t— '-y. ~ ~ i|^"PARENTAL. GRATITUDE J If It warn't fur Bill, my oldest son, 1 dunno what I'd have ever done. Savin' up cash was easy 'nuff. What puzzled me was to spend the stuff. When you've Hvod In a plain, old-fash ioned way You can't be a sport in Jes' one day. The coin would have laid there In the till L.lki two bushels of eyg*t“ j UNITED STATES RAISES THREE- j i FOURTHS OF WORLD’S CORN CROP : t_:_ ? The corn crops of the world, In each 'ear, are roundly 2,800.0T>0,000 bushels. The percentages produced in tho sev ual countries are as follows; United states, 74.9; Canada, .9; Mexico, 3.6; Europe, 16.4; South America, 2.7, and Africa and Australia, 1.5. The prin ipal producing country in Europe is -lungary, and not much is raised out iide of the Dtwiublan districts. The South Am.rican crop is mainly in Ar ;eniina. As will be seen, the United States In relation to the total crop, these states had 51.7 per cent of the entire area and raised 67.4 per cent of the total bushels. Their per capita pro duction, with a population estimated to be about 20,340,000 and about one fourth of the present population of, the United States, was 83.7 bushels; in all other states but 13.7 bushels. The area planted for the crop of 1903 is an unknown quantity. It is a general estimate that three-feurths of it had seeding by June 1. The re large, so much in excess of any pessi mistic view, that it calls for no enter tainment. The crop of 1902 was not the largest ever produced. There was every in centive that it should be. The coun try was bare. Farms were in sore need of their great essential. The price was high and stimulating, the season generally favorable. The crop, however, was late in maturing and late in availability. Its use began with October. A scarcity of animals u ses nearly three-fourths of the whole. In wheat the United States iaises but 22Vi per cent. This is one exhibit of the impor tance of the American corn crop. Corn in the most valuable of our produc tions. Our cotton crop is largely de pendent upon it. It is the keystone of our agricultural prosperity; the one crop we can least afford to lose. The crop in 1902 was not the larg est the United States has produced. In its measurement it was a large crop. Officially, it was 2,523,648.312 bushels from 94,043,613 acres. To grasp what these figures mean, the acreage, in square miles, is 146,983, and an area sufficiently large to make a band nearly six miles wide around the earth's largest circumference; an ^irea larger than is contained in the j states of Ohio, Indiana. Illinois and I one-fourth of Iowa, and all in corn, if in a singlo bulk of shelled corn, the production in 1902 would make a mass 112^ feet high, with perpendicular sides, cn a base of a square mile. If in car loads of 800 bushels, it means 3,154.560 cars, making a lino of freight cars 23,900 miles long, that would nearly girdle the earth at the equator. Tito land area of the seven surplus states, the states producing more corn | than they use, is 265,817,600 acres. In j 1902 these states had 18.3 per cent 1 of this area in com, or 48,692,079 I acres out of a total of 94,043,613 for the entire country. In detail, the sev eral surplus states had the following percentage of their land surface in corn: Ohio, 12.3; Indiana, 19.7; Illi nois, 26.9; Iowa. 26.1; Missouri, 15.5; Kansas. 14.2; Nebraska. 15.9. If lands not in cultivation—lands in forest, cit ies. railways, etc.—are excluded, these percentages are possibly dou bled. This is another evidence of the crop's importance. mainlng one-fourth—or, approximate ly, 18,500,000 acres—Is to be treated as most affected to mar the general prospect. And right here we enter the threshold of the crop Indication. Probably 70,000,000 acres at least had timely planting, for only In parts of the surplus states does there appear to have been highly unfavorable and preventing conditions. Should the acreage for this year’s crop be reduced to 80,000,000, which I do not believe will be the case, It would be a reduction of 15 per cent from the figures of last year. It would mean the loss of an area equivalent to 21,043 square miles, an area con stituting one-haif of the land surface of the state of Missouri. It would mean as many acres as were In corn in the states of Indiana and Illinois in 1002, or as many as were in corn in Missouri and Kansas in that year. Except in 1901, a calamitous year, when the yield of corn per acre was as low as 10.7. an average yield has been 24.52 bushels for ten years. In but one year of the ten forming this average was it under 20 bushels. It was 19.38 in the calamitous year of 1894, when the official crop was de clared 1,212,770,052 bushels. Assum ing 80,000,000 acres only for this year, this average production of 24.52 stands for 1,961,000,000 bushels. There are good reasons why we will have no such reduction as to 80,000, 000 acres. The damage districts are not general. As already Intimated, the area outside of the surplus states last year was 45.413,065 acres. This is probably not lessened in this year. Under thf incentive of a high price it may show' some increase. If, then, we place so large a loss as roundly 14, 000,000 acres from last year in the surplus states, it means nearly 30 per cent of their corn area. This is so to feed, as evidenced In lessened pack ing and the high prices of meats; the finest and most prolonged fall pastur age in years; a mild winter, and am ple stores of cheaper feeding stuffs, admitted of great economies In the use of corn. Farmers were disposed to good holdings against contingen cies of a following crop, and the price prevented waste. With these several features restricting consumption, the declaration that but 1,050,600,000 re mained on the farms on March 1, 1903, may he classified as among the many errors in official statistics. We are asked to believe in a greater con sumption in five months, when there was little need for it, than ever be fore; in a disappearance of nearly 1, 500,000,000 bushels, or 10,000,000 bush els a day. for 150 days. It is my opin ion that the reserves on March 1 were near 1,200,000,000. Deliveries by farmers were re strained by late maturity and the soft condition of the grain, a scarcity of cars during the winter, bad roads in the spring and later by a tendency to hold on an impaired crop promise. High prices are a great check on con sumption. At this time, with crop advices before me from representa tive districts, I believe a crop not un der two billion is a conservative esti mate. There can be conditions tc change this either way. The situa tion is probably more hopeful thar promising. A few bright days and o seasonal warming up will dispel much of the present anxiety.—Oscar K Lyle in New York Herald. A Missouri Judge. It does not always pay to appeal too independent, especially in a court room. They are telling the following story on a former Missourian, who it now a judge in Oklahoma: A gam liter was tried before the judge recent ly and convicted of playing poker. H* appeared in court dressed in flash) style and with plenty of money in hit pockets, apparently unconcerned a. to the outcome of his trial. Lookin* over his spectacles, the judge in i squeaky voice said: "Jim, st»r.d up." The gamble) obeyed. • Jim, have you anything to say be fore I pass sentence on you?” "No, sir." “Jim, I'm a-goin’ to fine you $50—’ "All right, judge," interrupted th« gambler, “here it is in my hii pocket." "And give you sixty days in jail,* continued the judge. “Now, look and see if you’ve got that in your hij pocket, too.”—Kansas City Star. WHAT THE CORN CROP OF 1902 AMOUNTED TO. 7,r,° ta.ttH 90.417 8M00 00.189 01.0.TO I cnciu Mcirut tigiTgt wcium imitk j»tu I 110,68® 630.394 611.110 490.010 604.176 M 10,360 *0.093 i ^3*° -- ■■"- -- jrmrmwmiumm _ L,f , J TO.690 03.009 9X019 49,460 90.000 U4«U kSO.OOl *“'•***’■ »*«“> ww o«iiUB goo.i, Mom V*52,032 100.406 681.078 846.476 469,113 1,490,084 1,950,010 ——W.160 i ■— i . ■ ^i. m , ,| f - ■ ^ , 104.640 OTTAWA O.C73 09.416 62.784 *>£*> 100.906 140.CC® . V,*,'®1" 2,123,000 vuuci locii ten ie:iM uui .utioi 1,777,282 tso.roo 7,06 158.866 103,881 681.040 1,827,533 ££41,092 US.B12 HUM U87 I 97.099 10.983 86.886 78.960 W*— ”364.*, -2|6S6’<0g | wc«r. won iam out ,arc, -—£§■ “Ta33 —-i"-"8 7Mo8<-_ fiSfiSt IOO 678 1.097 89.030 « » Tui«j«i «WHUpcW • - •unite* ann I**n r— a&ttrrn cimtt 161.033 «,«/' ..070 7.7*1 .,,334 7,n. SST ^371 "U -till »»0->«4 ToTUT ^ ^ '«»« 160 ° W 13,047 mitt ioj.mJTI ifsvncx "sr r ®£u i*2£i jss3» 630 r CJ 977 | 7 XB a01® a.,73 M.B38 *1 .«. mc, ‘ *3.3*8 ■:»io» tnnu imu w** *** eauoti uaa kiipu f*»»o *-°°9 730 9.216 06,89® 64.8(8 47^866 403036 £735,922 0,8’0,259 Wap Showing the Combined Acreage and Yield of Winter and Spring Wheat In Kansas In 1901, by Counties. Upper figures show acreage and lower figures the yield In bushels. The ’V.irty leading count 1*8 comprising the “Kansas Wheat licit.” as outlined below, produced T1.1C6.U7S bushels, or ~'J per cent, of the crop ot 1001. and the ylaliU of each at a shown In bold-faced typo.