The commoner. (Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-1923, March 10, 1911, Page 6, Image 6
j. ir I; tfi- r m - ?' . X? P. ri Si . i 4" 1 Y t i . The Commoner. Democratic Prospects for 1912 Are Bright Tho Denver Times of March 1st printed tho following nows itom: Doclarod former Governor 'Joseph W. Folk of Missouri, a smooth-faced, dimplod-chinnod man of forty-one years, when talking with a Timos roprosontative: t "Those aro somo of tho things I favor "A reciprocity treaty with Canada. "Popular election of United States senators. "Commission form of administration for cities. "Uniformity of laws in the several states. "And I believe that tho national democratic party will bo successful in 1912 if it advocates real democratic principles. "I am opposed to "Tho new nationalism of Mr. Roosevelt. "Protective tariff, bounties and subsidies In any form." Mr. Folk did not become heated while ox pounding his views. Ho is a calm man. Ho is choorful, dark comploxioned, a little above raodium height and carries a hearty handshako around with him on his journeys. Just now ho is hero bocauso of a contract that he had with tho teachers' club of Donvor to deliver an ad dress at Trinity M. E. church. "I favor reciprocity with Canada," said Mr. Folk, in his room at tho Brown hotel, "because It will open up a vast domain to American trade and will not cost tho country a cent. Tho United States is spending millions of dollars to open up trado in South America. The United States is spending hundreds of millions to build tho Panama canal for tho purpose of expanding trado. Tho proposed treaty with Canada will cost nothing. I believe that it should bo adopted by congress. "As to tho olection of senators by direct vote of the people, it simply is another step in govern ment, not only of and by tho people but govern ment for the people. When our constitution was boing framed the fear was that tho people might confiscate the property of tho well-to-do. That the time would over come when the rights of the pooplo would be in danger through accu mulation of capital, did not occur to the fathers of .the republic, bo they provided a mw of rep resentatives to represent the PWthS variouS senate elected by tho legislatures of the various states to represent property. i --, "Wo now have learned that property interests should not be inconsistent with public interests, and that officials should represent no class but 'TcoZion form of civic administration is' an excellent one. A city government is not a sovereign government like a state or national governmet, but is a business corporation and should bo modeled after a business corporation. Tho idea is to havo fire directors to conduct the affairs of the city. There is no reason that I know of why a commission system of administra tion should not be successful in a largo city like Denver." . mm ... In reply to further queries, Mr. Folk said: "I do not favor tho 'new nationalism' be cause I think the Integrity of the states should be preserved. Tho perpetuity of the nation de pends upon the dual form of government under which wo operate tho government, of the states and the government of the nation. If one of these is strengthened at the expense of the other, the ship of the republic will sink. "The chances for democratic success in 1912 are bright if the democratic paTty advocatea , real democratic principles. By these I mean those principles embraced in the maxim, 'equal rights to all, special privileges to none This prohibits protective tariff, subsidies and boun ties in any form for the benefit of the few at , the expense of all. "Privilege says to a man, 'Come with us and we will give you a tariff, with subsidies enabling you to make money at the expense of your fel low men.' True democracy says, 'Come with us, we cannot offer you any advantage over others, but promise that others will not have any advantage overvyou.' Privllego appeals to avarice and greed, true democracy to brother hood and conscience. One stands for the selfish few and the other for the common good.'' Popular Election of United States Senators (By Hon! Alva Adams.) "In accord with true democratic ideals I favor tho election of United States senators by direct vote of tho people. A democracy has no right to fear a popular verdict. "Political responsibility leads to political rectitude. Tho direct judgment of tho electorate is more apt to bo right than the conclusion of their agents. Direct power is more sure and safe than delegated power. The people are not and cannot be subject to tho diverse influences that may assail a' legislature. The direct voice of the people is the life of a true republic. "The present system of electing senators was a sort of compromise between the political sensi bilities of those who were willing to trust the people and those who distrusted them. "A century of experience has swept away the fears of those who doubted the stability of popu lar government. The faith Jefferson held in tho people haB been justified. It is time that tho proven capacity of the people to rule them selves should bo recognized. It is more democ racy, not less, that our country needs. If- the full electorate cannot be trusted democracy is a failure. While I realize, I do not fear, the pos sible perils In tho absolute rule of all the people, for I believe that way lies tho ultimate glory and destiny of free government. "In spite of the frenzied feats of subsidized editor and orator no harm has come to the re public through the franchise of the masses. Tho people can be trusted. Their self-directed ballots have never been false to liberty. Direct and universal suffrage is a power the 'interests' fear. It is the hammer than can break tho corporate plutocratic grasp upon tho senate of tho United States. "Hamilton's ideal was an aristocratic re public; our dream is a constitutional democratic republic. In such a government there can be no senator, no official that Is not subject to tho direct vote of the people. A free ballot is the best teacher in tho school of patriotism. Tho unconstitutional right to vote develops the self Tespect, confidence and Judgment of the race. . "The free Independent citizen, with no legis lative) complications, can bo trusted to select VOLUME 11, NUMBER control a legislature where they would be help less or impotent before the people. It is difficult almost impossible to corrupt an entire elec torate. In the direct verdict of the people there can bo no deadlock. Confine legislatures to the making of laws. Let the voters elect senators and all officials. Where possible let the people speak direct. Narrow the field upon which ambition, money and dicker may focus their blighting influence. "A broad river may flow clear and healthful where a small stream is easily tainted and poisoned. "'Let the people ruie.' " Aiva Adams Denver News. - in GOOD WORDS FOR THE COMMONER Joseph L. Valrey, Bushnell, S. D. I will gladly do all I can to extend The Commoner's circulation. Despite the fact that our community is rock-ribbed republican, the sentiment here, as elsewhere, Is rapidly changing. .Party lines are being broken and people are turning toward the reforms that the democratic party has stood for all these years. The wanton disregard of pre-election promises on the part of Taft and his evident alliance with the moneyed interests, together with the duplicity of Roosevelt and his third term aspirations, has awakened the repub licans as to where they are at. As a life-long re publican recently told me the other day that he would vote for Bryan, Folk, or any other democrat rather than be deceived again by an other administration such as Taft's. If at any time it will be possible for me to aid in secur ing a victory for the people in 1912, whether it be through The Commoner or otherwise, I shall gladly do so for I am one who, like Champ Clark says in his letter to The Commoner, "Havo Kept the Faith." senators. The nation demands a constitutional amendment giving them this right. The old senators object It is not human nature to tear down the bridge that carried them over, but from every new senator elected there should be exacted a pledge to vote for such an amendment. That pledge I will gladly take. "By our present method there is a possibility of a senator being chosen who Is not in sympathy with the people and who, in a primary election, could not carry a precinct In the state. Such a result is a travesty upon free government, yet an inventory of senatorial elections In the United States will show that such possibility is not entirely a child of imagination. The making of laws Is the true function of a legislature. The election of a senator interferes with that purpose. It breaks and disturbs the process of law making, Senatorial sessions are often bar ren sessions. ' Senatorial maneuvering and Inter ference delays, modifies or defeats desired legis lation. The Injection of a senatorial election affords a fruitful field for intrigue and corrup tion. Honest legislators are hindered In their work, needed and promised laws are used as trading pawns to secure senatorial Influence Tho statehouse becdmes stained with the barter of infamy, as wan the temple from which Christ lashed the money changers. "There is every opportunity for unfair com bines and manipulations. One body can be played against tho other. Law making and the election of senators aro different, and often con" flicting missions. Where these diverse duties are mixed a temptation Is offered to make trades nullify the honest purposes of the people. Legis lative history tells of senatorial contests where members have resigned, absented themselves and In various ways tied up and obstructed legisla tive business. A hundred cases might be citnfl of scandal and wrong resulting from Se present system. A compilation of senatorial eleSS would not make a history to stir the pride of the American citizen. In fact BonatniSoi r flicts are not seldom a reproach anff nace" to popular government. Selfish and poTerf Interests havo been able to twist, monlpulItTS Charles B. Chancellar, Parkersburg, W. Va You can depend on me to help extend The Commoner subscription list and thereby its Influence political and moral. One dollar spent to send The Commoner to a' republican (and am sorry to say many so-called democrats need it also) will do more good than $10 to $20 will do to any campaign fund. J. C. Llbis, Mantua, Ohio I am going to try to get a club for The Commoner. I think it the best paper I ever read. Please send me six or seven copies and I will make an effort. William Shepherd, Ness City, Kan. You will find enclosed a money-order for one dollar to pay for another year's subscription to The Commoner. We have not missed a single number of The Commoner. We received No. 1, Vol. 1, and yesterday Vol. 11, No. 4 came to hand and is read with just as much interest as the first number. How many readers of your paper can show a record' as good as this for faithfulness. TRY GUARANTEED DEPOSITS Los Angeles, Cal., January 27. Editor Tho Commoner: In a paragraph of this week's Colliers Weekly, under the caption, "Like a Colossus," that paper views, with pretended alarm, the incoming democratic house of repre sentatives, as affecting the banking system of the country. In' said paragraph, this ques tion Is raised: "Is it well for the banks of the United States to depend upon the good will of J. P. Morgan?" and closes with this unwarranted and disingenuous fling: "As the democrats come into power in the houso next fall, we may take it for granted that the little banks all over the country will continue to depend for their existence upon the big banks of Now York City." Has Mr. Collier forgotten that the heads of the Morgan-Rockefellor-Har-riman interests control the big banks of New York, and that they aro "practical men," and have shown by their contributions to the repub lican national campaign fund, which party they think will best serve them, in exercising guar dianship over the little banks of the country? Why not be fair, Mr. Collier, and let the bank deposit guarantee clause as contained in tho Denver platform (which is the last democratic expression on the subject) answer your question as to what is best for the small banks of the country? No, the trouble with Colliers is tho same as with so many publications that appear to be so much concerned for the welfare of the jeople, matador-like, they flaunt the flag of re form before the peoples' eyes, whllo they never lose an opportunity to stab the party and tho individuals who are, and have been for years, the real advocates of reform, WILLIAM LINDSEY. ' "nft-Jif I till lirtIM