Image provided by: University of Nebraska-Lincoln Libraries, Lincoln, NE
About The frontier. (O'Neill City, Holt County, Neb.) 1880-1965 | View Entire Issue (Oct. 22, 1936)
DELINQUENT TAX LIST fConcluded from page 9.) ■ »|i .... . n . ■ .i .. - —— ■ 1 ■■ E-S ____B 4.86 1-4 to 14 incl_B 19.70 Western Town Lot Co.’s Addition Lots Block Amt. I _ .1 11. S7 1-2 _ 2 25.36 3 „ .... _2 17.48 4 2 23.62 8, all except e 3 ft. 6 _ 2 49.84 9- 10 . ...._2 35.86 II ......... 2 29.74 12-13-14 .— 2 23.61 1-2-3 4 48.96 5-6_ 4 14.88 7-8-9 4 32.82 10- 11-12-18 - _4 4722 1-2-3 ..- _6 24.96 « 5 11.88 6 6 3.10 7 te 11 incl. 6 65.14 12 5 38.48 IS 6 2.64 14 _ 6 25.82 1-2-3-4 _6 34.56 1-2-3- 7 25.16 Kimball & Blair’s Addition Lots Block Amt. 4, n% 5 13 34.10 1 to 6 incl. 15 60.32 12-13-14 15 37.18 17-18-19 _ 15 11.38 1-2 16 22.74 4 16 11.38 6 16 31.48 7-8 16 13.11 9 16 3.10 I- 2-3 17 18.38 4 17 8.74 II- 12 17 9.64 1-2-3-4 . 18 9.64 5-6-7 . 18 37.18 10-11-12 18 36.30 15-16 _ 18 47.22 1-2-3 19 29.32 4 19 2.64 1 to 6 incl. — 20 89.16 Hallock’s 2nd Addition Lots Block Amt. 1-2 . 1 11.38 3-4-56 1 8-00 7- 8 1 3.10 1-2 3 3.10 3-4 3 1.65 1-2 6 36.74 1 to 5 incl.6 9.22 6 -6 1.76 7 6 1.76 8- 9 6 3.10 13-14 6 18.38 1 to 5 incl. 7 8.34 8- 9-10-11 .7 56.40 12-13-14 7 9.64 6 to 11 incl. . _8 24.04 9- 10-11 9 37.18 3- 4-5 *. 10 3.96 R 10 24.08 9- 10-11 10 28.44 5- 6-7 11 34.10 8 11 10.52 12-13-14 11 33.70 I- 2, c 115 ft. 3 12 145.56 w 35 ft. 3 12 2.64 2 13 27.56 3 13 3.10 4- 5 13 37.60 6- 7-8 13 81.94 II- 12-13-14 ..13 51.58 1-2 . 14 15.34 3-4 14 31.48 10- 11 14 16.22 12-13-14 14 28.44 22-23-24 14 21.86 26-26-27-28 14 39.82 1- 2-3-4 . - 16 10.52 6 to 14 incl. .... 15 13.60 16-17 16 1.34 2- 3-4 19 3.96 6 19 34.96 All 20 1.76 Pioneer Townsite Co.’s Addition Lots Block Amt. 1 to 6 incl. 21 10.08 1-2 22 16.22 3- 4 5-6 22 6.60 10- 11 22 21.44 1 to 5 incl. 23 8.34 6 23 1.76 7-8 23 16.22 11- 12 23 17.48 1 to 6 incl. . 24 42.44 All 26 6.60 All 26 31.08 All 27 16.22 7-8 30 8.10 5-6 31 3.10 1 to 12 incl. 36 52.44 4- 5-6 36 4.86 AD 38 18.12 kw!4 sw'i 40 4.38 pt. . 40 8.10 pt. _ 40 8.34 SWAN PRECINCT Township 25, Range 15 Description Sec. Amt. wVfe _ 1 nw’A, n% neVi, ae\4 ne!4, Lot 11 5- 6-7-8-9-10 eV4 *e\i . 2 60.54 net4, nw*4 .— 3 n% nH, seVi ne*4 4 17.90 ne^i. Lots 6 5-7-8 3 9.12 ne’A ne!4 _ 5 .94 wH ne*4, iiH sw*4, nw^4 se^4 10 5.46 n% 11 9.54 sw!4 bwH 11 3.06 se% se^4_11 neVi, sVi swV4. seVi _12 10.26 nVi nwV4 _13 neV4 neV4 14 4.32 sVi nwV4, wVi swV4_13 nwV4 neVi, nVi rwV4 .„14 18.66 eVi swV4, wVi seV4 -. —15 13.06 All 17 22.68 aw Vi 20 7.06 eVi, eVi nwVi _ 22 aeVi neVi, BVi 23 39.28 sVi nwVi, swV4 24 8.60 seVi neVi, neVi acV4, sVi seVi 25 7.78 nwVi 25 7.02 tiV4 swV4, seVi swVi _ 25 6.18 kwV* swV4 _ 25 1.84 «eV4, eVi nwV4 —26 10.36 ■wVi nwV4, nVi swV4, swV4 swV4, nVi seV4 .— 26 22.04 seV4 swV4. sVi aeV4 . 26 6.62 eVi swV4_27 6.76 swV4 nwV4 __ 29 1.80 wVi neV4, seVi »cV4_80 6.3ft eVi wVi -80 8.92 nVi__81 18.98 aeV4_81 7.06 aeVi swV4, bwV4 aeV4 -82 2.72 seU seV4_-32 1.32 eH, eH nw*4, ne*4 sw^4 _ 33 16.08 s'4 sw*4 _33 3.80 sw’4 nw‘4, sw*4 34 11.18 se’4 _34 7.94 nw*4 . 35 11.42 Township 26, Ranjre 15 Description Sec. Amt. 1 19.24 Lots 3-4 in n«H —3 4.54 w*4 w^a_—.4 6.28 cMs ne*4, sH .5 18.94 rnv’4 5 6.40 e>4 ne*4, 8*4 nwVi, s*4 — 8 21.44 nwV4 nw14 .... 9 1.42 ■H sH 11 9.12 nH ne!4 13 3.52 sw*4 neJ4, s% nw1/*, vv’4 bw'4, seU sw’4, 8\v% aeU _ 13 20.38 sett nett -13 3.06 ntt nwtt . 13 3.62 ntt ntt stt 14 24.66 stt stt --14 5.60 All - 17 28.66 sett nett 18 1.60 sett . 18 6.98 ett nett _ 19 2.52 wtt nett, stt 19 13.72 nwtt 19 6.40 ett ett -.-20 8.72 wtt ett 20 12.78 ntt nwtt -. 20 2.84 stt nwtt, swJ4 20 12.78 wtt 21 9.76 ntt ntt 23 8.74 stt nett, ntt sett 24 8.46 nwtt swtt, sett swtt, stt sett 25 3.62 ett sett 26 2.14 ntt nett, swtt nett, nwtt sett 27 9.28 ntt nwtt, sett nwtt 28 3.66 ett swtt, swtt sett 28 4.14 nett nett 29 1.60 stt nett, sett nwtt, nett swtt, ntt sett 34 12.22 nett, nett nwtt, stt nwtt, nwtt swtt, ntt sett - 35 20.80 sett swtt, stt sett 34 3.52 nett swtt, stt swtt, stt sett —35 7.64 Township 26. Range 16 a Description Sec. Amt. ett swtt, sett 4 10.46 stt sett - .- 5 2.22 ntt nett, wtt 6 21.34 stt nett, stt nwtt, ntt stt 7 13.30 ntt nwtt 7 3.36 stt Btt 7 11.46 nett, stt stt nwtt 8 24.98 nett, nett nwtt, stt nwtt, ett sett, nwtt sett - _ 9 21.78 nwtt nwtt, swtt swtt 9 2.76 All 10 28.42 wtt swtt 11 3.58 wtt nwtt, wtt swtt . 13 All 14 34.72 ntt, ntt swtt, sett swtt, sett .17 27.74 nett nett 18 5.98 wtt swtt 19 8.46 ntt nett, wtt 21 18.58 ntt nett, nwtt 22 10.00 nwtt -27 9.30 All 29 26.12 ntt nwtt 30 4.38 stt nwtt, ntt sw tt 30 8.72 stt swtt, wtt sett .- 30 8.64 All 31 13.74 All 32 13.74 VERDIGRIS PRECINCT Township 28, Range 9 Description Sec. Amt. nett 1 21.60 wtt nwtt 4 23.12 ett nett 6 22.84 nett 6 47.60 sett - 6 62.40 nwtt -.. 7 23.63 swtt -7 48.60 nwtt 8 27.20 nett 9 51.28 ett . 10 104.12 swtt 10 53.42 ett ett - 11 48.30 nwtt 11 52.08 ett nett..12 17.94 nett _ 13 37.38 swtt _ -14 44.64 nett _ 15 63.60 nwtt 15 63.6o swtt - 15 28.29 wtt nwtt 16 17.84 wtt swtt 16 17.84 ntt nett, sett nett 17 13.38 nett nwtt .17 4.47 wtt nwtt, sett nwtt _ 17 22.83 swtt nett - 17 4.47 ntt nwtt 18 30.63 pt. swtt nwtt 18 4.34 sett swtt 18 41.40 nett nwtt - 19 26.18 wtt swtt, sett swtt _ — —19 79.14 swtt 20 39.16 nwtt . 21 43.98 sett . 21 42.84 ne«4 _ 22 5(5.46 soli 22 47.76 swVi 22 39.5C sw Vi —. 24 38.00 seV4 25 30.02 wife sw 14_26 42.28 neV4 _ 27 49.16 nw 14 _ 27 35.62 8wV4 _27 44.96 seVi 27 34.10 neVi - 28 38.10 seVi - . 28 38.20 ne*4 - . 29 36.9J nwl4 29 28.54 swVi _ 29 62.96 wife Be % 29 20.38 nlfe neVi _ 30 29.14 nwM 30 64.06 seli 30 52.50 no Vi neVi __ 32 5.06 nwVi neV4 _ 32 6.06 nw 14 _ 32 28.28 swVi. 32 2(5.68 nlfe seK. slfe neVi _ _ 32 20.06 slfe se»4 82 10.06 elfe elfe_33 27.30 swVi .. 33 20.4-5 wife sel4 _83 13.68 nwli_ 34 43.58 b Vfe _34 33.33 eVfe nwl4 nwl4 35 4.16 Township 28, Range 10 Description Sec. Amt nwli- 1 29 8) nwlfe-3 30.64 sw*i, sVi seVi — 3 49.38 sw1* 10 35.34 neV4 11 29.05 nw Vi 12 62.58 m >4 12 125.48 n*4 neVi, pt. s% 13 118.04 pt. sVfc ne’i No. 10 13 10.30 pt. seV4 neV4 No. 4 13 1.18 a’4 nw*4 seV4 No. 12 13 11.62 sV4 se*4 se*4 No. 18 13 48.02 pt. b'A nwVi se*4 No. 17 13 4.34 ne*4 oeVi 14 17.34 sw’i 14 75.68 n,A nw*4 15 5.03 wV4 sw Vi 15 10.80 e'A .. .23 177.78 e% soVi 24 28.98 ste ne%, se1,4 . 26 29.34 nw‘/i 27 9.18 sM- 27 32.78 nw'4 _ 34 22.96 sw'/i 34 15.10 se'/t . 84 15.10 PAGE VILLAGE Township 28, Range 10 Description Sec. Amt. pt. nw*4 se*4 13 33.64 pt. seV4 seV4 . 13 42.88 pt. Be >4 neVi 13 62.94 pt. se*4 ne^i 13 64.96 Lots Block Amt. 3 4 1 12.20 I- 2 1 6.45 19-20 ...1 20.75 3-4-5 2 4.30 6- 7 2 12.20 8- 9-10 _ 2 16.72 II- 12-13-14 2 3.38 3- 4-5 8 21.02 11 to 15 inclusive 3 115.46 18 4 4.30 19-20 4 39.96 67 ft. of s end of 1 to 5 incl. _ 5 56.62 50 ft. of n end 1 to 5 incl. . 5 60.92 6 to 10 incl. 5 10.62 11-12 5 40.86 13-14-15 5 12.64 42 ft. of n end 16, 17-18-19-20 5 23.04 so. 72 ft. 16 to 20 inclusive 5 125.86 I to 9 incl. 6 16.72 13- 14-15 6 16.72 16- 17-18 6 8.38 4 to 9 incl. 7 46.02 14- 15 7 5.42 16 7 2.98 17- 18 7 38.58 No. 92 ft. 1-2-3-4 8 23.04 5- 6 8 12.64 7- 8-9-10 8 14.67 17 8 29.34 19-20 8 98.58 1-2 9 8.38 4- 5-6 9 11.80 7 9 130.70 H 9 5.00 s 25 ft. 9-10 9 17.62 center 50 ft. 9-10 9 21.02 19 20 9 33.64 1-2-3-4-5 10 41.95 6- 7-8 10 9.28 9- 10 10 76.54 II to 15 incl. 10 33.64 16 to 20 incl. 10 8.38 1 _ 13 1.80 I to 5 incl. _14 37.68 II to 15 incl.14 7.22 16 to 20 incl. 14 7.22 1-2-3-4 ..15 5.90 5- G-7-8 15 20.32 pt. se’A ne1/* 48x 100 feet 16 44.00 pt. Outlot B 25x100 .16 22.34 1 to 7 incl. 17 7.22 1-2-3-4 _ .18 6.32 5 _ 18 .92 6 _ 18 .92 7-8-9-10 18 21.02 14 to 20 incl. 18 10.G2 1 to G incl ..19 10.18 7-8 19 2.98 9-10 19 2.98 16 to 20 incl. 19 7.22 I to 5 incl. ..... 20 7.22 II to 15 incl. 28 7.22 16 to 20 incl. 20 32.26 1 to 10 incl. 21 39.96 5 to 17 incl ..... 23 19.86 18-19-20 23 36.08 7-8-9-10 24 5.90 17-18-19-20 24 18.04 5 to 16 incl. 27 17.14 I to 5 incl. 28 45.10 6 28 1.38 7-8-9-10 28 37.68 II to 15 incl. 28 7.22 16 to 20 incl. 28 7.22 East Side Addition Lots Block Amt. 3 . 2 2.60 4- 5 2 16.34 6- 7 2 34.64 1 to 14 incl. ... 4 83.64 5- 6 . .5 2.72 7- 8-9 6 29.34 14 to 18 incl. ._6 24.84 1 to 14 incl. 6 33.64 1 to 3 incl. _ 7 7.70 4-5 . __ 7 2.06 6- 7 7 23.94 8- 9-10 _7 4.30 1 to 5 incl. _9 8.38 6-7 _ 9 3.40 1 to 5 incl..10 29.34 6-7 _10 16.72 8-9-10 10 31.58 WILLOW DALE PRECINCT Township 30, Range 9. Description Sec. Amt. (*tt . 1 22.22 wtt 8 64.20 sett ..-__8 25.08 swtt _ 6 14.48 sett -. 6 24.28 8tt nwtt, ntt swtt —_ 6 10.90 wtt _ 7 28.70 nwtt _ 8 19.98 nw Vi 9 18.90 8tt swtt, nett sett, stt sett — 11 25.92 nett - 12 10.88 ett nett _13 11.74 ntt, nwtt sett, ntt swtt _ 14 72.22 ntt nett, wtt —16 48.02 ntt — _17 22.90 swtt_,_17 13.44 sett - - 17 12.78 ntt sett, sett sett _ 19 14.62 nett —_20 19.30 ntt nwtt_20 7.64 All_ 21 238.28 swtt _25 29.04 All _ 28 nett, nett nwtt 29 126.42 wtt wtt -.29 37.84 nwtt sett 29 6.24 swtt sett — 29 6.38 nett _80 22.80 w Vi _ 31 65.28 Mtt 31 38.86 nehi, s»4 —82 84.62 wtt 33 52.34 se>4 33 27.22 nw»4 34 22.82 eMi 35 80.16 w»4 35 88.52 Township 30, Range 10 Description Sec. Amt. sVi neVi 2 13.24 n Vi seV4 . 2 13.24 sVi seVi . 2 13.24 swVi .2 26.46 nwV4 2 26.46 neV4 neV4 8 13.46 swVi neV4 _ 3 5.90 seV4 neV4 3 5.90 nVi neVi 4- 18.16 4 23.28 nVi nwVi _5 11.66 .. 6 26.46 nwV4 6 13.21 SWV4 6 13.24 nVi 7 46.32 neV4 8 25.92 swV4 _ 9 30.24 nwV4 9 42.66 sw V4 10 .39.70 sVi neV4, nwVi 11 49.14 sVi nwV4 _ 12 13.24 seV4 17 28.20 wVi swV4 .20 12.50 seVi . 22 30.24 nVi . 23 51.42 wVi .24 41.58 eVi, eVi nwVi, eVi swV4 26 66.42 sw V4 ...... 27 32.78 eVi 29 61.64 wVi nwV4 29 10.06 neVi . 33 23.28 neV4 34 24.06 nVi nwV4 34 13.08 ne>4 35 31.62 nwVi .35 33.68 WYOMING PRECINCT Township 25, Range 14 Description Sec. Amt. n*4 ne*4, swVi neVi nwVi, nwVi seVi 2 30.02 neVi, e*4 nw*4, nwVi *eV4 . 3 10.67 w*4 nwVi . 3 n*4 neVi, nV6 mv Vi . . 4 16.90 neVi, e*4 nwVi, neVi swVi, n*4 se*4 . 5 18.82 w*4 nwVi, wV4 swVi __-. 5 13.82 Lots 1-2 nwVi, wV4 swVi . 7 7.96 se*4 -. 12 i 0.4<i n*4 neVi _ 18 3.78 swVi nwVi, wV4 swVi . 11 10.46 s*4 neVi, wV4 nwVi, seVi nwVi, s*4 „. _.15 33.04 All 17 49J4 nwVi neVi _ 18 12.46 n*4 neVi, e*4 nwV4,neV4 swVi 20 11.30 neVi neVi, s*4 neVi, neVi seVi 21 8.60 nV4 nV4 22 13.20 8*4 n*4, nV4 seVi 22 13.82 nV4 neVi, seVi neVi, neVi seVi 23 8.60 sw Vi ne*4, wV4 wV4 sey* 23 23.24 seVi seVi . 23 2.34 swVi 24 8.80 nwVi 24 8.80 e*4 so Vi 24 4.84 All 26 45.58 neVi neVi . 26 2.10 nwVi neVi _ 26 2.10 s*4 neVi, eVz nwVi, eVi swVi, seVi .. 26 20.60 seVi .. 27 11.62 n*4, seVi, nV4 swV4 ....35 43.90 sV4 swVi 36 4.18 Township 26, Ranee 14 Description Sec. Amt. ett swtt, wtt sett, sett sett .2 26.16 wtt swtt _ 2 9.10 sett . 3 21.78 wtt swtt -__7 9.02 stt nett — —10 9.10 ntt nett _10 19.18 nett, ett nwtt —11 25.30 wtt nwtt . 11 7.28 nwtt sett _11 7.28 stt _13 38.62 sett . 14 27.74 sett nett, ett sett -..-.—18 16.66 wtt nwtt . 18 15.70 nett .— 19 13.20 stt ntt - _ 20 20.14 sVi 20 30.04 ne’/4, ne*4 nw*4, s% nw>4, eV6 sw*4, nV4 se*4 21 57.28 wl4 swVi _ 21 6.24 eMs eV4 .. 23 19.18 swtt 24 30.34 neU _ 25 16.92 sett . 25 19.2(5 nw^4 nwVi -28 2.60 neV4 ne*4 _ 29 1.84 nw>4 _81 10.98 eMi se% _31 6.62 nMs nw!4, seV4 nwV4, neVi swVi, sH sw'4 _ 32 17.90 se*4 ne*4, se\4 swV», ne>>4 se'4 33 13.60 |ne>4 swVi, wVfe seVi, se^4 se\4 —.33 12.54 wVi wV4 _34 7.96 nH se*4, swH se»4 -34 3.88 AMELIA VILLAGE Lots Block Amt. 1 to 10 incl. _1 .82 1 to 6 incl._ 3 7.78 8-9-10 8 .30 1 to 12 incl._B 3.92 2-3 - --—6 .30 10-11-12-13 6 .30 All 7 7.78 1 to S incl._8 .54 6 to 10 incl. 8 1.58 5- 10 .16 1 to 9 incl..14 .98 10 -14 9.24 12-13-14. 14 .38 s% -16 7.02 nH_15 .64 PROMISE AND PERFORMANCE MORE _ tmmT ~\ L»T/ C MISS NEW DEAL' GOVT ALIBI ARTIST - BUT INSIDE THE TENT US. 1 SPTWNNG REVENUE PIE U.S. INCOME A AAA ROOD V SRORfTASE SKELETON < BOONDOGGLE 1 WHATlSlT ' Tfcr EjOKEAUTY WdThers RELIEF GRAFT- | POUTJCAL RULE 1 Abandoned project? AJEW i 1 5^^ j MISS jlAX BILL twrrcsr j ladv in ther ( ' WORLD' A Study In Contrasts—Roosevelt-Landon Malcolm W. Blngay, editorial direc tor of the Detroit Free Press, recently made a study of two men—President Roosevelt and Alfred M. Landon. Her* are his conclusions as published In his newspaper; No two men ever faced each other as presidential opponents who were such complete oppo sites in personality, temperament and political technique as Alfred M. Landon and Franklin D. Roosevelt. In only one instance do their lives touch common ground; both spring from pre-revolutionary colonial stock. In all else they are poles apart. Landon carved out his own ca reer. In the most competitive of American businesses, as an inde pendent oil producer, he won his way and earned by physical and mental labor and by sound busi ness principles, a comfortable fortune. Roosevelt was born to wealth and has lived the life of the landed gentry. His career has been that of private tutors, the ultra-exclusive Groton school for boys (an imitation of England’s Eton) and Harvard. Both men have been governors of their respective states for two terms. Landon balanced the Kan sas budget, got his state out of the red on a pay-as-you-go policy and gave a progressive and effi cient administration. Roosevelt accomplished noth ing in his two terms as governor of New York, devoting all his energies toward the presidency. He left office with the debt of his state doubled. Roosevelt is flambouyant, the atrical, striving always to create startling effect. Landon is quiet, never makes a move without purpose, never talks unless he has something to say. Artificiality is repugnant to him. Students of history will search the state papers and the speeches and writings of Franklin D. Roosevelt in vain for any con crete expression of thought, any coherent outline of program. Landon’s state papers and speeches are full of meat. He never writes or speaks without thinking through to a logical con clusion what he plans to do. He detests indirection. He wants facts—all the facts—so that he can speak plainly and clearly, and he wants everybody to under stand what he means. Roosevelt delights in leaving everybody who consults him in doubt as to where he stands. At no time in his three years in the white house have his congres sional leaders been able to state definitely where he stood on any ssue. Roosevelt is fascinated, sincere ly, by anything that is new just because it is new. Landon is im mediately interested in anything new, but he wants to test it to see whether it will work before endorsing it. Therein lies the greatest fundamental difference between the two men. The airy evasiveness that is part of the Roosevelt makeup leads him into constant cor - versy with all who work wh.i { him. Never making himself clear on any issue, he is constantly misunderstood by factions of his own support and every depart ment head of his administration is at war with some other bureau crat. The Ickes-Hopkins feud is only one of many. Landon believes in harmony of effort. He reunited the warring factions of Kansas republicans and even brought to his support thoughtful citizens of the demo cratic faith. Roosevelt has developed an es tablished reputation for seeking revenge on those who oppose him and pursues them with relentless and ruthless vigor. Landon is al together impersonal in his judg ments. Without personal vanity, he does not expect all men to agree with him. Roosevelt deals only with personalities, Landon only with principles. Roosevelt is not the studious type. None of his state papers or speeches reveals any depth of scholarship. His forte is purely political. Landon is a deep stu dent of history and an omnivor ous reader of good books. Roose velt depends upon his secretaries and others for background infor mation; Landon draws such ma terial from his well-stored mind. Roosevelt charms, dazzles, fas cinates, then repels—as the long list of those who were once with him and then “took a walk” makes all too clear. Landon, on the other hand, does not dazzle. He inspires confidence that grows through the years as is attested by the life long friends he has made. They may disagree with him, but they never break with him. Roosevelt looks upon all life as a joyous lark; Landon looks upon life with deep earnestness when the problems of groping mankind are under consideration. Roosevelt, the aristocrat, has a great expressed sympathy for the mass of mankind, but he has never rubbed shoulders with the toilers in the factories and the fields. Landon is one of them. He speaks the language of the man in the street without affectation. A conference with Roosevelt be comes a monolog. He does all the talking. Landon has genius as a listener. He listens sympathet ically and interestedly until the speaker has finished and then by intelligent questioning draws him on further. Roosevelt vacillates, changing his plans with his moods. Landon clings to fundamental principles and never deviates from them. Roosevelt delights in dictating; Landon conciliates by sound reas onableness. Roosevelt has the ar rogance of the born aristocrat; Landon wins men by a spirit of comradeship. Roosevelt drives; Landon leads. You have a feeling all the time you are in the presence of Roose velt that he is acting a part. You have a feeling when you are with Landon that he is just being him self. If the God of our republic’s destiny has reached down among us to bring forth a man to save the American system—so that “government of the people, by the people and for the people shall not perish from the earth”— then He has chosen Alfred M. Landon, so that the people, by striking contrasts, will be able to see the difference. No two men were ever more complete opposites. New Deal Foreclosed on 11,438 Farms in ’35 Washington, D. C.—Mortgages on 11,438 farms were foreclosed during 1935 under the New Deal, records of the Farm Credit administration here show. This is more than two and one-half times the number of such foreclosures in 1934, and 1,399 more than in 1932. One farm in every ten is now under mortgage to the United States. The federal government, accord ing to the records, owned 27,516 farms at the end of 1935, roughly 5,000 more than it owned at the same time the year before. AU had been seized through foreclosures. Despite the lar^e Increase in fore closures, 128,457 or approximately one-fifth of the leans of the FCA on Dec. 1, 1935, were delinquent. By ruling of the FCA on February 1, 1935, this did not include loans upon which an extension had been granted. Critics of the New Deal policies pointed out that the government was paying bounties to farmers, pre sumably to keep them solvent, at the same time that it was fore closing on thousands more farm mortgages than it had the year before. __ In Your Light Bills Hie New Deal collects a 15 pel cent tax on the electricity you use but you are HIS REAL ROLE Mt)U HAV/6 WORM ALL THOSE COSTUMES, WHV NOT OOEAR one That bealuv FITS voo ? I Copyil***1 ,MG> Th‘ Chie»f» Tiibunt _