HAGUE TRIBUNAL TO DEAL WITH VENEZUELA L The decision of the European pow ers to allow The Hague tribunal to decide upon the justice of their claims against Venezuela has caused great satisfaction in Washington. On this subject a correspondent of one of the leading newspapers of the country, wming from the capital, says: ‘‘The selection of The Hague court to determine a dispute which had reached the stage of actual war is gratifying to an extraordinary degree to Secretary Hay and of course to the president himself. “When the emperor of Russia sug gested the idea of a permanent court of arbitration the whole world smiled, and ever since then diplomats have been ti the habit of referring to The Hague court as a piece of buncombe. The Russian emperor seemed to be lieve that the great armies of Europe ly upon thp honor of the nations which have agreed to its existence. For this reason the old-time diplomats have predicted that nations would never refer to The Hague court anything ex cept the most trivial disputes. "In the Venezuelan case, however, a condition of actual war exists, and yet the parties to this deplorable state ol affairs have nearly come to an agree ment to submit the matter in dispute to the permanent court of arbitration, known as The Hague tribunal. "In discussing this unexpected tri umph of the principle of arbitration a distinguished official of the govern ment. whose name could not be pub lished because the negotiations are still far from concluded, said to me: “ 'The decision to refer the Vene zue:«^x-*«v V&P&&4++++ l NEBRASKA IN GENERAL ♦ ♦ i 41 ^ <$♦ 6 ♦ t-e,+4*i'