The commoner. (Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-1923, March 06, 1908, Page 2, Image 3
""i r arwwtyyrr VOLUME 8, NUMBER 8 2 Fa M I announced Unit I would bo a candidate if llio clomourulH desired it. I said that I would obey tlio parly if It summoned mo and would, if tlio parly wIhIipcI, carry tlio Htandard no matter whom (he republicans iiiIkIiL nominate and no ! i.. .i ii. . ,.i. ....,... riiirwiii vW'.lnrv or JlWllUM WIIIMIUM llli: Nmi;n i"'"""' ' " " defeat. Tlmt 1h my position todjiy. If I have retained your confidence it is br caiiHo I bavo spoken from my heart, to you hearts and have cherished tlie same ideals Ilia -ifin )ifii'i Owir-lulxwl IP- r It If I am nominated I want the nomination to come from the voters rather than from tlio convention. The convention is but. the servant of the voters the voters are (he masters. They have a right to determine both the plat form and I ho candidates. If you want mo nomi nated, Instruct for me. Inst ructions are demo cratic. io one nas any iikijl - iqiiunuui. others unless they want him to represent, thoni. I believe in instruction. I do not care upon whom your choice falls. Whoever he Is he should have? delegates instructed by the peo ple who elected (hem. They should represent LI IU WIHIM.1 Ol HID H'()IH'. If I am to be your candidate I want your dogates Instructed for me. If I am your can- (lujuio again n. win ne in answer 10 a can irom tho parly, and upon that condition only am I a candidate. If the voters of tho party want mo for their candidate tiiey will instruct their delegates to that effe.-t. And (here is more needed than Instructions. Tho delegates should bo ineii vho aro willing to bo Instructed. They should bo men willing to carry out tho instructions which the pcopje glvo them. I do not want delegates Instructed for mo, but complaining of (heir instructions. J do not want delegates who will spend their time at tho convention explaining (hat they would like to bo free and that they consider it impossiblo to elect (ho man whom they aro instructed to nominate. I am perfectly willing to light all tho enemies that can got in front of mo, but my enemies shall not get behind mo again. T nay this of myself, but it. holds good for any candldnto whom you may wish to nominate. If you prerer another candidate then thoso who prerer me should not. ask to ho a part of the convention which nominates him. Tho dele gates should act as tho representatives of the people, and they should bo men who are willing to do what they bavo been instructed to do. If you want mo to bo your candidate lot no man who does not want to see me nominated repre sent yon in the convenUon. Let no man havo a seat hero who does not want to seo mo elected if nominated. Let the candidate who has (lie support of tho people have the heart as well as tho voico of tho delegates. And again, if I am nominated, it will come at tho cmcl of twolvo years of fighting in tho open My views aro known to all the people They havo been openly voiced and r have a right to assume that the people who nominate no will glyo ,i,o the kind of platform on wh ch pect thSnif T flBht T hnvo lh0 rlKht to -tho ,m tv im, )0 nomi,mtGd, tho platform of the paity will bo ono for which 1 shall not havo to apologize. It should ho one on which I can make the campaign. It should he o no whfrh will enable mo to make an honest fight in ho open or tho principles for which tho eo o toTo l,era?hi'aKnd;r!h0Ut GVl0n' TliVK is anouior thing. If I am nominated, and iriven a platform on which I can stand and fight I have a right to assume that tho party wi moo tho management of tho campaign in II i! ?nom,i1Chth?oWant t0 SC oocted hIhhavo tno right to assume that the pnmmif LI charge of tho campaign will lo 2iH Jf " vote their time to winning a victory i,0, it .ra; campaign when son,o men,bers of tho committee would not attend J! i! ? I shall not make another cnmniyJS?lni!? whackers in tho orSattoT 5 t , U8h" aro too well known for thorn in h! ,mn1v' Tlioso who do not want tw i i i ftliy drilbt do not want mo n?toc , ( lnof "t mo elected. Tf thov do If V Vln not wnt thoy should give their sun ?ortfnt m?, lccta didato. If they are not oH-T ,Cr Cnn' I shall make they m st Lot ?.,nf ,ml f a flRht man and the fight bWCTi?' Tho natod it will ho because l, 1, nm nomI prineiplos for whiel? YLVC0 aro fr the thoy aro for mo personal v t "0t becauso enough to holiovn n, "?" 5:. . ,T am t vain The Commoner. You aro interested in me because you are in terested in yourselves, becauso you aro in terested in your children and your children a children. You aro interested in me because I helievo in the kind of government you love. I would rather be the leader of six and a half million democrats who think for themselves and march with mo only when I march in the direc tion in which thoy want me to march than bo tho leader of six ar.d a half millions without thoughts who would simply echo what someone else said. The democrats havo been thinking for themselves and they have been studying public questions from tho standpoint of the many. They havo been considering tho rights of all the people rather than tho privileges of a few. There is no doubt that a large majority of tho people believe in vlemocratic principles and are ready to try tho policies that our party has been advocating. The nation's conscience is awak ened; let us appeal to it with an honest plat form; with an honest organization and with honest methods, and our appeal will not be in vain. v 5 w t&fc WILL THE BANKS ANSWER THIS? In addition to tho arguments already pre sented by Tho Commoner in favor of the guar anteed bank, the following is submitted: The United States government requires a deposit of specific security when it deposits money in a national bank; the state also re quires security as a rule, and the county, and city deposits are secured either by bonds or by the deposit of specific securities. Now the question arises, if the United States government which can at any time in spect a bank and find out just what it is doing and how its business is being conducted, requires security for its deposits, why should not security bo given to the depositor who can not examine for himself and does not know anything about the hank's solvency or methods? And loss to the national government, to the state, to the county or to the city would be borne by all the people and thus be small upon each one, while the loss to the individual has to bo borne entirely by himself and may wipe out his entire savings. Is not the argument stronger in favor of the protection of depositors than it is in favor of the protection of the na tion, tho state, the county or the city? Cut tho case is even stronger when tho bank is required to put up specific security for the protection of national, state, county, or city deposits. Its gilt-edged securities are thus hypothecated and the inferior securities are left for the security of the depositors, so that as a matter of fact, the public deposits aro not only protected, but they are protected at the expense of the individual depositors. What shall wo say ot a national bank which willingly gives the government specific security and then op poses tho protection of depositors? And strange to say, these big banks that get the big deposits from tho government upon specific security are the very ones that have fought and are fighting the system for the guaranty of depositors. It is time .that the depositors understood the situation and got together fo? their own protection. Will any banker who U opposing the guaranty system answer this argu ment and explain why it is right to protect gov- uaMeSoBite?08"8 aUd Wrng t0 PrteCt iudiv" &&&& A GOOD IDEA Congressman Hitchcock, of Nebraqki mn,i a strong point the other day in preaentin? ?n amendment authorizing our consuls abroad to gather information as to the price charged on Americau-mado goods which are sold abroad Tn addressing the house Mr. Hitchcock stted:' Phis matter is very largely in the interest of American manufacturers. To i vorv tl I extent these manufacturers are in thJ I?at ment of a .high protective tariff to enS?i ?iJy" to compote, as it has been supposed wit? th,em manufacturers in tho American fields It u ! g" open secret, a notorious fact o en, , nn. even denied, that a great S r 5? h thmk not facturers are sellingg their goods inT manU and other markets to const me? X ,El!rPean much below the prices th5tiv0ad at prIces American market and that imerfc nn0 in the are compelled to Jv mL, mrlcan consumers amendment is to require our SSn??3? f, my reports on nr fi"r .?" agon.ts in making enough to believe thaSKn nm not va for the American neonl om do. Informa of voters will turn out i i .lmlf m,,,io l)oillt. to the S ! Pa1 thls Portant o just to salC r p, rS! !!!-i--Pli PS1' - ui,uU people aro perfectly willing to have these agents of the United States investi gate trade conditions for the purpose of develop ing such -facts as may be helpful in spreading American trade, but it certainly seoms to me that we should couple with them instructions to our agents to ascertain authoritatively and officially whether the charge is true that these American manufacturers, protected by law, favored by the government of the United States', are actually engaged in selling their products at prices to foreigners in foreign markets far below those that they charge to Americans in the American market. This additional informa tion will cost nothing, and it certainly will bo of value. If the charge is true, it ought to be come known. If it is false, it will do no harm to ascertain that fact." Mr. Hitchcock is entirely right and has presented the subject in a forceful style so char acteristic of him. We have a right to know at what price American goods are being sold abroad and our consuls are the proper persons to secure this information. By all means let the facts be known and then let the republican leaders explain the facts if they can. & f ( && WOULD HE REMIT THE FINE? Governor Hughes is arguing against fines he says they are unjust to stockholders. Pie pre fers imprisonment. Well imprisonment would bo better but Mr. Rockefeller has not been im prisoned and that fine is the only penalty in sight. In view of the fact that Chancellor Day is for Governor Hughes and in view of the furth er fact that the younger Rockefeller has de clared for Governor Hughes the question arises would Governor Hughes limit the $29,000,000 fine if he were president? This may become a pertinent question how will Governor Hughes answer it? WOULD HE REMIT THE FINE? , t & t& &fr A FAITHFUL DEMOCRAT Here is a letter full of heart thrills. It needs no explanation. It speaks for itself: San Francisco, Cal., January 29, 1908. Editor Commoner: 1 enclose a postofiice money order of $3 and five membership certificates. These were obtained by Mr. Manzer on his dying bed. He passed away January 23, after a long illness, but it was the earthly end of a long life spent in working for humanity and for true democracy and, as these certificates testify, his dying efforts were for the cause of humanity. He was born August 3, 1830 and there is no doubt that it was through his efforts that this state was carried for Lincoln. He was the first ' president of the Single Tax society in this city and an earnest worker for its principles. He was my husband and the best man I ever knew. Yours cordially, MRS. MARY J. MANZER. The Commoner extends to Mrs., Manzer its condolence. 2f fcy t REAPING THE WHIRLWIND The republican leaders sold the govern ment at auction in 1S96 and delivered tho goods. In 1900 the contract was renewed and now the people are paying the penalty. Those who sow the wind still reap the whirlwind. &&&, EMERGENCY If the emergency is such as to make an emergency currency necessary it is strange that so many of the financiers are willing to appoint a commission and put the whole thing over until after the election. THE "FIRST GUN" ,a ZhK rePubljcan convention in Florida was tw f! g f t,he camPasn" and, considering that two delegations were elected, it may be regarded as a double-barrelled gun "DEAD EASY" IN WISCONSIN nm?r,S 1?1g05)d lettei from Wisconsin: Grand Rapids, Wis., Jan. 25, 1908. Edi- ;nnlm0Uer' Liucoln, Neb.: Inclosed Si 2, fln?. money order for $40.20 togeth n JJ! atllsi;of sixty-seven subscribers and pledges to the million army membership. Th nn?ad aSy., obtaini"S subscribers for iho Commoner this year. "Respectfully yours, "L. .M. NASH."