ssp %
SIhe ^farm.
itt j y:..' .
Immense Lou of Bottor.
An lofft bulletin says: In studying
■v the question of how to mslce the dairy
most profitable, two problems are pre
sented for solution. The first of these
problems is, how to produce the great
; , est amount of butter fat at the least
cost; the second, how to save all the
fat produced and market it in the
form of high-priced product Both of
these problems are being studied, not
only on thousands of dairy farms, but
at many experiment stations.
During the past nine months
we hare been devoting especial
attention to a study of the low of fat in
the buttermilk in chnrning, with the
hope of ascertaining the causes of the
loss, whether it can be avoided, and if
so the conditions necessary to secure
the best results. This report gives the
results of the work we have done so
far in this line. If the value of the
butter fat annually lost in the butter
milk in the creameries and dairies of
the state of % Iowa alone could be ac
curately ascertained the figures would
reach such astounding proportions as
to be almost incredible to those who
have not investigated the matter. Dur
5 ing the past summer we have tested a
great many samples of buttermilk
from creameries and private dairiea
In only one sample did we find the
x amount of fat as low as two-tenths of
1 per cent, while in a number of cases
we found the fat in the butter
milk to be above 4 per cent, and one
:; sample tested as high as 7 3-10 per
cent The loss on the farm and in
, private dairies is much higher than, in
the creameries, but we have found as
4^ high as 214 per cent of fat in butter
milk from creameries; but this we be
; lieve to be exceptional. It is quite
common, however, to find as muoh as
one-half of 1 per cent of fat in the
buttermilk from creameries; and if
the amount of fat lost was carefully
determined by daily tests it would be
Is Yellow Jasmin# Bossy Poisonous?
Mr*. C. L. Rio* of Ramsey, La.,
writes to American Be* Journal aa
follows: I have seen the several arti
cles in the Bee Journal and Gleanings,
about the poisonous yellow Jasmine
honey of the south, and thought 1
would give our experience with It In
1883 we cut out comb from our hives,
which was filled with pollen (or bee
bread), with a few cells of honey in
terspersed. Five of our ehildren ate
freely of this “bee-bread,” as it is
called by old bee-keepers. In a short
while they became so weak that they
could not stand, and complained of
blindnesa In alarm we sent for a
physician, who pronounced it an over
dose of yellow jasmine We were be
ginners in those days, and had only
one atory to our hives, and squeezed
the honey. Mow we use twoand three
stories, and extract, and so' we never
get the pollen and honey mixed. At
the time onr children were poisoned,
other members of the family ate of
the honey alone, and were not in the
least affected. We now use extracted
honey without fear of the result.
Is it not possible that all cases of
honey-poisoning could be traced to the
pollen? I know many old bee-keepera
advise eating the “bee-bread” with the
■bee-honey,” conaequently some are
made sick, especially by honey taken
from tho tree at the famous bee-tree
cutting picnics. The yellow jasmine
grows plentifully around us, yet we
never have had any sickness, as the
result of eating extracted honey. The
flowers open in the very early spring,
before the orange, and I should think
the honey would be used in rearing
brood. Dr. Brown says, in Gleanings,
that it kills the bees; but why does it
not kill all? I rather think the disease
mentioned in Gleanings, is bee-paral
ysis, for it is not the whole apiary that
becomes affected—only a few colonies,
wherein will be found a quantity of
sealed honey from last year's harvest.
With due respect to the experience of
others. I submit the foregoing, hoping
to see the subjeot sifted to the utmost
limit.
Dairy WMm.
National Stockman says:
It won’t pay to lot the cowa fall off
In their yield for want of grain feed;
the corn meal and cottonaeed meal
may be reduced somewhat, but bran,
middlings and linseed meal must be
fed as usual.
Cows going to pasture in good eon*
dition are all ready to increase their
milk, but if they are in poor order
they must use a lot of apnng pasture
to make flesh.
The rule should be never allow the
cows to go hungry.
t The full fed cow is the paying one.
It pays to seed a field especially for
pasture if it can be .spared from the
rotation; a mixture of grasses is better
than the old stand-bys, timothy and
red clover.
In seeding for pasture don’t sow
grain with the grass to “protect it;’’
you might as well put a lot of big
piga with the little ones to protect
them.
There is nothing equal to atop dress
ing of fine manure to give grass seed
a start, and the more manure the
sooner the grass will be ready for
grazing and the better the feed.
Give the young grass rleh soil and
it Won’t need protection from the sun.
Sometimes a loss is made by turning
out the cows too soon; the way to tell
is not to judge altogether by the size
of the field, but by the forwardness of
the grass and the kind of weather we
are having.
If a pound of butter sells for only
26 cents wholesale, and a bushel of
wheat only sells for 68 cents, which
pays the better to produce?
A good cow will make enough
pounds of butter to count up against
many acres of wheat; and the butter
crop is the surer of the two.
The butter does not take any of the
farm’s fertility when it is sold, but the
wheat doea
We have to feed the wheat as well
as the cows, but the latter convert a
good per cent of their feed into wheat
feed.
Ia it not a fact that on some farms
THE ILLUSTRATION IS OF A FLORIDA PINE-APPLE FIELD.—FROM FARMERS’ REVIEW.
&5' round that the creamery that
U not suffering a loss of sev
eral dollars a day from this cause
alone is the exception, while in
some creameries, where large quan
tities of cream are handled, the value
of the fat lost in the buttermilk would
pay for several extra men and then
f le»ve a very comfortable profit. We
have before us the report of one day’s
w work in a creamery in this state. The
*■’ amount of milk received was 10,403
pounds. In running this milk through
If1 the separator a total of 4.3 pounds of
fat were lost in the skim milk, but in
churning the cream the next day
twenty-nine pounds of fat were lost in
the buttermilk. Considering this fat
worth 30 cents per pound, which
' was about its value at that time, the
loss in the buttermilk for one day
would-be $5.80. Some creameries re
ceive many times the amount of mm*
or cream mentioned above, and in
them the lose, at the same rate, would
. reach figures that would render the
owners most decidedly uncomfortable.
From the investigations we have made
we venture the assertion that some of
the larger creameries lose from $15 to
$30 daily during the season of greatest
milk flow, from suffering fat to pasa
off in the skim milk and buttermilk.
* We know that theee figures are atart
ling, but we believe thatcareful invee
p tigation would show them to be close
to the truth. The important question
" is, can this loss be avoided? From our
etudy of the question during the pest
nine months we are inclined to believe
that if it can not be avoided it can be
greatly reduced. During January
and February, 1803, Mr. F. A. Leigh
ton made study of the conditions neoes
nary to the most thorough churning.
Be found that the temperature of the
cream at the time of churning, the
amount of cream in the churn and the
condition of the cream as regards ripe
ness, seemed to be the controlling fac
tors in thorough churning, and on sev
eral different occasions he succeeded in
churning with practically no loss of
i. fat in the, buttermilk. .The main diffi
culty seemed to be in securing the
;; same conditions each day. It was, of
h-' oonitre, an easy matter to secure the
same temperature each day, and to
place the same amount of cream in the
churn; but the difficulty lay in deter
§,> mining when the cream v ms in
proper condition as regards ripe less—
Farmers Review.
Kplsootle Abortion In Cows
From thp evidence which hu re
cently been brought to the no
tice of the society, it is con
sidered desirable to recommend to
the special attention of stock owners,
in whose herds abortion has appeared,
the system of preventive treatment,
which is described in the following
quotation from the article on abortion
in the Society’s Journal. The plan
which Prof. Nocard recommends to be
used in cow sheds and premises in
which epizootic abortion occurs year
by year is the following;
1. Every week the places in which
cows are kept must be well cleansed,
and especially the part behind the
cows, and then disinfected by a strong
solution of sulphate of copper (blue
vitriol), or a solution of carbolic acid,
one to fifty of water.
8. The under part of the tail, the
anus, vulva, and parts below of all
the cows must be sponged daily with
the following lotion, which is a strong
poison:
Rain water or distilled water. .8 gallons
Corrosive sublimate.^ drachms
Hydrochloric sold.^ ounces
During the first season of this treat
ment only a moderate amount of im
provement is to be expected, but after
the next season abortion will cease en
tirely. It would very much assist the
Society in their Inquiry if members of
the Society whose herds have been
affected by abortion would inform the
secretary at once if they propose to
adopt this system of treatment in their
herds; and, afterwards, if they would
send him particulars of the results of
the treatment When the owner de
sires it arrangements will be made
fora veterinary surgeon to visit the
farm at the coat of the society, and to
advise as to the preparation and ap
plication of the solution. It appears
that in some districts no precautions
are taken to destroy the foetus after
abortion. This should be done with
out delay in every case by burning or
burial hi quicklime. The latter should
be freely scattered over the ground
contaminated with the discharge.
I would say to all: Use tout gentlest
voice at home. Watch it day by day as a
pearl of great price, for it will be worth
more to you in days to oome than the beet
pearl bid in tbe sea. A kind voice is Joy,
like a lars's song, to a hearth at home It is
a light that sings at well as shines.—Elihu
BurritL
the dairy pay* for growing the wheat,
but the owner of the farm believes that
the wheat is the better money crop?
The butter comes in in small sums, but
the wheat money in a lump; the lump
makes the' man feel big, but the small
sums keep him out of debt.
'Wheat is a good crop to grow on a
dairy farm; it is a good crop to seed
to grass with, it supplies bedding to
the cows, and if the price of wheat is
low the cows will eat it and turn it
into butter, which will make the wheat
net a good price.
Wheat in the cow is all right, but a
cow in the wheat is all wrong; this is
the time of the year to put the fenoes
in good order.
Liability of Cbeamert Stockhold
ers.—A case of some general interest
has recently been before two courts in
Indiana, and the circumstances are
that when a local creamery was built
quite a number of business men in
Huntington subscribed money to the
enterprise, as they alleged, only for the
purpose of helping the matter along,
■ each one giving *50 or *100. After the
creamery association failed an effort
was made to make them liable pro rata
to the amount each paid. The defen
dants contended that they were not
stockholders in the sense that thev
would be thus liable. The Jury on the
trial of the case in Circuit court found
against them and Julge Dailey sus
tained the verdict. They appealed,
the Appellate court reversing the
case.—Ex. _
A (Mm* far the Bu|eu.
A report from St Paul says: State
Dairy Commissioner Anderson has or
dered all the filled cheeses seised in the
commission of the city shipped back
to Chicago; and instructed the commis
sion men to produce the certificates
from the railroad companies that they
had been shipped. The commission
men are glad to do this rather than
have the cheeses destroyed, throwing
all the loss upon them These filled
cheeses have an outer crust of the real
article ana the interior is filled with
lard and cottonseed oil. It looks well
for a short time, but in a couple of
weeks it turns green and is filled with
bacteria.—Farmer’s Beview.
Thbrr are lots of people who mix their
religion with business, but forget to stir it
up welL As a result the business Invaria
bly rises to the top.
REPUBLICAN DOCTRINE.
AD VALOREM DUTIES.
fbl( Substitution for Specific Duties, ■
•**P Back Into Barbarism; a Law Im
ptMtlblo to Honestly Enforoa; Aban
doned by all Other Nations of the
Earth, but Now Dressed Up by South
ern Theorists,
The most startling feature in the
Wilson bill is the change made almost
entire in the senate, from specific to ad
valorem duties. The house bill started
the change, the senate committee com
posed of three southern members have
extended it over 90 per ceut of the
whole list
uuuer me mcKiniey act every duty
was, where possible, levied on the yard,
pound or quanity. This avoids under
valuations, bears equally upon all and
is the only rational method. Mr. Wil
son claimed the committee had been
induced to take this step so as to show
exactly how much the importer was
contributing1 to the general tax. Does
It give salt less or more savor to know
that the duty of 8c per 100 pounds,
which the importer pays, equals 80 per
cent of the selling price of home pro
ducts? If the duty be found too high
on any article it may be reduced, but
the rate should be one which would be
fair to all, easily estimated and not a
weapon for fraud.
The German shoddy goods maker can
swear down bis prices so as to flood our
markets with the “cheap and nasty1'
goods as they have done elsewhere.
Adulterations are cheaper than honest
goods and will be bought in at so much
less that we will get the itch outside
and dyspepsia within from their use.
These ad valorem duties are con
demned by the almost unanimous ver
dict of those whose opinions are en
titled to respectful consideration. The
judgment of every secretary of the
treasury investigating the subject from
Hamilton to Manning is invoked, in re
futation of the democratic position. It
is unnecessary to quote from the un
varying testimony of secretary of the
treasury, from our customs inspectors,
and from our consuls abroad, who all
have close and daily experience in the
practical workings of this subject It
will be sufficient to quote from Mr.
Cleveland’s secretary of the treasury,.
Manning, under date of December 7,
1885, as follows:
“It is desirable that in revising and'
reducing rates of duty they should be
made specific instead of ad valorem, so1
far as the nature of the merchandise
will admit Theoretically considered,
ad valorem are preferable to specific
duties; but in practice, under such
rates as me have had and must, continue
to have for years to come, the former
are the too easy source of deception
and inequality at the custom house.
Congress has it in its power to change
from time to time, as may be advisable,
specific rates so as to meet any perma
nent change in valuea ”
Secretary Manning summed, up the
whole matter as follows:
“One hears it often said that if our
ad valorem rates did not exceed 25 per
cent or 30 per cent undervaluations and:
temptations to undervaluations would
disappear; but the records of the de
partment for 1817, 1840 and 1857 do not
uphold that conclusion. Whatever suc
cessful contrivances are in operation
today to evade the revenue by false in
voices, or by undervaluations, or by
any other means, under an ad valorem^
system, will not cease even if the ad
valorem rates shall have been largely
reduced. They are incontestibly; they
are even notoriously inherent, in. that
system.”
In view of this overwhelming testi
mony, it is purile to contend in favor of
the superiority of ad valorem over spe
cific rates, Against the opinions of the
mere theorists of today, I interpose the
substantial judgment of practical busi
ness men, experienced officials and the
practice of the most enlightened nations
on the globe. In all continental.na
tions except the Netherlands ad va
lorem tariffs have been substantially
discarded. France, Germany, Austria,
Hungary, Italy, Sweden and Norway,.
Russia, Switzerland, Belgium; Portu
gal and Spain, as the result of long ex
perience with both systems,, have set
tled down to the collection of tbeir cus
tom revenues almost wholly to a spe
cific basis It is more than folly, there
fore, to attempt to foist upon, this coun
try a system condemned: by- a century
of our own history and the- experience
of the leading Curopeam nations
A SCENE IN THE HOUSE GALLEBIE8.
A Democratic Speaker Threatens. to Clear
Them Out Beeaose They Know a Good
Thing When They Bear It.
Mr. Burrows, from Michigan, made
a notable tariff speech in the house on
January 9th last,. In his> closing re
marks ho quoted trom, “Bradstreet” a
statement there are, “in New England
65.200 unemployed and 154,000 depend
ent; New York and New Jersey, 223,
250 unemployed and 563,750 dependent;
Pennsylvania, 151,500 unemployed and
449.200 dependent; Central Western
states, 227,340 unemployed and 443,
310 dependent; Northwestern states,
64,900 unemployed and 4,700 depend
ent; Southern states, 43,065 unemployed
and unemployed and 122,650 depend
ent; making a frightful aggregate of
801,685 people unemployed and 1,956.
710 dependent.
Yet the half has not been told. The
record of this year’s industrial and in
dividual suffering resulting from pro
posed legislation will never be made
UP- It- exceeds the possibilities of
human calculation.
I implore you to abandon this sui
cidal policy. Have you not pursued it
far enough to become convinced of its
disastrous consequences? It is no longer
an experiment—it has become a public
crime. You have it within your power
to instantly relieve this appalling situ
ation. You have only to substitute for
the pending measure a joint resolution
declaratory of your purpose to main
tain existing laws in full force andoffect
during the continuance of this admin
istration, ,and business activity would
instantly take the place of business de
pression. It would arrest the slaugh
ter of our flocks, open our mines, relight
the fires of our furnaces, unchain the
wheels of our industries, start every
spindle and loom; while whistles and
factory bells would call the tramping
starving millions back from enforced
idleness to profitable employment and
the American republic would leap with
a bound to its accustomed place in the
van of industrial nations [Prolonged
applause on the floor and.in the galler
The Chairman—The chair begs to re
mind our visiting friends In the galler*
in that such demonstrations are not
allowable under the rule** and a repe
tition of them will warrant the chair
in having the galleries cleared. [Re
newed applause.] The serrgeeant-at*
arms will be directed to remove visitors
from the galleries unless they cease
their demonstrations.
A Member—They vote, Mr. Chair
naan. [Laughter.]
They will vote and their vote* will
be counted.
i
Work, Mot Brag.
Working1, not bragging, should bo the
business of the campaign. Instead of
assuming that the democrats are al
ready defeated, go on with the hard
work needed to beat them. Tell tho
voters wbat the democratic lead era
have done to deserve defeat, as by giv
ing the rapacious Sugar trust 950)000,1
000 of taxes. Organize in every pre
cinct, prevent ballot box stuffing and.
get out the full vote. These are the*
methods that lead to victory, not boast
ing about sweeping the state from, end
to end because rome discontentedi dem
ocrats in the Fourth judicial district,
slapped the first candidate—for a non
political office—who came along and.
relieved themselves of their wrath,
thereby on the blunders of their party
leaders in Washington.—Chicago Trib
une.
Star-Eyed Goddess Speaks.
With overwhelming changes of party*
majorities going on ail about us—in.
the face of such a popular rebuke to.
the incapacity of leaders as no politic
cians ever received before in the his
tory of the country—it is worse than,
folly, it is a crime, for Democrats who.
yet retain some self-respect and to
whom the people have been wont to*
look for unselfish counsel, to bate their
breath and hold their tongue. The
feathers of the ostrich are fair to see,.
but his methods of self-prptection are
ridiculous. They are not. to be initia
ted by democrats. The tariff bill which
is- about to pass the senate is abomin
able. Practically, it will yield the con
sumer little, if any, relief. It presents
the democratic party in the character
of both a fool, and a fraud, crippling
the cause- without a shadow of com
pensation. The administration should,
in. some way—there are many ways—
disentangle- itself. The house should
throw it out by a single vote The
committee of conference should prompt
ly report itself unable to agree. The
ways and means committee should as
promptly bring in a measure involving
revenue only—a simple tariff scale
raising 950,000,000 on fifty single items
—no- schedules- and no classifications
with their misleading subterfuges and
confusing incidents—and, if this be re
jected—as it. doubtless would be—ad
journ congress and go to the country,
placing the responsibility where it be
longs, pledging the party to stand by
its guns-and to fight its battle apon the
line of principle and honor until the
people shall decide, conclusively and
for all time,- whether we are to live un
der. a. free trade system or under a
protective-system..—Louisville Courier
Journal..
Who-Deceives-the- laboring People?
Here I place beside each other a
statement of perhaps the greatest
Democratic economist living and the
statement of Grover Cleveland, uttered
about the same- date upon the same
subject.
CLEVELAND,. HHK DEMAGOGUE.
At any rate the aonsumer has found *,
life harder since this reform (i. e., the
McKinley tariff) than before, and if
there is a workingman anywhere who
has had his-wages, increased by virtue
of its operation, he has not yet made
himself known.—Speech at Providence,
B.. L,. April 2, 1893.
ATKIX8OX,.THK.1SVE3TI0ATOB. „
There has never been a period In the!
history- of this or any other country
when, the general rate of wages was-as -
high, as it is today, nor a period when i
the workmen, in. the strict sense of the
word,, has so fully secured to his awn.
use-and enjoyment such a steadily and.
progressively increasing proportion of
a constantly inareasing product.—May.
Forum, 1892.
Added to.the fcuregoing is the further -
statement of Mr. Atkinson:
There has been during the twenty
seven years since 1965, subject to .the
temporary variations and fluctuations,
a, steady advance is the rates of wages,
a steady reduction in the cost of labor,
per* unit of production and a corre
sponding reduction in the price of goods
of almost every kind to the consumer. .
—May Forum, 1892.
The-following is an extract from,the
summary of the report of the bureau of
statistics, at labor, written and.issued
by a democrat under a democratic Uow
ernor,. August 22, 1892:
“It appears that there was a netJm
crease in wages of $6,377,925.09 in. the
year 1891, as compared with the
amount paid in 1890, and a net increase
in production of $31,315,130.68, in. the
year 1891 over that of 189a A. simple
analysis of this table further demon
strates the interesting fact that of tho
sixty-seven industries covered 7X per
cent of them showed an increase-either*
of'the- wages or produce, or both,, and
that there were no less than 80,.717 in
stances of individual increase-of wagne
during the same year/’
Quran CoiutloB*
There seems to be s spirit of inmtl
gation which is growing diitj.H to
the ultimate results of the late rule
adopted by the democratic house of
representatives, which provides for the
counting of a quorum. Underlying
thia principle is the fact that the ma
jority are responsible for the aetion of
the body, and therefore thia method of
force is brought into use. If it be true
and its application is essentially neces
sary in the government of the house of
representatives, would it not be well to.
substitute the same rule in the govern.*,
ment of some of ouratates, by which a
very small majority are allowed to be
the governing power, notably in the
state of Mississippi, which, with a not
ing population of 271,000 at the presi
dential election of 1892 cast but 52,809
votes The aggregate white vote of
the state is 120,600. The aggregate
colored vote of the state is 150,400.
Here 17 per cent, or less than one-fifth
of the voting population of the state,
controls the entire business and wel
fare of the people. Would H not be
wise on the part of the people ol Mis
sissippi to raise the question of a quo
rum and adopt, if possible, the demo
cratic method that no business oould be
transacted until a visible quorum were
present at the polls?
CmlesHta, VtaMtftr
w£loh was recently crown,
•d by the French academy I. “*
•eteed of unusual merit ^2Lkh,P?*’
sentence of which the folto£i« ?* *
translation: ‘‘It was midnight ** ?
®an who lay in ambush l£2£» ,A
their eonrersation; but suddSu*0
dense dark cloud passed L •
the moon, and prer“ted hli"£>»
hearinsr more" Here Is an«Sh«
phrase, written to full earnests '
master of French criticism: *l\**
one of those duels <» -ki.v "*•
tb,t,.r,M,t.oth.r. i
inn french journal upon a dramatu
s
S°rike ftehf Uh Judl“’• tal°“*
is like the froth on good champagne
fte7r,,0f the scalpeUnto
it, for if you do, there will remain
naught but a pinch of ashes at the
bottom of the alembic.” Another 1
French journal; hs speaking of thl
T9Ul^^rU,n ^^PortVde
olared: -This U the handiwork of
* »«•»
rSufferedTram Catarrh
For more than a dozen years. I concluded
try-Hood's Shrsapnrllla. T. Hare taken OTer
bottlea-and I'amnowperfcctlyfrcafrom
Hood’s
1 1%%%%%% parilla
tarrh. I am looking and
feeling better: Ireeom
mend Hood’«: Sarsapa
rilla foruny complaint
earned by- impure blood, and especially for
oatarrh." Jins C. SoaniEL,. 4603 Edmond
Street, Frank ford Station, Philadelphia, Pa.
Hood’d Pllle are purely vegetable.
Patents. Trade-Marks.
Examination and Advice as to Patentability at
invention. Band for “Inventors' Guide, or Mow to Gel
a-Patent." FAT2XCX 0TAX22LL, WASEKOTCN, S. l
Davis' Inter*
national Cream
Separator,.
H4nd or Flower.
Every - fanner
that' has cows
should: have
one.-. It-, saves
half the? labor,
makeso n e
third more but- 1
ter;- Separator J|
Butter: brings C
one-third more I
money.. SendM
for:- circulars. 9
Davis & Rankin buxa.&Sfg. Co.
Abbots Wanted. Chicago, HL
IDs Kmsewife’s
FRIEND.
01. HUM. If EACH
CAN LABEL
iMifiUfiW >
WASHING RECEIPT
Wklak ■»*•? TltaiM*.
AHjr it
AMD. BE SURPRISED).
FUEBLEUB
MICE a Rupp*rt*»L
- ▲•prwUltaKtitolDcUhBt thouMBds of ladi*
■mint af prt»fc»*fck la *» par bmiu, aa*
la<flrdaalhaAAUaaBy ■**•<! a fair l.’1'. a
_ wlll.aaajBVBiafcXlla.aaMy P*'""'"
irhaanaapaapald. m raralpt ol ««•
IhLIACHrrmflawaBd raraa W
rftfl.Uaa.HaafhB.walh. H«*h-da. aaUjJ
wrlnhUa, orToogbBiaaw
Mm*. A. RUlWUT.tl. 14th »«.,W.T.UU¥
CLAIMANTS who
frum their Attorneys
or the CoiuntAsloner, w II
m or tun vomnimKmvr, *» " *'ir, w/rfiS
lOKFORD. Pension A Potent Att*j* dl4 F
iMMgtoa, D.G.* they will receive a prompt reply.
TOURIST TRAVEL
To COLORADO RESORTS
SHMSSSEaS®*8
(MMniX amk M OuWiMa’i
MMH
The Troak. Jo perfi
Mflalow. TnloKc
•ad doable over
OMAHA
Business
_Houses.
BTtrcIl SSSSSSS^l
Vaccina Vims
1Tll~f—1-— KBHH A CO- ** -
WBAP«J*?
rBB.
KM.
Howard Street.
Omaha
King Paper Co
Hotel Dolloneigl
waMwaamaur
Oiikeind Dress Goods
OIIKo 'msrsnsssrs^ss
ssuftru**'
