The commoner. (Lincoln, Neb.) 1901-1923, May 26, 1905, Page 6, Image 6
1 itMWtttftttaMMMMH if, JpBPPfPiWWf ! UW -1 '-rr, - 'w;jpfljli ) fflJJiiyjl,i.itnf m 6 for I shall put 100 gamecocks In tho Plain Dealer 'and sell the whole lot of them for five cents.' And ho redooniod his word." THE Underwriters Review takes Mr. Bryan to task for suggesting that a maximum limit bo flxel upon the business that can bo done by insur ance companies, but Collier's Weekly in a recent editorial says "possibly it might bo well to set a limit even in amount, say of five hundred millions, so that less attention should bo paid to acquiring new business and more attention to getting good returns for the policyholders already in. Now the big insurances companies sacrifice old policy holders to now Ohcs by such devices as giving tho first' year's insurance free, so that men will be led into largo companies by this temporary bribe where they might, in the long run, be better off in the smaller companies. Why should not the amount of business be limited? Why should an insurance company bo allowed to grow to pro portions that make it u menace to the welfare of tho country." THE history of wheat corners is referred to in an interesting way by a writer in the New ark News, who says: "So far as known to date the only really successful corner in wheat (re ferred to in scriptures as "corn ) was that by Joseph when ho presided over tho destinies of Egypt, but it will be recalled that he had more than human aid In estimating the size of forth coming harvests. When domestic vheat crops were much smaller and facilities for transport ing and storing them at I'istributing points were much less efficient, perhaps thirty years ago, there were several so-called successful minor corners in wheat and corn, but the only successful corner in wheat within twenty years was that engineered by Hutchinson at Chicr o in 1S88, when he put the price up to $2 a bushel, and made the short3 settle at that. Records of similar attempts include Keeno's loss of $2,000,000 in wheat in 1879, Han dy's similar loss of $1,500,000 in 1881, Harper's dropping $4,000,000 on the cereal in 1887 and young Letter's parting from $7,000,000 in his attempted wheat corner of 1898. In addition to these there were failures to corner lard by McGeoch in 1883 and Cudahy in 1893, in which each lost, it was said, Tlie Commoner. about $2,000,000, and Deacon White's memorable corner in corn in 1892, in which ho lost a million, which he subsequently paid with interest." GEORGE GOULD'S reason for resigning from the Union Pacific directorate, follow closely, 'according to a writer in tho New York Evening Post, the ethics of directorship as laid down by his father. Jay Gould, while a director of the Union Pacific in 1879, had bought control of tho Missouri Pacific, and was planning to extend it into Union Pacific territory by means of the Kan sas Pacific. Previously, however, he had given his approval to a consolidation of the Kansas Pa cific and the Union Pacific, and although (accord ing to his own assertion) he offered $1,000,000 to bo released from this approval, other Union Pacific directors held him to it. In the investigation of these conditions by the Pacific commission, Mr. Gould was asked: "According to the ethics of Wall street, do you consider it absolutely within the limits of your duty, while a director of the Union Pacific, to purchase another property and to design an extension of the road which would perhaps ruin the Union Pacific?" "I don't think it would have been proper," Gould replied; "that's the reason I let it go." The Post writer adds: "Cynics who refused to believe in the white-souled financial integrity reflected by this reply always asserted that Gould had 'worked off' his Union Pa cific stock at the current high price, while buy ing up Kansas Pacific stock for 7 and 8 cents on the dollar, and arranging to exchange it for Union Pacific, worth ten or fifteen times as much, on a share-for-share merger basis. The upshot of the affair was Gould's return to the Union Pacific di rectory, not very long afterward, in absolute con trol of the property. The present instance will hardly duplicate that part of the family history; but it may be recalled that, even in 1879, Wall street said Gould had 'quarreled' with the Union Pacific people, and on that assumption they broke the market." VICE PRESIDENT FAIRBANKS rather turned the joke on former Senator Chandler. The Washington correspondent for the Brooklyn Eagle says that Mr. Chandler in-his mirthful moods jol lies aspirants for the presidency, and on a recent .VOLUME 5, NUMBER lg occasion penned and triplicated a letter in these words: "My Dear Mr. Secretary Shaw: I desire to in. form you that it seems to me you ought to be tho next president of the United States. Your loim devotion to the principles of the republican party, with your eminent fitness for the position high integrity, and the faith and confidence which the people of the country repose in you, muko you the logical presidential candidate of the party of which you are today the most distinguished leader. Yours very sincerely, WILLIAM E. CHANDLER. "P. S. No. lI have written similar letters to .Vice President Fairbanks and Senator Foraker, "P. S. No. 2. Please don't forget me. "W. E. C." Mr. Shaw and Mr. Foraker answered in kind but the correspondent avers that Mr. Fairbanks replied in this dignified fashion: "He sincerely thanks ex-Senator Chandler for his cordial en dorsement .and promise of support, appreciating thoroughly what this meant at the hands of a man possessing the great influence of the New Hamp shire republican. He then added: 'I am also pleased to learn that you have informed Secretary Shaw and Senator Foraker regarding your attitude toward me and the -presidential nomination.'" The Eagle correspondent adds: "Mr. Fairbanks may bo be as solemn and serious minded as charged, but the last quoted sentence shows considerable clev erness in turning the joke on the author and rivals." A FEDERAL statute requires live stock in tran sit to be unloaded, fed and watered at in tervals not longer than twenty-eight hours. It is agreed that it is cruel to keep animals longer than this without food and water, and that their meat is not so healthy if they are feverish and hungry when killed. The Chicago Tribune, referring to this law, says: "Investigations by Secretary of Agriculture Wilson :eveal that the law has been broken 400 times in three months. Like manv other enactments, state and national, for the regu lation of railroads, it is habitually violated. Where obedience to a law is inconvenient or expensive, the law is disregarded. THE HIGHER TESTS OF HANHOOD Tho philosopher who asked "take away ambi tion and vanity, and where will bo your heroes and patriots?" might have learned something to his advantage had he lived to read from the pen of tho good Quaker poet: "Dream not that helm and harness are signs of valor true; Peace hath higher tests of manhood than battle ever knew." For every ounce of evil in this sorry old world there are several pounds of good. For every act of meanness there are several deeds of love'. In this day when the world hears so much to the discredit of men, it will do it no harm to bo reminded that, "the evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones." It will do men and women no harm to have their attention distracted from the dark pictures of cruelty, of passion and of man's inhumanity to man to the' brighter view where sacrifices are made, where burdens are borne, where mighty obstacles are ovorcome- in many instances by frail men and delicate women and all done in the name of that love that "passeth all understand ing." Charles Reade described the experiences of tho thoughtful observer when he said "Not a day passes over the earth but men and women of no note do great deeds, speak great words and suffer noble sorrows. Of these obscure heroes, phil osophers and martyrs, the greater part will never be known till that hour when many that were great shall bo small and the small great " One need not go beyond the borders of his own town to find those who keeping "the noiseless tenor of their way" and unknown even to many of their neighbors, meet the higher tests of man hood. Po nting out that "heroes in history seem to us poetic becauso they are there" one writer has reminded us that "if wo should tell the simple like oetrSO f UP neighbors lt would sound Regular patrons of a certain street-car line in a western city frequently observed a mother nnlni prom,aturely Sy by he burdens, carry on and off tho cars, to and from Adoctor's office a girl, in the neighborhood of eighteen years of ago, who had been stricken with pMiyste For years this mother hoped against hope and trying first one experiment and then another was, after years of painstaking devotion, finally rewarded by her daughter's restoration to health. - Those who remembered how that good mother carried in her arms the daughter, then grown to woman hood, even as she had carried her when a babe, must have felt their hearts beat a little faster when they were permitted to see that mother and daughter walking side by side, the one restored tc health and the other happier and prouder be cause of the sorrows she had endured and the sacrifices she had made. A man in a clerical position met with a ter rible accident. A large family was dependent upon him for support. A fellow-employe, who was himself dependent upon wages and who had passed his sixty-fifth year, joined with other em ployes of the office in an agreement to do the work of their fellow in order that those dependent upon him might obtain his salary. Every night in that office some men were engaged in working overtime and several nights during the week this aged man was contributing his portion in this labor of love. He overworked himself and brought" on an apoplectic stroke. For several weeks he lingered between life and death, but, to the gratifi-' cation of all who have the honor of his acquaint ance, he is now well on his way to health. Who will say that on the roll of heroes the name of this man does not occupy a conspicuous place' A young physician was called to attend a woman who was at that time perhaps nineteen years of age. Although the disease with which this girl was stricken had been pronounced incur able by other and older doctors, the young phy sician devoted himself to the case. So attentive was he to his patient that he secured one of the rooms in her mother's house as his office that ho might be conveniently situated to respond, day or night to ca s from the invalid. On pleasant days he carried the delicate woman to his phaeton for a drive. Before the second year had passed be knew that his fair patient loved him He kept his own love for another locked within his big heart. For fourteen years the patient lingered and finally .passed away. Within a year the doctor had married the woman of his choice, who, evi dently understanding the heroism of the man, had never married, although it was currently reported she Jhad many opportunities. Intimate friends of those concerned in this romance know the facts as related. The doctor and his wife are still living and they keep refreshed the memory of the poor invalid as well as the grass and flowers about her grave. There are everywhere girls of tender years engaged in laborious tasks and using their all too small income for the purpose in some cases of lifting mortgages, in others of providing bread for the family. There are boys, pushed before their time to the line of manhood's duties, who have taken the places of fathers dead, have become pro tectors for their brothers and sisters and pro viders for their widowed mothers. There are parents struggling to conceal, and finally to cure, the waywardness of a son or daughter. There are wives bearing in silence the grief that husband's shame has brought upon them and concealing, for their children's sake, the hideous skeleton in their nE5?J!' are husbands who, to spare their ?mnSl g T6' Sleel their hearts aeainst the first S?a f ma1n1Il00d t0 destroy and close their 7rtn . Ve?C e,f ness of wives- TIiere are chil- fiwa Vu h0Jding Up their heads amonS their 52 7?L al1thoug1h a Parent has brought disgrace S?vm f household- There are men and women wXitTYej l0Bt ground' battlInS with their eTerv t?linhef aml With every struggle and with ZnZ Swf mpressed-as those who may not SS I?a' !Jsto strugglG th one's self can St th i?e fact that "he wii ieth W3 nil greater than he who taketh a city." thn innrSerUS !ve and the tender sympathy, th?t ahmSS f ?Hfice aml the migllty endeavor - t th?n nnn thiS Y,0rld today need to be brought tetnS1011, f those wh0 seeln& so much of nelr to?S??i "I?' may be movlng dangerously n a ne of cynicism. thit mi We are the exception. It is natural and q2L5d Wmen be g00d and d0 god- Love vmt watVy ?re part of tlie dIvine Plan. "That from nWeWUich mlds a tear and -Ma's, it trickle snZri i0UrC;e,"tllat law Preserves the earth a spheie and guides the planets in ihejr course." RICHARD L. METCALFE. - . . XtoMJ.lf,- -