THE message Harrison Lays the Situation Before Congress. The President Defends Minister Egan’s Course. Demands Made Upon Chile Must Be Satisfied. Full Text of the Ultimatum Sent To Santiago. No Notice Taken of the Demand for Egan’s Recall* Aoology Must Be Made for the Matta Note. The Chilean Government Assured That the United State* Will not Recede From the Ground Taken— Courteous, but Firm. Washington, Jan. 25.—The follow ing is President Harrieon’s message on the Chilean situation sent to congress today: To the Senate and House of Represents fives: In nay annual message, delivered to congress at the beginning of the present | session, after a brief statement of the fact9 I then in possession of this government j touching the assault in the streets j of Valparaiso, Chile, upon the sail- ! ers of the United States steam- j ship Baltimore on the evening of the 16th ; of October last, I said: ‘‘This movement; is now awaiting the result of an investiga- j tion which has been conducted by the criminal court at Valparaiso. It is re-1 ported unofficially that the investigation j is about completed, and it is expected the j result will soon be communicated to this j government, together with some j adequate and satisfactory recompense to the note by which the attention of Chile I was called to this incident. If these just! expectations should be disappointed or | further needless delay intervene, I will by ] a special message bring this matter again ; to the attention of congress for such action ] as may be necessary.” In mv opinion the time has now come when I should lay be- j fore the congress and the country the cor respondence between this government and the government of Chile, from the time of the breaking out of the revoltion against Balmaceda together with all other facts in the possession of the executive depart ment relating to this matter. The diplomatic correspondence is here with transmitted, together with some cor respondence between the naval officers for the time in commanddn Chilean waters and the secretary of the navy, and also the evidence taken at the Mare island navy hards since the arrival of the Balti more at San Francisco. * Egan’s Course Defended. I do not deem it necessary in this com munication to attempt any full analysis of the correspondence or of the evidence. A brief statement of the international ques tions involved and of the reasons why the responses of the Chilean government are unsatisfactory is all that I deem neces sary. It may be well at the outset to say that, whatever may have been said in this country or in Chile in criticising Mr. Egan, our minister at Santiago, the true history of this exciting ueriod in Chilean affairs from the outbreak of the revolution until this time discloses no act on the part of Mr. Egan unworthy of his position or that could justly be the occasion of seri ous animadversion or criticism. He has, I think, on the whole borne himself in very trying circumstances with dignity, discre tion, and courage and has conducted the correspondence with ability, courtesy and fairness * n is worth while alto In beginning: to say that the right of Mr. Egan to give shelter in the legation to certain adherents of the Balmacedan gov ernment who applied to him for asylum has not been denied by the Chilean authorities nor has any demand been made for the surrender" of these refugees. That there was urgent need of asylum is show n by Mr. Egan's note of Augusts, 1891, describing the disorders that prevailed in Santiago and by the evi dence of Captain Schley as to the pillage and violence that prevailed in Valparaiso. The correspondence discloses, however, that the request of Mr. Egan for a safe conduct from the country in behalf of these refugees was denied. The precedents cited by him in the correspondence, parti cularly the case of the revolution in Peru 1865, did not leave the Chilean govern ment in a position to deny the right of asylum to political refugees and seemed very clearly to support Mr. Egan’s con tention that a safe conduct to neutral territory was a necessary &4& acknowl edged incident of the asylum. These re fugees have very recently, without formal safe conduct, but by the acquiescence of the Chilean authorities been placed onboard the York jown and are now being conveyed to Callao, Peru. This incident might be considered wholly closed but for the dis respect manifested toward this govern ment by the close and offensive police JjrveiUanee of the legation premises len was maintained during most, the period of the stay of the ugees therein. After the date of my an Buai message and up to the time of the "*for tlie refugees to the Yorktown tl„ lePakon premises seem to have been rounded by police in uniform and po ce agents or detectives in citizens* 0®€nBiv,ely scrutinized persons 0 nnE or having the legation and on or more occasions arrested a member w the minister's family. i p A Veritable Prison. »o«^InAII^er Kvan*» who by my directioi hi* visit®d Mr. Egan at Santiago, ii •priK tli* M-vy department, de *"'bed„ the legation' a. n “veritnbh •i. ?n.’ aad state, that the police ngenti I™, were after hi* arrival with drawn during hi* atay. c*„ti at'l'eiira further from the note of Mr ,n °‘ November 20, 1891, that on one oc hr ,i’”1 at eftst these police agents, whon , Glares to be known to him, invaded th« diL '0n Prern‘*«*, pounding upon its win ianiFi nild U8*nP insulting' and threatening !««»«■ toward* person* therein. y retirement am * "hould have sought to provuki in th.:*1 jlon which could only cut 'ondUi. 1?tr.uction or to “OTr»yate tbei inethby intensifying a popular feel t»tln.ttt Bt one ti™* so threatened the le Iht ml-”,10 r*«l“ire Mr. Egan to appeal t< “tints tor of foreign s flairs. „ Baltimore Affair. But the most serious incident disclosed py the correspondence is thst of the st uck upon the sailors of the Baltimore in the streets of Valparaiso on the 18th of la,t' ,,In, “r annual measure, speaking upon the information then in my possession, X said: ‘ Bo far as I have yet been able to learn, no other explanation of this bloody work has been suggested than that it had its origin in ?T0*iV jyi° the*e tnnn as sailors of the United States, wearing the uniform of their government, and not in any individ ual act or personal animosity.” Views Not Modified. We have now received from the Chilean government an abstract of the conolu sions of the fiscal general upon the testimony token by the judge of crimes in an investigation which was made to extend over nearly three months. I very much regret to be com pelled that this report does not enable me to modify the conclusion announced in my annual message. I am still of the opinion that our sailors were assaulted, beaten, stabbed and killed, not for anything the or any one of them had done, but for what the government of the United States has done or-was charged with having done, by its civil officers and naval commanders. If that be the true aspect of the case the injury was to the government of the Unltid States, not to those poor sailors who were assaulted in a manner so brutal, and so cowardly. Legal Aspect of the Case, Before attempting to give an outline of the facts upon which this conclusion rests, I think it right to >ay a word or two upon the legal aspect of the case. 1 he Balti more was in the harbor of Valparaiso by virtue of that general invitation which na tions are held to extend to the war vessels of other powers with which they have friendly relations. This invita tion, I think, must be held ordinarily to embrace the privilege of such communica tion with the shore as is reasonable, neces sary and proper for the comfort and con venience of the officers and men of such vessels. Captain Schley testifies that when his vessel returned to Valparaiso, on September 14, the city officers, as is customary, extended the hospitalities of the city to his officers and crew. non rersonai Matter, It is not claimed that every personal collision or injury in which a sailor or of ficer of such naval vessel visiting the shore may bo involved raises an international question, but I am clearly of the opinion that where such sailors or officers are assaulted by a resi dent populace, animated by hostility to the government whose uniform the sailors and officers wear, and in resentment of acts done by their government, not by them, this nation must take notice of the event as one involving an infraction of its rights and dignity: not in a second ary way, as where a citizen is injured and presents his claim through his own government^ hut in a primary way precisely as if its minister or consul or the flag itself had been the object of the same ebaraoter of assault. The officers and sailors of the Baltimore were in the harbor of Valparaiso under the or ders of their government, not by their own choice. They were upon the shore by the implied invitation of the gov ernment of Chile and with the approval of their commanding officer, and it does not distinguish their case from that -of a consul that his stay is more permanent or that he holds the ex press invitation of the local government to justify his long residence, nor does it affect the question that the injury was the act of a mob. If there had Men no participation by the police or military in this cruel work, and no neglect of their part to extend protec tion, the case would still be one, in my opin ion, when its extent and character are con sidered, involving international rights. The incidents of the affair are then recited by the president He reviews all the testimony col lected from an sources, Chilean, Amer i can and neutral, and analyzes it in a clear and luminous fashion. He calls attention to the fact that while eighteen of our sailors were clubbed, stabbed or killed, but one Chilean was injured at all, and it is doubtful whether he was not hurt by a missile thrown by his fellow rioters. This fact, the president thinks, disposes of the charges that the American seamen were the aggressors; or that they were armed with deadly weapons at all. The charge is further refuted by the fact that seven penknives were the only weapons found upon them when searched by the police. The president then shows in a strong light the brutal and inhuman treatment to which one of the sailors was subjected in the police stations and the hospitala “No amount of subterfuge or evasion,” says he, “is able to cloud our dear vision of this brutal work.” The evidence of the existenoe of animos ity towards our sailors in the minds of the sailors of the Chilean navy and of the populate of Valparaiso are so abund ant, are so various as to leave no doubt in the mind -of any one who will examine the papers submitted. These incidents con clusively establish that the attack was upon the uniform, the nationality, and not upon the men. Origin or tne Hostility. The origin of this feeling is probably found in the refusal of this government to give recognition to the congressional party before it had established itself; in the seizure of the Itata, for on alleged viola tion of the neutrality law in the eablc incident, and in the charge that Admiral Brown conveyed Informa tion to Valparaiso of the landing of Quin ter. It is not my purpose to enter here on any defense of the action of this govern ment in these matters. The president then quotes the ulti matum sent to Chile January 21 and continues: I desire to say that I am of the opinion that the demands on Chile by this govern ment should be adhered to and enforced. If the dignity as well as the prestige and influence of the United States are not to be wholly sacrificed we should protect these who in foreign parts display the flag or wear the colors of this govern ment. against insult, brutality and death, inflicted in resentment of the acts of theli government, aud not for any fault of theii own. . , . I have as vet received no reply to oui note of the 21st in*t., hut in my opinion i ought not to delay longer to bring these matters to the attention of congress foi such action as may be deemed appropriate. (Signed,) Bsxjamin Harrison. Executive Mansion, January 25, 189A TEXT or THE ULTIMATUM. Telegram Transmitted by lilaln to Min ister Egan. Washington, Jan. 25.—The Chilean correspondence from the department oi state forma nearly 300 pages of printed matter and is a complete history ol the alienation of the two countries. The state department, for the conven ience of the press of the country, and in order to impress public sentiment, prepared and sent out by mail last Wednesday a printed synopsis which I will occupy a full page of a seven column newspaper. This synopsis ii in the main a defense of Ministei Egan. It shows as a matter of fact that he erred in judgment as to the ► • I outcome of the revolution In Chile, j over the controversy between the legis lative and executive departments, be-; gun August 15, 1890. It is a history of ' that revolution and of the part played in it by the United States and oilier foreign governments. * I On the Slst lust. Secretary Itlaine I sent the following telegram to Mr. 1 Egan: j I am directed by the president to say to you that he has given careful attentlou to all that has been submitted by the govern ment of Chile touchiug the affair of the assault upon the crew of the United States 1 warship Baltimore, in the city of Val paraiso on the evening of the ltjlh of Octo ber last, and the evidence of the officers and erew of that vessel and of some others who witnessed the affray; and that his conclusions upon the whole case are as follows: First, That the assault is not relieved of the aspect which the early information of the event gave to It, vis: That of un attack upon the uniform of the United Slates navy, having its origin aud motive ina feeling of hostility to this government and not in any act of the sailors or any of them. Second, That the public authorities of Valparaiso flagrantly failed in their duty to protect our men, and that some of the police and of the Chilean soldiers and sailors were themselves guilty of unprovoked assault upon our sail ors before and after arrest He thinks the preponderance of evidence and the inherent probabilities lead to the conclusion that Riggins was killed by the police or soldiers. Third, That he is therefore compelled to bring the ease baek to the position taken by this government in the note of Mr. Wharton of October 28 lust (a copy of which you will deliver with this) uud to ask for a suitable apology and for somo adequate reparatiou lor the injury done to this government • You will assure the government of Chile that the president has no disposition to be exacting or to ask anything which this government would not under the same ciir cumstances, freely concede He regrets that, from the beginning, the gravity of the questions involved has not apparently been appreciated by the government of Chile, and that an affair in which two American seaman were killed aud sixteen others seriously wounded, while only one Chilean was seriouslv hurt, should not be distinguished from an ordinary brawl be tween sailors in which the provocation was wholly personal and the participation limited. No self-respecting government can con-J sent that persona in its service whether i civil or military,shall be beaten and killed in a foreign territory iu resentment of acts ! done by or reputed to their government, without exacting a suitable reparation, i The government of the United States has j freely recognized this principle, and acted j upon it, when injury was done by its peo ple to one holding an official relation to a ! friendly power, in resentment of acts done by the latter. In sueh case the Uuited States has not sought for words of the smallest value or equivocal meaning in which to convey Its apology, but has con demned such act in vigorous terms and has not refused to make other adequate reparation. But it was not the purpose here to dis cuss .the incidents ol this affair, but only to state the conclusions which this govern ment has reached. We have given every opportunity to the government of Chile to present any explanatory or mitigating facts and have have had due regard to the fact that the government of Chile was for a considerable .part of the time that has elapsed since October 10 upon a provis ional basis. I am further directed by the president to •ay that his attention has been called to the note of instructions sent by Mr. Mattu, secretary of foreign affairs, to you under date of the Uth ult Mr. Moutt very pru dently, aud, 1 must suppose, from a just sense* of the offensive nature of the dispatch, refrained from com municating it officially to this gov ernment. But iu view of the fact that Mr. Monti was directed to give it to the president of this couuiry and that it was given the widest possible publication throughout the world, this government must take notice of it You arc therefore directed to say to the Chilean government that the expressions therein imputing un truth and insincerity to the president and to the secretary of the navy in their offi cial communications to the congress of the United States are In the highest degree offensive to this government. Kccognizlng the usual rules of diplomatic intercourse, of the respect and courtesy which should characterize international relations; which he cannot assume arc wholly unfamiliar to the Chilean foreign office, the president was disposed to regard the dispatch re ferred to as indicating a purpose to bring about a suspension of diplomatic relations, but in view of the fact that Mr. Matta was acting pro visionally and that a reorganization of the Chilean cabinet was about to take place, and afterward in further view of the expectation that was held out of a withdrawal and of a suitable apology, no tice of this grave offense has been delayod. I am now, however, directed by the president to say that if the offensive parts of the dispatch of December 11 are not at once withdrawn and a suitable apology offered, with the same publicity that was given to the offensive expressions, he will have no other course open to him except to terminate diplomatic relations with the government of Chile. lur. iuuuitiu u iwi