f
?.
J
V.
'Cl
11
i'S ' fTfi "i Tr""
Jl X.J sJf ILw
W ir" La K3 U L-l lis taJ
TONIE
COOHS MIDSUMMER
BEST TAN CONTEST
$100.00 1st Place for Men
$100.00 1st Place for Women
COORS LITED SIGN 2nd Place
for Men and Women
DRINK SPECIALS
50 DRINKS
25 DRAWS
$150 PITCHERS
8-10 pm
SPECIAL ON COORS ALL NITE
SPONSORED BY COORS
'ci
J2
hi
ii
ii
8-10 pm
PEIOMOT
is
11
8
cl
pi "GOLDEN OLDIES NITE"-
cl
id
r
',.::94l4
T
HAWS
'cl
Come flock" To The Hits j
Of The 50's, 60's, & 70's! -c5
THUEIS. NITI
WET T-SHIRT
CONTEST
$100
ii 1st PLACE
8 PRIZE
2
3
it i
FEE Drbb 8-9 for cifbI
a
11
it $
vi cj
C'
J
11
c
11
Monday 8 p.m.
BOYLESQUE HAL
REVUE
2
11
a
li
DANCE TO STOOGES NEW
VIDEO SYSTEM
V-5
f'l
C A
9th & P ST.
l? ROCK LINCOLN
'Pandering' may.hu
One of the great delights of the quadrennial
intellectual experience we call the presidential
campaign is the way it enlarges our vocabulary.
There was "window of vulnerability" and "wimp" in
1980, and now in 1984 a new and delicious entry:
"pander."
EE22EHS5BK3
Ellen
Goodman
Pander, for those of you who have been on
vacation the past two weeks, is not the name of a
rare black-and-white bear living in the mountains of
China, Not unless you say it with a Boston accent.
Pander is a political name as in "sticks and
stones will break my bones, but names will hurt my
image." It has stuck for the moment to the personage
of one Walter F. Mondale.
In the process of choosing a running mate out of
the Democratic rainbow coalition, Mondale has
been accused of "pandering" to blacks, women and
Hispanics. Mondale was "accused" of this crime, first
by a candidate for the job (Hart) and then by
opponents (Republicans) and finally by analysts
(the media). When a candidate is "accused" of
Summer Dining
Hall Special
June 11 August 17, 1984
Harper Dining Hall, 1140 N. 14th
Purchase a pre-paid meal ticket and eat at Harper
Hall this summer. This ticket lets you eat any
combination of breakfasts, luncheons, or dinners
at SI. 80, $2.90, and $3.80 respectively. Enjoy
the air conditioned dining room with its pleasant
atmosphere and large variety of menu selections.
Tickets and details available at the Food Service
OTceaper Dining .J
u u
Barber Styling Salon
124 North
12 th
Gdme ForThe QtTake HovieThe Care.
Walk in or,
for appointments:
474-4455
f AMIlf HAH CiNlit
r
I lh
ill y '
1 -.v'-
1 f
I V
Hi i i
J
rt Mondale
something, you know he is in trouble. On to the
dictionary. ,
The Oxford American defines "pander" as a verb
meaning "to gratify a person's weakness or vulgar
tastes" As a noun, panderer is the word for a pimp
fcr, more benignly, a go-between in an illicit love
affair.
Of course, this literal definition of pandering
doesn't fit the current political scene. It is safe to
assume that Mondale was trying to pick, rather than
procure, a vice presidential nominee up in North
Oaks, Minn. It's safe to assume that he was not
trying to gratify a public "weakness" for blacks and
women in high places. Equal opportunity is, not
strictly speaking, a weakness or a vulgar taste.
But, in slang terms, the issue is whether Mondale
was trying to flatter and please women, blacks and
Hispanics in short, huge groups of voters. This
leaves open some intriguing questins .about the
linguistic relationship between politicking and
pandering;
Interviewing Wilson Goode, Dianne Feinstein, and
Henry Cisneros for vice president is not exactly the
same as kissing babies. But politicking is, by another
sort of definition, the business of wooing, listening
and responding. It's not for nothing that candidates
eat kielbasa in Hamtramck, bagels in the Bronx and
ribs in Dallas. It's not for nothing that they bowl,
chop wood, ride horseback and shake hands.
Candidates have to prove that they are one of us
while also proving they are better than us. Each
candidate walks the line between seeming aloof
from voters and groveling for votes.
The process gets pretty sticky. Pols can win the
outrage of groups who are ignored and the scorn of
groups who are courted too ardently. In Mondale's
case, the dilemma is expressed in another 1984
political wordset: "special interests," as in "pander
ing to the special interests."
The recent Minnesota parade admittedly looked a
bit like a First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth and
Sixth of July parade. But the current notion that
blacks, women, Hispanics, unions, teachers, etc., are
special interests is weird. If you want to see a special
interest, I suggest you check out the oil lobby, the
Tobacco Institute and defense contractors.
There is something peculiar going on when Mon
dale's supporters are considered a special-interest
conglomerate, while Ronald Reagan's Three R coali
tion the rich, the right-wing and the red-baiting
are considered all-American. What's peculiar is
American politics, especially presidential politics.
American Presidents, it's been said, are both kings
and prime ministers. They represent the flag and a
delicate coalition of voters. The most successful
candidates simultaneously appeal to their constitu
encies while aiming above them. They make some
ideological link between self-interest and the public
interest. Those are the candidates we call leaders.
They're the winners.
Mondale's problem isn't that he's raching out too
hard for voters. Not at all. The problem is that he
hasn't yet reached above the voters. He's been a
better prime minister than king.
In San Francisco hell need the right words not
to appease the delegates but to lead them, not to
play to the voters but to act for them. Words are
always tricky in politics. But if you're looking for one
that's absolutely lethal, then this is the year that
"pander" bears watching.
C1S84, The Boston Globe Newspaper Connpeny
Washington Post Writers Group
Win or lose .
Continued from Pag 4
Therefore, the w y it appears, either Mondale and
the Democratic Party will reap the benefits now, or
they'll reap them later. Only if the Democrats win
the November general election will white women
reap the benefits; blacks and other colored people
probably will reap no benefits at all. These people
will have to chose between a man who is blatantly
against their interests, and one who may hand out a
few tokens of appeasement should he win in Nov
ember. IH let the reader decide which is whom.
Walter, you are to be congratulated. You've saved
the American two-party system for at least a few
more years. You've ensured the future of our "demo
cracy" and kept the White House just that.
The Creators
of Timeless
Beauty
t
icy
XT a m
S s7! J
(LpJEWELERS
CORNER OF 13th a P
ipl MEMBER AMERICAN GEM SOCIETY
Unsigned editorials rep
resent official policy of
the summer 1984 Daily
Nebraskan. They are
written by this summer s
editor in chief, Lauri
Hopple.
According to thepolicy
set by the regents,
responsibil ity for the con
tent of the newspaper lies
solely in the hands of its
student editors.
51
Page 6
Daily Nebraskan
Tuesday, July 17, 1984