The commoner. (Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-1923, January 12, 1912, Page 3, Image 3
3 JANUARY 12, 181S The Commoner. N "V IN rvj TO I to O labor. Today tho struggle of mankind is to avoid work, to put It upon others; and, as Tolstoy has said, we no sooner shift tho bur den of labor upon others than we begin to look down upon them. A lack of sympathy with our fellow-men is the cause of most of human in justice and misery." The schools, too, came in for some comment' as he added: "I sometimes think that our educational system is at fault in separating our Intellectual progress from our moral advance ment. Too often education is sought to enable one to avoid hard work. When this becomes tho prevalent idea, education ceases to become a blessing and becomes a curse. The most im portant thought that can be lodged in each child's mind is that education is to onlargo one's capacity for work, and not to relieve him from the necessity of it." "About the most toil-demanding place is tho farm. You evidently believe in tho back-to-tho-farm movement." "Decidedly. In the cities men accept posi tions giving small pay because they are enabled to dress more stylishly and keep their hands clean. They consider this the badge of respec ability, and they prefer it to greater pay for manual labor. It is not only labor they avoid, but the physical and often moral development which goes with it. The farm, toil and all, gives tho greatest opportunity which is left to us for tho development .of independence and character and strength I believe that wo shall only do our full duty to ourselves, our country men, and posterity when we emphasize the fact that it is the idler, not the toiler, who is a dis grace. In disseminating this idea there is work for us all." Mr. Bryan is positive in his estimate of poli ticians, but when he, talked of various leaders of both parties it was with an understanding that he was not to be quoted. It was characteristic of Mr. Bryan's tempera ment that he exerted himself to be in Lincoln on the day that President Taft visited that city. He proposed a toast to the president at tho luncheon in his honor, in which he paid a courteous tribute to the man who had defeated him. "I ask you," said he, "to rise, fill your glasses with the beverage upon which the Al mighty has set his approval, and drink to tho health of President Taft, and may God give him wisdom to discharge aright the onerous duties imposed upon him!" It must have been pleasing to tho speaker that a little later in the day Mr. Taft, making an appeal for the support of arbitration treaties with France and Great Britain, gave him credit for making one of the most important sugges tions incorporated in the pacts. He said he first heard from Mr. Bryan the scheme of ap pointing a commission to make a preliminary Investigation prior to the actual submission of the question to a board of arbitration, with the further proviso that this investigation should continue for a year, thus giving both nations time to calm down before the final issue was reached. So it was typical of the attitude of western people toward the democratic leader that this reference was greeted with cheers. Mr. Bryan, in discussing national politics, fits every phase to his own theory of govern ment, which he has worked out satisfactorily in his mind, and which, in his view, accounts for all conditions. He is as sure of his position today as he was in 1896. The public always likes that sort of public man though he may not secure a majority of the votes. That Mr. Bryan will be a most influential factor in the coming campaign is evident, as it Is that ho will use his utmost power to shape his party's policy and nomination in accordance with his views of democracy. With the activities of a national campaign added to present demands upon his time, it means a year with few resting-places. But he is used to it. The belated train arrived at 9:15 p. m. Ho hurried to an automobile, was driven a mile to an audience of ten thousand that had waited Ian hour and a half for him, and applauded him jto tho echo through a sixty-minute talk. Then hack to tho station and aboard another Pull man for a lecture two hundred miles away. . These are busy days for Bryan. V FORGETTING DEMOCRACY Tho New York World quotes Mr. Underwood as saying that tn dealing with the industrial Question wo ought to forget that we are demo crats. After one reads his views on public Sestions it Is easy to understand his advice illustrates it by his example. JS NEBRASKA I. J. Dunn of Omaha, on of Nebraska's most faithful democrats and the man who placed Mr. Bryan In nomination at tho Donvor convention in 1908 is a candidate for delogate-at-largo from Nebraska to the democratic national convention of 1912. Mr. Dunn has issued the following statement: "To tho Democrats of Nebraska: I shall bo a candidate for delegate at large to tho demo cratic national convention. I favor tho indorse ment of candidates for president and vice presi dent who are known to be progressive, and tho selection of delegates who will work for tho nomination of such candidates, and of the adop tion of a progressive platform. I favor the indorsement of tho principle of free raw ma terial, including wool, regardless of tho action of tho democratic majority in the house of representatives. I believe that the anti-trust law should be amended to mako it effective as a criminal statute, such as it was prior to the decisions of the supreme court in the Standard Oil and Tobacco trust cases. "If chosen a delegate I shall endeavor to aid William J. Bryan in whatever manner he may see fit to lead the fight for a progressive plat form and candidates. While I have not at all times agreed with him on local state issues, I believe he is and has been right on national issues for eighteen years, and today voices tho sentiment of tho real progressive democracy of the nation as no other democratic loader does. "I consider the influence of Mr. Bryan and tho confidence that progressive democrats have in his leadership, courage, honesty and devotion to tho principles of truo democracy, the most valu able asset our party has today or will have in tho coming campaign. An effort is now being made to weaken, If not to destroy Mr. Bryan's standing as a party leader. The opposition may not, in this state, go so far as to try to defeat him as a candidate at largo to the convention. His opponents, however, will endeavor to elect delegates not in sympathy with his views regarding t,he platform, and a fight is on to secure the indorsement of a candidate to whom he is opposed. We all recog nize the right of every democrat to vote for any principle or candidate he pleases. Consequently those who agree with Mr. Bryan, and desire to send him as a delegate, together with a dele gation in sympathy with him, who will work with him in the convention to secure tho adoption of a progressive platform and the nomination of progressive candidates, ought to state their position plainly and invito the opposition to do tho same. "If the democrats of this-state are ready to desert the leadership of Mr. Bryan for that of some other democrat, well and good. That is their privilege. But let us have tho matter determined in a manner open and abovo board so that all democrats may know just what the issue is, and just who. and what every candi date stands for. I. J. DUNN." Omaha, Neb., January 4, 1912. result Is to glvo to tho packers no more than a fair, just, and reasonable profit, that is less than the profit mado by any other great enter prise in tho world. DESTROYING THE LAW MR. NICHOLS' STATEMENT Cincinnati, O., Dec. 26, 1911. Editor of The Commonor: My attention has just been called to an articlo entitlod, "Liko Judge Parker," publlshod in your issue of dato, December 22, 1911. Tills articlo Is a republication of an allogod interview with mo purporting to have boon sent out from Cincinnati. Tho interview is a fako, pure and simple. Furthermore, it has tho badgo of falsehood and malice written all over and through it. I can not imagino tho source of such an intervlow unless it oraanates from a bureau under republican auspices with head quarters at Cincinnati, now quite busily engaged in sending throughout tho country falso and malicious attacks on Governor Harmon. My attention has never been drawn to the publication of the alleged Interview until I saw It In your paper. Mr. W. J Bryan wrote mo Juno last, that he was opposod and would continue to oppose tho nomination of Governor Harmon as the demo cratic candidate for president, but that in his opposition ho was determined to employ only fair and honorable methods Such assurance was hardly necessary from Mr. Bryan. In that spirit I ask publication of tho refu tation. Sincoroly, HUGH L. NICHOLS. Campaign Manager for Governor Harmon. Tho Interview to which Mr. Nichols takes exception was sent to Tho Commoner by a Farmorsvlllo, Texas, reador, and It was also printed very generally throughout tho United States. The article as It appoared In Tho Com moner December 22nd, was as follows: LIKE JUDGE PARKER? A Cincinnati, O., dispatch credits Lieutenant Governor Nichols, Mr. Harmon's campaign manager, with this statement: "Wo will not bo drawn into any arguments with Mr. Bryan or anybody else on tho presi dential matter. This may seem a bit odd to some of tho people, but it Is tho truth. A great many big men In this country have been pulled down to medlocracy by talking too much. How ever, this Is one point where Governor Harmon will outdistance them all. Any of the democrats of this country who do not like him have the free will to vote for him and ho will ask them no questions, and he in turn will allow these arguments to go for naught and to keep on get ting delegations to vote for him at the conven tion next summer." Referring to Mr. Nichols' statement, R. S. Rike, of Farmersvillo, Texas, writes: "Does Governor Harmon expect to outdistance Judge Parker in playing shut mouth? If he can he Is a good one. However, from tho attached clip ping he is going to try we had as well pre paro for another Parker trouble." Those democratic newspapers that have de fended tho supreme court decisions in the Ofi and Tobacco cases on the theory that those de cisions upheld rather than interfered with the Sherman anti-trust law as It was written by tho lawmakers might learn something to their ad vantage from tho opening statement made by George T. Buckingham,, ono of tho beef trust attorneys, in the case now on trial at Chicago. Mr. Buckingham said: "I now again call your attention to the fact that tho Sherman law has been construed by tho supreme court of the United States as to tho meaning of its language. On its face it pro hibits 'every combination, contract and con spiracy in restraint of trade.' The supreme court, however, has held that this language is not to bo read literally, but that the act is to be construed as if it read "that every combina tion, contract or conspiracy in undue or un reasonable restraint of trade, is prohibited.' Or to put it in another way, no act restricting com petition, comes within. the technical definition of 'restraint of trade unless it is 'an undue and unreasonable act of restriction.' Now, just . what acts aro undue and unreasonable may in some phases of the case become a question of fact before this jury; and if it does so become a question of fact, then I insist that you pay close attention to these facts and figures with reference to operation and to profits which will be put in evidence for the purpose of establish ing before tills jury that whatever has been done, is not undue and unreasonable, when the A VALUE LIMIT TO PATENTS Have we not reached a tlmo when we need a value limit on patents? Now, a patent runs for seventeen years, whether the amount de rived from it be much or little. Why should it not expire In less time if a reasonable sum Is derived from it at an earlier period? Suppose a limit of one million, half a million or a quarter million be fixed, would not the reward and stimulus be sufficient? A provision -for a like sum might bo given to the inventor if he has not received sufficient compensation, but why permit the lucky holder of a patent a monopoly to an unlimited extent? Why? ABOLISH THE JOB SESSION What has become of Congressman Henry's constitutional amendment changing the day for inauguration and tho date of the sessions? A later date for inauguration is desirable, both on account of weather and to give the incoming president moro time to shape his policies and make necessary appointments, but it Is even moro important that the first term of congress should be held earlier than now and that the second term should adjourn before the follow ing election. The second session is now the job session it should bo changed. LOCATING BLAME If the members of labor unions are to be blamed for the unauthorized acts of their leaders why should not the stockholders be censored for the criminal acta of the trust magnates who presided over the Oil trust, tho Tobacco trust and the Steel trust? &! '