our land shows all the va riations of mountain and valley and plain. It Is inevitable that the occu ADV KRTI8EM ENT. Cured Her Rheumatism Knowing from terrible experience the tuffering caused by rheumatism, Mr*. J. E. Hurst, who lives at 204 Pavia Avenue. B-170 Bloomington. III., ia so thankful at having cured herself that out of pure gratitude she is anxious to tell all other aufferers just how to get rid of their torture by a simple way at home. Mra. Hurat has nothing to sell. Merely eut out thi* notice, mail it to her with your own name and address, and she will gladly send yv»u this valuable infor mation entirely free. Write her at once before you forget. __ ^ * ADVERTISEMENT. REMARKABLE RECOVERY OF MRS. SPINK Gives Lydia EL Pinkham’s Vegetable Compound Full Credit Minnesota Junction, Wia.—“I «u under treatment, but nothing seemed to help me, and I was run-down and so weak that I had to remain in bed much of the time and was like an invalid. I had pains in my abdo men and in the fe male organs, and my stomach both ered me. My hus band saw Lydia E. Pinkham’s Vege table Compound advertised, thought it must be good, and brought it home to me and advised me to try it. After taking one bottle 1 was able to eat, and after aix bottles 1 was doing my own work, which I hadn't been able to do for years. I have a new baby who is doing nicely, and l am still taking the Vegetable Compound and feeling better than I have for four years. The medicine is surely wonder ful and a good thing to have in the house.”—Mrs. Georoe Spink, Min nesota Junction, Wisconsin. A country wide canvsss of pur . -• of the Compound reporto 98 cent, benefited. i f • patlons of our people should be equally varied, and that the economic problems upon which our prosperity depends should vary with those occu pations. So I have come first of all to Nebraska, one of the most, purely ag ricultural states within the nation's borders, to talk face to face wltfi my fellow countrymen here about the problems and difficulties that beset them. Search Oat Tarts. 1 am not a farmer, although I was born and spent the greater portion of my life in a purely rural communi ty where agriculture was the princi pal occupation of the people. If I have gathered from my lifework and training nothing else, however, I have learned, I hope, first of all, to search out the facta and to withhold opinion until the facts have been obtained. When once we have the facts and all the fnctsi the principles which should guide us are not difficult to discern. I am here to gather auch facts as I may concerning the interests of this section of the country, and to aHk you from your own experience to verify or correct my understand ing of the matter. The picture which has already been painted to me is one of great dis tress, for which the causea are not far to seek. During the great war the farmer was urged to Increase his production and multiply his efforts, on the theory, undoubtedly well founded, that "food will win the war." He responded In a manner which makes one of the brightest pages of American history. When the war came to Its end, the farmei with his greatly increased acreage and production suddenly found his markets cut off and the price of all he had to sell correspondingly re duced. In order that he might meet the Increased demands that were being made upon him he had borrowed money for the purchase of land and Implements, gone heavily Into debt, and many had mortgaged all their holding* as aecurlty. Depression came, prices fell, foreign purchases decreased. There came also a deflation of credit on an extended scale. On the 17th day of May, 1920, the repub lican senate adopted a resolution, in troduced by Kenator McCormick of Illinois, Inquiring what steps the Fed eral Reserve board proposed to take or to recommend to the member banka of tha Federal Reserve system to meet the existing inflation In cur renly and rredlt. Republicans Promise Dilation. Th republican platform, adopted in the following month, pledged that party to "a courageous and an in telligent deflation of our eredet and currency.” and the republican nom inee, In his speech of acceptance of the 23d of July, declared that "de Ration ought to have begun on the day after the armistice," and pledged "that earnest and consistent attack which the party platform covenants." The Federal Reserve board recom mended such a policy to Its mem bers, and between the 30th day of June, 1920, and the 30th day of June. 1922, a contraction of loana and dis counts of over $5,500,000,000 occurred Rank failures multiplied. Many farmers were driven Into bankruptcy. A survey mads by the Department of Agriculture shows that in 15 corn and wheat producing states. 5S per cent of all farmers, owners and tenants combined, either lost their farms outright or were spared merely through the leniency of their credl tors. Migration was Inevitable. In 1922 alone. 1,200,000 people moved from the farms to Industrial centers. Ac cording to the figures, interest alone consumed all the capital earnings of the farmers of th# United States dur ing th# crop years of 1920-1921, and 1921-1922. Within that period there was a de flation In capital value of land, build ings, machinery, livestock and work ing capital of more than twenty bil lions of dollars, while the earnings of farm operativea on the capital owned by them aunk from 8 3 per cent for 1919-1920 to an actual loss In the two succeeding years, and a profit for 1922-1923 of only 1 1-2 per cent and 1.4 per cent for 1923-1924. This return barely sufficed to pay Interest charges and left the farmer nothing as a return upon his capital. Taxes, Interest Take All, Another side of th# picture Is pre sented by the statement from the De partment of Agriculture that, leaving out of consideration all Indirect taxa tion paid by the farmer on the things he buys, property taxes and interest charges for the year 1920 consumed the entire value of the wheat and to bacco crops; for the year 1921, the entire value of the wheat, oats, po tato and tobacco crops; and for 1922, the entire value of the cotton crop plus two-thirds of th# wheat. When we turn to the question of prica ratios, th# burden which the farmer has been given to carry seems even more extreme. The national In dustrial conference board, in figures recently prepared, shows that the ex change value of our principal food export products-—wheat, corn, beef, cattle end hogs — averaged hut 63 per cent of their value in 1914. No decline approximating this has oc curred in the prices of any other commodltlea. Figures such ss these tell their own Story. If they are alarming to the farmer, they should be even more so to the rest of the country, which is dependent upon him for Its dnlly bread. They may well reflect upon n statement once made by W. .1. Tlryan. that if all the cities should disappear, the farms could rebuild them, but If the farms were abandoned, the cities would die, never to be reborn. In spit# of the recent welcome rise in the value of certain staple crops, no man will question the statement that the situation of agriculture Is desperate and full of danger to the country. The problem Is, In Its last analysis, not one of statistics, but of human lives There Is no duty which the govern ment" can he called upon to perform more pressing or more escred than to organize the economic Ilf* of Amer lea so I4»at American citizens can earn on their farme a living In keep tng with American needs and Amer lean traditions The outstanding problem of the hour Is to provide some mesne by which this can lie done We hear much talk of economic laws, and there are those who de clare that the farmer must he left to work out his salvation by hi* own hands, under the Inexorable domina tlon of economic forces w hich neither he nor his government can control. Of course there are such things as natural and economic laws. No amount of government persuasion will Induce human beings to consume or digest a given amount of food. No legislative flat can bring the sun shine or withhold the rain, nor do away with the lean klne and the fat that disturbed the dreams of Pharoah. , Republicans Ignore Economics. The republican party which through Its candidate has most to say on the subject of economic laws, has been the last to recognize In its legislation that such things exist. The chief compliilnt today of agriculture is that It no longer enjoys economic equality with Industry and commerce. At whose door shall this fact be laid? What party Is It that has followed the consistent practice in legislation of giving a deliberate preference ns against the farmer to the manufac turing Industries of the country? It Is ignorant or Insincere to cry out against the farm bloc In congress as if It were a new thing. Each suc ceeding republican administration has heen a government hy an industrial bloc. The granting of undue prefer ence and subsidies to Industry by re publican administrations, and the at tempt of agriculture to get a fair hearing In congress have been the main thread of domestic polities for the last generation. It explains the populist movement of the '90s. It explains the insurgent movement of 1910 and 1912 In the republican party. It explains the wide breach In that party today. The unrest back of these movements will continue until the voice of the farmer Is listened to just as attentively in the White House and the halls of congress as that of the industrialist. The policy of the democratic party is to readjust the balance and put agriculture where It belongs—on an equality with Indus try. Tariff as Cure-All. In order to delude the farmer with a false pretense of Imaginary bene fits and with utter disregard of eco nomic law, those In control of the re publican party announced, in the spring of 1921, that all hla Ills would be promptly cured by the enactment of a protective tariff for his benefit. They declared that high tariff rates on wheat, corn, livestock, meat prod ucts. and so forth, would Immediate ly raise the domestic price. Such a law was accordingly placed upon the statute books In May, 1921. But when wheat fell from $1.47 In May to $1 in December, and corn from 62 cents In May to 47 cents in October, the prom ised relief was seen to be a pure po litical fiction. Under cover of this pretense, how ever, the oppressive Fordney-McCum ber bill was enacted In September, 1922. Lobbies representing greedy manufacturers stormed the nation's capital and wrote their own excessive and extortionate rates In utter dfsre gard of every theory, even of protect ive tariff taxation. No consideration was given to the new and changed financial business and economic conditions. The "old guard" of the republican element In control Ignored the fact that America Is no longer a debtor nation; that our productive capacity had Increased more thun 30 per cent above the pre war level: that our exports had Jump ed from $2,428,000,000 In 1913 to 98. 000,000,000 In 1920; that we possessed nearly one-half of the world's gold; that we had constructed a great mer chant marine Intended to carry freight both ways; that our produc tive machinery and our intelligent la bor were unexcelled, and In most In dustries could produce a given amount of product per person as cheap or cheaper than any other na tion; that our supplies of raw mi terlal and of foodstuffs were almost unlimited In variety and quantity. Forget McKinley Axiom. They Ignored the axiom accepted by McKinley that "We cannot sell unless we buy." This law was both a fence and an offense. It was a fence against reciprocal trade, no matter how profitable or desirable, and shattered our trade structure throughout the world. It was an offense to every consumer In the United States, and not least of all to the farmers who were left outside the scope of Its pretended benefits. It might have been appropriately entitled "An act to obstruct our foreign commerce*, to Increase the prices of what the farmer buys and to reduce the prices of what he sells." Thereafter, as an additional sop to the farmer, under the so-called flexi ble provision, the duty on wheat was Increased hy executive order end that ungrateful commodity promptly re sponded by a further fall In value. Ilawes Sees Light. Surely the day when the farmer can he lulled to re*t hy a nominal tariff on the commodities of which he has a surplus to sell abroad has passed forever. Indeed, light seems to be breaking In high circles on this question, for In hla speech recently made at Lincoln, Neb., on behalf of the administration, the republi can nominee for the vice presidency said that: "It la an admitted fact that In the case of any agricultural com modity of which wo raise a sub stantial surplus, the price obtain able for this surplus In the wrtrld's markets established In a general way the price level of the entire crop." The scales sre falling from their eyes. I commend that statement to th* perusal of the republic*n con gressmen snd senator* who boasted or still boast of benefit* to th# farmer from a tariff duty on his wheat Th* earn* economic blindness hss affected the foreign policies of the repuhllcsn party. America hi* *1 ways been an exporter of food prod ucta and proved during tha war how far It could go In feeding the nations of th* world. Restore Foreign Markets. When th# war was over It should have been clear to everyone that the first duty which th* government of the United Blale* was railed upon to perform was to assist In ths prnnipl a*d i>errnanent restoration of those nations who were our chief customer* It was only by restoring our mar kets that we could hope to dispose of our surplus production, and such » restoration was worth to America hardly less than to the European countries themselves. Instead of that we chose, under re publican guidance, to shut our eyes to the needs of Europe and our own best interests to declare for a policy of isolation and leave the nations exhausted by the war to make their own way out of their difficulties, with out co-operation from us. The democratic administration was vainly seeking to maintain such eco nomic and moral co-operation as would sustain the general trade situa tion, so that our vast surplus, essen tially of foodstuffs and raw materials, might find a market. It Is a reproach to the collective wisdom of mankind that each year since 1929 there have been for 109,000,000 to 200,000,000 peo ple in Europe underfed and under nourished, and otheb millions literally starving, while during the same pe riod America's storehouses of food stuffs and raw materials have been vainly seeking a mdrket at reasonable prices. Reparations Problem. At the bottom of the European problem lies, and has lain, ever since the armistice, the question of repara tions. In 1919 President Wilson asked permission of congress to appoint an American representative on the repa ration commission. In a spirit of partisan Jealousy It was denied. And for five long years, so far as we are concerned, we left that question to be devil the economic life of Europe, and delay the hour when Germany and the othef defeated nations might be restored to health and be able once more to contribute to the economic prosperity of the world. Today we hear from those most re sponsible for this state of affairs loud praise over the fact that Americans participated in the recent reparations conference that brought forth the so called Dawes report. That, report is even claimed as a diplomatic victory for an administra tion that time and time again die claimed In most positive terms all re sponsibility for the presence of Gen eral Dawes and his colleagues, or any participation In the preparation of their report. Not Political Asset. I have no desire to decry that re port, and I have every wish that it may prove a step along the way. I am not even disposed to debate with those who talk as If It were the end of the Journey Instead of merely the first milestone. But I resent the be lated attempt to capitalize lta possi bllltles as a political asset. If Americans have, In fact, by their unofficial presence accomplished or aided In this result It laya a crushing burden of blame and responsibility on the shoulders of those who for five long years prevented any form of American participation. In the speech to which I referred a moment ago and which I take to he an accurate statement of the posi tion of the republican party. I read that the question of the farmer's welfare Is "a nonpartisan and econ omic question, and must not he and cannot be ever discussed or settled as a party question." The same thing might, be said In the same bland terms of the tariff, of taxation, of railroads, of foreign policy and prac tically every other problem that af fects the welfare of the American people. Parties Must Have Issues. If we eliminate from political de hate every question that Is either na tlonal In Its scope or economic In Its character, and especially every ques tlon that Is embarrassing to the party In power, we will reach that millen nium when government through poli tical parties will cease to exlet. The very purpose of political parties la to frame policies, and to propose and execute them on all great questions that are national In their scope. Poli tical parties that hava ceased to have opinions or the courage to avow them have lost sll reason for existence. What, then, la the program which the republican party puts forward by its accredited spokesman? It seems to have two propositions only to submit: One, the regulation—which in this case means the curtailment—of production, In which connection the statement Is made that "every rec lamatlon project, whether by Irriga tlon or drainage, furnishes added competition for existing cultivated farms, orchards and vineyards, at a time when we are elready serlouelv embarrassed by overproduction In many lines." Reclamation and Irrigation, there fore, must be forthwith abandoned, and multitudes of other farmers must make up their minds to quit farm ing or let their fields lie fallow. Dawes' Commission Proposal. And the second proposal. In Its prospect of Immediate relief. Is like unto the first. It has not even the merit of novelty, for Its consists In remitting the consideration of the entire problem to an "Impartial, non partisan, competent commission under economic guidance." This commls slon la to "suggest means" of pro tectlng agriculture from Inequality with other Industries, snd until a specific plan has emanated from euch a tribunal the question cannot be properly considered or discussed I seem to have heard something of this sort before. In 1921 congress Itself set up a Joint commission of agricultural In qulry, which deliberated for six months concerning the agricultural crisis and 11a causes, and submitted to » republican hotme and senate over the Intter President Coolldgc then presided—a moat exhaustive re port. In 1922 President llardlng convened an agricultural conference, which again deliberated concerning the subject In the eprtng of 1922 the OSTEOPATHY The Voiee of Authority on Spinel Adjustment Department of Agriculture Instituted an Investigation on Ite own account concerning the disparity between agricultural and other prices. Much Debate; No Action. And congress In 1923 debated the entire subject at length. No action has thus fur resulted. We are nosv told that none can result until the process of investigation Is begun again. If such a commission Is need ed now. why was It not needed a year ago. and why was the suggestion of its appointment delayed until the eve of election day? The patient seems In a fair way to die before the doctors have finished their diagnosis. I believe that It is the duty of men in office and the business of political parties to face responsibility and not to shirk It. Enough evidence has been already gathered to furnish a basls'for congressional action. If it has not, there is something lacking In the administration of the Depart ment of Agriculture, which exists for that purpose. What the republi can administration is seeking to evade Is a decision on matters of principle, and from this no commis sion can furnish an escape. Democratic I'rogram. The democratic party has a definite program by means of which we hope to restore to the farmer the eco nomic equality of which he has been unjustly deprived. We undertake: To adopt an international policy of such co-operation, by direct official Instead of Indirect and evasive un official means, as will reestablish the farmer's export market by restoring the industrial balance In Europe and the normal flow of International trade with the settlement of Europe's eco nomic problems. To adjust the tariff so that the farmer and all other classes can buy again In a competitive market. To reduce taxation, both direct and indirect, and by strlrt economy to lighten the burdens of govern ment. To readjust and lower rail and water rates, which will make our markets, both for the buyer and the seller, national and Internation al instead of regional and local. To bring about the early com pletion of internal waterway sys tems for transportation, and to de velop our water powers for cheap er fertilizer and use on our farms. To stimulate by every govern mental activity the progress of the co-operative market in government and the establishment of an export marketing corporation or commis sion in order that the exportable surplus may not establish the price of file whole crop. To secure for the fanner credits suitable for his needs. This Is our platform and our pro gram, <^jnd if elected, I purpose with the aid of a democratic congress to put it Into effect. This program is made up of both administration and legislation. I am not sure that of these honest and effective administration Is not the more Important. No law, however beneficial In Its purpose, can ac complish good results If it Is badly administered. It Is quite as Impor tant to the farmers of the United States that existing agencies should be administered to the»r interest aa it is that new laws should be passed for their aid and benefit. While the farmer shares the gener al Interest of every citizen in good government, he has a peculiar inter est In some of Its activities. The De partment of Agriculture, created in 1839 under a democratic president, and presided over in its early days by a great citizen of Nebraska—.1. Ster ling Morton—has done much for the welfare of the American farmer. Un questionably It can and it should do more. It has devoted the larger share of Its activity In the past to problems of production; It should be stimulated now to think in terms of marketing and distribution. The farmer should he aided in the study of hl» cost* and assisted In building up nation-wide system* of co-operative marketing. The depart ment should be rid of political influ ence, and presided over by a secre tary competent, courageous and loy.il io the best in'erests of agri culture, and care should be taken to sec that Its entire personnel Is of the same character. The Interstate commerce commis sion. with its control over railroad rates; the farm loan board and the federal reserve board, with their con trol over credits, and the federal tar iff commission, with its present pow ers of Investigation and review, all dial with Interests vital to agricul ture. No person biased or prejudiced for or against any imrticular class or interest should be permitted to sit on any of these nodies. Personal honesty alone is not a sufficient qualification. Intelligence and Impar tiality and courage are equally de nianded. Equally important to the farmer ace the Department of Justice snd the federal trade commission. It Is to an able and aggressive attorney gen oral and an active and alert federal trade commission that the public must look to for protection and de fense. President Is Responsible. According to my views, the respon stbility for providing such an admin istration rests upon the shoulders of him who is chosen to he president of the United States. He may share with others the Aurdens of the task; his responsibility he cannot divide. It is his businss to select fit men for of fice, and when mistakes in selection are made to be prompt in their cor rection. He need not wait for con gressional committees or grand juries to point them out; nor can he or the party that he leads escape responsi bility on the plea of general good character or fair intent. It is his busi ness to give the people a government honest all the way through. If such Is the wish of the American people, I shall not seek to escape the duty or avoid the responsibility for its per formance. Speech By Bryan. The following Is the speech of in troductlon given by Charles W. Bryan: "As chief executive of the state of Nebraska, I congratulate you upon your acceptance of this opportunity to hear our distinguished guest, the leader of the democratic party ami the hope of the agricultural inter ests of the United States. "As a candidate I thank you on be half of Mr. Davis and myself for the opportunity that you have given us to meet and to talk pver with you the Important Issues of this campaign. "Mr. Davis, you are standing in the center of the United States. You are in the heart of the mlddlewest. You are In almost the renter of the corn belt of the United States and in the greatest agricultural section of the world. It Is most fitting that you have selected this place to talk on the subject of agriculture. Agriculture Is the basic Industry of the nation anarty has a record In the nation for honesty, economy and efficiency, the same as the demo cratic state administrations have where they have been In control. "I feel sure that the message which the democratic standard bearer brings to the farmers, stock raisers and com mon people of the prairie states this evening will not only make a pro found Impression upon them, but he may feel assured of their support in his desire to remove the republican handicaps and restrictions under which agriculture has suffered during the past four years. "I appreciate the honor conferred upon nte In nominating me as a can didate on the democratic national ticket, and I am especially proud to be associated on the national ticket with the speaker of the evening, whom I have the exceptional pleasure and the distinguished honor of wel coming with you to our great state, John W. Davis." -- ' • Bad Breaks May Hurt Davis (Continued from rag* On*.) ment of all men and of honesty In government. The issue in this cam paign is to raise the standard of pub lic morality and honor." rittman Don’t Say Why. Senator iPttmun is the ballyhoo ex pert of the Davis party. He stands outside of the democratic tent arid bids the people enter. He stated at the luncheon that Davis and Bryan will lie elected in November, without explaining why. He staled there is enough in the republican administra tion to warrant people supporting the democratic nominees, and he did not explain why. “How can any thinking republican pxppct the people of this western country to help the republican party?" the senator asked. "Our candidate is simply a plain human being, raised in the mountains of West Virginia, and earned his living since boyhood." Hull Also (speaks. Cordell Hull of Tennessee, former democratic national chairman, aald lie brought a message of hopa and cheer to Nebraska democrat* whom he hoped would not he downhearted. He urged Nebraska democrats to ba alert and active. Then he made an other characteristic democratic state ment: "Democrats never had more to lie proud of and republicans never more to be ashamed of.” But he did not tell why. He concluded with the statement that if Davis should be elected, the country would have an administration comparable to Wash ington, Lincoln and Wilson. ,The luncheon was attended by many out-of-town democrats, includ ing: Congressman Edgar Howard, T. S. Allen, stats chairman; Dan V. Stephens of Fremont, Grant Shum way and C. A. Lord of Lincoln, J. J. Thomas of Seward, Dr. Cameron of Kearney, Thomas Smith of York. At the speakers' table were Mayor Dahl man, Kd P. Smith. Dr. Jennie Call fa*. Mrs. W. E. Bolin. Arthur F. Mullen, B. F. Marshall, H. H. Harper, T. C. Byrne. H. L. Moss man, Edna M. Thurbcr, Mrs. McGirr. Davis sat between State Chairman Allen and Hitchcock. Cordell Hull was between Mrs. Jennie Callfas and Mayor Dahlman. Davis and Hull were among those who smoked cigars dur trg the luncheon. Gov. C. W. Bryan wore his skull cap. iThe Brandeis Store yOSS Double Tub I The double-tub washer is the ideal machine for the family that have large washings. It gives double speed and cuts the time in half because it is in fact two separate washers in one and sells at a price even less than some single tub washers do. Now 5.00 Down p?H Tk« Br.ad.il Star.—Fifth Floor P)L OR COLLEGE? | lege Bureau of The Omaha le selection of a school, col irmation about the best inse rtion will be furnished upon ik below: —CW«' Boarding Scheal —Gfrla* 5cKmI —Art School —Journalism —Banking and Finance —Kinder far ten Training — Boy* Prey School —t.aw >* —Boya* School — Buaineaa AdmUila*Tatleo — niemc.n# || —Buaineaa College