The commoner. (Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-1923, May 18, 1906, Page 8, Image 8
i-M ,M "ti I - V 11 ' J ., , " i, "J V 7 ' ' ynMniD miwi yn)iiiywi';ii'a'in"i nui i imp'"W"'juii""''nri "" " "'" "' ,i. 1,1.. i. nf, y'TTmr r- --t . 8' The Commoner. Volume 6, number is--. ac f" " A. CURB6NT pssryji Aw?. tisriss Topics aff flfl:5cS)i'v E1 I THE APPOINTMENT of Assistant Secretary Barnes to be postmaster at "Washington is not popular among the "old inhabitants." The Washington Star, usually found on the ide of the administration, prints this editorial: Tho carnival of crime continues in tho District. Last night the wife of a policeman was robbed while passing through nock Creek Park. This assail ant took long chances, for the woman was armed, but her aim was poor. This morning an Ana costia woman on returning home from market was grappled by a robber in her own house and robbed of a considerable sum of money. No ar rests have yet been made in these cases. Mean while thirty-eight policemen remain on duty at the White House. And the major ana, 'superin tendent of police and the remnants of his force are still engaged in scouring the city and country for evidence with which to blacken the cnaracter of Mrs. Minor Morris, in order that the president's assistant secretary may be whitewashed and rail roaded into ofllce as the postmaster of Washing ton. The situation is altogether significant." SENATOR TILLMAN has introduced a resolu-' tion instructing the District of Columbia committee to investigate the connection of the police with the ejection of Mrs. Morris ana to ascertain whether the superintendent of police undertook to make an investigation "concerning the previous life and reputation of JVIrs. Morris, and especially to inquire whether the superin tendent of police and one of the chief witnesses against Mrs. Morris have since then received recognition by the appointment of near relatives to office, and whether any laws should be adopted by congress for the better regulation and improve ment of the police force of the city of Washing ton." The Washington correspondent for the New York World says: "The appointments referred to are those of a son of Richard Sylvester, su perintendent of police, and the son of a news paper correspondent, who was the only eye-witness giving testimony favorable to Mr. Barnes, who were appointed cadets to the militarv acad emy at West Point. It is said these appointments were ma.de February 7." MIDDLE AGED AMERICANS will remember the air to which the London Dailv Mail refers when it says; "Forty years ago: every barrel organ in London was jigging to the: tune of Champagne Charlie,' and George Leybourne, alias Joe Saunders, a whiskered 'swell' who drove to his music hall in a carriage with four horses, sang Champagne Charlie' night after night to de lighted thousands. Those were the days of the Great Vance and Alfred Lloyd, when he who now calls himself an 'artiste or a 'serio' was a 'Lion comique,' and then everybody knew the name of Mr. Alfred Lee. Now the famous Mr. Alfred Lee is dead at a great age, and men past middle r trri, II ,, lt "c wlB uie composer of Champagne Charlie.' The last generation is w n fr V10 !;emindei, 'or the 'song died long llfiini'ft ire mnlrni" HRHE TERMS OF twenty-nine governors ex--- pire -this year or early in 1907, and their ZZeaSLmlVe, ?h,?en bef0re the'enf of the "Oreiwn will 5welDhltt PublIc Ledger says: uiegon will elect a successor to Governor G SeorSn ba hiifUne I' The Aata uiecuon will be held on September 1 Vprmnnr'n on September 4, Maine's on September 10 T?nr gias on October 3 and Kentucky on November 5 e other states choosing state officers win elect them on November 6, at the same time rente sentatives in congress are chosen. The states o tho GCh ?overnors this year, with the namel of the retiring executives are: Alabama WD o S& CaXnla Tl' " KVdel. rado t 7 A a,?' Pardee' democrat; Colo- Hoch, republican; Kentuckv T n w ?,, democrat; Maine William t nW Beckham Massachusetts, Curtis GuiM Tr' YQl' Michigan, F. M. Warner rmfiihii' miblIcan: 7. A. foh'nson, tJ'XStfi &, republican; Nevada, John Sparks, democrat; New Hampshire, John McLane, republican; New York, F. W. Higgins, republican; North Dakota, E. Y. Searles, republican; Oregon, G. E. Chamberlain, democrat; Pennsylvania, S. W. Pennypacker, republican; Rhode Island, George H. Utter, re publican; South Carolina, D. C. Hey ward, demo crat; South Dakota, S. H. Elrod, republican; Ten nessee, John I. Cox, democrat; Texas, S. W. Lan ham, democrat; Vermont, Charles J. Bell, repub lican; Wisconsin, J. O. Davidson, republican; Wyoming, B. B. Brooks, republican." WILLIAM ALLEN WHITE, editor of the Em poria Gazette, has practically bolted the republican ticket in Kansas. Mr. White intimates that Governor Hoch loaned the name of the state of Kansas to the M. K. and T. railroad's suit' in the Indian Territory on condition that John Madden, an old friend of the governor, be made general attorney for the railroad. Governor Hoch says: "It is true that John Madden is a personal friend of mine, and he has been for many years. It is true that I indorsed him for the position he now holds, as well as for a dozen others, and I hope to indorse him for many if he and I live long enough. But this suit will not cost the state of Kansas one penny. I allowed the name of the state to he used because I believe that such a suit is necessary to settle the rights ot the people who have taken up this land in In.lian Territory and Who are living upon it now as well as to ascertain what claims the railroad company has to the land." THE UNJTED STATES supreme court recently rendered an important decision affecting di vorce proceedings. The court holds that a divorce issued to a person when the defendant to the ac tion is a non-resident of the Btate vhere the de cree is granted is illegal. Under this decision persons may not, for instance, by going to South. Dakota, remaining there for a certain time ac cording to state law, obtain a divorce unless both parties are residents of that state. The court stood five to four, Justice White speaking for the court, and Justice Brown delivering a dis senting opinion in which- Justices Brown, Har lan and Brewer concurred. Justice Holmes dis sented but read an independent dissenting opinion. THE CASE UPON which the supreme court acted was that of John W. Haddock against Harriet Haddock. It came up on appeal from the New York courts. The Haddocks were married in 1868. The husband claimed to have been an unwilling participant in the ceremony. He says m his answer to the woman's complaint that he left her immediately after the marriage rites were performed, and during all the time that has intervened has seen her only three times. In 1881 he secured a divorce in Connecticut, where lie then resided, and in 1882 was married there to another woman. The New York supreme court held the second marriage to be illegal and -le-creed the first wife to be still the legal wife, . and directed Haddock to pay her an annuity of $780. That finding was sustained by the de cision, which held that Mrs. Haddock was with out the jurisdiction of the Connecticut court. T T IS ESTIMATED that at least 20,000 children A are affected by the opinion of the supreme court, these being the offspring pf marriage based on divorces granted where but one of the parties resided in the state, 'in their dissenting opinion Justices Brown and Holmes spoke very earnestly, Justice Brown saying: "i regret that the court -in this case has taken what seems to me a step backward in 'American jurisprudence and has virtually returned to the old doctrine of comity which it was the very object of the full faith and credit clause of the constitution to supersede." Justice Holmes said: "I do not sup pose that civilization will come to an end which ever way this case is decided; but as the reason ing which prevails in the mind of the majority does not convince mo, and as I think that the decision not only reverses a previous well-con-sidered decision of this court but is like ly to cause considerable 'disaster to innocent persons and to bastardize children hitherto supposed to be the offspring of legal marrrage, I think it. -proper to express my views." Justice Holmes, quoted from the case of Atherton vs. Atherton, a New York-Kentucky case, which he said had been reversed by this decision. THE PUBLIC IS considerably stirred by the supreme court's decision .affecting divorces, and newspapers generally demand tliat steps be " . taken to provide a remedy for the situation. Tho New York World, for Instance, says: " The de- cision of the United States supreme court in the Haddock divorce case impresses once more tho imperative necessity of divorce law reform and ' uniformity of practice between the states. If all those divorces are invalid which have been obtained by the haphazard methods which the court condemns, then the present status of thou sands of women and children is most unfortunate, property questions of great complexity are raised and society is needlessly shocked and disturbed Jn regard to a matter upon which it is most sensitive. The confusion of the laws which per mits three times as many divorces to be granted in Chicago as in New York, which recognizes no cause in one state, only one cause in another and in half a dozen states almost any cause, Is., , bad enough without the confusion of the techni cal rules as to actual residence and procedure." IT-IS GENERALLY agreed by newspaper writ ers that Thomas W. Lawson was one of tfie gentlemen whom Mr. Roosevelt had In mindwhen he delivered his famous "muck rake" speecn. ' Newspaper dispatches say thai; Mr. Lawson bubi ' " bled over with smiles after reading the presi dent's Standard Oil message. Mr. Lawson gave out the following facetious statement: "The. ' fully attended meeting of the American Muck: 1 Rakers' association, hastily called at noon today for the purpose of listening to the special message of its supreme mentor, President Theodore Roose velt, accepted my unanimously requested resig nation as president, to which office our ideal was at once elected for a life term. A notification committee left for Washington tonight to present the president with his new honors and to secure his approval of the new standard rake which was adopted at today's meeting. The new rake differs from the old only in the increased length of -handle and the substitution of automatic teeth, the number of which has been increased four times over any heretofore used by the associa tion. It was also voted at today's meeting to suspend all raking for ninety days, or until the miasmitics created by the president's rake be concreted. The association's experts submitted analyses and figures to the effect that such con creting would be sufficient to pave the highways and byways of hell with an ebonized coating twenty-seven feet in depth, and of gutta percha consistency. At the first reaaing of the presi dents message two of the most talented mem bers, of the association succumbed to apoplectic " fits. After the meeting adjourned five others, who had been wrestling with the green monster, were similarly affected, while a large number of oth ers wired the Standard Oil for 'the hook.' The meeting broke up late in the evening with the singing of the hymn: . . . Muck-rakers we; . - , We dig and we delve, ' " From midnight till twelve, '' ..A' '' In muck and in mire, ' - ' S-:'- In slush and in fire, - ' ''-P Dis-in-ter-est-ed-ly. "' -" DO THE PEOPLE of Texas and of the south', , generally desire to have Senator Bailey ,- made the presidential nominee of the democratic' Ewf !Sr10S?? .Thls ls tne nation propounded- by the Washington correspondent for the Houston ... uexas) Post. That correspondent adds: "If . they do and are willing to show it at this time, careful students of the political situation say that' , Mr. Bailey can certainly be nominated. His per formances in the senate during the present ses sion of congress have added to his already en Yiable reputation in such a wny as to make him easily the leading democratic figure in congress1" )i not in the whole United States. It is always uJUbU IJlgM-W'...- -Hi -JhiU'iJltoii