The commoner. (Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-1923, January 01, 1917, Page 26, Image 26
h The Commoner 26 roa: i7, no. 1 w E I Webb-KenoriLaw Held Constitutional r '' Ar Washington dispatch, dated 'Jan.ll, says: In tho most sweeping of all decisions upholding prohibition laws tho supremo court last Monday upheld as constitutional and valid tho Wobtb-Konyon law prohibiting ship ments of liquor from wet to dry states. It also sustained West Vir ginia's recent amendment to her law prohibiting Importation in interstate commerce of liquor for personal ;uso. A?tor having been vetoed by Pres ident Taft, who hold it unconstitu tional, and having boon repassed by congress over his vop, tho Jaw was sustained by tho silpromo court by a vote of 7 to 2. Leaders of tho pro hibition movement declare it is to their fight second only, in importance to tho proposed constitutional amend ment.' Affects Twenty-seven States Tho Wobb-Konyon law, as; uphold by tho supromo court, will affect twonty-soven states. Of these, nine toon already have prohibition estab lished, four have voted for prohibi tion and four have elected. prohibi tion legislatures. These states now have power to pass laws forbidding tho shipment of liquors into their ter ritory. Admit Big Dry Victory h Lawyers for linuor interests who heard tho decision today admitted it I upnoia ana appnea tno law "in its fuljest sense." t. , , ; "Tho all-reaching power of govern ment over liquor is settled," said. Chief Justice White in announcing, tho decision. "There was no, inten tion of congress to forbid individual use of liquor. Tho, purpose of this act was to cut out by tho roots the practice of permitting violation of state liquorjaws. We can have no doubt that congress has complete au thority to prevent paralyzing of state authority. Congress exerted a power to, co-ordinate tho national with, the state authority." ' Two Justices Dissent Justice Holmes and Vandevantor InhOTltofl in flin nnlnlnn Tultnn of tho fourteenth amendment of tho constitution of tho United Stateb. It, however, decides that unless the state authority has an exceptional appli cation to shipments of Interstate commerce as tho result of tho act of congress known as tho Wobb-Kenyon law tho provisions of tho state law restricting shipments of intoxicants into tho state from other states would bo unconstitutional because interfer ing with tho power of congress to regulate commerce among tho state's, and consequently would bo a direct burden upon such commerce. Shuts wff Carriers "2. Considering the. WebbrKenyon act, tho court holds that there is no foundation for the contention that tho act r ly applies to shipments from one stato in'- another for a use prohibited by the stato to which the liquor is shipped. On the contrary, it is decided that tho Webb-Kenyon act, to use tho words of the act, ap plies to shipments of liquor 'intended to be received, possessed, sold or In any manner used' in violation of the laws of tho state. As' tho conclusion causes every prohibition of the Wnst Virginia law to be embraced and comb under the right conferred by congress by-tho Wobb-Konyon act, it is decided that tho West Virginia law was not in conflict with the commerce clause of tho constitution and tho power of congress to regulate commerce if 'congress had power to enact the Wobb-Kenyon law. Congress Has tho Power "3. Disposing of that question, it is decided that congress had the, power under the constitution to adopt tho Webb-Kenyon law, whether con sidered from tho point of view "of original, reasoning or in fti n-fcf , tho previous legislation by congress! and tho decisions of the 'court ho'lVi- ing that legislation valid. It is there fore decided that ,by virtue of the Webb-Kenyon law there is no power to ship intoxicants from one state in to another in violation of the prohi-' bltions of tho law of tho state into which the liquor is shipped. "In other words, it is decided that sirtco the amendment nf tha wi uvenyon law the nnntmAiM .JI i'a . dissented to tho opinion. Justice Mc2j state 'commerce may not be lispfttv f--w-pf tw wtjiuiujj IV A til LUC majority decision, did not concur in thq opinion. the state prohibition." fary 'T f convey liquor into a state against the prohibitions of its laws or tn j tGrst.fitA hhVntVi1r. net !,' 1L ail , A digest of, the majcJiWoijrn.lpmVfght.to receive, possess,- sell -o in propared by the court Sets JoM iis Wv MnnfiVi. nm, sZL..1j.- i,tirij... e li ,,r . "vi"v ouuuiy to xiui,uin& no J.UUUWH. "1. That the WeafVhWln. livw! besido prohibiting tho manufacture ana saio ok an intoxicants except as to thft't which is permtyt,edfQr! med ical, sacramental arid manufacturing? purposes, also forbids all transporta tion of liquor and all receipt and pos session of linuor tranfmnrtnri .In !!; state whether originating, in or out? siob or tne state, and, although it does .not prohibit-vp,ersonal. .use, 4puts, serjous restrictions upon the power W obtain for such use. v 4 yTho court holds that, in vio.w of tho well-established. police ' authority of the state! over Intoxicants, there is ntt reason to thihk that this law was in any wise repugnant to the due process clauSe NEW RUPTURE CURE j? Doa't Wdavh THimm "; Brook's Appllanco. Nyw , discovory;' wnaoriui. xno oonoxious springs or jiaun, .txuiuiuu.ua Air Cushions. Iliads hhA drawn tko broken part; together us yeHv.fmld . broken limb. No salvos. No plasters. No llos. Dur able, cheap. Sent -on trial to prove it. Full inform ation anu btookJet FKEBl O. E. Brook, 103A Stntc St., MKrakuli; Mick. - i BILL TO ABOLISH SALOONS' IN NATIONAL CAPITAL PASSES : h-.-)v" 'SENATE ., Associated press dispatch, dated Washington, Jan. 9, says: The Sheppard bill to abolish saloons in me , nauonai canitnl Swanson, Thomas, Thompson, Varda man, Walsh, Willianls. Total, 28. Republicans Borah, Brady, Clapp, Clark, Cummins, Curtis, Dillingham, Fall, Fernald, Gallinger, Gronna, Jones, Kenyon, McCumber, Nelson, Norris, Oliver, Page, Poindexter, Sherman, Smith of Michigan; Smoot, Sterling, Sutherland, Townsend, Watson, Works. Total, 27. Total ayes, 55. Noes Democrats Bankhead, Broussard, Culberson, Hardwick, Hitchcock, Hughes, Husting, James, Johnson of Maine, Lee, Lewis, Martine, New lands, O'Gormau, Phelaii; Pomefene, Reed, Saulsbury, Smith of Arizona; Stone, Tillman, Underwood. Total, 22. Republicans Brandegee, Colt, Du pont, Harding, Lippitt, Lodge, Mc Lean, Penrose, Wadsworth, Weeks. Total, 10. Total noes, 32. Neither Vote on Party Lined Neither the vote, on the referen dum amendment nor that on the passage of the bill was on party lines. There were 26 democrats and 17 re publicans voting for the referendum, and 22 democrats and 21 republicans voting against it. Most of the repuo licans of tho so-called progressive group voted against it. For the bill itself there were 28 democratic and 27 republican votes, with 22 democrats and 10 republicans against it. All the progressives voted for passage. Provisions of the Bill The prohibiting language ofthe bill says that after Nor. 1: No person or -persons, or any house, company, association, club or corpor ation, his, its or their agents, offi cers clerks or servants. nlronHv nr J indirectly shall, in the 'District of Columbia, manufacture for sale or gift, import for sale, offer for sale, keep for sale, traffic in, barter, ex port,, ship out of the District of Co lumbia or exchange for goods or merchandise, or solicit or receive or ders for the purchase of any alcoholic liquors for beverage purposes or for any other than scientific, medicinal, pharmaceutical, -mechanical, - sacra mental .or dther nonbeverage pur poses'. '' ,',: Andther section says the measure ,suaii not do -construed to prevent 'the manufacture, ImDortaho'n . av .pprtatidn ' of Sale" of denatured. methyl alcolibl-or of ethyl alcohol" tor scientinc; medicinal ' and like ' pur poses, but their inaufacture and sale are limited to licensed druggists or manufacturers. The Bo-caljed lock ers system is specifically forbidden. Common Carriers as "Detectives" All common carriers bringing in toxicants into the District of Colum- Dia are to keep a record of the con- JlfrPf TSTrw 1 1917, was passed late today by th . ar0 l? Keep a record of tUe con- rS$.': vJM 1ltema where. 1U fri3r:a, claim it is .assured While the measure prohibits the saleof liquor in the District of Co lumbia, it permits importation tor personal use. An amendment which would have submitted the proposal to a referendum of citizens of the DiBtrictwas defeated lnRf w , passage by a tie vote, 43 to 43. , ine vote Tn jpassage follows: Democrats -, ishurst,' Be'ckman, Bryan, Chamberlain, Chilton, John ston of South - kpta; Kern, Kirby L,ea, Martin, Myers and Overman Pittman, Ransdell, Robinson, Shaf roth Sheppard Shields, Simmons, Smith of Georgia; Smith of . "Marv Und; Smith of South Carolina ' xney-ar for personal use. Th l declares property rights shall exist in alcoholic liquors illegally manufac tured or brought into tho District, makes every place tha.t violates the law a "common nuisance," and, gives the right to any citizen to sue and tb enjoin such nuisance. Heavy penalties are provided for violations, including a provision aimed at physlciaj who prescribe li quor for patients without cause. A right to sue for damages from the person who sells liquor to a person .who is" injured "in nerson or nrnn. I.erty" in consequence of intoxicaion is given to wood relatives. Efforts to absolutely forbid manu facture in the District and expert from it were beaten without a record vote. An amendment by Senator PlHilan which "would permit' salo of dSX;5le' beer and porter" For Making Territories "Dry" Whilo the Sheppard bill was under consideration in the senate, legiBla tion to prohibit liquor traffic in it, waif was urged before tho house tor- ' ritories committee by representatives of the Anti-saloon League of America and tho Women's nhricHo mTwtd ance Union. The committee tomor- xurt win ueur arguments in favor of a drastic liquor prohibition law in Alaska. HOUSE COMMITTEE FAVORS PRO HIBITION RESOLUTION , A Washington D. C, dispatch, says The resolution to submit national prohibition to the states is again out of committee and before congress. The judiciary committee of tho house reported it favorably Decem ber 13, the vote being twelve to seven. Here is the way the com mittee members lined up: For Chairman Webb of North Carolina, Thomas of Kentucky, Tag gart of Kansas, Wilson of Illinois, Whaley of South Carolina, Carroway of Kansas, Neely of West Virginia, Walker of Georgia, Volsted of Min nesota, Nelson of Wisconsin, Mor gan of Oklahoma, Chandler of New York. Against , Igoe of Missouri, Gard of Ohio, Steele of Pennsylvania, Dan forth of New York, Graham of Penn sylvania, Dyer of Missouri and Walsh of Massachusetts. The resolution as recommended by the judiciary'committee is as follows: "Tho sale, manufacture for sale, transporting lo- sale, importation, for sale of intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes in the United States and all territory subject to tno jurisdiction thereof and exportation thereof are forever prohibited. "The -congrjMfs or the states shall have power independently or con currently to enforce this article by all needful legislation." SENATE REPORT FAVORS PRO HIBITION A Washington dispatch, dated Dec. 21, says: By a Tote of thirteen to three, with two members not voting, the senate judiciary committee today reported favorably a joint resolution providing for a: national prohibition amendment. The three senators who voted against the report were Reed, of Missouri; -Brandegee, of Connec ticut, and Culberson, of Texas. As reported by the senate com mittee, the resolution would read: "The sale, manufacture or trans portation of intoxicating liquors witbr in, the importation thereof into and exportation thereof from the United States and all territories subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes, are hereby prohibited. "The congress shall have power to enforce this article by all appropriate legislation. This article shall not bo construed to abridge the power oi the several states, to enforce state prohibitory laws." MABD PROHIBITION BILL PASSES UNITED STATES SENATE A Washington dispatch, dated Jan. 11, says: Transmission in the mans of liquor advertisments, in circulars, newspapers or otherwise, into states Which prohibit such advertising or solicitation, is barred b a bin oy Senator Bankhead. of Alabama, passed today by the senate, it now gqes to the house. Editor I iiko' this poem; it is cap ital. - PoetWsfes, . hope so; but how much? Boston Transcript. V