The commoner. (Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-1923, February 19, 1909, Image 1
The Commoner WILLIAM J. BRYAN, EDITOR AND PROPRIETOR VOL. 9, NO. 6 Lincoln, Nebraska, February 19, 1909 Whole Number 422 LINCOLN AS AN ORATOR Lincoln's fame as a statesman and as the na tion's chief executive during its most crucial period has so overshadowed his fame as an orator that his merits as a public speaker have not been sufficiently emphasized. When it is remembered that his nomination was directly due to the prominence which he won upon tho stump; that in a most remarkable series of debates he held his own against one of the most brilliant orators America has produced; and that to his speeches, more than to the argu ments, of any other one man, or in fact, of all other public men combined, was due tho success of his party when all these facts are borne in mind, it will appear plain, even to the casual observer, that too little attention has been given to the extraordinary power which he exercised as a speaker. That his nomination was duo to the effect that -his speeches produced, can not be disputed. When ho began his fight against slavery in 1854-he was but little known outside of the counties in which he attended court. It is true that he had been a member of congress some years before, but at that time he was not stirred by any great emotion or connected with the discufesion of any important theme, and he made but little impression upon national poli tics. The threatened extension of slavery, how ever, aroused himt and with a cause which justi fied his best efforts, he threw his whole soul into the fight. . The, .debates with Douglas have never had a parallel in. this, or, so far as history shows, in any othor country. - In engaging in this contest with Douglas he met a foeman worthy of his steel, for Douglas had gained a deserved reputation as a great de bater, and recognized th'at his future depended upon the success with which he met the attacks of Lincoln. On one side an institution support ed by history and tradition and on tho other a growing sentiment against tho holding of a hu man being in bondage these presented a su preme issue. Douglas won tho senatorial seat for which the two at that time had contested, but Lincoln won a larger victory he helped to mould the sentiment that was dividing parties and re-arranging the political map of the coun try. When the debates were concluded every one recognized him as the leader of the cause which he had espoused, and it was a recognition of this leadership which he had secured through his public speeches that enabled him, a western man, to be nominated over tho eastern candi dates not only a western man, but a man lack ing in book learning and the polish of the schools. No other American president has over so clearly owed his elevation to his oratory. Washington, Jefferson and Jackson, the presi- CONTENTS LINCOLN AS AN ORATOR "EDUCATING" THE SOUTH MR. ROOSEVELT IS INDIGNANT PAWNED HONOR "NEW LAND OF PROMISE" INFLUENCING LEGISLATORS MISSOURI'S ANTI-MONOPOLY VICTORY TAFT AND ROCKEFELLER EDUCATIONAL SERIES POSTAL SAV INGS BANKS LETTERS FROM THE PEOPLE COMMENT ON CURRENT TOPICS HOME DEPARTMENT WHETHER COMMON OR NOT NEWS OF THE WEEK Address delivered by Mr. Bryan at Springfield, 111., February 12, 1909, at celebration of the one hundredth an niversary of birth of Abraham Lincoln dents usually mentioned in connection with him, were all poor speakers. In analyzing Lincoln's characteristics as a speaker, one is impressed with the complete ness of his equipment. He possessed the two things that are absolutely essential to effective speaking namely, information and earnestness. If one can be called eloquent who knows what he is talking about and means what he says and I know of no better definition Lincoln's speeches were eloquent. He was thoroughly in formed upon the subject; he was prepared to meet his opponent upon the general proposition discussed, and upon any deductions which. could be drawn from it. There was no unexplored field into which his adversary could lead him, he had carefully examined every foot of tho ground and was not afraid of pitfall or ambush, and, what was equally important, ho spoke from his own heart to tho hearts of those who lis tened. While the printed page can not fully reproduce the impressions made by a voice trembling with emotion or tender with pathos, one can not read the. reports of tho debates without feeling that Lincoln regarded Jtfia sub ject as far transcending the ambitions or tho personal interests of the debaters. It was of little moment, he said, whether they voted him or Judge Douglas up or down, but it was tre mendously important that the question should be decided rightly. His reputation may have suffered in the opinion of some, because he made them think so deeply upon what he said that they, for the moment, forgot him altogether, and yet, Is this not the very perfection of speech? It is the purpose of the orator to pursuado and, to do this, ho presents, not himself but his sub-" joct. Someone in describing the difference be tween Demosthenes and Cicero said that "when Cicero spoke people said, how well Cicero speaks, but when Demosthenes spoke, they said, let us go against Philip." In proportion as one can forget himself and become wholly absorbed in the cause which he is presenting does ho measure up to the requirements of oratory. In addition to the two essentials, Lincoln possessed what may be called the secondary aids to oratory. He was a master of statement. Few have equalled him in the ability to strip a truth of surplus verbiage and present it in its naked strength. In the Declaration of Independence wo read that there are certain self-evident truths, which are therein enumerated. If I were going to amend the proposition, I would say that all truth is self-evident. Not that any truth will be universally accepted, for not all are in a posi tion or in an attitude to accept any given truth. In the interpretation of the parable of the sower, we aTe told that "the cdres of this world and the deceitfulness of riches choke the truth," and it must be acknowledged that every truth has these or other -difficulties to contend with. But a truth may be so clearly stated that it will commend itself o anyone who has not some special reason for rejecting it. No one has more clearly stated tho funda mental objections to slavery than Lincoln stated them, and he had a great advantage over his opponent in being able to state thpse objections frankly, for Judge Douglas neither denounced nor defended slavery as an institution his plan embodied a compromise and he could not dis cuss slavery upon its merits without alienating either the slave-owner or the abolitionist. Brevity is the soul of wit, and a part of Lin coln's reputation for wit lies in his ability to condense a great deal into a few words. He was epigrammatic. A moulder of thought is not necessarily an originator of the thought moulded. Just as lead moulded into tho form of bullets has its effectiveness increased, so thought may havo its propagating power enor mously Increased by being moulded Into a form that the eye catches and tho memory holds. Lincoln was tho spokesman of his party ho gave felicitous expression to tho thoughts of his followers. His Gettysburg speech Is not surpassed, if equalled, in beauty, simplicity, force and .ppro priateness by any speech of the samo le gth of any language. It Is tho world's model In elo quence, elegance and condensation, He might safely rest his reputation as an orator on that speech alone. He was rpt in illustration no one moro so. A simple story or simllo drawn from everyday life flashed before his hoarors tho argument that he wanted to present. Ho did not speak over the heads of his hearers, and yet his lan g'uago was ' never commonplace. There is strength In simplicity, and Lincoln's dtylo was simplicity itself. Ho understood the power of the Interrogatory for some of his most powerful arguments were condensed into questions. Of all those who dis cussed the evils of separation and tho advan tages to bo derived from tho preservation ol the. union, no one ever put tho mattor more forcibly than Lincoln did when, referring to the possibility of war and the certainty of peace some time, '-ven If the union was divided, he called attention to tho fact that tho same ques tion would have tp be dealt with', and then asked, "Can enemies make treaties easier than friends can make laws?" Ho made frequent uso of Bible language and of illustrations drawn from Holy Writ. It Is said that when ho was preparing his Springfield speech of 1858 he spent hours trying to find language that would express tho idea that dom inated his entire career, namely, that a republic could not permanently endure half free and half Vlave, and that finally a Bible passage flashed through his mind, and he exclaimed, "I havo found it" "and if a house be divided against It self, that house can not stand," and probably no other Bible passage ever exerted as much in fluence as this one in the settlement of a great controversy. I have enumerated some, not all but the more Important of his characteristics as an ora tor, and on this day I venture for the moment to turn the thoughts of this audience away from the great work that he accomplished as a pa triot, away from his achievements in the lino of statecraft, to the means employed by him to bring before the public the ideas which attract ed attention to him. His power as a public speaker was the foundation of his success,, and while it is obscured by the superstructure' that was reared upon it, it can not be entirely over looked as tho returning anniversary of his birth calls increasing attention to the widening in fluence of his work. With no military career to dazzle tho eye or excite the imagination; with ,no public service to make his name familiar to the reading public, his elevation to tho presi dency would have been impossible without his oratory. The eloquence of Demosthenes and Cicero were no more necessary to their work, and Lincoln deserves to havo his name written on the scroll with theirs. fc lnl iT ig?0 "EDUCATING" THE SOUTH At the tariff hearing in Washington the other day the following colloquy took place: W. II. Tift of TIfton, Ga., urged a higher duty on the commoner grades of lumber. "Why do you people in the south vote for low duties and then come up here and ask for the highest?" asked Chairman Payne. "I did not vote' against Mr. Taft," answered the witness. "There were forty thousand votes 4 ,Hj r-s - . ,a f-W-JJ. jfc, ttf jl. -jW-- -itti .