\*;as\vR c\*1 w* :■>- •.€&»** «*?•-* u.\* Ufa' -,|S ^ » «■■.—. , . ««I 'uifmHwivn M Ilf* v- v ■* * * PUBLISHED BY THE FRONTIER PRINTING OO. ' >' **' ' »"J BUMOR1PTION, BI.BO PER ANNUM VOLUME XVII. O’NEILL, HOLT COUNTY, NEBRASKA, OCTOBER I, 1896. .NUMBER 13. Items of Interest Told They Art ; / Told.to XT«.‘ ( ‘ _■■ • ' -<"•-■ , WTfcENAND HOW IT HAPPENED *n.-. Loool Kapyealnfs. Portrayed Tor Btmtnl r. Edification and AmoMasnt. Prwh oysters this week it Ifrs. Cress’ restaurant. . ‘ tf J5. Li Coburn, of Phoenix, was in the city Monday. JUHir at Innait next Saturday even ing, Ootobor 3. JohaFlannigan was down from Stuart oxer Sunday., William Kroner, of Stuart, wai in the city last Monday. John licHugh made a business' trip to . Fremont last week. Frank Emmerson was ■ transacting business in O'Neill Saturday. R.-R. -Dickson transacted business in Odrahh the first of the week. Ed Wei ton left Tuesday evening for hlshomein Dawescounty. The music box and watch at BehtlCy’s will.l|e given awav Oct. 8, 1896. 8. J. Weekes and John Skirving re turned'from a business trip to' Lincoln Sunday evening. Joe Richardson, of Chambers, and Jack Sageser, of Elgin, were callers at this office Tuesday. l John Halloran and A. J. Clark . were up from Inman Wednesday attending theTunerslof Dr. Morris. < John R. Hayes, of Norfolk, came up Tuesday evening to attend the funeral of Dr.' .Morris yesterday. Dr. Plummer, dentist, of Norfolk, will remain with us a few days after the close of the Presbytery. Mrs. Thomas Waldron left this morn ing for Scranton, Penn., where she will ^spetad a few weeks visiting relatives. V Dr. Oilligan, Andy Gallagher, J. H. y Weiton, Ed. Welton and Ham Eantz 'man visited Sioux City last Saturday John, Schneider and Emma Eurlz re ceived permit to wed from Judge Mc Butcban yesterday. They are both resi dents of Stuart. Corbett's photo studio .and dental parlors will be open from September 25 to Ootober 8, 1886, inclusive. A. H. Corbett. Harry Huddleson went down to Sioux 1 City last Saturday to hear his old school mate,. Congressman Cousins, expound 1 republican doctrine. ifou are going fishing? Well, before J you start get your fishing tackle of Neil Brennan, who keeps everything In the spurting line. 44-tf Geo. Garrison, of West Union, Custer county, came over Tuesday after his wife 1 wh. selfish devotion to their country. The attempt to mention In the Mate breath the names of those noble spirits with that of the arrant demagogue who Is now tramping the eouhtry, firing the spirits of section against section and class against class for his own personal ends, deserves the condemnation of every American citiaen who loves his country and reveres its honored dead. Those honored gentlemen, Mr. Mc Cafferty, whose names you mention, did, with Robert Morris.and some others, take the most active part in preparing and helping to pass the first coinage act, , of the present constitution. But, Mr. McOafferty, your subtle attempt to leave the inference that the principles upon which the ratio of the metals was de termined and established in the act of 1703 and those contemplated by the Bryanites is, to say the least, unbecom ng a man who makes any pretention to rairness or Justice. Anyone who has read even a small part of the debates on ihe question, or the correspondence be tween Jefferson and Hamilton and Mor- 1 ■is, knows that the central idea of the ! vbole discussion was to make the legal i ’alio correspond as .nearly as possible i vith the commercial ratio. They con- i sluded that one ounce of gold was, in i he commercial world,- equal in vaiue to 1 Ifteen ounces of silver, and fixed the i egal ratio at that rale. It was after- i vards discovered, however, that an 1 tunes ot gold, as bullion, was worth < nore than fifteen ounces of silver, its i nint value, and hitoce gold was not i »lned for circulation. Now, why was hp change made in 1884, and upon what t irinciple did the legislature again deter- .1 nine to establish it? It was made to i iorreot the error committed in 1773, via: » he miscalculation in fixing the mint to I sorrespond with the commercial ratio, I ind it was now hoped that upon the < triginal idea—that of making cominer- i dal and legal ratio equal—the concur-1 < 1 I I «nt circulation of both metala would bo ecured. But this time there wu a dia irlmlnation alightly in favor of cold, rith a aimllar reault u In the caae of hf original act, viz: that but one of the aetala circulated—thla time it waa cold, ^rom 1884, ailver being more valuable a the market than at the mint, retired rom circulation until after the "Bland lill,” which paaaed in 1878. I apologize to you, Mr. Editor, and to patient public, for going over thla undred-timea told tale. The only ex* use I have to offer for taking np your >ace and time ia my deaire to ahow the laential and the aole principle upon hich it ia poaaible to have blmetalliam, tat i8 concurrent circulation of both etala, under unlimited coinage of both, do thla by allowing that the principle f which the congreaa of 1788 waa gov ned in framing the coinage act waa lat the legal and the commercial ratio lould be equal; that by reaaon of a mia* ilculation in determining thia equality, e metal, ailver, favored at the mint, ent to the mint, and the other metal, ild, being more valuable aa bullion, ent to the market The amendment 1834 waa baaed upon the aame prin* pie—that of commercial yalue—but the tioe were again made unequal, and win only the metal favored at the int went into circulation. What are called free ailveritea to-day ;her do not underatand the above inqiple or, through their perveraity, \ « < i i I t t t ii a a I tl c n II w at V ol it Pi a< at at di rc h< ei nfUM to recogbiae It. Hr. McCaffertj Mya that if Hr. Bryan and hla aupport era are anarchlau, Waahlngton, Jailer aon, et. al. rauat have been anarohlati too. i Thia ia a repetition of aome ol Bryaa’a deceitful prattle by which It li (ought to leave the impreaaion that thi prinaiplae Involved in both raiaa Hill of the original act and the Bryan moa atroalty—are alike, ia which caae tha ooacluiion—that Waahlngton et. el. wake an arch late—would be iadlaputable. But the prfnclplee involved are aa far apart aa the polea. If Jefferaon and Hamilton, or the otbera, ahould advocate trm coinage of allver at double, or al any; other than ita commercial value wj|h gold, I don't think they would be ■mwviiww ivr w« n—oo uiti tbiMfMMMmbontlTc evidence (o ccpvitt than, white hi Bryan’s case It nn be furnished in abundance. A cbaigu of insanity, however, might lie. Tb«lr reputation, unlike that of Bryan, .would afford po other explanation. If the commercial ratio* of the two metals should always remain the same, no matter whether at 1 to 1 or 100 to 1, then, with unlimited coinage, concurs rent circulation of both might be secured And it would be immaterial which waa called the "unit of value.” But with a fluctuating market rains of both metals concurrent circulation with unlimited coinage is impossible. This ie the ex* parlance of every cirilixed nation upon the globe. Mr. McCafferty does not seem to be able .to grasp the principle upon which the government is able to keep so much silrer in use at present and why the coinage of silrer Is limited. Your inter ogatorles, Mr. Me, inrolre the whole “silverquestion." The government is. enabled to keep a large quantity of su rer in use because it is pledged to main tain its parity with gold; and It can maintain such parity only by being allowed to control the coinage of the cheaper metal, silrer. Deprive the gov ernment of the power to control the •liver coinage and you remove the con dition which makes It possible to main lain the parity and at the same time step down to a silver standard and leave no Further excuse for a “silver question." It may be Added that our bimetallism then, Instead of being the practical, true bi metallism which we now enjoy, and which the republican party is pledged to maintain, will be the bimetallism of ivery silver standard nation in the world to-day, via: silver monometallism. Bi metallism does not exist to-day outside >f gold-standard nations. Mr. Mo’s question as to whether the [►rice of silver has fallen hardly deserves lotlce, and is characteristic of the trick ily and subterfuge continually practiced >y his leader.' All commercial values, it s hardly necessary to say, are deter mined and expressed with reference to tome fixed standard. The standard of iomparison In this country is the gold lollar. The only question to be deter mined, then, is: Is the relation between illver and gold, in a commercial sense, ess than it waa when the standard was stablishedF and It la not necessary to isk the opinion of Sootbur or any one ilse to make up an answer. The Soetbur tables were constructed 0 show the average prices of oommodi Is* from 1861 to 1888, the prices of 100 irticles having been taken from the iffleial testa at Hamburg, and that of ourteen articles of British manufacture rom London. As Congressman Mo ’leery has shown, in his answer to Con gressman Towns, (both Minnesotlans) he prices after 1878 never reached as dv u those between 1847 and 1850, the ▼erege o( which wu taken aa a stand rd. The prices of some articles, after re. declined, but the prices of many rare well sustained, while that of many there showed an advance. The great st decline was in minerals and metals nd the fourteen British manufactured rtlcles. The speeches of thoye two entlemen can easily be obtained as | oth were printed in pamphlet form. The attempt on Mr. McCafferty’s part > leave the inference that the Soetbur 1 tblee were published simply to show an j itlmate relation between the prices of ' iricultural products and silver is as I upid as it is dishonest. He can find in r. Sauerbeck's "Course of Prices" that 1 te greatest fluctuation in prices oc- 1 irred in what he (Me) would call *‘bi- | etallic times," notably from 1789 to \ 114, and again in the early "flfties.” 1 hen prices were unusually high, and 1 other periods between times when j ■ices were very low. This Is but one ■ 1 many refutations of the gross absurd f that "the prices of agricultural * oducti and the price of silver fluctu- jj e together. c I now come to the moet interesting * itement Mr. McCafferty has made J ice the commencement of tbe present £ icussion. I have laid him down, o lied him oyer, stood him upon his u ad and back again on his feet, in my deavor to force him to commit him f on some point that had direct bear b ing upon Ui theory o( coinage, bui withont even until the preecnt. Ur. McGafferty eaeerte that the amounl of bullion in the dollar haa nothing tc do with fixing ita value; declare* in fact that aueh an idea i* the "veriest non aanae," and In proof ot hi* itaUmeal cite* the faot that the trade dtdlari al though containing eight grain* more, exchanged for twenty oent* lew than the atandard dollar, and that the latter will now purchase ae much pfpducuand labor a* the gold .dollar, although it* hullion value i* fortr*aaven cent* lew. Juatao, John, Ton have given ue a fair and exact etatement for once, and one which completely proven my poeit* Ion, a* previoualr Mated. Thank you, •loan, very moon. I have already wplBlBBd tiryou why Uit itudud silver dollar ha* an equal purchasing and debt-paying power with the gold dollar, although Ita bullloi value la only about oaa-half that of the latter—that the government la pledged to keep both at a parity on oouditlou that it be allowed to limit tbe ooluage of allver, and to remove the eonditlon la to throw ua on a allver baala. The cue of the trade dollar provu thia exactly. By Motion Si of the act of 1878, the ownera of allver bullion were allowed to have It coined on their own account without limit. But, on that very account—the privilege of unlimited coinage—the government never undertook to keep it (the trade dollar) at a parity with gold, and hence ita value wu, u muat ever be the caee under unlimited coinage, only about that of the bullion it contained. The can of your purohulng the Mex ican dollar, which you try to evade, ie a further llluatration of the truth of my poeition. You aay the Mexican dollar reduced itself to bullion by coming on thia aide of the line. Mr. McCafferty, your Inclination to practice eubtle trick ery ia acarcely lua than that of Mr. Bryan, but you lack hia ability In that line. The Mexican dollar, John,. ia worth but ita bullion value no matter where It happena to be—whether In Mexico or out of it. But how about your American dollar? Would It be re duced to ita bullion ualue by expatria ting ltaelf to Mexico? By lateet accounta it wee worth 11.90 of Mexican money in the City of Mexico. John, you are either knaviab or idiotic. Mow, I have taken a good deal of paina, even at the expenae of being proay, in handling thia, the only direct poaition which you have u yet ■—wivd, on the queatlon you pretended to, but did not, discuaa. But I hope m/ labor will not prove fruitleu; that you will atudy the priaciplu laid down and act upon them with candor. And now, that I may mot diatract your attention from thia important leaaon, I will allow other mattere to paaa and cioee by asking you to kindly anawer the following quea lon: If, under unlimited coinage of gold and allver, the bullion valuee need not be taken into account, (aa they have “nothing to do with fixing the value of the coin*") why may not the ratio be flxed.even up—an ounce of ellver to an ounce of gold? I have a few more per tinent queatlon* to which I would like very much to have an anawer, but ahall reserve them until I hear from you upon the foregoing. BtuDmht. P. 8.—Pleaae give ua a reaaon or two why you think allver should be ooiued without limit at the ratio of “16 to 1.” The Latest. Oar mw fall itock Is bow nearly si] |n and we have never been in ns good shape to serve the people of Holt county as we are this fall. Our stock of dress goods never was more complete. It contains everything from a double, width cotton worsted at 15c to the latest novelties in illks and worsteds. We call your es pecial attention to our line of Bradhead worsteds, the most popular, most styl ish end best wearing goods ever sold at SO cents per yard, and they coet the tame In O’Neill as in New York. Our line of cloaks will surprise you when you hear the pricee commencing it 18.70 for a stylish light colored Jacket ind running up to 815. For 85, 80.50, 17.50, 89.00 and 810 we can give you ralues that cannot be equaled anywhere his side of Omaha. On shoes we can do you more good han anybody, as we have the largest lock within a hundred miles of O’Neill nd make a specialty of carrying the * lest goods obtainable. We have the t rell-known £. P. Bead ft Co. fine shoe r or ladies, Miller’s celebrated Racine f hoes for every day, the Little Giant v hlldren’s and Misses' shoes and Huls- T amp Bro’s. celebrated shoes for men n nd boys. f, We bays a tremedous large line of nderweai and some startling bargains. * 'hlnk of a good heavy jersey-ribbed, ® eece-lined ladies’ vest or drawers at 88 sots each or 75 cents per suit, and an ti stra heavy one for 50 cents each. 880 b liu of men’s wool mixed shirts and H rawers at 50 cents per garment, and the eavleet one you ever saw for 81. Every se of these are a leader and hard to latch anywhere. Give us a cbancs to sell you your fall 111 and we will save you some money, tl Yours truly, Si 18-8 - J. P. MANN. :>4#' ss&ts or os. mows. hi* reridence in thiacitv, ?“ MoPd»T evening. September Sffl., Dr- Alexander Up. .*5rJ? *"*. *** year* later tbe family moved to.Phlla*. delpbia, where he received hie education, excepting one year in wbleb be took * eouree in college at Salem, Ohio. At ' the age of 18 be entered a drug itore a*',,; °lerk, that being, hie choice of pro* feulon, where, he remained two year*, He then went to Louiaville, Kentucky, remaining there two year*, and then to • Bvanaville, Indiana, where he aeoepted t filflfklhlDi After holrflmr this i\abIiIah ft Tftftr 1m resigned it ud want into ’ bnaln«M on hie own aoconat nt Vineen* nea, Indiana, lq this city he was mar* ^ ried to Fannie Caddlngton on December 88, 1857. Thraa children warn boro to them, Thomaa being the only one now ' living, the othara having died Inin fancy. i Early in 1880 he moved to Cincinnati ' where he again entered the drug busi* naaa, remaining there but a year, when he removed to Clinton, Illinois, where [he remained in bnaineee about eight years, in 1888 he went to Chicago, re* u malning there until 1881, when hern* moved to LaPorte, Indiana. Be resided V 4n LsPorte until the apring 1885, when','., he cAnc to Kali county and went into > the buelnaae which he waa running at •*'< the time of hie death. He had enjoyed ‘ perfect health since coming to O’Neill up to within a few days before he wee ’ oalled from further earthly duties. Deceased leaves a feeble mother, who is nearly 90 years of age, and a loving wife and , son to mourn hie demise, ’ and they have with them the deepest ^ sympathy of the community. «•-».>■ He became a member of the Masonic lodge in 1850 at Vincennes, Indiana. , In 1808 he was one of the officers of the ' grand chapter in lljnois, since which time he hu held a. number of Maaonio. offices. He had held the position of high priest in Illinois, LaPorte and in ‘ O’Neill and was also Eminent com* " mender of tb* 'Knights Templar at LaPorte. In the death of Dr. Morris O’Neill loaee one of Its boat and most enter* ' prising dtlsens and he will be greatly missed. He had unbounded faith in > Holt county, and any enterprise inaug* * urated for the benefit of this city found ’ him a foremoat worker to carry it to 7 ■ucccas. It is saddening to .sec a young > * ■apllng ascending the pathway of life " full of bright promise of usefulness cut iown before it reaohes maturity; but more deeply do we regret to see the , ■turdy oak that baa breasted the alormq, , t and troubles of a half century without a blemish to mar its beauty cut down by < the Grim Destroyer. But such Is life, f In the midst of it we are in death. Hie memory will over live fresh in the hearts [, Bf hie legion of friends and be cherished .f In the dally walks of life by all who knew him. The funeral was held at 11 o’clock under the direction of the Maaonio lodge >f this elty. The remains were interred ' In the Protestant cemetery, and were - Followed to their lest resting place by a large ooncoursa of dtiiens. A WOES Of ADVICE. v T® those in posaacston of the present surreney which is supposed on one side to be 100 cents, on the other only 08 sente:. At the day of reckoning sops >ne will get left, so my adviee would be to purchase some good merchandise, that represents full value for 100 cents. ' rhe place to find such goods is at P. J. ' dcManus* as I have opened for sale the argest stock of general merchandise vest of Sioux City. Ladies’, misses’and i thildrens jackets a specialty. Ladies’ Ine ehoes the beat the market can afford n style and quality; also mens’ shoes of he latest model the market has designed. ; )ress goods of. up-to-date effects with 11 the latest trimmings. So do not hold * ’our 08 cent dollar, but purchase the eat values that have ever been shown he trade in Holt county. 18-8 Respectfully yours, P. J. McManus, i- iV-' MOTION. The republican elector* of the city of 1'Neill and Grattan townahip are . > meet in delegate convention in the ; ■publican elnb rooms in the city of •’Neill on Saturday, October 10, at 9 , . m., for the purpose of placing in omination a candidate for supervisor >r the Third district, and for the trans ition of such other business as may > >me before the convention, * The township and wards will be en-1 tied to representation ae follows, being wed upon the vote cast for Judge orvall in 1805: GrattanS. O’Neill, First Ward 4. , * , ’’ Second Ward 4. i * “ Third Ward 5. '" c It is recommended that primaries -for e selection of delegates be held on iturday, October 8, at 8 o’clock F. u. C&yon Kina, Secretary. «