The frontier. (O'Neill City, Holt County, Neb.) 1880-1965, October 22, 1936, Page TEN, Image 10

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    DELINQUENT TAX LIST
fConcluded from page 9.)
■ »|i .... . n . ■ .i .. - —— ■ 1 ■■
E-S ____B 4.86
1-4 to 14 incl_B 19.70
Western Town Lot Co.’s
Addition
Lots Block Amt.
I _ .1 11. S7
1-2 _ 2 25.36
3 „ .... _2 17.48
4 2 23.62
8, all except e 3 ft.
6 _ 2 49.84
9- 10 . ...._2 35.86
II ......... 2 29.74
12-13-14 .— 2 23.61
1-2-3 4 48.96
5-6_ 4 14.88
7-8-9 4 32.82
10- 11-12-18 - _4 4722
1-2-3 ..- _6 24.96
« 5 11.88
6 6 3.10
7 te 11 incl. 6 65.14
12 5 38.48
IS 6 2.64
14 _ 6 25.82
1-2-3-4 _6 34.56
1-2-3- 7 25.16
Kimball & Blair’s Addition
Lots Block Amt.
4, n% 5 13 34.10
1 to 6 incl. 15 60.32
12-13-14 15 37.18
17-18-19 _ 15 11.38
1-2 16 22.74
4 16 11.38
6 16 31.48
7-8 16 13.11
9 16 3.10
I- 2-3 17 18.38
4 17 8.74
II- 12 17 9.64
1-2-3-4 . 18 9.64
5-6-7 . 18 37.18
10-11-12 18 36.30
15-16 _ 18 47.22
1-2-3 19 29.32
4 19 2.64
1 to 6 incl. — 20 89.16
Hallock’s 2nd Addition
Lots Block Amt.
1-2 . 1 11.38
3-4-56 1 8-00
7- 8 1 3.10
1-2 3 3.10
3-4 3 1.65
1-2 6 36.74
1 to 5 incl.6 9.22
6 -6 1.76
7 6 1.76
8- 9 6 3.10
13-14 6 18.38
1 to 5 incl. 7 8.34
8- 9-10-11 .7 56.40
12-13-14 7 9.64
6 to 11 incl. . _8 24.04
9- 10-11 9 37.18
3- 4-5 *. 10 3.96
R 10 24.08
9- 10-11 10 28.44
5- 6-7 11 34.10
8 11 10.52
12-13-14 11 33.70
I- 2, c 115 ft. 3 12 145.56
w 35 ft. 3 12 2.64
2 13 27.56
3 13 3.10
4- 5 13 37.60
6- 7-8 13 81.94
II- 12-13-14 ..13 51.58
1-2 . 14 15.34
3-4 14 31.48
10- 11 14 16.22
12-13-14 14 28.44
22-23-24 14 21.86
26-26-27-28 14 39.82
1- 2-3-4 . - 16 10.52
6 to 14 incl. .... 15 13.60
16-17 16 1.34
2- 3-4 19 3.96
6 19 34.96
All 20 1.76
Pioneer Townsite Co.’s
Addition
Lots Block Amt.
1 to 6 incl. 21 10.08
1-2 22 16.22
3- 4 5-6 22 6.60
10- 11 22 21.44
1 to 5 incl. 23 8.34
6 23 1.76
7-8 23 16.22
11- 12 23 17.48
1 to 6 incl. . 24 42.44
All 26 6.60
All 26 31.08
All 27 16.22
7-8 30 8.10
5-6 31 3.10
1 to 12 incl. 36 52.44
4- 5-6 36 4.86
AD 38 18.12
kw!4 sw'i 40 4.38
pt. . 40 8.10
pt. _ 40 8.34
SWAN PRECINCT
Township 25, Range 15
Description Sec. Amt.
wVfe _ 1
nw’A, n% neVi,
ae\4 ne!4, Lot 11
5- 6-7-8-9-10 eV4
*e\i . 2 60.54
net4, nw*4 .— 3
n% nH, seVi
ne*4 4 17.90
ne^i. Lots 6
5-7-8 3 9.12
ne’A ne!4 _ 5 .94
wH ne*4, iiH
sw*4, nw^4 se^4 10 5.46
n% 11 9.54
sw!4 bwH 11 3.06
se% se^4_11
neVi, sVi swV4.
seVi _12 10.26
nVi nwV4 _13
neV4 neV4 14 4.32
sVi nwV4, wVi
swV4_13
nwV4 neVi, nVi
rwV4 .„14 18.66
eVi swV4, wVi
seV4 -. —15 13.06
All 17 22.68
aw Vi 20 7.06
eVi, eVi nwVi _ 22
aeVi neVi, BVi 23 39.28
sVi nwVi, swV4 24 8.60
seVi neVi, neVi
acV4, sVi seVi 25 7.78
nwVi 25 7.02
tiV4 swV4, seVi
swVi _ 25 6.18
kwV* swV4 _ 25 1.84
«eV4, eVi nwV4 —26 10.36
■wVi nwV4, nVi
swV4, swV4 swV4,
nVi seV4 .— 26 22.04
seV4 swV4. sVi
aeV4 . 26 6.62
eVi swV4_27 6.76
swV4 nwV4 __ 29 1.80
wVi neV4, seVi
»cV4_80 6.3ft
eVi wVi -80 8.92
nVi__81 18.98
aeV4_81 7.06
aeVi swV4, bwV4
aeV4 -82 2.72
seU seV4_-32 1.32
eH, eH nw*4,
ne*4 sw^4 _ 33 16.08
s'4 sw*4 _33 3.80
sw’4 nw‘4, sw*4 34 11.18
se’4 _34 7.94
nw*4 . 35 11.42
Township 26, Ranjre 15
Description Sec. Amt.
1 19.24
Lots 3-4 in n«H —3 4.54
w*4 w^a_—.4 6.28
cMs ne*4, sH .5 18.94
rnv’4 5 6.40
e>4 ne*4, 8*4
nwVi, s*4 — 8 21.44
nwV4 nw14 .... 9 1.42
■H sH 11 9.12
nH ne!4 13 3.52
sw*4 neJ4, s%
nw1/*, vv’4 bw'4,
seU sw’4, 8\v%
aeU _ 13 20.38
sett nett -13 3.06
ntt nwtt . 13 3.62
ntt ntt stt 14 24.66
stt stt --14 5.60
All - 17 28.66
sett nett 18 1.60
sett . 18 6.98
ett nett _ 19 2.52
wtt nett, stt 19 13.72
nwtt 19 6.40
ett ett -.-20 8.72
wtt ett 20 12.78
ntt nwtt -. 20 2.84
stt nwtt, swJ4 20 12.78
wtt 21 9.76
ntt ntt 23 8.74
stt nett, ntt
sett 24 8.46
nwtt swtt, sett
swtt, stt sett 25 3.62
ett sett 26 2.14
ntt nett, swtt
nett, nwtt sett 27 9.28
ntt nwtt, sett
nwtt 28 3.66
ett swtt, swtt
sett 28 4.14
nett nett 29 1.60
stt nett, sett
nwtt, nett swtt,
ntt sett 34 12.22
nett, nett nwtt,
stt nwtt, nwtt
swtt, ntt sett - 35 20.80
sett swtt, stt
sett 34 3.52
nett swtt, stt
swtt, stt sett —35 7.64
Township 26. Range 16
a Description Sec. Amt.
ett swtt, sett 4 10.46
stt sett - .- 5 2.22
ntt nett, wtt 6 21.34
stt nett, stt nwtt,
ntt stt 7 13.30
ntt nwtt 7 3.36
stt Btt 7 11.46
nett, stt stt
nwtt 8 24.98
nett, nett nwtt,
stt nwtt, ett sett,
nwtt sett - _ 9 21.78
nwtt nwtt, swtt
swtt 9 2.76
All 10 28.42
wtt swtt 11 3.58
wtt nwtt, wtt
swtt . 13
All 14 34.72
ntt, ntt swtt,
sett swtt, sett .17 27.74
nett nett 18 5.98
wtt swtt 19 8.46
ntt nett, wtt 21 18.58
ntt nett, nwtt 22 10.00
nwtt -27 9.30
All 29 26.12
ntt nwtt 30 4.38
stt nwtt, ntt
sw tt 30 8.72
stt swtt, wtt
sett .- 30 8.64
All 31 13.74
All 32 13.74
VERDIGRIS PRECINCT
Township 28, Range 9
Description Sec. Amt.
nett 1 21.60
wtt nwtt 4 23.12
ett nett 6 22.84
nett 6 47.60
sett - 6 62.40
nwtt -.. 7 23.63
swtt -7 48.60
nwtt 8 27.20
nett 9 51.28
ett . 10 104.12
swtt 10 53.42
ett ett - 11 48.30
nwtt 11 52.08
ett nett..12 17.94
nett _ 13 37.38
swtt _ -14 44.64
nett _ 15 63.60
nwtt 15 63.6o
swtt - 15 28.29
wtt nwtt 16 17.84
wtt swtt 16 17.84
ntt nett, sett
nett 17 13.38
nett nwtt .17 4.47
wtt nwtt, sett
nwtt _ 17 22.83
swtt nett - 17 4.47
ntt nwtt 18 30.63
pt. swtt nwtt 18 4.34
sett swtt 18 41.40
nett nwtt - 19 26.18
wtt swtt, sett
swtt _ — —19 79.14
swtt 20 39.16
nwtt . 21 43.98
sett . 21 42.84
ne«4 _ 22 5(5.46
soli 22 47.76
swVi 22 39.5C
sw Vi —. 24 38.00
seV4 25 30.02
wife sw 14_26 42.28
neV4 _ 27 49.16
nw 14 _ 27 35.62
8wV4 _27 44.96
seVi 27 34.10
neVi - 28 38.10
seVi - . 28 38.20
ne*4 - . 29 36.9J
nwl4 29 28.54
swVi _ 29 62.96
wife Be % 29 20.38
nlfe neVi _ 30 29.14
nwM 30 64.06
seli 30 52.50
no Vi neVi __ 32 5.06
nwVi neV4 _ 32 6.06
nw 14 _ 32 28.28
swVi. 32 2(5.68
nlfe seK. slfe
neVi _ _ 32 20.06
slfe se»4 82 10.06
elfe elfe_33 27.30
swVi .. 33 20.4-5
wife sel4 _83 13.68
nwli_ 34 43.58
b Vfe _34 33.33
eVfe nwl4 nwl4 35 4.16
Township 28, Range 10
Description Sec. Amt
nwli- 1 29 8)
nwlfe-3 30.64
sw*i, sVi seVi — 3 49.38
sw1* 10 35.34
neV4 11 29.05
nw Vi 12 62.58
m >4 12 125.48
n*4 neVi, pt. s%
13 118.04
pt. sVfc ne’i No.
10 13 10.30
pt. seV4 neV4
No. 4 13 1.18
a’4 nw*4 seV4
No. 12 13 11.62
sV4 se*4 se*4
No. 18 13 48.02
pt. b'A nwVi se*4
No. 17 13 4.34
ne*4 oeVi 14 17.34
sw’i 14 75.68
n,A nw*4 15 5.03
wV4 sw Vi 15 10.80
e'A .. .23 177.78
e% soVi 24 28.98
ste ne%, se1,4 . 26 29.34
nw‘/i 27 9.18
sM- 27 32.78
nw'4 _ 34 22.96
sw'/i 34 15.10
se'/t . 84 15.10
PAGE VILLAGE
Township 28, Range 10
Description Sec. Amt.
pt. nw*4 se*4 13 33.64
pt. seV4 seV4 . 13 42.88
pt. Be >4 neVi 13 62.94
pt. se*4 ne^i 13 64.96
Lots Block Amt.
3 4 1 12.20
I- 2 1 6.45
19-20 ...1 20.75
3-4-5 2 4.30
6- 7 2 12.20
8- 9-10 _ 2 16.72
II- 12-13-14 2 3.38
3- 4-5 8 21.02
11 to 15 inclusive 3 115.46
18 4 4.30
19-20 4 39.96
67 ft. of s end of
1 to 5 incl. _ 5 56.62
50 ft. of n end
1 to 5 incl. . 5 60.92
6 to 10 incl. 5 10.62
11-12 5 40.86
13-14-15 5 12.64
42 ft. of n end 16,
17-18-19-20 5 23.04
so. 72 ft. 16 to
20 inclusive 5 125.86
I to 9 incl. 6 16.72
13- 14-15 6 16.72
16- 17-18 6 8.38
4 to 9 incl. 7 46.02
14- 15 7 5.42
16 7 2.98
17- 18 7 38.58
No. 92 ft. 1-2-3-4 8 23.04
5- 6 8 12.64
7- 8-9-10 8 14.67
17 8 29.34
19-20 8 98.58
1-2 9 8.38
4- 5-6 9 11.80
7 9 130.70
H 9 5.00
s 25 ft. 9-10 9 17.62
center 50 ft. 9-10 9 21.02
19 20 9 33.64
1-2-3-4-5 10 41.95
6- 7-8 10 9.28
9- 10 10 76.54
II to 15 incl. 10 33.64
16 to 20 incl. 10 8.38
1 _ 13 1.80
I to 5 incl. _14 37.68
II to 15 incl.14 7.22
16 to 20 incl. 14 7.22
1-2-3-4 ..15 5.90
5- G-7-8 15 20.32
pt. se’A ne1/*
48x 100 feet 16 44.00
pt. Outlot B
25x100 .16 22.34
1 to 7 incl. 17 7.22
1-2-3-4 _ .18 6.32
5 _ 18 .92
6 _ 18 .92
7-8-9-10 18 21.02
14 to 20 incl. 18 10.G2
1 to G incl ..19 10.18
7-8 19 2.98
9-10 19 2.98
16 to 20 incl. 19 7.22
I to 5 incl. ..... 20 7.22
II to 15 incl. 28 7.22
16 to 20 incl. 20 32.26
1 to 10 incl. 21 39.96
5 to 17 incl ..... 23 19.86
18-19-20 23 36.08
7-8-9-10 24 5.90
17-18-19-20 24 18.04
5 to 16 incl. 27 17.14
I to 5 incl. 28 45.10
6 28 1.38
7-8-9-10 28 37.68
II to 15 incl. 28 7.22
16 to 20 incl. 28 7.22
East Side Addition
Lots Block Amt.
3 . 2 2.60
4- 5 2 16.34
6- 7 2 34.64
1 to 14 incl. ... 4 83.64
5- 6 . .5 2.72
7- 8-9 6 29.34
14 to 18 incl. ._6 24.84
1 to 14 incl. 6 33.64
1 to 3 incl. _ 7 7.70
4-5 . __ 7 2.06
6- 7 7 23.94
8- 9-10 _7 4.30
1 to 5 incl. _9 8.38
6-7 _ 9 3.40
1 to 5 incl..10 29.34
6-7 _10 16.72
8-9-10 10 31.58
WILLOW DALE PRECINCT
Township 30, Range 9.
Description Sec. Amt.
(*tt . 1 22.22
wtt 8 64.20
sett ..-__8 25.08
swtt _ 6 14.48
sett -. 6 24.28
8tt nwtt, ntt
swtt —_ 6 10.90
wtt _ 7 28.70
nwtt _ 8 19.98
nw Vi 9 18.90
8tt swtt, nett
sett, stt sett — 11 25.92
nett - 12 10.88
ett nett _13 11.74
ntt, nwtt sett,
ntt swtt _ 14 72.22
ntt nett, wtt —16 48.02
ntt — _17 22.90
swtt_,_17 13.44
sett - - 17 12.78
ntt sett, sett
sett _ 19 14.62
nett —_20 19.30
ntt nwtt_20 7.64
All_ 21 238.28
swtt _25 29.04
All _ 28
nett, nett nwtt 29 126.42
wtt wtt -.29 37.84
nwtt sett 29 6.24
swtt sett — 29 6.38
nett _80 22.80
w Vi _ 31 65.28
Mtt 31 38.86
nehi, s»4 —82 84.62
wtt 33 52.34
se>4 33 27.22
nw»4 34 22.82
eMi 35 80.16
w»4 35 88.52
Township 30, Range 10
Description Sec. Amt.
sVi neVi 2 13.24
n Vi seV4 . 2 13.24
sVi seVi . 2 13.24
swVi .2 26.46
nwV4 2 26.46
neV4 neV4 8 13.46
swVi neV4 _ 3 5.90
seV4 neV4 3 5.90
nVi neVi 4- 18.16
4 23.28
nVi nwVi _5 11.66
.. 6 26.46
nwV4 6 13.21
SWV4 6 13.24
nVi 7 46.32
neV4 8 25.92
swV4 _ 9 30.24
nwV4 9 42.66
sw V4 10 .39.70
sVi neV4, nwVi 11 49.14
sVi nwV4 _ 12 13.24
seV4 17 28.20
wVi swV4 .20 12.50
seVi . 22 30.24
nVi . 23 51.42
wVi .24 41.58
eVi, eVi nwVi,
eVi swV4 26 66.42
sw V4 ...... 27 32.78
eVi 29 61.64
wVi nwV4 29 10.06
neVi . 33 23.28
neV4 34 24.06
nVi nwV4 34 13.08
ne>4 35 31.62
nwVi .35 33.68
WYOMING PRECINCT
Township 25, Range 14
Description Sec. Amt.
n*4 ne*4, swVi
neVi nwVi, nwVi
seVi 2 30.02
neVi, e*4 nw*4,
nwVi *eV4 . 3 10.67
w*4 nwVi . 3
n*4 neVi, nV6
mv Vi . . 4 16.90
neVi, e*4 nwVi,
neVi swVi,
n*4 se*4 . 5 18.82
w*4 nwVi, wV4
swVi __-. 5 13.82
Lots 1-2 nwVi,
wV4 swVi . 7 7.96
se*4 -. 12 i 0.4<i
n*4 neVi _ 18 3.78
swVi nwVi, wV4
swVi . 11 10.46
s*4 neVi, wV4
nwVi, seVi nwVi,
s*4 „. _.15 33.04
All 17 49J4
nwVi neVi _ 18 12.46
n*4 neVi, e*4
nwV4,neV4 swVi 20 11.30
neVi neVi, s*4
neVi, neVi seVi 21 8.60
nV4 nV4 22 13.20
8*4 n*4, nV4
seVi 22 13.82
nV4 neVi, seVi
neVi, neVi seVi 23 8.60
sw Vi ne*4, wV4
wV4 sey* 23 23.24
seVi seVi . 23 2.34
swVi 24 8.80
nwVi 24 8.80
e*4 so Vi 24 4.84
All 26 45.58
neVi neVi . 26 2.10
nwVi neVi _ 26 2.10
s*4 neVi, eVz
nwVi, eVi swVi,
seVi .. 26 20.60
seVi .. 27 11.62
n*4, seVi, nV4
swV4 ....35 43.90
sV4 swVi 36 4.18
Township 26, Ranee 14
Description Sec. Amt.
ett swtt, wtt
sett, sett sett .2 26.16
wtt swtt _ 2 9.10
sett . 3 21.78
wtt swtt -__7 9.02
stt nett — —10 9.10
ntt nett _10 19.18
nett, ett nwtt —11 25.30
wtt nwtt . 11 7.28
nwtt sett _11 7.28
stt _13 38.62
sett . 14 27.74
sett nett, ett
sett -..-.—18 16.66
wtt nwtt . 18 15.70
nett .— 19 13.20
stt ntt - _ 20 20.14
sVi 20 30.04
ne’/4, ne*4 nw*4,
s% nw>4, eV6
sw*4, nV4 se*4 21 57.28
wl4 swVi _ 21 6.24
eMs eV4 .. 23 19.18
swtt 24 30.34
neU _ 25 16.92
sett . 25 19.2(5
nw^4 nwVi -28 2.60
neV4 ne*4 _ 29 1.84
nw>4 _81 10.98
eMi se% _31 6.62
nMs nw!4, seV4
nwV4, neVi swVi,
sH sw'4 _ 32 17.90
se*4 ne*4, se\4
swV», ne>>4 se'4 33 13.60
|ne>4 swVi, wVfe
seVi, se^4 se\4 —.33 12.54
wVi wV4 _34 7.96
nH se*4, swH
se»4 -34 3.88
AMELIA VILLAGE
Lots Block Amt.
1 to 10 incl. _1 .82
1 to 6 incl._ 3 7.78
8-9-10 8 .30
1 to 12 incl._B 3.92
2-3 - --—6 .30
10-11-12-13 6 .30
All 7 7.78
1 to S incl._8 .54
6 to 10 incl. 8 1.58
5- 10 .16
1 to 9 incl..14 .98
10 -14 9.24
12-13-14. 14 .38
s% -16 7.02
nH_15 .64
PROMISE AND PERFORMANCE
MORE _
tmmT
~\ L»T/ C
MISS
NEW
DEAL'
GOVT
ALIBI
ARTIST
- BUT INSIDE THE TENT
US. 1
SPTWNNG
REVENUE PIE
U.S.
INCOME
A
AAA
ROOD V
SRORfTASE
SKELETON <
BOONDOGGLE
1 WHATlSlT
' Tfcr
EjOKEAUTY
WdThers
RELIEF
GRAFT- |
POUTJCAL
RULE 1
Abandoned
project?
AJEW i
1 5^^ j
MISS jlAX BILL
twrrcsr j
ladv in ther (
' WORLD'
A Study In Contrasts—Roosevelt-Landon
Malcolm W. Blngay, editorial direc
tor of the Detroit Free Press, recently
made a study of two men—President
Roosevelt and Alfred M. Landon. Her*
are his conclusions as published In his
newspaper;
No two men ever faced each
other as presidential opponents
who were such complete oppo
sites in personality, temperament
and political technique as Alfred
M. Landon and Franklin D.
Roosevelt.
In only one instance do their
lives touch common ground; both
spring from pre-revolutionary
colonial stock. In all else they
are poles apart.
Landon carved out his own ca
reer. In the most competitive of
American businesses, as an inde
pendent oil producer, he won his
way and earned by physical and
mental labor and by sound busi
ness principles, a comfortable
fortune.
Roosevelt was born to wealth
and has lived the life of the
landed gentry. His career has
been that of private tutors, the
ultra-exclusive Groton school for
boys (an imitation of England’s
Eton) and Harvard.
Both men have been governors
of their respective states for two
terms. Landon balanced the Kan
sas budget, got his state out of
the red on a pay-as-you-go policy
and gave a progressive and effi
cient administration.
Roosevelt accomplished noth
ing in his two terms as governor
of New York, devoting all his
energies toward the presidency.
He left office with the debt of his
state doubled.
Roosevelt is flambouyant, the
atrical, striving always to create
startling effect.
Landon is quiet, never makes a
move without purpose, never
talks unless he has something to
say. Artificiality is repugnant to
him.
Students of history will search
the state papers and the speeches
and writings of Franklin D.
Roosevelt in vain for any con
crete expression of thought, any
coherent outline of program.
Landon’s state papers and
speeches are full of meat. He
never writes or speaks without
thinking through to a logical con
clusion what he plans to do. He
detests indirection. He wants
facts—all the facts—so that he
can speak plainly and clearly, and
he wants everybody to under
stand what he means.
Roosevelt delights in leaving
everybody who consults him in
doubt as to where he stands. At
no time in his three years in the
white house have his congres
sional leaders been able to state
definitely where he stood on any
ssue.
Roosevelt is fascinated, sincere
ly, by anything that is new just
because it is new. Landon is im
mediately interested in anything
new, but he wants to test it to
see whether it will work before
endorsing it. Therein lies the
greatest fundamental difference
between the two men.
The airy evasiveness that is
part of the Roosevelt makeup
leads him into constant cor -
versy with all who work wh.i {
him. Never making himself clear
on any issue, he is constantly
misunderstood by factions of his
own support and every depart
ment head of his administration
is at war with some other bureau
crat. The Ickes-Hopkins feud is
only one of many.
Landon believes in harmony of
effort. He reunited the warring
factions of Kansas republicans
and even brought to his support
thoughtful citizens of the demo
cratic faith.
Roosevelt has developed an es
tablished reputation for seeking
revenge on those who oppose him
and pursues them with relentless
and ruthless vigor. Landon is al
together impersonal in his judg
ments. Without personal vanity,
he does not expect all men to
agree with him. Roosevelt deals
only with personalities, Landon
only with principles.
Roosevelt is not the studious
type. None of his state papers or
speeches reveals any depth of
scholarship. His forte is purely
political. Landon is a deep stu
dent of history and an omnivor
ous reader of good books. Roose
velt depends upon his secretaries
and others for background infor
mation; Landon draws such ma
terial from his well-stored mind.
Roosevelt charms, dazzles, fas
cinates, then repels—as the long
list of those who were once with
him and then “took a walk” makes
all too clear. Landon, on the other
hand, does not dazzle. He inspires
confidence that grows through the
years as is attested by the life
long friends he has made. They
may disagree with him, but they
never break with him.
Roosevelt looks upon all life as
a joyous lark; Landon looks upon
life with deep earnestness when
the problems of groping mankind
are under consideration.
Roosevelt, the aristocrat, has a
great expressed sympathy for the
mass of mankind, but he has never
rubbed shoulders with the toilers
in the factories and the fields.
Landon is one of them. He speaks
the language of the man in the
street without affectation.
A conference with Roosevelt be
comes a monolog. He does all the
talking. Landon has genius as
a listener. He listens sympathet
ically and interestedly until the
speaker has finished and then by
intelligent questioning draws him
on further.
Roosevelt vacillates, changing
his plans with his moods. Landon
clings to fundamental principles
and never deviates from them.
Roosevelt delights in dictating;
Landon conciliates by sound reas
onableness. Roosevelt has the ar
rogance of the born aristocrat;
Landon wins men by a spirit of
comradeship. Roosevelt drives;
Landon leads.
You have a feeling all the time
you are in the presence of Roose
velt that he is acting a part. You
have a feeling when you are with
Landon that he is just being him
self.
If the God of our republic’s
destiny has reached down among
us to bring forth a man to save
the American system—so that
“government of the people, by
the people and for the people
shall not perish from the earth”—
then He has chosen Alfred M.
Landon, so that the people, by
striking contrasts, will be able to
see the difference.
No two men were ever more
complete opposites.
New Deal Foreclosed
on 11,438 Farms in ’35
Washington, D. C.—Mortgages on
11,438 farms were foreclosed during
1935 under the New Deal, records
of the Farm Credit administration
here show. This is more than two
and one-half times the number of
such foreclosures in 1934, and 1,399
more than in 1932. One farm in
every ten is now under mortgage to
the United States.
The federal government, accord
ing to the records, owned 27,516
farms at the end of 1935, roughly
5,000 more than it owned at the
same time the year before. AU had
been seized through foreclosures.
Despite the lar^e Increase in fore
closures, 128,457 or approximately
one-fifth of the leans of the FCA on
Dec. 1, 1935, were delinquent. By
ruling of the FCA on February 1,
1935, this did not include loans upon
which an extension had been
granted.
Critics of the New Deal policies
pointed out that the government was
paying bounties to farmers, pre
sumably to keep them solvent, at
the same time that it was fore
closing on thousands more farm
mortgages than it had the year
before. __
In Your Light Bills
Hie New Deal collects a 15 pel
cent tax on the electricity you use
but you are
HIS REAL ROLE
Mt)U HAV/6 WORM ALL THOSE
COSTUMES, WHV NOT OOEAR
one That bealuv
FITS voo ? I
Copyil***1 ,MG> Th‘ Chie»f» Tiibunt
_