The frontier. (O'Neill City, Holt County, Neb.) 1880-1965, January 14, 1937, Page FOUR, Image 4
The Frontier B. H. Cronin, Editor and Proprietor ■atared at the Postoffice at O’Neill, Nebraska, as Second Class Matter. Oae Year, in Nebraska__$2.00 (toe Year, outside Nebraska 2.25 ■very subscription is regarded as •a open account. The names of eabecribers will be instantly re moved from our mailing list at ex Nfcwtion of time paid for, if pub lisher shall be notified; otherwise the subscription remains in force at the designated subscription price. Deary subscriber must understand that these conditions are made a part of the contract between pub lisher and subscriber. ADVERTISING RATES Display advertising is charged for on a basis of 26c an inch (one •eiamn wide) per week. Want ads too per line, first insertion, sub sequent insertions, 6c per line. One House legislative Body Goes Into Action (Continued from page 1.) would like to have engaged a Ne braskan, we could find no engineers resident in this state equipped with the broad experience in the utilities field revealed by Mr. Cargo.” Shortly before the hour set for the inauguration of Walter H. Jen son, state treasurer-elect, the bond ing companies of the state furnish ed bond to the extent of $750,000 instead of the million dollars usual ly provided. There are rumors that the bonding companies dictated the retention of H. J. Murray as deputy and that Mr. Hannigan, chosen by Jensen for this position, is to be placed in another position. After these conditions wore im posed Mr. Jensen was inauRurated. Governor Cochran takes the posi tion that the people of the state eject the constitutional officers. It is not within the province of one class to prescribe the conditions under which these offices shall be held. The Rovernor believes that the state bondinR bill, recently held, invalid by the supreme court should be reenacted, if it is possible to eliminate the constitutional ob jections. If not an amendment should be submitted to curb the power of the bondinR, insurance and bankitiR interests. The committee on committees for the new unicameral legislature has been chosen as follows: R. C. Re gan of Columbus, member at large. Charles A. Dafoe of Tecumseh, and Robert M. Armstrong of Auburn, first congressional district; Walter 1L Johnson and William Worthing, both of Omaha, second; Emil K. Brodecky of Howells, and Frank Brady of Atkinson, third; John N. Norton of Polk, and E. M. Neu bauerofOrleans, fourth; and Harry E. Gantz of Alliance and R. M. Howard of Flats, fifth. A second appeal to the WPA wus 'made by Governor Cochran when be sent a telegram to Harry L. Hopkins, WPA administrator, in Washington, asking that the quota of WPA workers for Nebraska be raised from 19,000 to 25,000. This followed the departure for Kansas of R. C. Jacobson of Chicago, WPA field director f<V eight states, after a conference with Governor Cochran. A smull army of lobbyists is in the offing. However, they seem gun shy. I .ater on the gentlemen of the Second House may make up to the members. Lincoln hotel keepers are howling for more busi ness. The crowds in the hotel lob bies are small. In fact, there has not been any of the usual hurly burly of a legislative session. An effort to modernize the prima ry law of Nebraska is to be made by democrats and republicans working together. Platform pledges of both parties recognize the faults of the primary law as it now stands, and it is generally admitted that the law must be amended if the two party system is to continue. James C. Quigley of Valentine, chairman of the democratic state committee, and Lyle Jackson of Neligh, chair man of the republican state com mittee, announced Wednesday the appointment of the following joint bi-partisan committee to work for this purpose: Charles F. Barth and John Delehant of Beatrice; Asa K. l^ane of Fremont; Earl Moyer of Madison; Hugh Brown of Kearney; Fredrick M. Deutsch of Norfolk; A. V. Shotwell and Joseph T. Vot ava of Omaha, and Harry Spencer and Clinton J, Campbell of Lincoln. J. B. Kincer, of the Washington headquarters of the United States Weather bureau, in an address be fore the joint meeting of the crop growers’ and livestock breeders’ association, gave little hope for any success in efforts of man to abolish drouth periods or to change climate conditions. He doubted that the building of lakes and ponds would have any effect in increasing rain fall, and called attention to the fact that dust storms wore often violent in the "dust bowl" as long as fifty years ago. He recommended, how ever, the restoration of the original natural conditions as rapidly as possible to the grass-lands—-land that should never have beer, plowed. The motion of John Adams, Jr., of Omaha, to hire George E. Price of Lincoln, as temporary legal ad viser to the unicameral legislature, at a salary of $10 per day, was de feated, after argument by Charles A. Dafoe of Tecumseh, against such action, showing that no such help was needed immediately, and that later on, after careful investigation of qualifications, it might be well to employ three attorneys. WILL WE TRIM EXPENSES? So far as domestic issues are concerned it is evident that the present session of Congress will have a considerable portion of time consumed with proposals for the reorganization of the government with a view to simplification of the departmental work. While, accord ing to news stories, the President is chiefly concerned about increas ing the efficiency of government, and is for economy as an incidental result, it is becoming evident that the question of economy will loom large in the discussions of the sub ject in Congress. For example, Senator Harry F. Byrd of Virginia, who is chairman of the Senate com mittee investigating the subject of reorganization of the government, in conjunction with a House com mittee headed by Representative Buchanan of Texas, in a statement recently emphasized the need and the possibilities of securing econ omy in governmental activities thru reorganization. Incidentally Senat or Byrd mentioned some evidences of the huge growth of bureaucracy and increase of governmental dup lication of activity during the past three or four years. In part, Sen ator Byrd said: “The gigantic task of surveying and investigating the tangled mass of agencies is still incomplete, yet at this stage it is not difficult to find opportunities for great saving without impairing the present gov ernmental objectives. “My first recommendation, as chairman, will deal with the dupli cation in agencies lending govern ment funds. There are twenty-four —some of them actively engaged in competing among themselves. “Another phase demanding im mediate attention and closest study embraces emergency agencies ex isting under a list of fifty-six leg islative authorities which expire during 1937. Those to be contin ued must be considered with utmost care in light of the fact that once they are moved from the temporary status they become a permanent charge. “The work has been rendered ex tremely difficult by recent rapid ex pansion of the government. Some agencies, even now, are in the midst of their build-up.” There are few people who will gainsay the need for the simplifica tion of the machinery of govern ment. No doubt the duplication of effort and expenditure in the gov ernment during the recent mush room growth of bureaus and com missions has rendered it much eas ier to spend the taxpayers’ money. Now that the New Deal leaders themselves claim that the economic crisis is practically over surely it is time to retrench and to make good on the promises of a balanced fed eral budget. There need be no great dipute | over whether efficiency or economy should come first. Economy is bound to follow real efficiency. The two grow together. There have been several efforts in the past to cut thru government inefficiency and waste by curtailing the bureau cracies which continue to wax and grow fat at Washington. But these efforts have always been defeated by special interests who had a sel fish purpose in keeping the bureau cracies alive and healthy at the expense of the taxpayers. The No vember election placed the govern ment, so far as the legislative and executive branches are concerned, entirely in the hands of the New Deal administration. It now re mains to be seen whether or not the administration is bigger than bur eaucracy. The political observers at Washington who have seen the same battle waged before are in clined to bet on the bureaucrats. Let us hope they are mistaken. CHISELING AT CONSTITUTION “Radical forces in our country are endeavoring to accomplish thru what they hope will prove to be a subservient majority in Congress, that which they are sure the people never shall initiate: i. e„ many radical changes in our Constitu tion,” writes Dr. R. J. C. Dorsey in the National Republic. “There were at least 72 Joint Resolutions introduced during the last session of Congress to amend the federal constitution. Of these, 18 were introduced in the Senate and 54 in the House. Joint resolutions are used where Congress desires to propose amendment to the Consti tution, for this type does not re quire the approval of the executive. Before any such resolutions be come a part of the Constitution they must have received the ap proval of two-thirds of the quorum present in both houses and the ratification of three-fourths of the state legislatures of our nation. The adoption of some of these sug gested amendments would so en croach upon the fundamental prin ciples of our iederai constitution that our present form of govern ment would be completely disrupt ed. The most drastic of these pro posed changes are undoubtedly the result of the acceptance of false doctrines. Many of these radical theories have apparently seriously impaired the sound reasoning mech anism of some of our legislators. They have insinuated themselves on many ingredient members of our body politic, and thru the subver sion of our youth may seriously threaten the welfare of future generations. Thru ridicule there is a concerted attempt to deprecate the men who framed the Declara tion of Independence, the Constitu tion of the United States, and the justices of the Supreme Court, our highest tribunal. “On bept. 1<, libi, delegates from twelve states attended the constitutional convention in Phil adelphia and affixed their signa tures to the seven articles then contained in the Constitution. In all, 65 delegates had been appoint ed, 55 attended, and 39 signed. In order to preclude the possibility of a publication of the mental ef fusion entitled ‘Fifty-five old men who framed the federal Constitu tion,’ allow me to suggest that the average age of the delegates was 43, which one must admit is not extreme senectitude. John Francis Mercer was 28. Benjamin Frank lin was more than 80. General George Washington was 55. The New Jersey plan was brought forth by William Paterson who was 42. The Virginia plan was proposed by Edmund Randolph who was 31. Charles Pinickney, whose plan played a large part in forming the Constitution, was only 29. The Connecticut compromise was large ly the work of Oliver Ellsworth, who was 42. The man who con tributed more possibly, than any other to the daily labors of the con vention was James Madison who was 36. Gouverneur Morris, who headed the committee on style which made the final draft, was 35. There you had, the experience of age, the desires of youth, and the balance of the two, the middle aged. What they accomplished in the con vention has already lasted for 150 years.” GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP If the radicals are permitted to put over in the new Congress three bills for the aquisition and opera tion of the railroads introduced in the last Congress (by Senator Wheeler and Representatives Mav erick and Lundeen), and which it is now planned to introduce again, federal, state, county and local gov ernments will lose in taxes a total of $3,221,997,920. Many counties rely on railroad taxes for the major part of the money necessary for support of their public schools. All govern mental units depend largely on railroad taxes to enable them to function. Nobody wants govern ment ownership but the profession al office-seeker element. They want it because they figure it can be exploited for the creation of new jobs. The minute the railroads pass under government ownership, that minute all tax revenue from rail road owned real estate stops. Prop erty owned by the government is not subject to taxation. Railroads owned and operated by the govern ment won’t be subject to railroad standards of efficiency. A railroad job will become a political job. Em ployes won't be picked, as now, for their efficiency and attention to duty. They’ll be picked for polit ical reasons, and will becomes parts, not of a skilled working railroad personnel, but of a huge political machine.—Phil. Sunday Dispatch. NATIONAL AFFAIRS By Frank P. Litschert The Supreme Court has again upheld the right of free speech and assembly, this time in the unani mous decision rendered on January 4, in the appeal of the conviction and seven-year jail sentence assess ed against Dirk de Jonge in Oregon for alleged violation of the state’s Criminal Syndicalism law. De Jong’s conviction was upheld in the state courts, it was said, not because he had made revolutionary or inflamatory remarks but because1 the Communist Party, under whose auspices the meeting was held, was said to be an advocate of criminal syndicalism. In touching on this finding the Supreme Court of the United States said: “The holding of meet ings for peaceable political action cannot be proscribed. Those who assist in the conduct of such meet ings cannot be branded as crimin als on that score.’’ “While the states are entitled to protect themselves from the abuses of the privileges of our institutions through an attempted substitution of force and violence in the place of peaceful political action in order to effect revolutionary changes of government, none of our decisions go to the length of sustaining such a curtailment of the right of free speech and assembly as the Oregon statute demands in its present ap plication.” Justice Hughes in reading the decision, stated that the rights of free speech, free press and peace ful assembly may be abused by the press or assembly to invite violence or crime and, he continued: “The people through their legis latures may protect themselves against that abuse. But the legis lative intervention can find consti tutional justification only by deal ing with the abuse. The greater the importance of safeguarding the community from incitements to the overthrow of our institutions by force and violence the more imper ative is the need to preserve inviol ate the constitutional rights of free speech, free press and free assembly in order to maintain the opportunity for full political dis cussion, to the end that the gov ernment may be responsible to the will of the people and that changes if desired, may be obtained by peaceful means. Therein lies the security of the republic, the very foundation of constitutional gov ernment.” ' The written opinion, which is a lengthy one, was concurred in by the entire membership of the court. It contains a clear and careful an alysis of the relation between free speech, a free press, the right of peaceful assemblage, and the pres ervation of constitutional govern ment against the attacks of incen diarism and revolution. It is interesting to note, in con sidering the decision, that the com munists themselves, who have in this instance, as in many others, fled under the folds of the consti tutional banner for protection, are usually the first and the busiest to denounce constitutional govern ment as a sham and a fraud, and an instrument designed by “capital ism” to preserve itself against the “proletarit.” There perhaps could be no great er tribute to the Constitution, con sidering the motive of those who I take part in agitating against it, than this action of so many ex treme radicals, at the first sign of danger, in running for protection to the custodians of this charter, which they are always the most eager to denounce. Had the com munists themselves any sense of humor, they might easily laugh themselves out of court, although revolutionary activity of course is no laughing matter. The difference between consti tutional America and autocratic Russia, which the reds worship, can be envisioned from this decis ion of the Supreme Court. In Russia those taking part in a polit ical meeting unfriendly to the gov ernment could not plead effectively the right of free speech or free assemblage. They would go not to the Supreme Court, only to Siberia. PARENTAL INTEREST As a father, we are deeply con cerned over the charge that in Oklahoma City a school teacher sealed the lips of talkative children For BEST RESULTS * CONSIGN AND BUY THROUGH THE Atkinson Livestock Market “Your nearest and best market.” Cattle, Horses, Sheep, Fat & Stock Hogs Auction Every Tuesday starting at 12:30 p. m. Our selling charges are very moderate. If we do not sell your livestock, we charge you nothing. Send your next shipment of livestock to Atkinson. with clothes-pins. What we want to know is, Did it work?—Balti more Evening Sun. COOPERATION Another reason why it’s so easy to go to the devil is because he wrill meet you more than half way.—. Washington Post. . might not have starved but we got food because we had a Telephone” That 18 what one farmer told us when talking about 4 the snow-bound and sub zero days of last winter. A farm woman said: “I believe I’d have gone crazy if I hadn’t been able to talk with my neighbors by telephone." Another farmer told us: “Nothing seemed more important than having a telephone to talk with the doctor who couldn’t get out to our farm.” NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY a SEMI-ANNUAL STATEMENT OF B. T. WINCH ELL, COUNTY TREASURER OF HOLT COUNTY, NEBRASKA, SHOWING RE CEIPTS. DISBURSEMENTS AND BALANCES FOR THE SIX MONTHS BEGINNING JULY 1, 19.16 AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1936. RECEIPTS To balance on hand July 1, 1936 $155,258,31 “ Total Tax collected 179,927.12 “ Total School Land Funds collected 14,295.54 “ Total University Land Funds collected 906.79 “ State Apportionment to Schools .. 13,585.17 “ State Aid to Schools .. .... 1,899.00 “ Miscellaneous Collections (County General Fund) 91.94 “ “ “ (County Bridge Fund). 5,413.15 “ “ “ (County Road Fund)_. 12,967.47 “ “ (Village Gas Tax Fund)— 1,940.97 “ “ “ (Motor Vehicles Fund) -. 4,838.33 “ “ “ (Inheritance (Poor Fund). .. 211.42 “ “ “ (Redemption Fund). 1,495.25 “ “ “ (Fees Fund)_ 141.00 “ “ (Fines and Licenses)- 299.00 “ “ (Drivers License). 132.50 “ “ (County Officers Fees) 3,336.81 “ , “ (State and Federal Assistance). 24,540.84 “ “ “ (County Fair Fund)_ _ 310.90 “ “ (Discrepancy Account). 1,445.03 “ “ (Stuart Sewer Bond Acc’t.) 560.00 $423,696.54 DISBURSEMENTS By State Treasurer’s Receipts (Consolidated Fund) $ 16,035.18 “ State Treasurer’s Receipts (School Land Fund) 13,403.56 “ State Treasurer’s Receipts (University Land Fund) 545.13 “ State Treasurer’s Receipts (State Highway Supervision) 80.36 “ State Treasurer’s Receipts (State Highway Maintenance) 940.07 “ State Treasurer’s Receipts (Driver’s License Fund) 73.50 “ State Treasurer’s Receipts (Old Agen Pension Fund) 3,414.36 “ County General Fund Warrants Paid 20,165.64 “ County Bridge Fund Warrants Paid 9,733.24 “ County Road Fund Warrants Paid... 17,580.81 “ County Road Dragging Fund Warrants Paid 790,65 “ County Mother’s Pension Fund Warrants Paid 576.06 “ County Special Emergency Bridge Warrants Paid 20.00 “ County Judgment Warrants Paid. . —. 7,900.00 “ County Road Relief Fund Warrants Paid _. 83.90 “ County Unemployment Relief Fund Warrants Paid 3,735.42 “ County Fair Fund Warrants Paid 1,303.00 “ County Court House Coupons Paid 1,482.00 District School Orders Paid 75,455.81 “ District School Bonds and Coupons Paid. 4,177.63 “ District School Free High Orders Paid 362.25 District School Judgment Orders Paid 25.00 “ Township Orders Paid.. 13,932.98 “ Township Library Orders Paid 1,415.00 “ Village Orders Paid 10,273.00 Village Refunding Bonds and Coupons Paid_,. ... 948.76 Village Electric Light Bonds and Cupons Paid (Stuart) 341.25 “ Village Sewer Bond and Coupons Paid (Stuart). 1,023.00 Village Paving Bond and Coupons Paid (O’Neill) 190.00 “ Redemptions Paid 1,293.40 “ Salary Warrants Paid. 11,172.33 “ Poor Fund Warrants Paid . 20.00 “ Refund Warrants Paid. 279.13 “ Soldiei’s’ Relief Ordei's Paid \ 100.00 “ Special Bee Tax Orders Paid 5.10 “ Stuart Sewer Bonds and Coupons paid from Assessment Fund ...—. 377.00 “ Chambers School Athletic Fund Orders Paid 70.00 “ State and Federal Assistance Fund Warrants Paid 26,634.00 “ Balance on hand 177,638.13 $423,596.54 BALANCES Stale Consolidated Fund $ 2,770.83 State School Land Fund ..— .. 2,576.42 State University Land Fund.. 401.55 State Highway Supervision Fund . 60.75 State Highway Maintenance Fund 711.98 State Driver’s License Fund .. 132.50, State Old Age Pension Fund 1,652.62 State County Highway Fund _ 4.55 County General Fund . 5,024.02 County Bridge Fund ... .. 2,167.61 County Road Dragging Fund .. .... 59.86 County Soldier’s Relief Fund 697.72 County Special Emergency Fund 261,49 County Fair Fund ... . 133,40 County Mother’s Pension Fund .... 619.50 County Repairs and Improvements Fund 1,264.87 County Unemployment Relief Fund 1,624.21, County Labor Tax Fund 2,932.98 Township Fund . 10,170 04, Township Library Fund 443.90 District School Fund ...... 83,012.65 District School Bond and Coupon Fund . 8,294.03 , District School Free High Fund 19,789.98 District School Judgment Fund 14.05 Village Fund 16,913.64 Village Refunding Water Bond and Coupon Fund 4,343.16 Stuart Electric Light Bond and Coupon Fund 3,142.01 O'Neill Fire Truck Bond and Coupon Fund 740.27 O’Neill Curb and Gutter Fund 394.38 O’Neill Paving Bond and Coupon Fund 1,241.53 Stuart Sewer Bond and Coupon Interest Fund. 85.60 Stuart Sewer Assessment Fund 139.42 Coleman Railroad Fund balance (Bonds and Interest paid) 18,37 Special Bee Tax Fund 2.30 County Road Relief Fund 62.72 Redemption Fund 1.360.50 Poor Fund 2.35 Salary Fund (Fees) 71.13 Chambers School Athletic Fund ... .. 82.46 State and Federal Assistance Fund, Including Relief, Old Age Pension, Dependent Children, Blind , and Administrative Expense 7,276.18 $178,697.53 OVERDRAFTS: County Judgment Fund $ 33,29 County Road Fund ... ... 637.26 Refund • 279.13 Court House Bond Fund 109.72 1,059.40 $177,638.13 : . I Cash in Banks $145,671.24 Cash and Checks in Office 2,228.30 Warrants Carried as Cash 29,738.59 $177,638.13 REGISTERED WARRANTS: General Fund $ 43,010.25 UNALLOWED CLAIMS IN COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE TO DECEMBER 15, 1936: General Fund $ 24,992.24 Road Fund 15,018.20 Bridge Fund -- 13,592.92 Road Dragging Fund ... 231.85 $ 53,835.21 •t, - State of Nebraska, County of Holt 1, B. T. Wine hell, County Treasurer of Holt County, Nebraska, do solemnly swear that the foregoing statement of receipts, disburse ments and balances is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. B. T. WINCHELL, County Treasurer. Ed Hancock, Bookkeeper. , v ■ >?:•: Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11th day of January, 1937. JOHN C. GALLAGHER. County Clerk. [SEAL] By Loretto Phalin, Deputy.