l
m
fi,
t
The Commoner.
VOLUME 11, NUMBER 23
."Wl"
IP
K't
r,
.
-
The Commoner.
ISSUED WEEKLY
Entered at tho Postofllco at Lincoln, Nebraska,
as flccond-class matter.
WlULIAM 3. IJHYAM
Kdltor nnd Proprietor
UlCJIAlU) L. MXTCAI.VX
AnocJotc Editor
CllAIlUUJ W. lillYAM
Publlslior
rdltorJnl Hooms nntl Jluslncss
Cfllco 324-330 South 12th Street
One Ycnr 91.00
Six Month .r.O
In Clubs of Five or
moro, per your... .71
Three Months...... ,'M
Single COpy OS
Samplo Copies Free.
Foreign Pont. Do Extra.
SUIIHCUII'TIONS can bo nont direct to Tho Com
moner. Thoy can also bo sent t!irug?' nowspapers
which liavo advertised a clubbing rato, or through
local affonts, whoro oub-aRonts havo been appolnt
d. All remittances should bo sent by postofllco
money ordor, express order, or by bank draft on
Now York or Chicago. Do not sond Individual
chocks, stamps or monoy.
1.ISCONTI1VUANCKS It is found that a largo
Majority of our subscribers profor not to havo their
subscriptions Interrupted and tl.olr flies brokon in
caso thoy fall to remit beforo expiration. It Is
thoroforb assumed that continuance Is desired un
less subscribers ordor discontinuance either vhon
subscribing1 or at any tlmo during tho year.
PHIOSIflNTATlON COPIES--Many l orsons sub
scrlbo for friends, Intending that tho paper shall
stop at tho ond of tho year. If instructions aro
given to that effect thoy will rocoivo attention at
tho propor tlmo.
IlENEWALS Tho dato on your wrapper shows
tho tlmo to which your subscription is paid. Thus
January 21, '10, means that payment has been re
ceived to and Including tho last issue of January,
1910. Two weeks aro required aftor monoy has
boon recolvod bbforo tho dato on wrapper can bo
changed.
CHANGE OP ADDRESS Subscribers requesting
a chango of address must glvo old as well as now
address.
ADVERTISING Ratos will bo furnished upon
application.
Address all communications to
THE COMMONER, Lincoln, Neb,
t
holding trust under tho Now Jersey charter in
1899 tho individual conspirators who were,,ilier'
trustees of tho trust, and became tho. .directors
o tho holding Action tho NewJers'ey Standard
Oil company, by virfc,Ui,oWielr individual hold
ingrQk a-maJ6rn.ycf tho subsidiary stocks, ran
tlio monopoly in the same common interest and
in tho same illegal manner.
Judge Sanborn in the principal opinion, after
denouncing the aggregation as illegal and mo
nopolistic, and in terms demanding its dissolu
tion, expressly declares that tho subsidiary
stocks must not be distributed pro rata to the
conspirators (stockholders of the holding com
pany) for he well knew, as does every one at
all conversant with tho history of tho monopoly,
that if this were permitted, it would not dis
turb tho monopoly in tho slightest degree or
afford tho public any measure of relief.
Judge Hook in a brief concuring opinion on
tho main issue, said that that measure of re
organization was left open to tho conspirators.
In this manner it is obvious that there was a
marked difference of opinion among the mem
bors of tho court as to whether the conspirators
should be permitted to so distribute their sub
sidiary stocks, when it came to tho matter of tho
formal decree which is the real, tho final test
of tho effect of the judgmont.
The Hook contingent won out, however, for
one of the closing paragraphs of tho decree reads
as follows:
"But the defendants aro not prohibited by
this decree from distributing to tho stockholders
of tho principal defendant (the holding trust)
prorate, the stock to which thoy aro equitable
entitled In the several corporations which aTO
parties to the combination."
Evidently Judge Van Devantor lined up with
that contingent constituent element of the court
whoso sentiment against disturbing tho autono
my of the trust was voiced in tho opinion of
Judge Hook for tho supreme court did not
chango that obnoxious feature of tho decree and
Judge Van Dovanter did not disapprove. '
Verily tho million dollars of the people's
monoy wasted in this judicial fiasco did tho
people no good, and tho Standard no harm, while
its dictum gives almost universal immunity to
all monopolistic combinations of tho system
whoso politically appointed federal judges can
conclude do not "unreasonably" restrain inter
state and international commorco.
This situation deserves to bo thoroughly ex
posed so that tho people need be no longer de
ceived as to tho efficiency of tho politicians now
constituting this government, to deal effectively
with that private monopoly which, according to
the last platform of "the national democracy "is
both indefensible and intolerable." Vory truly
yours, GEORGE H. PHELPS.
MR. BRYAN AT ALBANY
Several incidents combined to make Mr.
Bryan's visit to Albany a notable occasion. His
address before the legislature, with its strong
recommends for progressive legislation, as em
bodied in the income tax amendment, direct
primaries, and direct election of United States
senators, was most timely. Especially instruc
tive was Mr. Bryan's luminous and thoughtful
analysis of the income tax amendment in its
bearings on tho democratic pledge regarding
that subject, in the Rochester platform. Mr.
Bryan is one of the greatest authorities on
platform ethics this country has ever seen.
No statesman has surpassed him in clearness
of insight into tho relations between parties and
their platforms, and few publicists have so
keenly and consistently recognized that platform
pledges fill a dual function they are the sub
stantive law of the party, and they are also
promises to bo kept, and which cannot be
violated, or trifled with, without breach of the
party faith.
Therefore, tho only thing to be anticipated
from Mr. Bryan, in his discussion of the income
tax proposition, was a powerful assertion of
tho party's obligation to fulfill its pledges, and
that assertion was given, with all Mr. Bryan's
characteristic argumentative vigor. Not less
significant was tho reception which the Nebraska
statesman's views on the income tax, met in the
assembly. When one of the assemblymen inter
rupted with the statement that the Rochester
platform did not commit the party to the specific
amendment now before the country, cries of
"Yes, yes, it did," came from all parts of tho
room. This justness and unanimity of senti
ment constitutes a' splendid augury that tho
assembly will place itself in line with the senate
in ratification of the income tax amendment as
it stands, and without any shuffling, or equivoca
tion. Anotherstriking incident was Governor Dix's
t introductory speech, before Mr. Bryan's lecture.
Tho governor's address was an earnest, eloquent
and feeling tribute, and was delivered with an
impressiveness which quite removed it from the
conventional character of many introductory
speeches. Buffalo (N. Y.) Times.
"WATCH IT GROW"
The Commoner's special campaign offer is
meeting with popular favor throughout the coun
try. The Commoner will be sent to every new
subscriber for a period of two years for the sum
of $1.00 the regular price for one year. This
will carry the subscription beyond the presi
dential election.
Rufus Thompson, Oregon Herewith find
$2.00 to pay for two two-year campaign sub
scriptions at $1.00 each. Send me more sub
scription blanks at once.
C. C. Shafor, Iowa. I enclose draft for $6.00
in payment for campaign subscriptions as per
enclosed list. I assure you we hold in high
regaTd your valued paper it is one of the truly
necessary educators of modern times. May the
good work go on until corruptioa in public
affairs is completely overturned. Please send
me more blanks, as I shall surely get others to
take advantage of the special educational rate
J. W. G. Book, Pa. Enclosed find money
order for five dollars to pay for five two-year
campaign subscriptions to The Commoner. Send
me samplo copies and additional subscription
blanks and I will endeavor to secure further
subscriptions. Many times I-haye gone down
in defeat with Mr. Bryan and I am ready for the
fourth heat with, to my mind, bright prospects
for success.
Following named readers have sent in new
subscribers: P. E. Pulto, Mich.; August Fer
rer Cal.; T J Bronson, 111.; H. M. Schilling,
111.; Jacob Schlirz, S. D.; J. P. Cooley, S. D.;
H. G. Eppler, Tex.; A. F. Goss, Pa.; J. E. Barl
J?rW lli''d' W Davls' Mo- Mra- Jas. Gaynor,
yia'lAM- strater Ind.; Noel Somers, Kan
Job McDowell, Pa.; R. L. Whaley, Mo. J. w
Kirby, Mo.; C. T Brown, Mo.; Wm. Cater, Ala.
D. W. Fagley, Pa.; Al. Hansen, Minn.; H V
Goethins, Minn.; C. F. Champ, W Va ' C
French Cal.; J. P. Browning, 111.; J. M.'Bru
baker, Ind.; A. H. Gilbert, O.; W. E. Cowan,
la.; R. J Graham, la.; F. F. Haight, la.; Grove
Jordan la ; H. J. Barth, Ida.) J. M.'Bird, Tex.;
J. W. Castleman, Tex.; W. L. Alford, Tex.; J
W. Beem, O.; J. C. Copeland, O.; S. S Long
?an S; 5 Llbbey Kan-J. . Schick Sv
A. B. Fisher, Mo.; A. L. Conn, Mo.; J. w La
hive, Pa.; W. J. Church, Pa.; J. L. Couch, ' Pa
Alva Curry, 111.; Geo. M. Clark; 111.; M. C. Hill'
111.; Jas. Devine, 111.; C. M. Dickson, N. C.;'
C. O. Oliver, Kan.; C. A. Bonnett, N. D.; C F
Bodinson, Neb., E. D. Cannon, Wis.; W C
w - '
APPRECIATED IN CALIFORNIA
'
Marysville, Cal., May 24, 19JL1.
The Commoner, Lincoln, Neb: En-
closed find 50 names and addresses, also
check to pay for same. This club is
from the county central committee.
We are taking this method te build up
democratic ideas in our county and to
encourage you in your work. Yours
truly, H. H. DUNNING,
Treas. Dem. County Committee.
Dizer, W. Va.; Chas. Miller, Wash.; Mack Rose
borough, Okla.; J. D. Burns, Wis.; D. "W. Kaser,
Colo.; J. R. Bangs, Kan.; J. L. Heintz, 111.;
Dan Connell, Tex.; C. F. Bedell, N. Y.; David
Mapes, Pa.; A. C. Stolting, N. Y.; O. Hubbard,
N. D.; W. N. S. Cobb, Tex.; F. A. Long, Tox.;
J. R. Holt, Ark.; Jas. Wythers, Neb.; Fred
Barr, N. Y.; E. Heck, Ind.; A, C. Menglekock,
Minn.; T. W. Mitchell, Kan.; Herman. Francke,
Neb.; H. C. Braton, O.; W. H. H. Scott, Nev.;
Ben Smith, Ky.; J. C. Firebaugh, 111.; R. c.
Woodward, Mo.; M. N. Clingan, Kan.; P. C.
Helder, Kan; Kirk H. Ely, S. D.; Frank
H. Selden, Ida.; Harry J. Shields, N. Y.;
T. E. Lewis, Okla.; Frank McKee, Canada;
J. W. Boyle, la.; C. T. Ayers, la.; F. M. Miller,
O.; N. B. Bidleman, O.; Jno. F. Clark, 111.; Nels
Henjumm, Minn.; Jno. McCoy.; Wis.; W. H.
Baker, 111.; Geo. Delaney, Kan.; M. F. Burns,
W. Va.; Mrs. E. Compton, Mo.; H. L. Clark,
Kan.; I. M. Blanks, Va.; S.- F. Darnlelle, la.;
G. H. Moore, Mich.; Wm. Bowden, Pa.; C. F.
Cox, Ariz.; Richard Moore, Okla1.; J. L.
Daugherty, 111.; J. W. Farthing, 111.; N. Nish,
la.; Eber.De Cou, la,; D. Z. Kochendarfer, Neb.;
G. N. Damron, Va.; F. Z. Moss, Colo.; C. P.
Burbacher, O.; Frank Brother, O:; A. Barbee,
O.; Jno. Rooney, Minn.; B. F. Cary, Mo.; Geo.
Neln, Wis.; J. O. Carpenter, O.; A. H. Kinseley,
Okla.; G. H. Barnes, Ind.; Sanders. Smith, Ind.;
W. K. Moore, Ind.; W. E. Hoffman, 111.; D. A.
Lewis, 111.; W. L. Groegr, Pa.; W. H. Miller,
Mich.; A. H. Wood, Kan.; T. P. Mannlon, Kan.;
J. S. Carter, S. C; J. P. Kubesh, Tex.; J. O.
Grower, Neb.; J. W. Schmaling, D. 0.; S. R.
Chappell, Ind.; Andrew Coon, N. Y.; S. S. Field,
Md.; F. A. Grimm, la.; S. F. Hammer, la.;
Dennis Cavanaugh, Minn.; T. Y. Elton, Tex.;
Levi Ronco, N. D.; A. La Due, Fla.; Geo. Riley,
O.; C. H. Phillips, Kan.; W. J. Teague, N. C;
W L. Knox, Wash.; Mike Hegarty, 111.; E. E.
Gidding, Vt.; A. E. Young, Cal.; H. S. Ross,
Pa.; D. D. Colema, Pa.; J. B. Spahr, Pa.; Eb
binghous Bros., Ind.; R. Q. Baker, Fla.; Wm.
Holtzclaw, Ky.; Wm. Franklin, Va.; Jas. Left
wich, Okla.; A. A. Riggs, Ore.; F. J. Pelham,
Ind.; S. F. Stambaugh, O.; F. H. Gregg, N. J.
Wm. Burns, Minn.; J. D. Baker, Penn.; J. B.
Bertleson, la.; L. M. Yager, Ind.; J. J. Petti-
fe n 'i W- Hward, Ark.; H. Bland,
wash.; A. R. Sherbuso, Ia; Michael Wolfe, Pa.;
Jno. L. Bates, N. Y.; M. A. Hoyt, la.; H. H.
Hawkins, Nehj J. A. Huber, la.; J. H. McLear,
n i xr b FTeGman Tex.; Scott Kail, O.; Jno.
S S .v; Tynon' Neb- F- J- Millen Ia"'
' M; ichaJcleford, Mo.; O. C. R. Bastian, Pa.;
D. W. K. Martin, O.; Chas. Genolin, Ind.; G. T.
Royer, Ore ; N N. Rogers, Pa.; E. L. Ashford,
& t Newman, N. D.; C. Christiansen,
?J ?KrJ,i,D Hys' Mo'J Geo- Dingman, N. D.;
Ji Mllen ill jGerane E. Week, la.; Jno. C.
SSe.' na'A o- ? TO"iamB, Minn.; C. B. Pease,
'l C,tG- Sm.ith' N' D"' M- R- Everett, Minn.;
w 5' enilQtt MIn.; B. R. Brown, Tenn.,"
S MC.Dnn??gJ; N Y- G- B- Cl0n Kan.; Jno.
Dye, a, C. R. Singrey, Kan.; F. A. Adair, Tex.;
J;, ?J??.BS' olo-; Wm- Hyslop, Ida.; Jas. D.
Hatch, Mich.; Margater Shenkle, Colo.
S)0
THE PRESDDENTIAIi CANDIDATE
J01?1?5 WteUy and practically un
JSSS0dy the body of tne American
5,?2e,the special intrests are already,
JfntEL i a year ln advance of the
nSo,?f VConventions' Panning to bring
about the nomination of a republican
SSnr. mSfat.lc candidate for the presl
SwL BiS business, naturally enough,
S2BS fha7e a candidate ln both
SS J ft tIlat no matter which way the
Jtaa blows, it will win. San Francisco
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00(5)0
rr.
--..1'&S