tlGHTlXGI'BOTEfTIOX7 democrats will make the tariff an issue. Its Repeal nr Modineetlon [Irnianiird ' on the Pretext That In This Way Alone Can the Tru»t Problem Ue Successfully Solved. Will the tariff be made a conspic uous issue among the questions to be submitted to public adjudication in the presidential campaign of 1900? Opin ion varies widely on this point. By P many the belief is expressed that in the light of the splendid prosperity that has followed the restoration of the protective policy, and in view of the enormous extension of our for eign trade that has taken place con currently with the unrestricted opera tion of that policy, the Democratic par ty in its next national platform will not have the hardihood to reopen the tariff question, but will discreetly re frain from any agitation thereof. Among those who hold to this belief we find the New York Sun very posi tive and emphatic. After pointing to the splendid showing made in the sta tistics at our exports of domestic man ufactures—wherefrom it appears that, after deducting the exports of mineral oil and copper from the unexampled to tal of $338,667,791 for the last fiscal year, the net exports of products in which labor cost forms a higher per centage than in these relatively crude C articles reached in 1899 the sum of $252,000,000, a gain of $165,400,000 in ten yearn—the Sun announces this con clusion: "The prosperity of our manufac tures, Indicated by these statistics, re moves the tiresome and mischievous tariff controversy from the field of politics, for the time being at least, and relegates it to the purely academic discussion where only it has always belonged in this country. It did not appear In the campaign of 1896, and It will not appear In the campaign of 1900. The ridiculous and disastrous re sult of It after the campaign of 1892 has warned the Democratic party to let It alone.” Almost at the identical moment when the Sun writer was engaged in recording the conviction that the facts of trade and commerce and the disas ters which resulted from the cam paign of 1892 would compel the re moval of “the tiresome and mischiev ous tariff controversy from the field of politics, for the time being at least,” and would “relegate It to the purely academic discussion where only It hau always belonged in this country,” a ( body of orthodox Democrats were hold ing their state convention in Iowa. In the platform adopted by this body of orthodox Democrats, without a dis senting vote or voice, we find the fol lowing: ^ “We view with alarm the multipli cation of those combinations of capi tal commonly known as trusts, that are concentrating and monopolizing industry, crushing out independent producers of limited meanB, destroy ing competition, restricting opportuni ties for labor, artificially limiting pro duction and raising prices, and creat ing an industrial condition different from state socialism only in the re spect that under socialism the benefits of production would go to all, while under the trust system they go to in crease the fortune of these institu tions. These trusts and combinations are the direct outgrowth of the policy of the Republican party, which has not only favored these institutions, but has accepted their support and softe ned their contributions to aid that par ty in retaining power which has placed a burden of taxation upon those who labor and produce in time of peace and who figut our battles in time of •war, while the wealth of the country is exempted from these burdens. “We condemn this policy, and it is our solemn conviction that the trusts must be destroyed or they will destroy free government, and we demand that they be suppressed by the repeal of the protective tariff and other privi lege-conferring legislation responsible for them and by the enactment of such legislation, state and national, as will aid in their destruction.” Does this look as though the tariff controversy was going to be lifted out of polities and relegated to academic discussion? The Iowa Democratic state convention did not think so. We would gladly share the confidence of the New York Sun as to tile disappear ance of the tariff front among the live issue* of the campaign of next year, but the fuels and proltahilitles wholly fail to Justify that agreeable anticipa tion. On the contrary, the facts a id probubtliths point unerringly toward a savage and determined attack on the tariff all along the Democratic line. At the prese-* writing nothing appears more certain than that from this time on every Democratic state convention ■ will present the Iowa declaration in 1 sonic form or other, and that the re- I p*a| nr modification nf the Dlngley tariff will tie demanded in the national Dcnim-ratlc platform. Ilar.l TImm liM Haa I law. Ttt* of « prslwllti tariff ar« probably f»*lt (toalt*n« In th« toontry nixrr th*u m I’ltuintrg i* •nam|ii*at;y lb* following •UtUtir*. >mby |b* )'«w vorb World, gr* of ator* lb«a p.iaaing tatartal traa of Htttaborga laduatrlal kl«n4ib*, (M aqua re aiil*a. aumbor of |ar*rlng all tlata**. ITd.Odd. atarage aagea par day. |.* I*, mad* «f w*g«a. II H to 91 par day. bomber of Ml* man i>«*. at apt from •Ivhaaaa anm ay ml »i!ta and fart., rla* aaabl* to yoa foil lima by r*aaoa •# aearalty »f labor M rallroa.te «p. | •bM to biota ftaigbi prom pi ip to«Mbb] the traffic 4s 30 per cent larger .than all the freight ears in service; gross daily value of trade In industrial Klon dike. JMOO.OOe. When it Is remembered that the fore going statements are published by a Journal that has lost no opportunity for denouncing and ridiculing the llingley tariff bill, they form pretty good evidence that there is more com fort in the present situation fc*r indus trial tollers than for free-trade theo rists. And it should alao be remem bered that most Industries throughout the country are nearly If not quite as active as those of Pittsburg. These are hard times only for those who are hunting anti-tariff arguments.—Pitts burg Commercial Gazette. The McK Inley Policy. It Is American first, last and all the time. It never halts, never hesitates, ■whether the question be the defense of American Industries or the defense of American dignity. McKinleyism and Americanism are synonymous terms. The one Involves the other. Listen to what the president of the United States said in his address before the Catholic summer school at Plattsbarg, N. Y., Aug. 13, 1899: “The flag symbolizes our purposes and our aspirations; It represents what we believe and what we mean to main tain, and wherever it floats it is the ilag of the free, the hope of the oppressed; and wherever it is assailed, at any sac rifice it will be carried to a triumphant peace." This utterance was greeted with ringing cheers all the reports agree in saying. Its lofty purport appealed instantly to the Intelligent minds to which it was addresed. It appeals to every true American throughout the country consecrated to freedom and progress. It ought to make the small coterie of "flre-in-the-rcar'' anti-Amer icans feel smaller and smaller. They Will lie lleenluleil. The family of trusts (loutitless needs regulation. Provision has already been made to control pools and com binations in restriction of trade and the like, but the problem still to be solved is: What interference can the government interpose against large capitalizations against the outright purchase of many small concerns for the purpose of concentrating and sim plifying management, cheapening pro duction and enlarging trade? Mean while the parentage of trusts is still in doubt, even though the protective tar iff has been cleared of responsibility for the progeny, but there is reason to believe that trusts are simply the outgrowth of business enterprise.— Kansas City (Kan.) Journal. CaiiM! for C'lmNtenfil Ka tin fart Ion. John Bull—We don’t worry about merchandise balances so long as our delieit is made good by returns on for eign investments and profits on our ocean carrying trade. Uncle Sam—Well, if you're satisfied we are; but what is to become of British industries if your American debtors keep on Increasing their pay ments to you in the shape of manu factured goods, in place of raw mate rials? Itayonri tlio Arcnmnntttt lv«t Stugr. Mr. Havemeyer's emphatic assertion that a high protective tariff is the mother of trusts will he seized upon by the Democratic free traders as a choice morsel of wisdom and the other features of his rather noteworthy tes timony ignored by them. His view of protection is distinctively Democratic and might have been written by the author of the famous Wilson bill. The value and effectiveness of a protective tariff to the country has got beyond the argumentative stage with the peo pie, who look to results more than to theories, and what Mr. llavemeyer thinks or says upon the subject will have little or no weight with them.— Seattle (Wash.) Poet-Intelligencer. Itcntflt* !§••* VI »»rkinuhimn. It would be a* foolish to blunt* par ent* who have reared a child In the b«*t possible manner for hi* turning to evil way* after he ha* grown to manhood, a* to blame the tariff for building up a splendid American Indus try. giving employment to Su.uoo Amer ican workingmen, he. a use avaricious men Mccure control of It and enter into a wicked combination Combination nr not, the tlu plate true! can make no money without employing the worV Ingnirn and paying them for their labor. Tacoma (Wash » l.rdgcr. Ik* Mm*. r«a H>«m. The year UW may he considered a* the time of our eacwnd wind-** Iaun year we look a deep breath of protec ts*. prosperity and ecilpaed all pre «tuu* record* This year there wa* nothing to do but to eclipse |*m tad We proceeded to da It, We have lwhen In tha fall, deep breath which always j carries the runner tw a race tw vic tory Our commercial rival* mar a* j well drop out, for the eluee of Hum will see the I’at'ed Plate* the alaaer by « gawd margin la the industrial «oa t**t , • * IS« »f fn Ktnl#> and the column policy. Hound looney wae placed In ; the foreground, the IlSngiey tariff *p proved, and the truet* denounced W lieu the roll of ail the etalea liu been railed. It will be a u«*un*» >m ' • at 1 >1 ne a1 .■ !< b* » I have re ■ wived Grand Ur put* iMi lt I Her aid a t latent I uatotlusltt. The Ire# iraier la « nimble laaaei Me formerly told u* that If you haw j a protect!*# tariff yon ran l eel! t« i furetgm cooalrl#* ' II# twe any* “T ,« j feet that we are awtllag m> many mar*, f.tnred gu*«4a ahnual prove# that at do wot a**d a |tat#*tl»a tariff ** *>me ctreat ought to ha*# tkla matcttiag j let. • Ilea lea lUL) ItepublUaa TALM AGE'S SERMON. I LONGEVITY THE SUBJECT FOR LAST SUNDAY. from rsalms, 01 j 15. as Follows: "With It •ruts th* (mil that only JJ<> a>tU« of railway ha«a haaa built la tha whole .ta#wa with a aofwlatioa of teo.ww tot), Aa atlumyk tolutaa of miuIi by orU-iJo 41 Uou tha ar*at compoaar of aa«r»4 Muala of tha autaaath re a ';i|. raaaatly 4Ueo*afa4 la tha MB yartal library at Vlenaa. aeautaa a httharto aabaowa portrait of tha mm yoaar 4raaa * baa ha wa* fa yaan *14.