The commoner. (Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-1923, May 28, 1909, Page 5, Image 5
I.T- - ItfAY 28, 190r The Commoner. The Tariff in the Senate In spito of all tlio protests Mr. Aldrich seems Mjo havo It his own way In the senate. Ho has jregularly put through his amendments by safo jnajorities. Washington dispatches say that a combination has been formed between democrats find republicans to adopt the income tax. A jdispatch to the New York World says: "Those who believe in an Income tax as vt revenue producer declare that victory awaits n final test of strength. They declare that thirty-one democrats will unanimously vote for the Bcheme. Senator Davis will not return for this session, and thirty-one represents the mi nority. Eleven republicans are pledged to vote for an Income tax. These are Senators Borah, Brown, Bristow, Bourne, Burkett, Crawford, Cummins, Dixon, Dolliver, Gamble and LaFol lette. Eight other republicans lean toward an Income tax and will be subjects for missionary .work. They are Senators Clapp, Curtis, Gug genheim, Johnson, Jones of Washington, Ma Comber, Nelson and Piles. The combination ivas arranged at a conference held by Senators JCummins, Borah and Bailey, who will frame the amendments as a stubstitute for all other propositions of a similar character. The Bailey amendment will be taken as the basis for build ing up the income tax feature. The chief points In it are: " 'For raising about $35,000,000 annual rev enue from the income tax; for the imposition of the uniform tax of two per cent on the excess above $5,000 in all incomes; for the imposition of this tax on individuals and corporations alike, the burden to fall upon net incomes only, and only on the excess above $5,000 per annum; for the collection of the tax from corporations direct, with provision for remitting to stock holders, in their individual capacity, such share of their income tax as comes from corporations that have already paid the tax.' "In doing this Senator Cummins abandons his" graduated tax plan, and further agrees to the Imposition of a tax on corporations, which ho has opposed. The democrats insist that the rate should be three per cent, and a change to that effect may be made when the amendment is drawn. Senator Aldrich and his associates have prepared to meet the attack of the income taxers. They have carefully counted noses, and do not concede the progressive re publicans more than twelve votes. This with thirty-one democrats would be three short of a sufficient number to win. Senator Aldrich has mapped out his program. He will defer action on the income tax amendment until the last possible moment. He will then move that it be referred to the judiciary committee, with in structions to investigate all the legal questions Involved and report whether such a tax would be constitutional in view of the supreme court's decision in the Pollock case. The test vote will then come on his motion to refer to the judiciary committee. Stalwart leaders are absolutely cer tain they will have enough votes to make this reference, thus disposing of the question for the present session. The coalition of republicans and democrats has not improved the chances of Income tax legislation as a part of the pending tariff bill. The entire democratic strength has always been conceded for such a proposition. The progressives fluctuate. They count at vary ing times all the way from twelve to 21 votes, but fifteen must be actually produced when the test comes." As a sample of the ease with which Mr. Aid rich has his way the following from a dispatch carried by the Associated Press, May 19, is in structive: "An amendment by Mr. Newlands to reduce the duty on sewing machines from 30 to 20 per cent ad valorem .was rejected by a vote of 29 to 43, Senators Beveridge, Bristow, Brown, Clapp, Cummins, Dolliver and LaFollette join ing the democrats in voting for reduction. Mr. Dolliver offered an amendment to make the duty . of 45 per cent ad valorem apply to articles or wares not specially provided for whose 'chief value was metal Instead of those composed 'In part' of metal and declared that the committee provision placed under his schedule many art icles containing but a trifling quantity of metal. Mr. Ardrich said the provision was one that had been in all tariff laws since 1883, and lie defended it as being necessary to prevent eva sions of the law. The amendment was rejected by a vote of 30 to 4,0. The paragraphs relating to typewriters, sewing machines, etc, was adopt- ed as were all sections of tho metal schedule. Just beforo the senate adjourned Mr. Aldrich announced that tho sections passed over in tho chemical schedule would bo taken up tomorrow. "Senator Paynter of Kentucky endeavored to obtain a reduction of duty on bottle caps from 55 to 45 per cent ad varolem, but tho paragraph was adopted as reported by the finance com mittee. Lace-making machines will bo taxed at the rate of 45 per cent ad valorem when im ported into this country although they have been admitted free of duty in tho past, as the senate adopted tho provision to that effect recommended by tho committee. Mr. Paynter supported an amendment facing linotype type setting machines on tho free list instead of con tinuing a duty on them of 30 per cent ad valorem. Changing his amendment later so as to provide a duty of 10 per cent, Mr. Paynter asked for a vote, and the amendment was de feated, 35 to 43. Messrs. Borah, Bristow, Brown, Burkett, Clapp, Dolliver, LaFolletto and Nelson (republicans) voted with the democrats. Mr. Paynter sought to reduce the duty on lino type and other typo sotting machines from 30 per cent ad valorem as provided In tho tariff bill to 10 per cent ad valorem, but his amend ment was rejected i " The Associated Press of May 20, says: "The senate today distributed its attention among the three items in the tariff bill provid ing a duty on an extract of chestnut bark used in tanning known as quebracho, on cottonseed oil, and on white lead. On each of these art icles tho senate was led by tho committee on finance, although the committee was induced to change its original suggestions on both white lead and cottonseed oil. The lead duty fixed by the committee was originally 2 cents per pound, but Mr. Curtis, who is a member of tho committee, today suggested a reduction of one eighth cent a pound, bringing the figures down to 2 cents, and Chairman Aldrich accepted the reduction. Even this Increase over the house provision excited sharp criticism, espe cially from Mr. Curtis' colleague, Mr. Bristow, who contended that tho duty would prove to be a direct tax on the consumer. When the vote was taken the committee obtained its usual tri umph, the figures standing 41 to 32 In favor of tho Curtis amendment. As usual Senators Beveridge, Bristow, Brown, Burkett, Clapp, Cummins, Dolliver, Gamble, LaFollette and Nel son voted with the democrats. Senator Borah voted with tho republicans. "Probably the most interesting contest of tho day was that over the question as to whether there should be any duty on cotton seed oil. Senators Tillman, Bacon and Money made an intense fight against the senate provision fixing a tariff of three cents a gallon on the ground that it would injure the sale of .cottonseed and after the controversy had gone on for some time Mr. Aldrich withdrew the provision. "Mr. LaFollette sought to" reduce the duty on quebracho to one-quarter cf one cent a pound, but his amendment to that effect was rejected, 29 to 38. Mr. Daniel led the fight for a higher rate, exciting much interest because of his ad vocacy of low duties in the past. The commit tee had reduced tho house rate and the Virginia senator, In whose state are several quebracho factories, sought to have that figure restored. Ho did not succeed, and the duty was fixed at half a cent per pound instead of seven-elghthB of a cent as he proposed." The tariff debate stirred the Ire of many sen ators. Hale of Maine charged Beveridge of Indiana with seeking newspaper notoriety. Beveridge hotly denied it. Mr. Culberson of Texas said: "While there may be found a democrat who is a protectionist or another who is a free trader, yet the democratic party believes- in neither protection nor free trade. It stands for a rev enue tariff; that -is, for a tariff that will admit imports yielding revenue primarily as opposed to protective duties whether levied on finished products or on raw materials." The protective tariff, he said, had undoubted ly contributed to the formation of trusts and had created a favored class which it had as sisted in building up colossal fortunes. On all propositions Mr. Aldrich of Rhode Island continued to have'his way, showing that Aldrich is complete master of the senate and Aldrich ism the essential quality of tho repub lican party. BAILEY AND JOIINSON Senator Bailey of Toxa3, and Governor Jbhn Bon of Minnesota, havo clashed. A Washington dispatch under dato of May 20 to tho Denver News says: "Senator Bailoy was excessively savago in hfa reforenco to tho governor of Minnesota, and among other things declared him unfit to hold any ofllco. "Senator Clay's attack on the sugar trust was tho most sweeping condemnation of that corpor ation ever uttered in tho senate Aftor stating that it had violated tho criminal and civil laws of tho country repeatedly and had robbed tho Amorican people without mercy, ho declared that tho, sugar magnates 'ought to bo at tho bar of tho criminal courts on trial for tho most serious criminal offenses, and instead of enjoy ing their ill-gotten wealth they desorvo to bo Berving long terms In federal prisons.' "Senator Smoot also took part In tho carnival of denunciation and pronounced 'absolutely un true' 'Clay's statement that Joseph F. Smith, head of tho Mcrmon church, every year fixed tho price of beets In tho interest of tho Utah sugar factories. "The senate droppod into a party discussion " late today and democrats and republicans taunt- ' od each other with tho dissensions each party has suffered during tho consideration of tho tariff. Tho debate was precipitated by Bailoy, who charged tho republicans with entering into a conspiracy by exaggerating democratic dissen sions in order to hide their own difficulties. lie said ho had by careful observation recently be come convinced 'that a deliberate and systematic plan had boon inaugurated to obscure tho differ ences on tho republican sldo by exaggerating and even misrepresenting the differences on this , side.' Bailey referred to an interview with Gov ernor Johnson of Minnesota, criticising tho mi nority, in Its attltudo toward tho bill. " 'If this represents tho views of Mr. John son,' Bailey said, 'then ho might bo better at homo studying tho tariff question than seeking democratic favor In other states. If this inter view was authorized or sanctioned by Governor" Johnson he was utterly reckless of tho truth and is disqualified for any station. Ills explan ation is that the railroads of the south havo Interested themselves In this legislation and havo overcome the consciences of some sonators. He ought if ho knows that, In the cause of truth, to name the men to whom ho refers.' "Senator Clay of Georgia mado a wnrm ap peal for a smaller differential on refined sugar In tho interest of 'consumers. Clay argued that the consumer was discriminated against In favor of tho American Sugar Refining company, and that the sugar grower got no benefit from tho different ial botween the duties on raw and re fined sugar. Ho criticised most severely tho -manner in which the sugar schedule of tho Payne bill was framed. Clay declared that the duty on refined sugar almost prohibited tho im portation of foreign sugar into this country. Ho said that the beet grower and tho cane grower of sugar both are compelled to sell to the sugar trust at the price which it fixes." An Associated Press dispatch from St. Paul, Minn., follows: Governor Johnson, when asked regarding the statement mado yesterday by Sen ator Bailey of Texas, criticising tho governor for making alleged untruthful statements in re- gard to tho minority In tho senate and its atti tude toward the tariff bill, said: "So far as Mr. Bailey is concerned I do not care to make any denial of the charges he makes, but I do care to have other senators in life south know I did not make 'the statements that tho railways of the south Influenced any of the southern senators. Nor did I make any statements reflecting on any senator from tho south or any other section. I did say tho repub lican party would be held responsible for tho result of the extra session and could not screen itself with the co-operation of a few democrats acting with tho conservative republican element of the senate." 'Tariff revision downward is coming with what billiardists call the "reverse English." If there are those who are expecting down ward revision at the hands of the present con- . gress they would do well to be sending In their "C. Q. D." messages. A car load of live lobsters has been shipped from tho Atlantic to the Pacific coast. The shipment did not include any of the species v that hold to the opinion that the protective'; tariff which makes raw wool higher is the same tariff that makes manufactured woolens cheaper Cs jjU" A.-J 4 r y i O. t , J