Subdivision Out Lots A and B, Blocks
28 to 33:
Lot. Blk. Amt.
lot 1 .29 $ 1.30
lots 3, 4, 5, 6 .29 4.60
lots 1, 2 .30 1.85
lot 5 .32 .90
lot 14 .32 .90
lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.32 23.25
EMMET, VILLAGE.
Lot. Blk. Amt.
center 50 ft. 1, 2. 2 $ 2.20
south 50 ft. 1, 2 . 2 22.20
lot 4, south 70 ft. 5, 6, 7 . 3 13.70
lot 8 . 3 10.30
south 20 feet of the north
40 feet of 5, 6, 7.3 5.70
lot 9 . 3 1.15
lot 10 . 3 1.15
lots 12, 13, 14 . 3 25.65
lots 1, 2, 3. 6 7.75
lot 1 . 8 26.10
lots 5, 6, 7, 8. 8 7.75
lot 9 . 8 1.80
lot 10 . 8 1.80
lots 4, 5. 9 5.50
lots 6, 7 .9 2.75
lot 1 .11 2.20
lot 2 .11 1.80
lot 3 .11 2.20
lots 1, 2, 3, 4.12 13.75
Lyons’ Addition.
lot 1 .A $56.50
lot 2 .A 1.65
lot 4 .A 3.60
lot 8.A 10.30
lot 12.A 2.40
lot 1 .C 89.70
lot 2 .C 59.05
lot 6......C 2.50
O’NEILL CITY “ORIGINAL.”
Lot. Blk. Amt.
lots 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 .... 1 $60.74
lot 6 . 2 19.72
lots 12, 13 . 2 56.37
s% lots 1, 2, 3 . 3 42.26
lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 6, 7, 8 .. 6 34.40
lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16 . 6 18.05
lot 11 . 7 10.63
lots 15, 16 . 7 39.26
lot 8 . 8 3.79
lot 9 . 8 18.45
subdivision of lots 1, 2, 3. 8
lots 21, 22 . 9 78.84
w% lot 12. 9 2.40
lots 3, 4.11 6.40
e% lots 4, 6.12 25.89
lots 9, 10 .12 35.67
lots 11, 12, 13.12 15.40
e% 11, all of 12, 13.14 29.34
lots 14, 16, 16 .14 93,76
lot 3 .16 34.05
lots 6, 6.16 10.40
north 85 feet of east 37
feet of lot 11, north 85
feet of 12 .15 24.68
lot 15 .15 36.72
lot 16.15 11.75
lot 18 .16 7.09
lot 22 .15 17.05
north 88 feet of 26, north
88 feet of west 21 feet
of south 82 feet of 26,
ail of 27, 28, south 82
feet and east 1% feet
of 25, south 82 feet of
26 .15 617.20
lot 4 .16 44.10
lots 7, 8 .16 88.15
lot 10 .16 6.53
lots 13, 14 .16 70.13
lots 18, 19, 20 .16 35.17
lot 22 .16 28.17
lots 9, 10, 11, 12, west 30
feet of 13 .17 16.81
lots 1, 2 .20 63.12
lot 4 .20 24.72
lots 6, 6, 7, 8.20 19.04
lots 16, 16 .20 16.61
lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.21 82.08
lot 6 .21 61.13
lots 11, 12, 13.21 58.57
lots 14, 15, 16.21 309.20
2 feet north side 30, all 31 21 24.68
north east wing of alley
in Pahy's Subdivision
30 .21 8.25
lot 24 .22 39.16
lot 28 .22 86.18
lot 2 .23 23.48
west % lot 4 .23 2.43
east % lot 4 .23 3.93
lot 6 .23 8.26
lots 6, 7, 8.23 24.78
west % lots 9, 10 .23 25.41
lots 13, 14 .23 24.52
lots 7, 8 .24 9.86
lots 12, 13, 14 .24 29.61
lots 15, 16 .24 23.65
lots 3, 4 .25 4.76
lots 5, 6 .25 14.29
lots 14, 16, 16 .25 25.98
lots 6, 7, 8 .26 300.00
lots 9, 10, 11, 12 .26 20.21
lot 18, west 15 ft. 14 ..26 3.58
east 16 ft 15, all of 16 . .26 17.16
lot 13 .27 45.50
lots 14, 15, 16 .27 25.94
north 48 ft of 1, 2, 3... .28 50.41
north 48 ft. of 4 .28 20.60
south 24 ft. of north 96
ft lots 1, 2, 3, 4 .28 54.00
south 24 ft. of north 144
ft of lots 1, 2, 3, 4....28 11.85
south 26 ft of lots 1, 2 . .28 7.48
south 26 ft. of lot 3 ... .28 1.89
outh 26 ft of lot 4.28 1.28
south 40 ft of lots 14,
16, 16 .28 141.20
102 ft. of lots 14, 15, 16 .28 222.20
lots 1, 2, 3 .29 236.75
lots 4, 6 .29 65.30
lots 10,11 .29 68.15
lot 12 .29 5.65
lot 13 .29 1.87
lots 7, 8 . 30 158.54
lots 13, 14 .30 3.73
lots 2, 3 .31 28.17
lot 9 .31 19.91
lots 10, 11 12, 127% ft.
of 13, 14, lots 15, 16 . .31 6.52
42% ft. of lots 13, 14 15,
16 .31 102.30
lots 4, 6.32 16.51
lots 11, 12, 13 .32 84.35
lots 14, 15, 16 .32 23.61
lot 8 .33 18.75
lots 15, 16, 17, 18 .33 169.65
lot 22 .33 1.91
lot 13 .35 15.60
O’Neill and Hagerty’s Addition,
lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... .A 18.76
lots 8, 9, 10, 11 .A 16.75
lots 3, 4.C 11.77
lots 12, 13 .C 10.69
lot 4 .D 23.76
lot 6 .D 8.90
lot 6 .D 8.90
lot 7 .D 8.90
lots 8, 9 .D 17.60
lots 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ..D 4.92
lot 16.D 8.90
lots 16, 17, 18, 19 .D 69.80
lots 10, 11, 12, 13 .F 13.40
lots 14, 16.F 47.00
lota 16, 17 .F 5.75
lots. 18, 19, 20 .F 9.65
lots 3, 4.G 23.47
lot 6 .G 22.50
lot 6.G 2.90
tots 1,2.G 9.70
fct? ..G 1.40
Lot Blk. Amt.
lot 8 .G 4.15
lot 9 .G 4.13
lots 11, 12.G 5.60
lots 18, 19 .G 7.10
lot 20 .G 6.70
lots 21, 22, 23, 24 .G 66.95
lots 3, 4, 5 .H 28.30
lots 6, 7 .H 15.90
lots 8, 9.H 18.40
lots 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ....H 15.10
lot 20 H .73
lot 4.1 .73
lots 12, 13, 14, 15 .1 16.80
lots 10, 11, 12 .K 2.07
lots 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 .K 25.10
all of.N 27.70
Riggs’ Addition.
lots 13, 14, 15, 16 .42 31.83
lots 7, 8.43 27.45
wli 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17 .45 18.89
McCafferty’s Addition.
lot 5 .48 12.92
lots 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. .48 29.24
lot 11 .48 3.11
lot 11 .49 24.52
lots 12, 13 .49 14.80
lots 3, 4, 5 .50 2.11
lot 12 .52 1.70
lots 13, 14 .54 2.40
lots 16, 16 .54 11.90
Fahy’s Addition.
lots 2, 3 . 4 73.60
Fahy’s Second Addition.
lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ....A 3.16
lots 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,
18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24. A 6.06
lots 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35,
36 .A 2.47
lots 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8....B 24.04
lots 9, 10, 11, 12.B 21.77
lots 13, 14, 15, 6 .B 12.59
lots 4, 5 .C 3.11
lot 6 .C 4.20
lot 7 .C 6.80
lot 8.C 6.80
lots 9, 10, 11, 12 .C 220.60
lots 15, 16, 17 .C 16.06
lots 18, 19.C 7.55
lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8..D 30.15
lots 1, 2, 3. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 9..E 9.75
lots 19, 20, 21, 22 .E 6.18
lot 23.E 1.31
lots 24, 25 .E 3.11
Millard’s Addition.
pt. 1 .A 25.74
pt. 3 .A 46.48
pt. 2 .A 21.08
190 ft. of lot 4 ...A 155.10
pt. e% of lot 5 .A 13.85
west % of lot 6 .A 1.22
lot 13 .B .75
lot 14 .B .73
lot 15.B 8.26
lots 6, 7, 8.F 23.65
pt. 1 .H 1.94
lot 2 .H 18.19
McCafferty’s Second Addition.
45 ft. of .G .73
46 ft. of.G .73
sw*/4 .G 74.47
lot 5.H 7.25
lot 6 .II 13.46
south 45 ft. lot 14.H 14.30
lot 1 .1 3.70
lot 2 .1 .95
lot 3 .1 3.30
lot 4.1 3.30
lot 5 .1 3.30
lots 9..10 .1 7.50
lots 11, 12 .1 8.85
McCafferty’s Annex.
pt. s& . 1
nw^i . 1 12.39
90x170 ft. of. 6 3.90
all of .8 110.40
Mathews Addition.
lots 10, 11, 12, 13. 1 1.60
lot 14 . 1 1.25
lots 15, 16, 17, 18 . 1 1.60
all of .10 182.85
lot 3 .15 .35
lots 4, 5.15 .81
lots 1, 2, 3 .16 1.41
lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13 .16 24.69
lots 16, 17, 18 .16 2.07
lots 6, 7, 8, 9 .17 19.04
lots 1,2.18 1.32
lots 5, 6 .18 .79
lots 1, 2, 3 .19 .86
lot 1 .20 .35
Hazelett’s Addition.
lot 1 . 1 .67
lots 1, 2, 3, 4 . 4, .96
lot 8 . 4 .67
south 45 ft. lots 9, 10,
11, 12, .17 15.31
Fahy’s Park Addition.
lots 9, 10 .F 46.82
lots 13, 14, 15 .G 74.15
lots 16, 17.G 3.11
lots 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7, 8....H 47.42
lots 20, 21 .H 2.53
lot 24 .H 5.20
lot 1 .K .73
lot 1 .L 12.36
lots 11, 12 .M 12.99
lots 1, 2 .N 15.24
lots 3, 4.0 13.06
lots 5, 6.0 1.41
lots 7, 8 .0 35.90
lots 9, 10, 11, 12.0 3.31
Nondescripts in 29-29-11 in O’Neill.
number 17 . 1.41
number 18 . 1.41
number 19 . 28.17
number 34 . 19.75
number 35 . 2.76
number 37 . 23.51
number 38 . 46.82
number 39 . 4.86
number 40 . .83
Nondescripts in 30-29-11, in O’Neill.
numbers 5 and 6. 72.46
number 11 . 103.30
number 32 and 33 .... 28.17
number 43 . 29.44
INMAN VILLAGE.
Lot. Blk. Amt.
pt. lots 1, 2. 4 3.04
Pioneer Townsite Co’s Subdividision
of Out Lot B. and Part of C.
lot 1 . 8 29.15
lot 2 .8 3.46
lot 10. 9 6.90
Pioneer Townsite Co’. Out Lot A.
pt. of lot B .10 6.80
Blocks 12, 13 and 14 and Out Lots
4 to 11 Inclusive.
pt. of out lot 1 .11 17.95
lot 8 ..11 2.01
pt. of out lot 2 .11 17.95
lots 9, 10...,.12 2.19
lots 1, 2.13 5.00
lot 3 .13 1.05
lots 8, 9.13 2.70
STUART VILLAGE.
n% lots 12, 13. 1 25.67
lot 11 .. 4 20.35
lot 21 . 4 18.65
lot 24 . 4 1.13
lot 3 . 6 38.66
lots 7, 8 . 6 47.05
lot 9 . 5 3.85
out lot C . 5 9.45
Ha Hock’s Addition.
Lot Blk. Amt.
lots 5, 6, 7 . 7 13.40
lot 11 . 7 18.85
e'A lot 11. 8 2.16
lots 1, 2 . 9 17.02
Subdivision of Lots 1 and 2.
lots E. F.11 1G.10
Part of Out Lot N.
out lot .I 30.15
lot 3, 4, 5 .L 34.40
lot 6, 7 .L 10.45
Carberry’si Addition.
lots 20, 21 .D 1.07
lot 22 .D .57
Kimball & Blair’s Addition.
lots 2, 3.17 3.00
lot 4 .17 8.15
lots 11, 12.17 2.06
Haliock’s Second Addition.
lot 6 . 7 .60
lot 7 . 7 .60
lots 1, 2 .10 12.30
lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.10 2.36
lot 8 .10 10.83
lots 6, 7 .12 24.30
lot 1 .13 6.64
all of .20 .60
Pioneer Townsite Company Addition.
lots 10, 11 .22 45.00
lots 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6 .24 23.10
PAGE VILLAGE.
Nondescript in 18-28-9.
pt. nw'/i sw!4 . 11.65
pt. nw>4 sw’/i . 12.61
pt. nw>4 sw!4 . 32.55
pt. nw!4 sw!4 . 19.56
pt. nw>4 sw!4 . 10.32
Nondescripts in 13-28-10
pt. se‘A ne’/i . 17.35
Page Village.
67 ft. of south end of
lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6_5 148.75
lots 7, 8, 9, 10 . 5 34.00
lots 11, 12 . 5 9.85
pt. lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20.. 5 46.92
lots 4, 5 . 7 39.41
lot 16. 8 8.55
lot 17. 8 12.61
lot 18 . 8 22.00
lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 .. 9 20.15
lot 8 .. 9 29.85
south 25 ft. lots 9, 10 .. 9 5.90
north 42 ft. 9, 10 .9 14.50
center 50 ft. of lots 9, 10 . 9 11.62
lots 6, 7, 8 .10 80.50
lots 9, 10 .10 25.83
lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.14 9.41
lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... .14 1.92
lots 11, 12, 13.18 5.57
lot 1 .19 .50
lots 12, 13, 14, 16 .19 1.50
lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ....20 1.92
lots 1, 2, 3 .22 9.80
lots 11, 12, 13, 14, 15....22 1.92
lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ....22 1.92
lots 5, 6..24 .91
lots 1, 2, 3, 4 .27 7.64
lots 11, 12 .27 .93
lots 17,18, 19, 20 .27 2.65
East Side Addition.
lots 1, 2 . 2 5.25
lots 9, 10 . 2 47.30
all of. 3 11.62
lots 1, 2. 5 17.08
lots 1, 2, 3, 4 . 6 17.60
lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 .... 6 4.44
APPLE CREEK VILLAGE.
lots 1, 2. 1 .95
lot 3 . 1 .56
lots 4, 5, 6 . 1 1.90
lots 7, 8. 1 .95
lots 9, 10, 11 . 1 1.20
lots 1,2. 2 .95
lot 3 . 2 .55
lots 4, 5, 6 . 2 1.90
lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 . 2 1.80
lot 1 . 3 .30
EUROPE FACING INSOLVENCY.
One Year the Probalbe, Three Years
the Uttermost Limit of Avail
able Resources.
(By Simon N. Patten.)
(Professor of economics; author of
“Reconstruction of the Economic
Theory,” “The Dynamic Theory of
Economics,” and “The Premises of
Political Economy.”)
The fact that Great Britain has al
ready begun to draw on us shows that
she is nearing the practical limit of
her resources as distinguished from
the theoretical limit. Theoretically, in
view of all demands upon her and of
the resources for meeting those de
mands which she possesses, Great
Britain should be able to carry four
years of the war, waged on the scale
it presents today. In practice, how
ever, that period must be reduced one
half. One year of war having already
passed, the practical limit of resour
ces may be looked for by the end of the
coming year. Meanwhile, we may ex
pect Great Britain to come to us about
every four months for a credit amount
ing at least to a fresh half billion
dollars.
In the sense of having revenues in
adequate for its outlay, Russia has
been insolvent for twenty years, and
she has been making up her indebted
ness by loans from France ever since
the alliance was formed between those
two governments. Italy has been
similarly insolvent for the past half
dozen years.
For ten years the French have been
borrowing to make up the national
deficit; and, in addition, they have
been loaning to Russia. In addition
to her deficit and her loans to Rus
sia, France only a short time before
the outbreak of the war increased the
term of service with the colors from
two or three years—occasioning an
increase of not far from 50 per cent
in maintainance expenses for the army
and navy and a serious reduction in
the earning capacity of the French
people.
All of this means that the total ex
penses for the armies of the allies
must be borne by Great Britain. When
we figure out the war expenses as a
whole, and remember that Great Brit
ain has guaranteed as a whole the ex
penses of the allies, we confront two
questions:
What are the war expenses of the
allies ?
What are Great Britain’s resources
for the meetingof her obligations?
If we count in all the expenses of
the allies annually for the war, the
direct, military outlay is about ten
billions; the indirect loss is about five
billions, making a total sacrifice in
values of fifteen billions. Giving
Britain every favorable advantage in
the calculation, let us assume that she
need carry only the direct military
outlay of ten billions. With what re
sources can she meet it?
There are two ways of checking up
the British resources. One is based on
the value of property held by the Eng
lish people; the other is based upon
surplus income of the British people.
Under both heads fairly accurate fig
ures are available.
At the highest estimate, the surplus
incomes is two billions a year. As
suming that the British government
may take it all, how large a burden
in the form of debt can be assumed
without incurring insolvency? If we
suppose the assumption of a total debt
on the basis of interest at 6 per cent—
they are paying now five and one-half
per cent in the United States for a
fraction of it—Great Britain would be
insolvent when it carried forty bil
lions of debt, the total on which its
two billions of surplus income could
pay the 5 per cent interest charges.
If we take up the basis of property
values, we find that the total wealth
of Great Britain, at the opening of the
war, was estimated as being slightly
less than that of the United States.
A conservative estimate for our total
wealth would be two hundred billions
—probably from forty to fifty billions
higher than a conservative estimate of
Great Britain’s wealth.
Roughly estimated under present
conditions, about one-half of these
property values are commercial values
—that is, earning capacity as distin
guished from what we have learned to
designate as physical valuation. The
other half—the physical valuation—is
divided again into two fairly equal
parts, one of fixed capital and the
other of circulating capital. So, while
one hundred billions, being simply
earning capacity, is not available as a
credit asset, we find fifty billions more
of fixed capial tied up in permanent
improvements, leaving only fifty bil
lions of circulating capital as quick as
sets to be realized on in case of dire
necessity.
But, as soon as Great Britain sacri
fices her circulating capitol, her sur
plus income fails; and as soon as her
surplus income is used up, her cir
culating capital stops. Giving^either
form of liquidation to meet the yearly
war expenses of ten billion dollars,
the very highest amount to be realiz
ed is from forty to fifty billions; and
such a total liquidation would leave
Great Britain without any income at
all—the situation of the southern con
federacy in 1865, when absolutely
nothing remained except the hoes, and
the men with guns in their hands in
ovcau.
Theoretically, therefore, Great Brit
ain can finance the allies for a total
of four years, of which one has already
passed. Practically, like the south, no
such protracted period of real solvency
can be maintained.
A long time prior to the expiration
of her theoretical limit of four years,
England must draw upon her credit
with foreign countries. She has al
ready drawn upon us. The practical
limit of her resources is likely to be
two years instead of four. Neither
surplus income nor circulating capi
tal can be drawn upon to its full
amount without bringing the indus
tries of a nation to a dead stop.
Does It Pay To Grind Feed For Lambs
Experiments conducted at the Ne
braska Experiment Station during the
past winter indicate that the grinding
of grain and alfalfa hay for lambs is
not profitable under present conditions.
While lambs fed a mixture of ground
corn and ground alfalfa went on full
feed quickly, cleaned up their feed
each meal, and remained thrifty and
vigorous throughout the entire feed
ing experiment, their increased weight
was put on at a cost considerably
higher than that of lambs fed shelled
corn and whole alfalfa hay. The dif
ference amounted to practically $1 on
each 100 pounds gain,. The same
striking difference was noticable in
comparing lambs fed on ground corn,
ground alfalfa, and corn silage and
those fed shelled corn, whole alfalfa,
and corn silage.
Raising The Dairy Calf.
The best practice in the care and
management of the young dairy stock
are discussed in Bulletin 149, just is
sued by the Nebraska Agricultural
Experiment Station. The author has
endeavored to give explicit directions
for the successful raising of the skim
milk calf in the hope that more dairy
calves will be raised in Nebraska. He
also discussed the need of more dairy
calves and the kind of calves it pays
to raise, the feed required to raise a
calf, the best methods of feeding skim
milk, grain, hay, and silage, and the
prevention or treatment of calf
scours. Practical rations are given for
calves of different ages.
This bulletin may be obtained free
by any resident of Nebraska upon ap
WHEN YOU WANT
A NICE LARGE WHITE
LOAF OF BREAD
I VICTOR FLOUR!
IS WHAT
YOU WANT TO USE
TRY IT.
MERRIMAN & HARTY
QUALITY GROCERY
plication to the Agricultural Experi
ment Station, Lincoln, E. A. Burnett,
Director.
Agricultural Meetings Begin. ^
The farmers’ institutes and agri
cultural short courses are with us
again. About 100 farmers’ institutes
have been scheduled and a larger num
ber of short courses or extension
schools have been booked than ever
before. The farmers’ institutes have
been cut to one-day sessions this sea
son, owing to lack of money for this
purpose. The increased number of
extension schools has been made pos
sible by the use of federal funds which
may not be used for farmers’ insti
tutes. Towns having short courses
are allowed to choose subjects from
any three of the departments of the
College of Agriculture. The following
towns have arranged for such week’s
courses in agriculture: Sargent, Min
:len, Springfield, Gresham, Laurel,
Papillion, Swanton, Wisner, Wood
River, Allen, and Stromberg. The
speakers are furnished through the
Agricultural Extension Service, Col
lege of Agriculture.
Car Runs Off a Bridge.
Page Reporter: Bert Harding of
near Opportunity purchased a second
hand Ford last Thursday and in the
evening started to drive it home. At
the bridge just north of town he evi
dently lost his head and the car struck
the cement railing and went over into
the ditch, up side down. He was
thrown under the car, but the whole
front half of it was in the water and
he was able to crawl out, with no
personal damage but a cold bath. Help
was on hand in just a few moments
and the car was righted and found to
lave a smashed wheel, bent front axle
and frame, and the windshield com
pletely destroyed. He was very lucky
to escape with his life.
SIX YEAR OLD BOY SHOOTS
LITTLE SISTER.
Charge From Shotgun Enters Side.
Death Results In a Short Time.
Ewing Advocate: Eva, the four
year old daughter of Mr. and Mr.:.
Dewitt Gunter, who live a mile east of A
town, came to her death Wednesday^#
evening from the discharge of a shot-*|P
gun in the hands of her little six year »
old brother. The charge entered her
side and in less than an hour life had
fled.
It seems that a coyote had been
catching the chickens on the place and
hearing a disturbance in the rear
yard, Mr. Gunter had brought the
shotgun from the house. He was un
able to find any coyote and came back,
setting the gun near the front door
while he unharnessed a team just
brought in from the field. In the
meantime the little boy and girl came j
out and were playing, when the fowl
ing piece was discovered by them. The
boy picked it up and was able to raise
the hammer, then pulled the trigger.
His sister happened to be in front of
him and her little body received tho
entire load of shot and wads. The
gun was a double barrel and contain
ed only one shell.
It was a great shock to everyone,
the news of this deplorable accident,
and to the stricken mother and father
is extended the heartfelt sympathy of
all.
The funeral will be held at th*
Methodist church at ten o’clock thi*
morning and interment made in the
Ewing cemetary.
For Sale or Trade.
A 35-horse, 5 passenger Mitchel
Automobile for sale or will trade for I
horses or cattle. This auto is in good r
running order.
GEO. W. NEAL,
18-4p. Emmet, Nebr.
Opera. House
Three Nights, Commencing
Monday, October 25
Engagement Extraordinary
THE WESSELMAN-WOOD STOCK COMPANY
Supporting the Talented Actress
Miss Olga. Wood
In a Repertoire of
High Class R.oyalty Pla.ys
-------
Opening Play
“The Golden Gia.nt Mine”
A Beautiful Western Play in Four Acts ^
Special Scenery |
Feature Vaudeville between Acts
Change of Plays and Specialties Each Night
Guaranteed Attraction
Popular Prices. Seats on Sale at Pixley’s /
!■!■■■ I I I . I