n?'K*js *K*fst xt*5$? >JxTiz^M^TfK tfzyfz#}£$♦< m I A WARRIOR BOLD. 1 ^ * * # ^ By ST. GEORGE RATHBORNE. & Author of "Little Miss Millions," »The Spider's Web," "Miss $J£ Caprice," "Dr. Jack's Widow," Etc,, Etc. "5^ ^ * ^ [Copyright, 1901, bystreet end Smith, New York.] ^ ^ ^ l..l..e..l. .A. .A. . A . . A , - A. . A_ ^A> ^A-. ._A_ _AJ. . A * - A - .A. .A. .A. .A. .A. .A. .A. .A. .A. ,Y, fW, uld tell just how it came about. She remembered Captain Brand’s enthusiasm in leading her deeper into the recesses, and how he suddenly disappeared while she was examining some object of interest; how she waited for him to reappear, until, growing alarmed by the dimin ishing size of her candle, she had en deavored to find her way back to the party; how she tripped and fell, losing her light. Then she cried out in terror as the awful darkness closed around her, but no answer came. Then she realized that the others had gone; that this cruel-hearted man she called father, had deserted her, pre tending to believe, no doubt, that she had gone above with a portion of the party upon whom the horrors of the dungeon soon palled. He could also take it for granted she had gone away with her new-found frier.ds, and not show any alarm for hour*. It was a cleverly concocted and dia bolical scheme, which had for its ulti mate outcome the dethronement of her reason. Doubtless Captain Brand had ar ranged it so that in such a case he would be appointed the natural pro tector and guardian of his afflicted child, and thus, of course, have the handling of her fortune. Charlie was aghast. He had never heard so terrible a thing in all his life. He almost doubted his senses. ‘‘I have made up my mind regarding one thing, Miss Brand," he said, posi tively, "which is to the effect that I do not believe this man to be your father!” (To Be Continued.) HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN DELIGHTED Ladles Calling on President Thought Ho Had Reason to Be Pleased. “Just send in your cards,” said a well known army officer to two New York state women who were wonder ing how they could arrange “just to shake hands with the president.” The advice was followed next day, and much to their surprise aud delight they were at once shown into the re ception room, where the president was busily engaged in refusing the request ot a prominent senator who had called on the ever-present and everlasting topic of offices. “Very sorry, senator, but this is im possible; I cannot do it,” the presi dent was heard to say. “Please think it over, Mr. Presdent,” said the senator, “and I shall call again to-morrow.” “Absolutely final. I cannot do it. I cannot do it.” “My,” said one lady to the other, “but wouldn’t we better be going? That man is a senator aud we don’t know what may happen.” The next moment the president was shaking hands with both. “I am delighted to see you, de lighted,” said he. “Well, you ought to be,” said or»3 of the women, recovering from the whirl wind of cordiality. The president looked embarrassed. “We den’t want anything, yt»j know.” Cigarettes tor Subftcrlbora. El Pais, which is a pushing paper of Buenos Ayres, offers to give every sub scriber for three months an equal value in cigarettes, so that the custom er gets $5 worth of news and tobacco each for the one price. REFORM THE TARIFF? EFFECTS OF SOME PREVIOUS EFFORTS IN THAT DIRECTION. Whon Congressman DeArmond Tried It Klght Veers Ago Keen the Males In Osage Township, “Sheered at It Worse Than at a Locomotive Whistle.'* In 1894 Mr. DeArmond came home to the bosom of his political family, fresh from the halls of a congres* which had labored long and hard with the ques tion of “tariff reform." H* came di rect to Clinton, and was received un der an arbor, where he spoke to the dear people on this subject for two hours. The “Republican'' had hired a Democratic court stenographer to take the congressman's speech, that It might be preserved for posterity, but, after the oration had been delivered, the stenographer was bought, and the Republican could never get that speech in long hand for love or mon ey. Mr. DeArmond spoke as one di rect from the fountain head. He came straight from Washington, where he had seen the sugar trust and George Vest laboring with “tariff reform” on the floor of the senate, and he brought with him doubtless, though not for display, Grover Cleveland's denuncia tion of the “tariff reform" of himself and his colleagues, branded as “party perfidy and dishonor.” All over the sixth district Mr. DeArmond talked “tariff reform,” and when the polls closed on the night of the election his majority of thousands had dwindled uown to less tnan a hundred, and it s ancient history that, had Bob Lewis tried, he could have been the member from the sixth Missouri at the next session of congress. The reason for all this was that the peculiar brand of “tariff reform” advocated by Mr. De Armond had been working in the sixth district and the people were ex periencing some of its peculiarities. Up in Shawnee township, Charlie Powers was buying mule colts for $15 a head. The stock feeders were sell ing their fat cattle in the Kansas City markets for about what the hide and horns were worth under a protective tariff. Calves were worth about the price of jack rabbits, and horses sold on tho streets of Clinton for $5 a head. The banks were as good as closed, and gilt-edged paper could not get a hundred dollars for thirty days. Bank presidents spent their time whispering to each other, while the cashiers whittled boxes on street cor ners. The mills shut down and there was no market for their products; the coal mines followed suit because coal was not needed at the mills. People had plenty and to spare, but no per son wanted the surplus. Long trains loaded with Mexican cattle were run ning through the country and the fat steers of Henry county were not worth shipping. Since that time our con gressman has let tariff reform severe ly alone as a political issue when speaking his little piece to the people in this neck of the woods, and has had free silver, anti-imperialism, anti Americanism, down with Republican rural mail carriers and down with the trusts as his plea, but the "hants” have ceased to frighten the mossbacks and doubtless Mr. DeArmond has con cluded that his ancient argument and its dire result has been forgotten, and when he comes home again he will spring it as something fresh upon the voters. ‘‘Tariff reform!” The dog blamed thing almost knocked this county silly the only time it was ever tried, and they say that even the mules in Osage township “skeer” at it worse than at a locomotive whistle.— Henry County (Mo.) “Republican.” The Republican members of con gress who have taken a firm stand against any concession to Cuba in volving an exception to protective principles are thoroughly consistent and on solid ground. If the tariff on sugar is to be reduced especially to oblige Cuban planters and middle men the protective tariff system will be assailed at other points to assist foreign interests at the expense of our own. The Republican national platform goes no further with reci procity than to approve of it in deal ing with articles that we do not pro duce ourselves. That is the true basis of action for Republicans. If they in troduce an exception they open the door to other exceptions and to tariff tinkering, the end of which no one can foresee. The Impartial protection of American industries is ac knowledged unquestioned Republican doctrine. Special tariff concessions to a foreign country are not Republican doctrine and never can be until the party abandons one of its principle and cardinal articles of faith.—SL Louis Globe-Democrat. The Future of Sugar. It may be that the American Sugar Refining company, otherwise known as the sugar trust, has become a buga boo with which to frighten us honest, hard-working tillers of the soil, and it certainly appears in multifarious shapes, now as a Cuban sympathizer in Washington, deploring the recalci trancy of congress in admitting brown sugars at a fraction of the present du ties and at the same time religiously prohibiting the importation of Cuban white sugars; appearing again as a great plantation owner in Cuba and then again in Porto Rico. We learn that the trust Is a partner of Claus Spreckels in California, including his Immense new beet sugar factory at Salinas, the largest in the world, and now from Denver comes the news that the American Sugar Refining com pany has made the first move to take up the beet sugar industry in Colorado. Henry L. Nies of New York, superin tendent of construction and refiners of the American Sugar company, after two weeks spent in an investigation of the Mutation In Colorado, has returned to New York. Two companies, to operate in Boulder, Weld, Larimer, Arapahoe, Jefferson, Morgan, Wash ington and Logan counties, have been incorporated with a combined capital of $1,000,000, and Mr. Nies has secured options on lands suitable for beet cul ture and for the erection of sugar re fineries. These lands are those which independent beet sugar companies were examining with a view to pur chase. i Evidently the sugar trust must be casting anchors to the windward, and when sugar refining becomes a lost art, as Is certain as soon as the plantations make white sugars, which they can easily do, the magnates of the sugar trust will come to the cane and beet fields and earn their living by the sweat of their brows, like the rest ot us.—The Louisiana Planter and Sugar Manufacturer. INVITING RETRIBUTION. Southern Democrats Cannot Afford to Voto with the Tariff Robbers. The sugar interest could defeat the Cuban concession if the Democrats of the house were to stand by the insur gent Republicans and refuse to make any change in the tariff. It looks, how ever. ns if they are willing to open the bill for amendments only that they may attack the tariff at various points. This is a dangerous policy, especially for the members from the South. If the representatives of the cotton states insist upon attacKing tno taritr at va rious points, how can they expect to defend the iron and steel schedule by which Alabama, Tennessee and Geor gia are so largely defended? How can they refuse to reduce or entirely re move the tariff on cotton goods as be ing an unnecessary protection for a country where the raw material is grown and where we are experts in machinery? To glance for a moment at our great and growing cotton In dustry must convince every Southern congressman that he is Inviting peril ous retribution when he attacks sched ules In which this section is either not concerned or is greatly interested. In the cotton Industry the number of workers employed has increased 38.4 per cent while wages have Increased 31.3 per cent. This is explained by the expansion of the Industry in the South and the comparatively low rates of wages prevailing here. Details are as follows: COTTON GOODS. INCLUDING COTTON SMALL-WARES. 1900. 1890. Inc. Number of es tablishments .. 1.C31 905 16.1 Capital .$467,240,157 $354,020,843 32.0 Wage earners, av. number_ 302,361 218,876 38.4 Total wages.$ 80,689,752 $ 00,024,538 31.3 Miscellaneous expenses . 22,112.078 16,716,524 82.3 Cost of mate rial used . 170,551,527 154,912,979 14.0 Value of prod ucts . 339,19S,G19 267,981,724 26.0 If the census had been taken this year instead of in 1900, the returns would undoubtedly have been still bet ter, as trade conditions have improved materially during the past fifteen months. Now, If Southern Democrats attack certain schedules, in which they are not specially interested, they need not bo surprised to find the Republicans retaliating In kind. The mills of the North, which turn out a finer grade of goods, can stand a large cut In the cotton goods schedule, while It would be simply ruinous to the South. To reduce the cotton schedule Is to dis place from the home market, in favor of British and German mills, much of the products of our Southern mills. It is therefore good policy for the South ern Democrats to stand by the Louisi ana sugar growers and by the cotton factories that are now springing up in every direction. If an alliance is formed between the Democrats and the “insurgents" let it be an honest alliance!—New Orleans “Item." Twin Nuisances. u.s. treasury Will the Farmer* Stand It? Before making the cut in the sugar tariff the dominant party in Washing ton should study the statistics of the last election. Where did the big ma jorities come from, majorities which elected Republican congressmen and gave the presidential ticket an un precedented vote? The answer will be, From the farmers of the Middle West and Western states. The cities had overcome their alarm at the white metal menace, but the farmers, many of them carried away by the silver craze of ’96, lined up for the Republi can party as they never did before. And now the first change proposed in the tariff is one that will lower the protection on a product of the farm. Is this fair treatment of the farmers? Will the farmers stand it to see their prosperity threatened while other in dustries are left undisturbed? Unless all the signs fail the tariff will be a leading issue in the next campaign, and where will the Republican party be with the farmers alienated?—Grand Rapids (Mich.) “Herald.” Maintenance Ration for Horace. At the University of Wyoming ex periments were made to determine the amount of alfalfa hay and straw re quired to feed farm horses while at rest. Two horses were kept in the barn and fed dally all the hay and straw they would take. One horse, named Ben, ate 14.92 pounds of hay per 1,000 pounds of live weight. The other horse, Doc, ate 13.68 pounds of hay per 1,000 pounds of live weight. The average for both horses was 14.3 pounds of alfalfa hay per day per 1,000 pounds of live weight. Another test was made. The horses ate straw very regular ly during the feeding trials and it seems that they needed more carbo hydrates than alfalfa hay furnishes for a maintenance diet where the ra tio of carbohydrates should be not far from 7 to 8 to 1 of protein, while the ratio in alfalfa hay is little more than 3 to 1. Ben and Doc were ac- , cordlngly put in the stable and fed alfalfa hay morning and evening and were given an ad llblaim feed of straw during the day. We take twelve days of this feed ing with alfalfa hay and oat straw, since from the effect of the season the grain did not fill well, hence, doubtless, more of the material gath ered to fill the kernel must have been left in the straw. Ben ate 14.68 pounds of hay and 2.23 pounds of straw per 1,000 pounds of live weight and gained 44 pounds in weight during the twelve days. During this period, Doc ate 12.86 pounds of alfalfa hay and 2.28 pounds of oat straw per 1,000 pounds of live weight The average for the two was 13.76 pounds of hay and 2.26 pounds of straw per 1,000 pounds of live weight, or, we may put it, 13% pounds hay and 2% pounds of straw. Oar Exports of Horses* A publication of the Department of Agriculture Bays: A comprehensive Idea of the recent development of the United States export trade la horses may probably be obtained from the following statement which gives sep arately the exports to Europe, to North American countries and out lying Islands, to South Africa, and to all other countries combined from 1£94 to 1901: EXPORTS OP HORSES FROM THE . UNITED STATES. To To all •tear To North To other ending Eu- Amer- South coun June 30. rope. lea. Africa, trie*. 1894 .1,452 8.663 0 141 !896 . 7,972 6,860 1 161 189« .17,243 7,690 1 192 1897 . 28,488 10,608 1 636 1898 .87,673 12,989 117 371 1899 .81,949 12,890 127 812 1»00 . 37,377 14,045 10,220 8,080 1K»1 .24.488 14.842 87,465 6,455 It Is thus seen that the extraordi narily heavy exports of horses from the United States In 1901, amounting as they did to 82,250 head, were due primarily to shipments of 37,465 head to South Africa—a larger number of horses, with one exception, than had ever been consigned up to that time to any cingle destination in the his tory of our country. If this factor, however, be entirely eliminated from the trade there is still apparent a re markable and almost steadily Increas ing demand in both North American and European countries for horses bred and reared in the United States. Tbe Parsnip as Stock Feed In feeding cattle, the parsnip Is found to be equal, if not superior, to the carrot, performing the business with as much expedition, and afford ing meat of exquisite flavor and a highly juicy quality. The animals eat it with much greediness. It is reck oned that 30 perches where the crop is good, will be sufficient to fatten an ox three or four years old, when per fectly lean, In the course of three months. They are given In the pro portion of about 30-lb weight morn ing, noon and night, the large ones being split in three or four pieces, and a little hay supplied in the Intervals of those periods. And when given to milk cows with a little grass hay, in the winter season, the butter is found to be of as fine a color and excellent a flavor as when feeding in the best pastures. Indeed, the result of ex periment has shown that not only in meat cattle, but in the fattening of pigs and poultry, the animals become fat much sooner, and are more healthy than when fed with any other root or vegetable; and that, besides, the meat is more sweet and delicious. The parsnip leaves, being more bulky than those of carrots, may be mown off before taking up the roots, and given to cows, oxen, or horses by whom they will be greedily eaten.—Stephens’ “Book of the Farm." lladly'Tied Wool. L. M. Hartley, an Iowa correspond ent of the Farmers’ Review, writes: “To get wool to market in the best of condition, the most essential points are to have it tied up correctly by an expert. There should be no foreign substances left in the wool, but it should be strictly clean. As to mar kets, my experience is that St. Louis is a great deal better market than Chi cago, and Boston a little better than sither.” It is certainly true that the woolgrowerthat does not make a study pf the methods of marketing his prod uct loses money on account of the wool -eaching the market in a shape in vhich the buyer can find an excuse for paying less than the prevailing price. Symmetry can be increased by stun ner pruning or pincaing.